SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número1Can the posterior:anterior urethral ratio on voiding cystourethrogram be used as a reliable predictor of successful posterior urethral valve ablation in male children?Chronic gallbladder wall thickening: Is it always malignancy? índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


SA Journal of Radiology

versão On-line ISSN 2078-6778
versão impressa ISSN 1027-202X

S. Afr. J. radiol. (Online) vol.25 no.1 Johannesburg  2021

http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v25i1.1973 

PICTORIAL REVIEW

 

Infrapatellar plica injury: Magnetic resonance imaging review of a neglected cause of anterior knee pain

 

 

Dharmendra K. SinghI; Heena RajaniI; Mukul SinhaI; Amit KatyanI; Saurabh SumanI; Aayushi MishraI; Bibhu K. NayakII

IDepartment of Radiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
IIDepartment of Sport's Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Synovial plicae are normal remnants of synovial membranes within the knee joint cavity and are usually asymptomatic. Pathological infrapatellar plica, which is mostly due to plica injury, may be a potential cause of anterior knee pain, but is often overlooked and under-reported on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This pictorial review illustrates the MRI findings of infrapatellar plica injury and associated knee injuries, with emphasis on its differentiation from the mimics of plica injury.

Keywords: MR imaging; knee; synovial plica; infrapatellar plica injury; anterior knee pain.


 

 

Introduction

Synovial plicae are normal folds of synovial tissue within a joint cavity, which represent normal remnants of synovial membranes during embryological development of the knee joint. There are four main plicae in the knee joint, namely infrapatellar plica (IPP) or ligamentum mucosum, suprapatellar plica, medio-patellar plica and lateral patellar plica, in decreasing order of occurrence.1 These may become symptomatic because of plica syndrome or injury. Although IPP is the most commonly encountered plica, present in about 65% of patients, traditionally, it is considered least likely to be symptomatic.2,3

This review illustrates a series of cases where patients presented to the Radiology department of a tertiary care hospital with knee pain, often with a history of known trauma. The cases demonstrated abnormality along the course of the IPP, interpreted as either plica sprain or tear.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on a 3T unit (Discovery MR 750W 3T- GE Healthcare) in all cases. The T1W images were acquired in the coronal plane; PDFS (proton density fat-saturated) images in the axial, oblique sagittal and coronal planes; and T2W images were acquired in the oblique sagittal plane.

 

Anatomy and magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the normal infrapatellar plica

The IPP originates from the anterior part of inter-condylar notch and courses parallel to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) along its anterior aspect. It further courses through Hoffa's fat pad to finally insert on the inferior pole of patella (Figure 1). Its dimensions vary from being very thin to being as thick as the ACL. However, its course in Hoffa's fat pad is more delicate. It may attach to the transverse inter-meniscal ligament before coursing through Hoffa's fat pad.4 It is classified anatomically based on the degree of regression shape as: (1) having a vertical septum, (2) separate from the ACL, (3) split or bipartite or (4) fenestrated.1

 

 

The antero-medial meniscofemoral ligament (AMMFL) is an accessory ligament with a prevalence of 0.77% in knee MRI studies. Although its course in the inter-condylar notch may be similar to the IPP, it attaches to the anterior horn of the medial meniscus and does not course through Hoffa's fat pad. Injuries to the AMMFL are not clinically significant.5

On the MRI, the plicae appear as low-signal intensity linear structures on all pulse sequences (Figures 2 and 3).4 The surrounding Hoffa's fat pad shows normal signal intensity.

 

Causes of anterior knee pain

The spatial approach described by Flores et al.6 provides a systematic approach to anterior knee pain and is summarised in Table 1 under the four anatomic layers of the knee joint. It is beyond the scope of the present article to describe in detail the imaging findings of all the above-mentioned pathologies. In this review, we intend to emphasise on the imaging appearances of IPP injury.

