EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

 

Predicting work performance through selection interview ratings and psychological assessment

 

 

Liziwe Nzama^I; Marié De Beer^II; Deléne Visser^II

^IEDCON, South Africa
^IIDepartment of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, University of South Africa, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to establish whether selection interviews used in conjunction with psychological assessments of personality traits and cognitive functioning contribute to predicting work performance. The sample consisted of 102 managers who were appointed recently in a retail organisation. The independent variables were selection interview ratings obtained on the basis of structured competency-based interview schedules by interviewing panels, five broad dimensions of personality defined by the Five Factor Model as measured by the 15 Factor Questionnaire (15FQ+), and cognitive processing variables (current level of work, potential level of work, and 12 processing competencies) measured by the Cognitive Process Profile (CPP). Work performance was measured through annual performance ratings that focused on measurable outputs of performance objectives. Only two predictor variables correlated statistically significantly with the criterion variable, namely interview ratings (r = 0.31) and CPP Verbal Abstraction (r = 0.34). Following multiple regression, only these variables contributed significantly to predicting work performance, but only 17.8% of the variance of the criterion was accounted for.

Keywords: work performance, psychological assessment, personality traits, cognitive functioning, Cognitive Process Profile

---

 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

REFERENCES

Abrahams, A. & Mauer, K.F. (1999). The comparability of the constructs of the 16PF in the South African context. South African Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 53-59.         [ Links ]

Abrahams, F. (2002). The (un)fair usage of the 16 PF (SA 92) in South Africa: a response to CH Prinsloo and I Ebersöhn. South African journal of Psychology, 32(3), 58-61.         [ Links ]

Barrick, M.R. & Mount. M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions of job performance: a meta analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44,1-26.         [ Links ]

Barrick, M.R., Patton, G.K. & Haugland, S.N. (2000). Accuracy of interviewer judgments of job applicant personality traits. Personnel Psychology, 53, 925-951.         [ Links ]

Bergh, Z.C. & Theron, A.L. (1999). Psychology in the work context. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Burnett, J.R. & Motowidlo, S.J. (1998). Relations between different sources of information in the structured selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 57, 963-983.         [ Links ]

Church, AT (2001) Personality measurement in cross cultural perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 979-1005.         [ Links ]

Cornelius, N. (2001). Human Resources Management: a managerial perspective London: Thomson.         [ Links ]

Cortina, J M., Goldstein, N.B., Payne, SC., Davison, H.K. & Gilliland, S.W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 325-351        [ Links ]

De Beer, M. (2000). The construction and evaluation of a dynamic computerized adaptive test for the measurement of learning potential. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Pretoria: University of South Africa.         [ Links ]

De Bruin, G P. (2000). An inter battery factor analysis of the Comrey personality scales and the 16PF questionnaire. journal of Industrial Psychology, 26(3), 4-7.         [ Links ]

De Lange, M., Fourie, L.& VanVuuren, L.J. (2003). Reliability of competency based, multi-dimensional, multi-rater performance ratings A Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(2), 39-48.         [ Links ]

Employment Equity Act, No 55 (1998). Government Gazette, 400 (19370). Cape Town, 19 October 1998        [ Links ]

Gatewood, R.D. & Field, H.S. (1994). Human Resources Selection. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden        [ Links ]

Graziano, W.G. & Tobin, R.M. (2002). Agreeableness: dimension of personality or social desirability artifact? Journal of Personality, 70(5), 695-727.         [ Links ]

Gregory, RJ. (1996). Psychological testing, history, principles and applications (2nd Ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon        [ Links ]

Hoffman, C C. & McPhail, S M. (1998). Exploring options for supporting test use in situations precluding local validation. Personnel Psychology, 51(3-4), 987-1003.         [ Links ]

HPCSA, (2007), Ethical and professional rules of the Health Professions Council of South Africa as promulgated in Government Gazetter R717/2006 (2nd Ed.). Pretoria: HPCSA        [ Links ]

Jacques, E. (1998). Requisite organization Arlington, VA: Cason Hall        [ Links ]

Judge, TA., Higgins, C.A., Thoresen, C J. & Barrick, M R (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.         [ Links ]

Labour Relations Act, No 66 (1995). Government Gazette, No 1877. Cape Town, 13 December 1995        [ Links ]

