SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número2Rural women's knowledge of prevention and care related to breast cancerAssociated syndromes and other genetic variations at a South African cleft lip and palate clinic índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Curationis

versão On-line ISSN 0379-8577

Curationis vol.32 no.2 Pretoria  2009

 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

Effect, of waterbirths and traditional bedbirths on outcomes for neonates

 

 

HB Ros

M. (Cur).School of Nursing, University of Johannesburg

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

When women are pregnant, some plan to have waterbirths and other plan to have traditional bedbirths. Therefore some neonates will be born under water and other neonates out of the water on a bed. It is unclear what the outcomes for the neonates are after these two types of deliveries. The research goals of this study were to explore and describe the outcomes for neonates after waterbirths (group A) and traditional bedbirths (group B) and to generate hypotheses based on the outcomes for neonates after waterbirths and traditional bedbirths that need to be tested in subsequent research studies. The design was an explorative descriptive survey. The mothers were purposefully selected to participate in the research study. They had to be healthy, low-risk pregnant women with a single pregnancy and a cephalic presentation. They had to be 37 to 42 weeks pregnant. Group A delivered their neonates at two private hospitals in Gauteng and group B delivered their neonates at a government hospital in Gauteng. Data was collected during labour, just after the delivery, two hours after the delivery and 14 days after the delivery. A data collection instrument was used. The following neonatal outcomes were measured: Apgar score at one and five minutes, axillary temperature, pH-, haemoglobin- and sodium levels of the umbilical cord blood, the neurological condition of the neonate as reflected by the primitive reflexes and neonatal morbidity until 14 days after birth. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse the data. It appeared if group A had higher Apgar scores, neonatal temperatures and umbilical cord blood haemoglobin levels and lower sodium umbilical cord blood levels than group B. The umbilical cord blood pH levels, neonatal morbidity and primitive reflexes of both groups appeared equal. Group B needed more resuscitation of the neonate directly after birth than group A. Hypotheses were generated that need to be tested in subsequent research.

Key words: Waterbirth, traditional bedbirth, neonate, midwife, midwife obstetric unit


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

ADAMSON, SL 1991: Regulation of breathing at birth. Journal of Developmental Physiology. 15(1): 45-52.         [ Links ]

ALDERDICE, F & RENFREW, M 1995: Labour and birth in water in England and Wales. British Medical Journal, 310(6938): 837.         [ Links ]

AMPATH 2005: Final Report: Haematology and Biochemistry. Pretoria: Ampath Pathologists.         [ Links ]

BABBIE, E & MOUTON, J 2001 : The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.         [ Links ]

BARRY, CN 1995: Water births. British Medical Journal. 310(6994): 1602.         [ Links ]

BOWDEN, K; KESSLER, D; PINETTE, M & WILSON, D 2003: Missing the evidence or missing the point? Pediatrics. 112: 972-973.         [ Links ]

BURNS, N & GROVE, K 1993: The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilization. Second edition. London: Saunders.         [ Links ]

CRONJÉ, HS & GROBLER, CJF 2003: Obstetrics in Southern Africa. Second edition. Pretoria: Van Schaik.         [ Links ]

GARLAND, D 1996: Waterbirth: An Attitude to Care. Cheshire: Books for Midwives Press.         [ Links ]

GARLAND, D 2002: Collaborative waterbirth audit-supporting practice with audit. M1DIRS Midwifery Digest. 12(4):508-511.         [ Links ]

GEISSBUEHLER, V n.d.: Frauenklinik Frauenfeld: waterbirths. Available from: http://www.frauenklinik-frauenfeld.ch (Accessed 9 March 2005).         [ Links ]

GEISSBÜHLER, V & EBERHARD, J 2000: Waterbirths: a comparative study. Fetal Diagnosis Therapy. 15(5): 291-300.         [ Links ]

HARPER, B 2000: Waterbirth basics: from newborn breathing to hospital protocols. Midwifery Today. 54: 1-8.         [ Links ]

HARRISON, VC 2002: The Newborn Baby. Cape Town: Mills Litho.         [ Links ]

KINGSLEY,A; H UTTER, S; GREEN, N & SPEIRS, G 1999: Waterbirths: regional audit of infection control practices. Journal of Hospital Infection. 41 : 155-157.         [ Links ]

LADEWIG, PW; LONDON, ML & OLDS, SB 1998: Maternal-newborn Nursing Care. New York: Addison-Wesley.         [ Links ]

LICHY, R & HERZBERG E 1993: The Waterbirth Handbook: the Gentle Art of Waterbirthing. Wellow: Gateway Books.         [ Links ]

MERCER, JS & SKOVGAARD, RL 2002: Neonatal transitional physiology: a new paradigm. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 15(4): 56-76.         [ Links ]

NIKODEM, VC 1999: The Effects of Water on Birth: A Randomised Controlled Trial. PhD thesis. Johannesburg: Rand Afrikaans University.         [ Links ]

NOLTE, AGW 1998: A Textbook for Midwives. Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik.         [ Links ]

ODENT, M 2004: The Caesarean. Sidmouth: Chase Publishing.         [ Links ]

PARKER, C & BOWLES, RG 1997: Pseudomonas otitis media and bacteremia following a water birth. Pediatrics. 99(4): 653-654.         [ Links ]

PIETERSE, H (ed.) 1993: Mediese Woordeboek: Vertalend en Verklarend. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

PINETTE, MG; WAX, J & WILSON, E 2004: The risks of underwater birth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 190(5): 1211-1215.         [ Links ]

RAWAL, J; SHAH, A; STIRK, F & MEHTAR, S 1994: Waterbirth and infection in babies. British Journal of Midwifery. 309(8): 511.         [ Links ]

RODRIGO, WN; BROWN, L; WILLIAMS, C & CARTMILL, RSV n.d.: Delivery under water, safety and how different it is from conventional births. Unknown Journal. P2.02.04.         [ Links ]

ROOME, APCH & SPENCER, RC 1996: Birthing pools and infection control. The Lancet. 348(9022): 274.         [ Links ]

ROS, HB 2006: An explorative descriptive survey of the outcomes for neonates after waterbirths and traditional bedbirths. Mini-dissertation. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.         [ Links ]

ROSEVEAR, SK; FOX, R; MARLOW, N & STIRRAT, GM 1993: Birthing pools and the fetus. The Lancet. 342(8878): 1048.         [ Links ]

SCHROCKSNADEL, H; KUNCZICKY, V; MEIER, J; BREZINKA, C & OBERAIGNER, W 2003: Water birth: experience at a university clinic and a district hospital in Austria. Gvnakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 43( 1):7-11.         [ Links ]

SCOTT, P 2001: Active Birth Pools. Available from: http://www.activebirthpools.com (Accessed 8 March 2005).         [ Links ]

SHYMANSKI, J 1996: Sea of Love: Waterbirth, a Way of Life for Russian Couples. Available from: http://www.cgi.cnn.com (Accessed 9 March 2005).         [ Links ]

SIMCHAK, M 2003: Kangaroo Mother Care. International Journal of Childbirth Education. 18(1):24-25.         [ Links ]

THONI, A & MORODER, L 2004: Waterbirth, a safe and natural delivery method: experience after 1355 waterbirths in Italy. Midwifery Today. 70:44-48.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Hilde B. Ros
959 Hertzog street
Rietfontein, 0084
Pretoria
Tel: (012) 331-0196; Cell: 083 605 8748
Email: hilderos@yahoo.com

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License