 

Plica injury

Plica tear is known to cause anterior knee pain, if it is complicated by haemorrhagic rupture, thickening or fibrosis.2,3,7

Biomechanics of infrapatellar plica injury

The IPP has two components: an anterior component within Hoffa's fat pad and a posterior component located anterior to the ACL. At arthroscopy, only the portion of the IPP anterior to the ACL is visualised and normally remains horizontal in both flexion and extension. On the contrary, radiologically appreciable IPP sprain or tear is detected in the portion of the IPP within Hoffa's fat pad. It is noteworthy that a radiologically abnormal plica in Hoffa's fat pad, detected by MRI, may not be symptomatic until it alters the position of the IPP anterior to ACL on dynamic arthroscopic evaluation, appearing horizontal on flexion but vertical on extension. This alteration in dynamics, presumably because of fibrosis or stiffness in the IPP, ultimately causes chondral lesions on the superior portion of the inter-condylar notch and patellofemoral sulcus as a result of friction and compression forces, consequently resulting in chronic anterior knee pain.8

Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of infrapatellar plica injury

An injured or diseased IPP is suggested when a significant amount of curvilinear high T2-signal is seen along the expected course of the IPP in Hoffa's fat pad, or if a markedly thickened plica is visualised, or both.3,9 Sagittal PDFS is the minimum sequence required for the optimal evaluation of an IPP injury.

Plica injuries can be either a sprain or tear:

Sprain: Increase in signal along the IPP on fluid-sensitive sequences, not corresponding to (less than) fluid signal intensity (Figures 4 and 5).

Tear: Increased signal along the course of IPP having fluid signal intensity on fluid-sensitive sequences (Figures 6-9).

In spite of plica injury being a known entity in both the orthopaedic and radiology literature, it continues to remain under-reported and often neglected as a cause of anterior knee pain. An abnormal appearing plica in Hoffa's fat pad by MRI may alert the orthopaedic surgeon to look for abnormality in the segment of IPP anterior to ACL. It is important to mention plica injuries in the MRI report because with timely diagnosis, treatment in the form of arthroscopic resection can be offered to the patient, especially if conservative treatment fails.2,10,11

Although often associated with other ligamentous and meniscal injuries that contribute to internal knee derangements (Figures 7-9), it is noteworthy that plica tears may be the only abnormality detected by MRI to explain the patient's symptoms (Figures 4 and 6). Plica tear can often co-exist with ACL injuries, as illustrated in the case shown in Figure 9.

In the absence of any internal derangements and presence of MR evidence of plica abnormality, plica injury should be considered as the potential cause of anterior knee pain.10,11 Even if associated with other injuries, an injured IPP merits attention and resection on arthroscopy to prevent persisting pain.

 

Plica tear mimickers

The abnormal signal in Hoffa's fat pad along the IPP may also be found in the following conditions:

Synovial clefts in Hoffa's fat pad: Two synovium-lined clefts that communicate with the knee cavity are present along the posterior margin of the IPP, a vertical cleft located superiorly and a larger horizontal cleft located inferiorly. These can be identified in up to 70% and 90% of knee MRI examinations, respectively.5,12 The horizontal cleft is continuous with the joint cavity and its roof is formed by the IPP (Figures 10 and 11). It is not pathological, unless associated with ganglion cysts, loose bodies or other synovial pathologies like nodular synovitis or pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS). Horizontal synovial clefts can be differentiated from an IPP tear, which has a more cephalad extension up to the inferior pole of patella.3,13 Moreover, in our experience, the hyper-intensity in the case of sprain or plica tear typically has ragged/irregular margins as opposed to synovial clefts which are smoothly marginated and follow a continuous curvilinear pattern along the entire course of IPP (compare Figures 10 and 11 with Figures 6-9). Sometimes one may be able to appreciate an intact plica separately in the case of synovial clefts (Figure 11).

Post traumatic clefting/fragmentation of Hoffa's fat pad: Fluid-filled clefts may be noted within Hoffa's fat pad related to knee trauma.12 However, the presence of a curvilinear shaped hyper-intensity, limited to the course of the IPP, favours a plica injury, often associated with Hoffa's fat oedema and injury.

 

Other causes of symptomatic plica

Plica syndromes: Plica syndrome refers to painful impairment of knee function in which the only finding that helps explain the symptoms is the presence of a thickened and fibrotic plica, which becomes unyielding and snaps against the femoral condyle with repeated movement leading to erosive changes, degeneration and softening of the articular cartilage, resulting in synovitis or chondromalacia.1,2 The inciting event causing thickening of the plica may be acute trauma, repetitive stress injury, meniscal tears, osteochondritis dissecans, or loose bodies. The medial patellar plica is most likely to cause plica syndrome, followed by the superior plica. Infrapatellar plica may rarely be associated with trochlear groove chondromalacia.4

Imperforate superior plica may lead to loculation of joint effusion in the suprapatellar recess and the patient may present with soft tissue swelling in this region.3

 

Conclusion

Infrapatellar plica injuries are often overlooked as a cause of anterior knee pain and appear to have greater prevalence, much higher than previously expected. It is essential to include such injuries in knee MRI reports so that the surgeon can be alerted to arthroscopically remove the torn or abnormally-positioned plica which may otherwise continue to cause discomfort to the patient.

The limitation of this review is the lack of arthroscopic correlation. However, our observations open avenues for further research in a larger cohort of patients with arthroscopic correlation to confirm the same.

Teaching points

Infrapatellar plica injury is an under-reported cause of anterior knee pain and merits attention of the reporting radiologist as it is a treatable condition.

Normal synovial clefts within Hoffa's fat pad can mimic an IPP tear and can be differentiated based on location and margins. In plica tear, fluid signal within the Hoffa's fat pad extends throughout the curvilinear course of IPP, has ragged margins, often with oedematous changes in the surrounding fat, which is not seen along synovial clefts.

Plica injury can clinically mimic an ACL injury and the two often co-exist. Hence, in all cases of an ACL injury, an IPP tear should be sought for.

 

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Ethical consideration

This article followed all ethical standards for research.

Funding information

The research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of any affiliated agency of the authors.

 

References

1.García-Valtuille R, Abascal F, Cerezal L, et al. Anatomy and MR imaging appearances of synovial plicae of the knee. RadioGraphics. 2002;22(4):775-784. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl03775        [ Links ]

2.Al-Hadithy N, Gikas P, Mahapatra A, Dowd G. Review article: Plica syndrome of the knee. J Orthop Surg. 2011;19(3):354-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900319        [ Links ]

3.Cothran R, McGuire P, Helms C, Major N, Attarian D. MR imaging of infrapatellar plica injury. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(5):1443-1447. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801443        [ Links ]

4.Stoller D. Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopaedics and sports medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007; p. 677-680.         [ Links ]

5.Trinh J, De Verbizier J, Lecocq Texeira S, et al. Imaging appearance and prevalence of the anteromedial meniscofemoral ligament: A potential pitfall to anterior cruciate ligament analysis on MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2019;119:108645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108645        [ Links ]

6.Flores D, Mejía Gómez C, Pathria M. Layered approach to the anterior knee: Normal anatomy and disorders associated with anterior knee pain. RadioGraphics. 2018;38(7):2069-2101. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018180048        [ Links ]

7.Lee Y, Song H, Kim S, Kim S, Suh J. Infrapatellar plica of the knee: Revisited with MR arthrographies undertaken in the knee flexion position mimicking operative arthroscopic posture. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(10):2783-2787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.028        [ Links ]

8.Ozcan M, Copurog˘lu C, Ciftdemir M, Turan FN, Calpur OU. Does an abnormal infrapatellar plica increase the risk of chondral damage in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;19(2):218-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1273-3        [ Links ]

9.Vassiou K, Vlychou M, Zibis A, Nikolopoulou A, Fezoulidis I, Arvanitis D. Synovial plicae of the knee joint: The role of advanced MRI. Postgrad Med J. 2014;91(1071):35-40. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132176        [ Links ]

10.Demirag B, Ozturk C, Karakayali M. Symptomatic infrapatellar plica. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;14(2):156-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-005-0643-8        [ Links ]

11.Boyd C, Eakin C, Matheson G. Infrapatellar plica as a cause of anterior knee pain. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15(2):98-103. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jsm.0000152706.43395.68        [ Links ]

12.Draghi F, Ferrozzi G, Urciuoli L, Bortolotto C, Bianchi S. Hoffa's fat pad abnormalities, knee pain and magnetic resonance imaging in daily practice. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(3):373-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0483-8        [ Links ]

13.Patel S, Kaplan P, Dussault R, Kahler D. Anatomy and clinical significance of the horizontal cleft in the infrapatellar fat pad of the knee: MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(6):1551-1555. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.6.9609172        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Heena Rajani
heena.rajani@gmail.com

Received: 29 Aug. 2020
Accepted: 06 Nov. 2020
Published: 19 Feb. 2021

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons