SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue3Measuring excessive pricing as an abuse of dominance - an assessment of the criteria used in the Harmony Gold/Mittal Steel complaintThe battle for truth: Control and non-voting preference shares author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences

On-line version ISSN 2222-3436
Print version ISSN 1015-8812

S. Afr. j. econ. manag. sci. vol.11 n.3 Pretoria Oct. 2008

 

ARTICLES

 

Has the conduct-based approach to competition law in South Africa led to consistent interpretations of harm to competition?

 

 

Ryan Hawthorne1

Competition Commission South Africa

 

 


ABSTRACT

The Competition Act and certain recent decisions by the competition authorities are examined here to assess the extent to which South Africa's conduct-based approach to competition law has led to consistent outcomes in the assessment of effects on competition. This has not been the case in the assessment of anti-competitive effects among customers or resellers when a supplier accused of an anti-competitive action does not compete with its customers. An anti-competitive effect among customers or resellers is treated as anti-competitive when it arises from some form of conduct, such as price discrimination. However, it is not seen as anti-competitive when it arises from a refusal to supply, for example. Possible reasons for South Africa's conduct-based approach and this inconsistent outcome in the assessment of competition among customers and resellers, including the economic foundations of the relevant approaches and their relationship with competition law in other jurisdictions, are assessed.

JEL: K21, L41


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

1 AREEDA, P. & HOVENKAMP, H. (1996) Antitrust Law - Volume 111A: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and their Application, Little, Brown: Boston.         [ Links ]

2 BISHOP, S. & WALKER, M. (2002) The Economics of EC Competition: Concepts, Application and Measurement, Sweet & Maxwell: London.         [ Links ]

3 CHURCH, J. & WARE, R. (2000) Industrial Organisation: A Strategic Approach, McGraw-Hill: New York.         [ Links ]

4 EDWARDS, C. (1959) The Price Discrimination Law, The Brookings Institution: Washington, D.C.         [ Links ]

5 EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG COMPETITION (2005) "DG Competition discussion paper on the applicability of Article 82 of the Treaty to exclusionary abuses", available at: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/art82/discpaper2005.pdf, accessed on 1 November 2007.         [ Links ]

6 GELLHORN, E.; KOVACIC, W.E. & CALKINS, S. (2004) Antirust law and economics in a nutshell, (5th ed.) Thomson West, St. Paul, MN.         [ Links ]

7 GUAL, G.; HELLWIG, M.; PERROT, A.; POLO, M.; REY, P.; SCHMIDT, K. & STENBACKA, R. (the EAGCP) (2005) "An economic approach to article 82", available at: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/publications/studies/eagcp_July_21_05.pdf, accessed on 1 November 2007.         [ Links ]

8 HILDEBRAND, D. (2005) Economic Analysis of Vertical Agreements: A Self-Assessment, Kluwer Law International: The Hague.         [ Links ]

9 KWOKA, J. & WHITE, L. (2004) The Antitrust Revolution: Economics, Competition and Policy, Oxford University Press: New York.         [ Links ]

10 MOTTA, M. (2004) Competition Policy: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press: New York.         [ Links ]

11 SALOP, S, & RIORDAN, M. (1995) "Evaluating vertical mergers: A post-Chicago approach", Antitrust Law Journal, 63: 513 - 568.         [ Links ]

12 VICKERS, J. (2004) "Speech to the 31st conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics, Berlin", available at: http://www.oft.gov.uk/news/speeches/2004/0304, accessed on 1 November 2007.         [ Links ]

 

 

1 The views expressed here are his own and are not those of the Competition Commission South Africa. The author would like to acknowledge useful comments on drafts of this paper provided by Simon Roberts and two anonymous referees. The author is solely responsible for any remaining errors or omissions.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License