SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue1Trust and perceptions of compliance, fairness and good faith in primary labour relationshipsA critical analysis of the foreign services reportable arrangement provision of the Tax Administration Act of South Africa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences

On-line version ISSN 2222-3436
Print version ISSN 1015-8812

S. Afr. j. econ. manag. sci. vol.26 n.1 Pretoria  2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4900 

CORRECTION

 

Corrigendum: Lean practices and supply-chain competitiveness in the steel industry in Gauteng, South Africa

 

 

Sizwe Khoza; Chengedzai Mafini; Welby V. Loury Okoumba

Department of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Faculty of Management Sciences, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 

In the published article, Khoza, S., Mafini, C. & Loury Okoumba, W.V., 2022, 'Lean practices and supply-chain competitiveness in the steel industry in Gauteng, South Africa', South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 25(1), a4617. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v25i1.4617, on page 7 the following paragraph is updated as it was incorrectly formulated:

The original incorrect wording:

Explanatory factor analysis

A Harma's one-factor score test was conducted by running the preliminary explanatory factor analysis (EFA) on the sample data. In contrast, the unrotated factor solution was examined to determine the number of necessary factors to account for the variance in the variables. The single factor that emerged yielded one general factor accounting for approximately 24.89% of the covariance among the measures, concluding that common method variance is not a problem.

The revised and updated wording:

Exploratory factor analysis

A Harman's one-factor score test was conducted by running the preliminary exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the sample data. In contrast, the unrotated factor solution was examined to determine the number of necessary factors to account for the variance in the variables. The single factor that emerged yielded one general factor accounting for approximately 24.89% of the covariance among the measures, concluding that common method variance is not a problem.

The authors apologise for this error. The correction does not change the study's findings of significance or overall interpretation of the study's results or the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

 

 

Correspondence:
Welby Loury Okoumba
welbyl@vut.ac.za

Published: 21 June 2023

 

 

Note: DOI of original article published: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v25i1.4617

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License