SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.31 número4 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google



versão On-line ISSN 2223-6279
versão impressa ISSN 0379-8577

Curationis vol.31 no.4 Pretoria  2008




Clinical supervision and support for bridging programme students in the greater Durban area



P PillayI; NG MtshaliII

ISchool of Nursing University of KwaZulu Natal
IIProfessor; School of Nursing University of KwaZulu Natal





Reviewed literature revealed that clinical supervision is a conceptually sound learning model, which, unfortunately, is flawed by problems of implementation. Some of the more glaring problems include limited emphasis upon problem-solving, lack of clear expectations for student performance, inadequate feedback to students, inappropriate role models in clinical settings and inadequately prepared clinical teachers. The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the nature of clinical supervision and support provided to bridging programme students in the clinical settings. Participants were drawn from three nursing colleges and 122 participants returned questionnaires. College 1:26,2% (n=32), College 2:15,6% (n=19) and the majority, 58, 2 % (n=71) were from College 3. The participants were second year students in the Bridging Programme.
Purposive sampling was used for the selection of the hospitals. The researcher purposively selected those hospitals offering the Bridging Programme. The students were randomly sampled. According to Burns and Grove (2001), simple random sampling is the most basic and most effective of the probably sampling methods. Data was collected by means of a questionnaire and a critical incident report. The questionnaire used in this study was adapted from the Manchester Clinical Supervision Instrument. The findings revealed that clinical supervision contributes positively to the academic, professional and personal development of students. Although there was support for clinical supervision by the nursing staff, time for clinical supervision was the main problem. Clinical supervision was viewed as time consuming. Clinical learning emerged as secondary to ward routine. The students functioned as part of the workforce and missed out on some important learning opportunities. Results also showed that some clinical supervisors were not adequately prepared for their roles and responsibilities; as a result there was no significant relationship between clinical supervision sessions and the acquisition of knowledge. The critical incidence revealed positive and negative experiences regarding clinical supervision and the support provided by clinical supervisors and clinical staff.
There is a need for clear policies regarding clinical supervision, a structured and well monitored process of clinical supervision, building the capacity of clinical supervisors, and addressing the issues of use of bridging programme students as part of the workforce.

Keywords: Clinical supervision; Student; Clinical supervisor; Bridging Programme



“Full text available only in PDF format”




ANDREWS, M & ROBERTS, D 2003: Supporting student nurses learning in and through clinical practice: the role of the clinical guide. Nurse Education Today. 23(7): pp474-481.         [ Links ]

BENOLIEL, JQ 1988: Some Reflections on Learning and Teaching In Journal of Nursing Education. 27(8): pp340-341.         [ Links ]

BJORK, IT 1995: Neglected Conflicts in the Discipline of Nursing: Perception of the Importance and the Value of Practical Skill In Journal of Advanced Nursing. 22 (1): pp 6-12.         [ Links ]

BURNS, N & GROVE, SK 2001: The practice of nursing research : conduct/ critique and utilization. Philadelphia: Saunders.         [ Links ]

CLARK, P; JAMIESON, A; LAUNER, J; TROMPETAS, A; WHITEMAN, J & WILLIAMSON, D 2006: Intending to be a supervisor, mentor or coach: Do you know which, what for and why? Education for Primary Care. 17:pp 106-116        [ Links ]

DAVHANA-MASELESELE, M 2000: Problems in integrating theory with practice in selected clinical nursing situations. Master's dissertation. Pretoria: University of South Africa.         [ Links ]

LITA, H; ALBERTS, U; VAN DYK, & SMALL, LS 2002: Factors that influence the selection of learning opportunities for student nurses in primary health care. Health SA Gesondheid. 7(2):pp 25-34        [ Links ]

LIPINGE, SN & VENTER, ES 2003: Student nurses experiences during a rural community placement programme in Nambia. Curationis26(4):pp5-12        [ Links ]

ELKAN, R & ROBINSON, J 1993: Project 2000: The Gap Between Theory and Practice. In Nurse Education Today. 13(4): pp 295-298.         [ Links ]

HENDERSON, S 1995: Clinical Teaching Involves more than Evaluating Students. In Summers, L (ed). A Focus on Learning, pp 121-125. Proceedings of the 4thAnnual Teaching Learning Forum, Edith Cowan University, February 1995. Perth: Edith Cowan University        [ Links ]