La Grange, L. & Roodt. G. (2001). Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of the job performance of insurance sales people, journal of Industrial Psychology, 27(3), 35-43.         [ Links ]

Langdon, DC (2000). Aligning performance: improving people, systems and organizations San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.         [ Links ]

McDaniel, M.A., Whetzel, D.L., Schmidt, F.L. & Maurer, S.D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 599-16.         [ Links ]

McFarland, L.A., Ryan, A. & Ellis. A (2002). Item placement on a personality measure: effects of faking behaviour and test measurement properties Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(2), 348-369.         [ Links ]

McManus, M A. & Kelly, M.L. (1999). Personality measures and biodata: evidence regarding their incremental predictive validity in the life insurance industry. Personnel Psychology, 52(1/2), 137-148.         [ Links ]

Miner, J.B. (1992). Industrial Organizational Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.         [ Links ]

Mink, O.G., Owen, K Q. & Mink. B.P. (1993). Developing high performance people: the art of coaching. New York: Addison-Wesley.         [ Links ]

Mount, M.K., Witt, L.A. & Barrick, M.R. (2000). Incremental validity of empirically keyed biodata scales over GMA and Five Factor personality constructs. Personnel Psychology, 53(1-2), 299-323.         [ Links ]

Paunonen, S.V. & Jackson, D.N. (2000). What is beyond the Big 5? Plenty, journal of Personality, 68(5), 821-835.         [ Links ]

Pearlman, K., Schmidt, K.L. & Hamner, W.C. (1983). Contemporary problems in personnel (3rd Ed ). New York: John Wiley.         [ Links ]

Prinsloo, C H. & Ebersöhn, I. (2002). Fair usage of the 16 PF in personality assessment in SA: a response to Abraham & Mauer with special reference to issues of research methodology. South African journal of Psychology, 32(3), 48-57.         [ Links ]

Prinsloo, M. (2000). Cognitive process profile: Training manual. CPP training manual for workshop presented to Edcon, Johannesburg.         [ Links ]

Rothmann, S. & Coetzer. EP. (2003) The big 5 personality dimensions and job performance, journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1), 68-74.         [ Links ]

Sackett, P.R.¡ Gruys, M.L. & Ellingson, J.E. (1998) Ability-personality interactions when predicting job performance. journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 545-556.         [ Links ]

Salgado, J.F. & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview. European loamal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 299-324.         [ Links ]

Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.         [ Links ]

Schmidt, F.L. & Rader, M. (1999). Exploring the boundary conditions for interview validity: meta-analytic validity findings for a new interview type. Personnel Psychology, 52, 445-464.         [ Links ]

Schmidt, M.J., Kihm, J. A. & Robie, C. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53, 153-193.         [ Links ]

Sewell, T.E. (1987). Dynamic assessment as a nondiscriminatory procedure. In CS. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic Assessment: an integrated approach to evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford, pp. 426-442.         [ Links ]

Stöber, J. (2001) The Social Desirability Scale 17 (SDS-17) convergent validity, discriminant validity & relationship with age. European journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 222-232.         [ Links ]

Tett, R.P., Jackson, D.N., Rothstein, M. & Reddon, J.R. (1994). Meta-analysis of personality-job performance relations: a reply to Ones, Mount, Barrick, and Hunter (1994). Personnel Psychology, 47,156-171.         [ Links ]

The 15FQ+ Technical Manual. (2002). Psytech South Africa. Van der Mcrwe, R.P. (2002). Psychometric testing and human resources management, journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(2), 77-86.         [ Links ]

Vinchur, A.J., Schippmann, J.S, Switzer, F.S. & Roth, P.L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople, journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 586-597.         [ Links ]

Visser, D. (2002). The relation between population group and social desirability response style among South African telecommunications employees. Paper presented at the XVIth International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology Congress, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 15-19 July.         [ Links ]

Visser, D. & De Jong, A. (2001). Comparing fairness perceptions of personnel selection techniques of American, French and South African job applicants, journal of Industrial Psychology, 27(2), 62-68.         [ Links ]

Visser, D. & Du Toit, J.M. (2004). Using the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ) for measuring broad traits. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 65-77.         [ Links ]

Whiston, S.C (2000). Principles and applications of assessment in counseling. Stanford: Thomson.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Marié de Beer
E-mail: dbeerm@unisa.ac.za