ETHICS

 

Ethics in economic and management sciences: A researcher's resource

 

 

Jaco Pienaar

WorkWell: Research Unit for Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

In an international research climate of increasingly demanding ethical review, based on a biomedical model, reflection on best practices in social, behavioural and economic science research is necessary. It is widely believed that these sciences cannot be held to the same practical requirements as those for biomedical research, although the principles of ethical research are surely universal. This article considers the ethical requirements, principles and guidelines directing research in the social, behavioural and economic sciences, recognised in the national and international arena. By means of a systematic review of available best practices, it is anticipated that general guidelines for social, behavioural and economic science research could be developed and offered to researchers in these fields. Specific consideration is given to the unique characteristics of social, behavioural and economic science research.

Keywords: Guidelines, social sciences, human sciences, behavioural sciences, economic sciences, ethics, ethical, social desirability, deception

JEL: M14

---

 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

Reference list

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT (2009) Code of Ethics, http://www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?ID=268&page_ID=240 (Accessed 19 March 2009).         [ Links ]

ALSMADI, S. (2008) Marketing research ethics: Researchers' obligations towards human subjects, Journal of Academic Ethics, 6: 153-160.         [ Links ]

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (2002) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, American Psychologist, 57: 1060-1073.         [ Links ]

BARNETT, J. (1998) Sensitive questions and response effects: An evaluation, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(1/2): 63-76.         [ Links ]

BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (2001) Statement of ethical practice, http://www.britsoc.co.uk/equality/Statement+Ethical+Practice.htm (Accessed 6 October 2008).         [ Links ]

BRODY, B.A. (2001) Making informed consent meaningful, IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 23: 1-5.         [ Links ]

CANADIAN TRI-COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT (1998, August) Ethical conduct for research involving humans, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, ON.         [ Links ]

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. (2005) Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects, http://frwebgate4.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=472549283664+12+2+0&WAISaction=retrieve. Department of Health and Human Services: United States of America:        [ Links ]

COMMON FEDERAL POLICY FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS. (1991) United States of America, Department of Energy. http://history.nih.gov/laws/pdf/10CFR745.pdf        [ Links ]

DE VRIES, R., DE BRUIN, D.A. & GOODGAME, A. (2004) Ethics review of social, behavioural and economic research: Where should we go from here?, Ethics and Behavior, 14(4): 351-368.         [ Links ]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (2004) Ethics in health research: Principles, structures and processes. Research ethics guidelines. Government Printers/Department of Health, South Africa.         [ Links ]

DINGWALL, R. (2008, February) The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research, 21^st Century Society, 3(1): 1-12.         [ Links ]

DU BOIS, J.M. (2004) Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research, Ethics and Behavior, 14(4): 383-395.         [ Links ]

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (2005) Research Ethics Framework (REF), http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/opportunities (Accessed 17 November 2009).         [ Links ]

FREED-TAYLOR, M. (2008) Ethical considerations in European cross-national research, http://www.unesco.org/most/ethissj.htm United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Accessed 29 September 2008).         [ Links ]

FUENTES, L.A. (2004) Ethics in violence against women research: The sensitive, the dangerous, and the overlooked, Ethics and Behavior, 14: 141-174.         [ Links ]

HAVERKAMP, B.E. (2005) Ethical perspectives on qualitative research in applied psychology, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2): 146-155.         [ Links ]

HUNTER, D.L.H. (2008) The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC, Journal of Medical Ethics, 34: 815-820.         [ Links ]

IJSSELMUIDEN, C. & FADEN, R. (1992) Research and informed consent in Africa - Another look, New England Journal of Medicine, 326: 830-834.         [ Links ]

LEACH, A., HILTON, S., GREENWOOD, B.M., MANNEH, E., DIBBA, B., WILKINS, A. & MULHOLLAND, E.K. (1999) An evaluation of the informed consent procedure used during a trial of a Haemophilus influenza type B conjugate vaccine undertaken in The Gambia, West Africa, Social Science and Medicine, 48: 139-148.         [ Links ]

LINDEGGER, G. & RICHTER, L.M. (2000) HIV vaccine trials: Critical issues in informed consent, South African Journal of Science, 96: 313-317.         [ Links ]

MARSHALL, P.A. (2007) Ethical challenges in study design and informed consent for health research in resource-poor settings. World Health Organisation, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Cleveland, OH.         [ Links ]

MARSHALL, P.A. & ROTIMI, C. (2001) Ethical challenges in community based research, American Journal of Medical Sciences, 322: 259-263.         [ Links ]

MILLSTEIN, S.G. (1987) Acceptability and reliability of sensitive information collected via computer interview, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47: 523-533.         [ Links ]

NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION (2001) Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants (Vol. 1). U.S. Government Printing Office, Rockville, MD.         [ Links ]

NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS OF BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (1979) The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects. United States Government Printing Office, Rockville, MD.         [ Links ]

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. http://www. nsf.gov/bfa/cps/policy/hsfaqs.htm. NUFFIELD COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS (2002) The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. Nuffield Foundation: London.         [ Links ]

OAKES, J.M. (2002) Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator's guide to the IRB, Evaluation Review, 26: 443-479.         [ Links ]

OLIVIER, S. (1995) Informed consent and transcultural research, South African Medical Journal, 85, 984-985.         [ Links ]

PACE, C., EMANUEL, E. & CHUENYAM, (2005) The quality of informed consent for a clinical research study in Thailand, IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 7:9-17.         [ Links ]

PARKER, L. (1995) Ethical concerns in the research and treatment of complex disease, TIG, 11: 520-523.         [ Links ]

PRANSKY, G., FINKELSTEIN, S., BERNDT, E., KYLE, M., MACKELL, J. & TORTORICE, D. (2006) Objective and self-report work performance measures: A comparative analysis, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(5): 390-399.         [ Links ]

RICHARDSON, J.C. & GODFREY, B.S. (2003) Towards ethical practice in the use of transcripted interviews, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(4): 347-355.         [ Links ]

RICHTER, L., LINDEGGER, G., ABDOOL- KARIM, Q. & GASA, N. (1999) Guidelines for the development of culturally sensitive approaches to obtaining informed consent for participation in HIV vaccine-related trials. UNAIDS: Geneva.         [ Links ]

SIEBER, J.E. (2004) Using our best judgement in conducting human research, Ethics and Behavior, 14(4): 297-304.         [ Links ]

SIEBER, J.E., PLATTNER, S. & RUBIN, P. (2002, Spring) How (not) to regulate social and behavioural research, Professional Ethics Report. A publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, XV2: 1-4.         [ Links ]

SINGER, E. (1978) Informed consent: Consequences for response rate and response quality in social surveys, American Sociological Review, 43: 144-162.         [ Links ]

SMYTHE, W.E. & MURRAY, M.J. (2000) Owning the story: Ethical considerations in narrative research, Ethics and Behavior, 10: 311-336.         [ Links ]

SOLOMON, M.Z. (2005) Realizing bioethics' goals in practice: Ten ways 'is' can help 'ought'. Hastings Center Report, 35(4): 40-47.         [ Links ]

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS (SANParks). www.sanparks.org/people/social/resources/ethics.php. SUDMAN, S. & BRADBURN, N.M. (1974) Response effects in surveys: a review and synthesis. Aldine: Chicago, IL.         [ Links ]

THOMPSON, J.J., ELGIN, C., HYMAN, D.A., RUBIN, P.E. & KNIGHT, J. (2006) Research on human subjects: academic freedom and the institutional review board. American Association of University Professors: Washington, DC.         [ Links ]

US NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/cpo/policy/hsfaqs.htm.         [ Links ]

VAN DEN HOONAARD, W.C. (2001) Is research ethics a moral panic?, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38(1): 19-36.         [ Links ]

WANG, H., ERICKSON, J.D., LI, Z. & BERRY, R.J. (2004) Evaluation of the informed consent process in a randomized controlled trial in China: The Sino-US NTD Project, Journal of Clinical Ethics, 15: 61.         [ Links ]

WASSENAAR, T. (2008, June) Reviewing the question, HSRC Review, 6(2), http://www.hsrc.ac.za/HSRC_Review_Article-103.phtml (Accessed 19 March 2009).         [ Links ]

WEIJER, C. & EMANUEL, E.J. (2000) Protecting communities in biomedical research, Science, 289: 1142-1144.         [ Links ]

WOLCOTT, H.F. (1994) Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.         [ Links ]

ZIKMUND, W.G. (2003) Business research methods (7^th ed.) Ohio, USA: Thomson, South-Western.         [ Links ]

 

 

Accepted December 2009

 

 

End notes

1 The ESRC (2005: 7) defines 'human participants' as 'including living human beings, human beings who have died recently (cadavers, human remains and body parts), embryos and foetuses, human tissue and bodily fluids, and human data and records (such as, but not restricted to medical, genetic, financial, personnel, criminal or administrative records and test results including scholastic achievements)'.