SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 número3 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Curationis

versão On-line ISSN 2223-6279
versão impressa ISSN 0379-8577

Curationis vol.31 no.3 Pretoria  2008

 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

Expectations of postgraduate nursing students: An inquiry

 

 

S Lekalakala-Mokgele

PhD (Nursing); School of Nursing North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Postgraduate supervision in South Africa currently takes place in the context of university transformation with a notable increase in concern for quality. The latter is determined by the extent to which students' expectations within a supervisory practice are met. This study investigated students' expectations regarding their research supervision in a postgraduate nursing programme. A 48-item questionnaire was mailed to 24 postgraduate students, of which 22 (92%) responded, to determine their expectations within a supervisory relationship. Items in the questionnaire included students' perceptions of the responsibilities of the institution, the department, the supervisor and students' responsibilities regarding their supervised postgraduate studies in the School of Nursing Science. Descriptive statistics, namely frequencies and percentages for categorical data and means and standard deviations or medians and percentiles for continuous data, were calculated. Findings indicate that more than 80% of the postgraduate students in the study expected the university and the department to provide them with structures that would enable them to succeed in their studies. They also believed that the student had a major role to play in ensuring that studies were completed. Recommendations included making a code of practice for postgraduate supervision available to students and the use of a learning contract to clarify roles and expectations in the supervisory process. It was also recommended that supervisors should be trained to supervise students.

Keywords: Postgraduate students, supervision, supervisor, supervisory relationship


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

ANDERSON, C; DAY, K & MACLAUGHLIN, P 2006: Mastering the dissertation: lecturers' representations of the purposes and processes of Master's level supervision. Studies in Higher Education. 31 (2): 149-168.         [ Links ]

BABBIE, E 2004: The practice of social research. 10th ed. Australia. Thomson-Wadsworth Company.         [ Links ]

BARNACLE, R & USHER, R. 2003: Assessing the quality of research training: The case of part-time candidates in full-time professional work. Higher Education Research & Development. 22 (3)345-358.         [ Links ]

BISSCHOFF, CA 2001 : Customer service of a telematic learning BBA degree. SAJHE. 21(4) 228-223.         [ Links ]

BOUCHER, C & SMYTH, A 2004: Up close and personal: reflections on our experience of supervising research candidates who are using personal reflective techniques. Reflective Practice. 5(3): 345-356.         [ Links ]

BURNS, N & GROVE, SK 2005: The practice of nursing research. Conduct, critique and utilization.5th Ed. Elsevier Saunders. St Louis.         [ Links ]

DEEM, R & BREHONY, K 2000: Doctoral students' access to research cultures: Are some more unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education 25(2) 149-165.         [ Links ]

DELAMONT, S, ATKINSON, P & PARRY, O 1997: Supervising the PhD -A guide to success. Great Britain. Buckingham: SHRE.         [ Links ]

DENICOLO, P 2004: Doctoral supervision of colleagues: peeling off the veneer of satisfaction and competence. Studies in Higher Education. 29 (6): 693-707.         [ Links ]

DENICOLO, P & POPE, M 1994: The postgraduates' journey- An interplay of roles. In Ryan and Zuber-Skerritt (Eds) Quality in postgraduate education.. London. Kogan Page.         [ Links ]

DYSTHE, O; SAMARA, A & WESRHEIM, K 2006: Multivoiced supervision of master's students: a case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 32 (3)299-318.         [ Links ]

HOLTZHAUSEN, SM 2005: The supervisor's accountability versus postgraduates' responsibility within the academic writing arena. SAJHE/SATHO 19(1): 89-100.         [ Links ]

JOHNSON, L; LEE, A & GREEN, B 2000: The PhD and the autonomous self: gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education. 25(2):135-147.         [ Links ]

LE GRANGE, L & NEWMARK, R 2002: Postgraduate research supervision in a socially distributed knowledge system: some thoughts. SAJHE/SATHO 16 (3): 50-57.         [ Links ]

LESSING AC & SCHULZE, S 2002: Postgraduate supervision and academic support: students' perceptions. SAJHE/ SATHO 16(2): 139-149.         [ Links ]

LESSING AC & SCHULZE, S 2003: Lectures' experience of postgraduate supervisor in a distance education context. SAJHE/SATHO 17(2): 159-168.         [ Links ]

LESSING N & LESSING AC 2004: The supervision of research for dissertation and theses. Acta Commerça. Volume 4: 73-87.         [ Links ]

MALFROY, J 2005: Doctoral supervision, workplace research and changing pedagogic practices. Higher Education Research & Development. Vol 24 (2): 165-178.         [ Links ]

NGCONGO, RP 2000: Self-esteem enhancement and capacity building in the process of supervising master's students. SAJHE. 14(1):211-217.         [ Links ]

NGCONGO, RP 2001: Supervision as transformative leadership in the context of university goals. SAJHE. 15(3):53-57.         [ Links ]

OFI, B; SOWUNMI, L; EDET, N & ANARADO, N 2008: Professional nurses' opinion on research and research utilization for promoting quality nursing care in selected teaching hospitals in Nigeria. International Journal of Nursing Practice:14:243-255.         [ Links ]

PARKER, J 2005: Nursing Identity and differences. Nursing Inquiry. 12 (2): 65.         [ Links ]

PEARSON, M & KAYROOZ, C 2004: Enabling critical reflection on research supervision practice. International Journal for Academic Development. 9 (1): 99-116.         [ Links ]

PEARSON, M & BREW, A 2002: Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education. 27 (2): 135-150.         [ Links ]

POLIT DE & BECK, CT 2004: Nursing research. Principles and method. 7th ed. Lippincott Williams & Williams. Philadelphia.         [ Links ]

READ, B; ARCHER, L & LEATHWOOD, C 2003: Challenging cultures? Student conceptions of 'belonging' and 'isolation' at a Post-1992 University. Studies in Higher Education. 28(3):261-277.         [ Links ]

THOMPSON, DR; KIRKMAN, S; WATSON, R & STEWART, S 2005: Improving research supervision in nursing. Nurse Education Today. 25:283-290.         [ Links ]

WISKERS, G; ROBINSON, G; TRAFFORD, V; WARNES, M & CREIGHTON, E 2003: From supervisory dialogues to successful PhDs: strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teaching in Higher Education 8(3): 383-397.         [ Links ]

WRIGHT, T & COCHRANE, R 2000: Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education. 25(2):181-195.         [ Links ]

ZEELEN, J 2003: Improving the research culture at historically black universities: The situation at the University of the North. Perspectives in Education. 21 (2):137-147.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Prof Lekalakala-Mokgele
School of Nursing
P.O. Box X 6001
Internal Box 520
North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus)
2520
Tel : (018)299-1834; Fax:(018)299-1717
E-mail : Sebi.LekalakalaMokgele@nwu.ac.za

 

 

Researcher: E Lekalakala-Mokgele

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons