SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 issue1Scaling community-based services in Gauteng, South Africa: A comparison of three workforce-planning scenariosDelivery of primary health care in Malawi author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine

On-line version ISSN 2071-2936
Print version ISSN 2071-2928

Afr. j. prim. health care fam. med. (Online) vol.10 n.1 Cape Town  2018

http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1711 

EDITORIAL

 

Priority areas for cannabis and cannabinoid product research in South Africa

 

 

Tanya N. AugustineI; Carel J. CairnsII; Sean ChettyIII; Lisa G. DannattIV; Nadine GravettI; Glenda GreyV; Gerhard GroblerVI; Zukiswa JaftaVII; Peter KamermanVIII, IX; John LopesX; Motlalepula G. MatsabisaXI; Pierre MugaboXII; Michelle MulderXIII; Charles ParryXIV, XV; Solomon RataemaneXVI; Nandi SiegfriedXIV, XVII; Vanessa SteenkampXVIII; Eileen ThomasXIX; Richard van Zyl-SmitXX

ISchool of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
IIDepartment of Anaesthesia, Grey's Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
IIIDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
IVDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
VSouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
VIDepartment Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa
VIIFrere Hospital, East London, South Africa
VIIIBrain Function Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
IXSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Australia
XDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
XIDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Free State, South Africa
XIISchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of the Western Cape, South Africa
XIIIGrants Innovation and Product Development, Strategic Health Innovation Partnerships, South African Medical Research Council,South Africa
XIVAlcohol and Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, South Africa
XVDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
XVIDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa
XVIIDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
XVIIIDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa
XIXDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
XXLung Institute and Division of Pulmonology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 

The legalisation of cannabis for medicinal use is a contentious space both politically and in the medical community. In 2014, the Medical Innovation Bill introduced by Mario Oriani-Ambrosini MP, aimed to shift the political and legal positions of cannabis as an illegal substance to one available for research and medical use. To date, progress on this has been slow. Cannabis and cannabinoid products are currently available for medicinal use in several countries, including the Netherlands and 29 states in the United States. Locally, anecdotal reports suggest that many of our patients with chronic medical conditions are using cannabis and cannabis-derived or cannabinoid products for symptom alleviation.

In January 2016, the Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit (ATODRU) of the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) produced a policy brief evaluating the findings of a published systematic review of current evidence to inform the discussion.1,2 The review identified moderate quality evidence to support the use of medicinal cannabis for chronic pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, and multiple sclerosis,1,2 but the many formulations, dosages and routes of administration limit recommendations.

Subsequently, the SAMRC brought key stakeholders representing all nine faculties of health sciences at South African universities together on 08 February 2017 at the SAMRC Medicina Campus, Cape Town, to explore opportunities for conducting local research and clinical trials of medicinal cannabis and cannabinoids to inform local policy-making. The workshop identified three major research priorities:

· Conduct a national, multisite clinical trial of cannabinoids following identification of the optimal formulations, dosage and relevant clinical indications from the current evidence base to inform trial protocol development.

· Support exploratory research to quantify the prevalence and qualify the current use of extracts (e.g. oils) in the community to alleviate pain and other symptoms; methods to include are as follows, (1) community- or clinic-based cross-sectional surveys or online survey of general public, (2) cross-sectional surveys of practising general practitioners and/or specialists in pain clinics with respect to their knowledge of patient use of cannabis extracts through patient disclosure.

· Conduct qualitative evaluation(s) of possible barriers and facilitators to medical practitioners prescribing cannabis or cannabinoids for medicinal purposes, should it be legalised in the future.

Further to this meeting, an SAMRC-supported team of researchers evaluated the evidence for a trial of a cannabinoid for the management of pain related to HIV associated sensory neuropathy (HIV-SN). The team selected painful HIV-SN as the condition based on: (1) the high burden of HIV and HIV-SN in the South African population, despite availability of improved antiretroviral drug regimens, and (2) the absence of empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of pharmacological agents typically recommended for the management of neuropathic pain in this population group. They limited their assessment to high-quality trials of greater than 12 weeks duration, included participants with at least moderate intensity pain at baseline and who met current recommendations for trial design in the field of chronic pain.3 Only three studies, all using a fixed dose combination of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) delivered via oromucosal spray were identified, and the results of the GRADE4 assessment are shown in Table 1.

The team concluded that clinical equipoise5 exists for a fixed dose THC:CBD oromucosal cannabinoid spray trial for the management of painful HIV-SN. This was based on the GRADE assessment, the absence of demonstrably effective alternative therapies for painful HIV-SN and the clinical need in people living with HIV. The team is currently working on a study protocol for a multisite trial that conforms with the current highest standards for trials of analgesic agents for chronic pain.3,5 The SAMRC will be releasing a Request for Applications (RFA) from groups interested in participating in trials in due course.

In medical practice, there is a balance between early adoption of new innovation and a slower, more considered approach prioritising evidence and safety over potential benefit. Though there are some clear areas where evidence supports the use of medicinal cannabis (as reviewed in the SAMRC policy brief), this should not imply that cannabis is a panacea for all ails or that it should be freely available without due control of production quality, disease indications and specific dosing recommendations. Research is urgently needed and regulatory changes will promote and allow for high priority, locally relevant research using regionally sourced products.

It is imperative that the medical and scientific community - both practitioners and researchers - are involved in informing and developing evolving cannabis policies. Much confusion exists between medical versus recreational usage, the legal statutes of medical and recreational possession and usage, and the scientific evidence compared to impassioned anecdotal reports of its efficacy in addressing a host of medical conditions. We owe it to our patients to offer the best relief of suffering with all available therapies based on the rational assessment of benefit, cost and potential harms of cannabis and cannabinoid products for medicinal use.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, and the SAMRC Strategic Health Innovation Partnerships Division for their financial and administrative support.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors' contributions

All authors are members of the South African Cannabis Network and provided input to and/or attended an SAMRC Workshop held in February 2017 on which this article is based. All authors contributed to the draft manuscript. S.C., P.K. and N.S. developed the GRADE table. R.V.Z.S. and C.P. led the revision of the final manuscript.

 

References

1. Siegfried N, Parry C, Myers B. Cannabinoids for medicinal use 2016 [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2017 Nov 17]. https://www.health-e.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Cannabinoids.pdf        [ Links ]

2. Whiting PF, Wolff RF, Deshpande S, et al. Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;313:2456-2473. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.6358        [ Links ]

3. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Considerations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2012;153:1148-1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.003        [ Links ]

4. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD        [ Links ]

5. Hey SP, Truog RD. The question of clinical equipoise and patients' best interests. AMA J Ethics. 2015;17:1108-1115. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.ecas1-1512        [ Links ]

6. Langford RM, Mares J, Novotna A, et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of THC/CBD oromucosal spray in combination with the existing treatment regimen, in the relief of central neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2013;260(4):984-997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6739-4        [ Links ]

7. Serpell M, Ratcliffe S, Hovorka J, et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of THC/CBD spray in peripheral neuropathic pain treatment. Eur J Pain. 2014;18(7):999-1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00445.x        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Nandi Siegfried
nandi.siegfried@gmail.com

Published: 21 June 2018

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License