HINTZE, J 2001:Post hoc Kruskal-Walhs Multiple Comparison Z value tests Number Cruncher Statistical Systems (NCSS) and Power Analysis and Sample Size (PASS). Kaysville Utah        [ Links ]

HUMPHREYS, A; GIDMAN, J & ANDREWS, M 2000: The nature and purpose of the role of the nurse lecturer in practice settings. Nurse Education Today. 20. pp311-317.         [ Links ]

HYRKAS, K 2002: Clinical Supervision and Quality Care. (Academic Dissertation). Tampere Tampereen Yliopistopaino Oy Juvenes Pnnt.         [ Links ]

IRBY, DM 2004: "Clinical Teacher Effectiveness in Medicine" In J. Med. Educ. 53.pp 808-815        [ Links ]

JINKS, A& PATEMAN, B 1998: Neither this nor that: The Stigma of Being an Undergraduate Nurse. In Nursing Times. 2(21: pp. 12-13.         [ Links ]

JOWET, SJ; WALTON, I & PAYNE, S 1992: The Introduction of Project 2000-Earlv Perspectives from the Students-Interim Paper No. 5. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.         [ Links ]

KEMPPAINEN, JK 2001: The critical incident technique and nursing care quality research. In Journal of Advanced Nursing. 32(5): pp 1264-1272.         [ Links ]

LEDDICK, GR 1994: ED372340 94 Models of Clinical Supervision. In ERIC Digest. Greensboro, NC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Counselling and Student Services..Mendoza DW        [ Links ]

LYTH, GM. 2000: "Clinical Supervision, a Concept Analysis" In Journal of Advanced Nursing. 3 l(3):pp 722-729.         [ Links ]

MOELLER P1984: Clinical supervision: Guidelines for managing the problem student. Journal of Allied Health. 8, 205-211        [ Links ]

MOETL MR; VAN NIEKERK, SE & VAN VELDEN, CE 2004: Perceptions of the clinical competence of newly registered nurses in the North West Province. Curationis 27(3):pp72-84        [ Links ]

MOGAN.J & KNOX,JE 1997: Characteristics of Best and Worst Clinical Teachers as Perceived by University Nursing Faculty and Students. In Journal of Advanced Nursing. 12: pp331-337.         [ Links ]

MORTON-COOPER A & PALMER, A 2000: Mentoring, Preceptorship,Clinical Supervision.Blackwell Science,Oxford, UK        [ Links ]

MTHEMBU, SZ 2003: Analysis of the assessment of clinical learning in selected nursing education institutions in KwaZulu-Natal with an outcomes-based education (OBE) context. Unpublished thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban: South Africa.         [ Links ]

PROCTOR, B 2001: Training for the supervision alliance: attitude, skills and intentions. In: Cutliffe J., Butterworth T. and Proctor B. (eds). Fundamental Themes in Clinical Supervision. Routledge: London.         [ Links ]

QUINN, FM 2000: Principles and Practice of nurse education. 4,h edition. University of Greenwich London: Stanley Thornes Publishers.         [ Links ]

SMITH , G 2000: Friendship with Clinical Supervision: A Model for the NHS. Online:Hptt://www.clinical         [ Links ]

SOUTH AFRICAN NURSING COUNCIL 1995: R683 Guidelines for Bridging for Enrolled Nurses Leading to Registration as a General or a Psychiatric Nurse. Pretoria: SANC        [ Links ]

TIWARI, A; LAM, D; YUEN, KH; CHAN, R; FUNG T & CHAN, S 2005: Student learning in clinical nursing education: Perceptions of the relationship between assessment and learning. Nurse Education Today. 25. (41. pp299-308.         [ Links ]

THOMAS, B & REID, J 1995: "Multidisciplinary Clinical Supervision" In British Journal of Nursing. 4(15):pp. 883-885.         [ Links ]

WHITE, E; BUTTERWORTH, T; BISHOP, V; CARSON, J; JEACOCK, J & CLEMENTS, A 1998: Clinical supervision: insiders report of a private world. J Adv Nurs 28:pp 185-192.         [ Links ]

WONG J & WONG, S 1987: Towards effective clinical teaching, Journal of Advanced Nursing 12(4):pp505-513.         [ Links ]

WINSTANLEY, J & EDWARD, W 2003: Clinical Supervision Models, Measures and Best Practice. In A Nurse Researcher. 13515578, Vol. 10, issue 4.         [ Links ]



Padmini Pillay
5th Floor
Desmond Clarence Building
Tel: (031) 260-3045; Cell:0826530179

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons