SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número2Detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 in animal stools collected in rural areas of the Limpopo ProvinceLarge scale quantification of aquifer storage and volumes from the Peninsula and Skurweberg Formations in the southwestern Cape índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Water SA

versión On-line ISSN 1816-7950
versión impresa ISSN 0378-4738

Water SA vol.44 no.2 Pretoria abr. 2018

http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v44i2.04 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

 

Control of hydrogen sulphide in full-scale anaerobic digesters using iron (III) chloride: performance, origin and effects

 

 

D ErdirencelebiI, *; M KucukhemekII

ISelcuk University, Environmental Engineering Department, Konya, Turkey
IIKonya Water and Sewerage Administration, Konya, Turkey

 

 


ABSTRACT

The study presents the results of sulphide control using iron (III) chloride in full-scale anaerobic digesters (ADs) at a large-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Iron (III) ('ferric') chloride was applied at a range of 24-105 mg FeCl3/L with and without alkali solution using different strategies. Introduction points were implemented at the feeding line and the sludge thickener unit. Response of the ADs in terms of biogas H2S reduction over time, solid loading rates (SLR), feed sludge flow rate and pH level were investigated. Reduction of H2S in the biogas reached 4 035 μg/L in directly-dosed AD versus a 1 345 μg/L drop in non-dosed ADs, as a result of internal recirculation among the digesters, where actual values were possibly higher as volatile solid (VS) degradation increased in all ADs during the dosing period. No noticeable effect on biogas production and pH was observed. The degree of H2S production was found to be correlated to the volatile SLR, where primary sludge solids contributed mostly to the organic and proteinaceous content of the thickened sludge and presented a high variation and a strong relationship with H2S production. Correlation analysis based on data for the 17-month period that followed supported the significant role of primary SLR in H2S production.

Keywords: biogas, hydrogen sulphide, anaerobic digester, control, solids, full-scale


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Unionized hydrogen sulphide (H2S) produced in the biogas of anaerobic digesters (ADs) needs to be reduced to a low level before it reaches electric generators, gas storage units and machines in biogas applications, in order to eliminate corrosion. It can be removed from the biogas via dry or wet oxidation processes (Deublein and Steinhauser, 2008). Desulphurization of the biogas as it leaves the anaerobic reactor is a measure towards the protection of electric generators and metal equipment on the biogas line, whereas the removal of H2S in the AD liquid offers several advantages, such as methane augmentation and protection of the reactor's material and metal equipment from intensive corrosion (Yu et al., 2015). As ADs are tightly insulated, large-scale reactors, replacement of any metal equipment or maintenance of concrete walls/ceiling are highly problematic and costly, and require long periods of time to make the repairs and bring the reactors back into operation (Erdirencelebi et al., 2015). The break-up of interior equipment or crown corrosion may go unnoticed over a period of time (Erdirencelebi et al., 2015). Long-term maintenance requirements present the weakest point of anaerobic digestion, which is crucially important in the renewable energy field. Additionally, design capacity of the biogas desulfurization unit is usually based on the biogas production rate and may be underestimated in H2S removal capacity terms in wastewater treatment plants (wWTPs) (Erdirencelebi et al., 2015). The sulphate content of the raw inlet wastewater is one source for sulphide produced in the ADs, whereas the protein content can be a more significant factor for strong-character municipal wastewaters or in cases of industrial wastewater intrusion (Stams et al., 2003; Adams et al., 2003).

Micro-aeration of the ADs, both in the headspace or liquid, has been shown to convert H2S to sulphate via sulphide-oxidizing bacteria at lab-scale (Van der Zee et al., 2007) and pilot-scale (Diaz et al., 2010; Ramos and Fdz-Polanco, 2014). Pure oxygen is delivered to the headspace or recirculation flow at very low ratios. One disadvantage is the production of sulphate in the presence of H2O in the form of sulfuric acid, which may cause crown corrosion on the AD's concrete walls and ceiling in the long term. The process has not been shown to be applicable yet in the long term in full-scale digesters. Oxidation of sulphide to elemental sulphur in the headspace at sufficiently low aeration levels may be an alternative at a minimal cost, but the reaction has a lower energy yield compared to sulphate production, is closely dependent on pH, hard to control and unstable for sulphur production (Janssen et al., 1998).

The ability to reduce H2S/HS- in the digester liquid and biogas using iron (III) salts is an effective alternative. Ferric iron reacts by reduction to ferrous iron (iron (II)) and forms an insoluble precipitate:

These reactions indicate a 'stoichiometric' dose of 1.17-3.5 g Fe3+ per g of sulphide, making 2.27-6.82 g FeCl3 per 1 g of sulphide. The addition of iron salts is an effective way of removing sulphide from anaerobic effluents (Johnson and Hallberg, 2005). It is also an effective reducer of odours originating from volatile sulphurous compounds and has been reported to promote volatile solid (VS) digestion when added prior to anaerobic digestion (Higgins, 2010; Novak and Park, 2010). The amount of sulphide removed depends on several parameters, such as pH, ORP and temperature (Speece, 1996; Ali et al., 2015). The H2S reduction in the biogas is a result of equilibrium chemistry between H2S (g), H2S (aq) and HS- (aq), where partial pressure, pH and temperature will be the effective parameters (Speece, 1996; Appels et al., 2008). Chemical requirement, response of the AD and its duration can be determined accurately if based on full-scale applications. Feeding, internal recirculation and mixing characteristics of the AD systems with multiple reactor configurations require specific on-site applications. This technique also promotes methanogenesis, thus, methane production, as iron is an essential trace element for methanogenic bacterial growth and is reduced to insufficiently low levels due to precipitation with sulphide produced under usual operating conditions (Speece, 1996; Yu et al., 2015). Solid FeCl3 is highly soluble in aqueous medium (0.92 g/mL at 20°C) and also delays dissimilatory sulphate reduction as it also accepts other electrons during metabolism (Lar and Li, 2009).

In the present study, iron (III) chloride dosing on full-scale parallel ADs was investigated at different levels and patterns to determine the degree of H2S reduction in the biogas, the time for AD response to the dosing level and the effect of additional alkali dosing. Several parameters, such as pH, VS degradation and biogas production of the ADs, volatile solid (VS) concentration of the thickened sludge, solid loading rates (SLRs) and organic nitrogen/total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) content of the primary and secondary (waste biological sludge (WBS)) sludge and feed sludge flow rate were also investigated in the period following H2S control and their degree of correlation with hydrogen sulphide production was determined.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Konya WWTP (Turkey) is a large-scale plant serving an equivalent population of 1.2 million and receives wastewaters of municipal and industrial origins at an average flow rate of 160 000 m3/d. The plant consists of primary and secondary treatment (modified Bardenpho) units on the main line. Four 7 000 m3 active volume completely-mixed ADs with 17-20 d retention time generate an approximate 70% of the energy requirement of the WWTP. The design of the plant has been made according to German Association for the Water Environment (ATV) 1000 standards. ADs are mixed via a shaft and receive an average total flow rate of 1 400 m3 per day. The plant's desulfurization unit consists of a sulphide-oxidizing biofilter. The projected H2S concentration in the biogas of the WWTP was 1 880-2 020 μg/L and the design of the biological desulfurization unit was made for a capacity of 1 000 m3/hr flow-rate and 1 750 μg/L H2S removal by the designer firm.

Metal salt dosing at 24-105 mg FeCl3/L, with and without alkali (NaOH) addition, to the AD feed flows was the method chosen to reduce H2S in the ADs. Iron salt (FeCl3 41-42% aqueous solution (Akkim Kimya, TR)) was introduced first into the feed line of the thickened sludge via a dosage pump. Alkali addition was aimed to raise/balance pH against acidity increase after the ferric chloride addition and promote the equilibrium reaction to proceed, so as to reduce H2S and increase HS- in the aqueous phase. After a 4-week period, the dosing point was changed to the thickener unit at a tripled amount. Five different strategies of dosing were implemented at variable duration for a period of 6 months from January to July, 2011 (Table 1). Change in feeding dose was applied according to the level and stabilization of H2S in the biogas. An optimum chemical dosage range was targeted, but an unexpected maintenance and half-capacity period on the main-line was experienced during the study. Reduction in H2S concentration was calculated based on the initial level of 8 070 μg/L. One μg/L corresponds to 1.345 times part per million (ppm) of H2S.

Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) was measured in the biogas in duplicate samples as a daily routine by the laboratory staff of the facility via a titrimetric method (4 500-S2--C-F) according to standard methods (APHA, 2005). Hydrogen sulphide immobilized as ZnS in the alkaline zinc acetate solution was titrated via iodometric method. Other parameters evaluated in relevance to anaerobic digestion and H2S production were: TKN (4 500-Norg-B), TS/VS (2 540-Solids-B-E) of the raw wastewater, primary, secondary and thickened sludge (APHA, 2005). The pH was measured on-line via a pH meter installed on the recirculation pipeline.

Several monitored parameters via on-line monitoring and analyses on the sludge line (solid loading rates (SLR) (kg/d) of waste biological sludge (WBS) and primary sludge (PS), feed sludge flow rate (m3/d), thickened sludge VS concentration (mg/L), digester temperature (°C) and biogas production (m3/d) were evaluated for their degree of correlation with biogas H2S concentration in the 17-month period that followed (from July 2011 to November 2012). Pearson's correlation was used and coefficients were calculated via IBM SPSS Statistics 23. The correlation coefficient (R) is a statistical measure of the strength of a linear relationship between two variables with positive values denoting positive linear correlation and negative values denoting negative linear correlation where closeness to 1 or -1 shows the increasing strength of the linear correlation.

 

RESULTS

Konya WWTP was brought into operation in September 2010, and from the start biogas H2S reached 8 070 and 6 050 μg/L in the gas and desulfurization outlets, respectively. Designed capacity of the desulfurization unit was exceeded 4 times in the ADs during full operation. This level was unacceptable for the electric generators and the biogas was burned via a flame unit so as to protect the metal equipment and engines. Quick action to reduce the H2S became urgent.

Iron salt dosing: pattern and effects on H2S reduction

Iron (III) chloride dosing was started at 50 mg FeCl3/L in the feed sludge to AD3 only, because operators needed to be cautious with full-scale application as iron chloride is a coagulant used in sludge thickening and might have caused clogging and/or acidic effect in the feeding pipes (Tchobanoglous et al., 2003). As a result, reduction in H2S by 3 360 μg/L or 39% (down to 4 170 μg/L) occurred gradually over a period of 12 days (Stra-S1 (Table 1)) (Fig. 1). As each feed flow to the ADs was mixed with all the digesters' sludge at the inlet of the reactor, iron chloride added to one digester was distributed to all the ADs gradually, and consequently H2S was reduced to some degree (1 345 μg/L as 16%) in the non-dosed digesters. Consequently, reduced dosing at 30 mg FeCl3/L was started to all digesters (Stra-S2-L1) due to concern over the coagulating effect of iron chloride. This resulted in a slower reduction from 6 860 (±140) to 5 510 (±140) μg/L in all ADs in 15 d. The increase to 43 mg FeCl3/L dosing implemented for further reduction reduced the level down to 3 560 μg/L (24%) (Stra-S2-L2). Lower dosing (24 mg FeCl3/L) continued for 82 d (Stra-S2-L3 and Stra-S3) resulted in a rise in biogas H2S level to a large range of 4 040-4 980 μg/L (38-50% reduction). During this period (March) the average VS concentration reached 23 500 mg/L in the thickened sludge as AD4 was taken into full capacity operation inducing a rise in both solid load and average VS concentration to the thickeners and ADs, respectively, which was observed to be correlated to the high fluctuation pattern in the biogas H2S concentration (Stra-S2-L2/3) (Fig. 1-3(a)). Apparently, the final dosing level appeared insufficient to control and reduce H2S at full capacity AD operation.

Additional NaOH dosing at 60 mg/L in the feed to AD2 did not produce any significant effect on either the H2S level or pH during this period (Stra-S3) (Fig. 1, 3b). A 23-day shutdown period of the Bardenpho Unit Line-1 between 27 March and 18 April resulted in a delayed and significant decrease of biogas H2S to the 1 350-1 900 μg/L level and near the design value of desulfurized biogas, 27 d from the start of maintenance. Primary SLR seemed to be a more effective source of H2S production when the reduction degree was considered, where secondary SLR was accordingly reduced to half (Fig. 3-a). The effect of the maintenance period was observed as a 2 600 μg/L reduction in the feed sludge's monthly average VS concentration in May (Fig. 2).

 

 

Further strategies consisted of increasing the iron salt and alkali application to different ADs to observe any significantly different pattern among the ADs. During Stra-S4, AD2 was dosed with alkali and iron chloride and AD4 only with iron chloride. The new strategy's effect was observed at the end of 15 d with H2S rising to 4 040-4 400 μg/L (46-50% reduction) in the non-dosed ADs, with 70-72% reduction in the FeCl3 receiving ADs (Fig. 1). Primary SLR increased gradually to 160 t/d (orange arrow in Fig. 3-a). No difference due to alkali addition was observed between AD2 and AD4.

In the last strategy (S5), the dosage of the ADs (2 and 4) was reduced to 30 mg FeCl3/L and AD1 was restarted with FeCl3 dosing at a higher level (105 mg FeCl3/L) to observe the reaction time to reach AD2 and AD4 H2S levels, which apparently took 21 d (Fig. 1). A primary SLR at 200 t/d resulted in higher feed VS concentration (28 800 mg/L) during the period, and the combined effect with reduced dosing increased the biogas H2S in AD2 and AD4 by up to 3 800 μg/L (50-53% reduction) (Figs 1 and 3-a). An increase in primary SLR also increased biological unit MLSS concentration (data not shown here) and secondary SLR, as the primary settling capacity was exceeded (orange arrow in Fig. 3-a). This was mostly induced by the weather with heavy rains during the period.

The pH level remained between 7.2 and 7.9 in all ADs during January-June 2011 and no significant effect was observed on pH due to chemical dosing (Fig. 3-b). Biogas production proceeded on a large scale and with a fluctuating pattern and presented no noticeable response to iron chloride dosing in the study period, as presented in Fig. 3-c, and no apparent change after the dosing period (data not shown).

As a linear relation was established between the dosage at the applied range (20-50 mg FeCl3/L) and reduced H2S (g) (y = 49.472X + 744.45 R2= 0.9282), which was calculated based on a range of 7 000-8 070 μg/L of initial H2S concentration, for which a range of 4.14-5.64 g FeCl3 per g of liquid sulphide removed was obtained. The Henry constant of 2 650 mg/L H2S in the liquid per atmosphere of H2S (gas) at 35°C was used to determine sulphide removed in the liquid phase (Speece, 1996).

Nitrogen analyses conducted on primary and secondary sludge evidenced a significantly higher protein content in primary sludge (Fig. 4). TKN varied from 2 500-4 000 mg/L N, a wide range, compared to a stable level of 1 000 mg/L TKN for secondary sludge. The organic nitrogen ratio in the influent raw wastewater was 54-74% for a range of total nitrogen at 152-269 mg/L TKN during May-June 2011. This ratio is subject to increase in primary solids as proteinaceous matter will tend to settle and concentrate whereas ammonium nitrogen will be transported in the liquid form to the consequent unit on the main line. Additionally, primary sludge's VS content at 72-75% and its significantly higher concentration range of 22 000-33 000 mg/L were found to be more influential on the VS content of the thickened sludge.

 

 

An increased degree of VS degradation was also observed in this study as the 18-month data were plotted for the periods following and prior to the dosing of the ADs (Fig. 5). A second high level observed just after the maintenance period does not reflect a real increase as it shows accumulative removal of the biomass digested in the ADs over the maintenance period (not a steady state result). Regarding Konya WWTP ADs, the actual sulphide removal was probably higher than the observed degree, due to augmented VS/protein degradation.

The desulfurization unit had a fluctuating performance with H2S removal over a wide range (540-2020 μg/L) (Fig. 1). Higher removal and stability became noticeable with the start of the hot season, indicating the temperature effect and need for autotrophic sulphide oxidation. A second observation indicated that the present desulfurization unit met the design value at half the capacity of the WWTP with FeCl3 addition at 40 mg/L FeCl3.

Statistical correlation analysis

Primary and secondary SLRs, feed sludge flow rate and VS concentration, temperature and biogas production were considered as the input parameters and their correlation coefficients are presented in Table 2. Regarding the coefficients, the first and second most influential parameters on the ' formation of biogas H2S content were determined as the primary and secondary SLRs. The primary sludge effect was meaningful and supported previous findings. Negative numbers indicated that influent flow rate, temperature and feed VS concentration increased biogas production, and, therefore, decreased H2S concentration (by dilution) in the biogas.

As biological treatment units are operated at high stability and long retention times in WWTPs, the most influential parameter that can destabilize both activated sludge and anaerobic digestion units is expected to be the primary solids in cases of overloading (Erdirencelebi and Kucukhemek, 2015). A change in its characteristics over the daily, monthly or seasonal scale may cause disturbances in plant operation. Figure 6 (a) was constructed to present primary sludge SLR's high fluctuation pattern and effect on H2S in the following period. Biogas production followed a similar pattern to the feed VS loading rate values (Fig 6 (b)). Feed VS loading rate and biogas production proceeded over a wide but stable range, whereas the H2S profile indicated a closer relationship with primary SLR fluctuation.

 

DISCUSSION

Sulphide removal in the biogas at full-scale WWTP was necessary during the first year of plant operation as the design value of the desulfurization unit was not met by the actual H2S level reaching the electric generators. AD's response to dosing was stabilized quite fast after an approximately 11-day period. The linear relation established between the dosage and reduced H2S (g) gave a range of 4.14-5.64 g FeCl3 per g of liquid sulphide removed which was in the range of stoichiometric dose of 2.27-6.82 g FeCl3 per 1 g of sulphide.

As Fe (II) and Fe (III) effectively remove dissolved sulphide and H2S, their usage has become a common control strategy (Speece, 1996; Abatzoglou and Boivin, 2009; Ali et al., 2014). A disadvantage is the iron consumption by other reactions in the liquid phase. Despite this phenomenon, precipitation with sulphide will be the major sink. Removal of sulphide followed an increasing linear relation up to a dosage of 50 mg/L Fe3+ and a decreasing and non-linear pattern at 50-200 mg/L Fe3+ (Choi and Rim, 1991). Another benefit of iron salt addition was the increase in COD removal in their high sulphate removal study of glutamic acid waste.

In another current study, Ali et al. (2015) obtained sulphide removal gradually from 10.95 mg/L S (aq) to a level of 0-1.7 mg/L S (aq) at a FeCl3 dosing range of 20-30 mg/L in the liquid phase of a pilot UASB reactor.

Hydrogen sulphide production is mostly correlated with sulphate reduction and sulphate-reducing bacteria activity in anaerobic environments (Fedorovich et al., 2003; Appels et al., 2008; Carrera-Chapela et al., 2016). In the case of anaerobic sludge digesters, hydrolysis of the proteinaceous matter is more likely to be a major source of dissolved and gaseous hydrogen sulphide species. In the present investigation, a linear relation at a significant power was observed between primary solids and biogas H2S concentration at full-scale plant. The outcome supports the need for deeper consideration of primary sludge structure as hydrolysis of proteins is a completed reaction in the ADs whereas sulphate may not be reduced totally as a higher number of limiting conditions exist for sulphate-reducing bacteria in their competition with methanogens (Erdirencelebiand Ozturk, 2006).

FeCl3's promoting effect observed on VS degradation at real-scale AD operation was reported and verified previously in anaerobic digestion of mixed waste sludge (Park et al., 2006; Novak et al., 2007; Novak and Park, 2010). Adams et al. (2007) observed a parallel increasing pattern of the odorous volatile organic sulfur compounds indicating a correlation between iron and protein degradation. Novak and Park (2010) showed enhanced degradation of VS and improved dewaterability when ferric chloride was dosed to mixed sludge before feeding to ADs. These important findings indicate that iron chloride addition is a beneficial method for improved anaerobic sludge stabilization and final quality. Corrosion control for H2S will also lessen the odour intensity originating from the process and products.

 

CONCLUSIONS

Iron (III) chloride dosing at 24-50 mg/L FeCl3 of all four digesters provided a significant reduction but was not sufficient. As the study period ended, the management decided to replace the desulfurization unit with a higher capacity one as higher dosing would lead to coagulation effect and possible plugging in the sludge feeding lines.

Results obtained in the real-scale study can be summarized as:

Iron (III) chloride efficiently reduced H2S level in the biogas in a period of 11-15 d when dosed at 43-105 mg/L FeCl3

in the feed sludge. Dosing at a 43-50 mg/L FeCl3 level provided a biogas H2S reduction at 4 000-4 300 μg/L from a start-up level of 7 800-8 070 μg/L.

Dosing of one digester reduced other digesters' biogas H2S level indirectly due to the internal mixing in the feeding of ADs. The degree of removal of H2S differed depending on VS and TS loading of the ADs. 50 mg/L FeCl3 dosing reduced 4 000 and 1 340 μg/L directly and indirectly, respectively, at feed (thickened) sludge VS concentrations below 20 000 mg/L, whereas 105 mg/L FeCl3 dosing was necessary for the same reduction at 25 000-28 000 mg/L VS level.

Primary sludge SLR was found to be correlated with high H2S in the biogas as the most influential parameter. Its TKN content and SLR showed a highly fluctuating pattern and proved that it deserves more thorough investigation for sulphide control of anaerobic sludge digesters.

An increase in VS removal degree was observed in all ADs during the dosing period which indicated that the actual sulphide removal was higher than the observed level due to enhanced VS degradation.

The biological desulfurization unit exhibited a need for heating. It was concluded that biogas heat was not sufficient for the autotrophic activity of the biofilter during cold season.

 

REFERENCES

ABATZOGLOU N and BOIVIN S (2009) A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 3 42-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.117        [ Links ]

ADAMS GM, WITHERSPOON JR, ERDAL ZK, FORBES RH, HARGREAVES JR, HIGGINS, MJ, McEWEN DW and NOVAK JT (2007) Identifying and controlling the municipal wastewater odor environment Phase 3: Biosolids processing modifications for cake odor reduction. Water Environment Research Foundation, Report No.03-CTS-9T. WERF Alexandria, VA.         [ Links ]

ALI M, SINGH NK, BHATIA A, SINGH S, KHURSHEED A, KAZMI AA (2015) Sulfide production control in UASB reactor by addition of iron salt. J. Environ. Eng. 141 (6) 06014008/1-4.         [ Links ]

APHA (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 1216 pp.         [ Links ]

APPELS L, BAEYENS J, DEGREVE J and DEWIL R (2008) Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress Energ. Combust. Sci. 34 755-781. https://doi.org/10.1016Aj.pecs.2008.06.002        [ Links ]

CARRERA-CHAPELA F, DONOSO-BRAVO A, JEISONC D, DIAZ I, GONZALEZ JA and RUIZ-FILIPPI G (2016) Development, identification and validation of a mathematical model of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge focusing on H2S formation and transfer. Biochem. Eng. J. 112 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.03.008        [ Links ]

CHOI E and RIM JM (1991) Competition and inhibition of sulfate reducers and methane producers in anaerobic treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 23 (7-9) 1259-1264.         [ Links ]

DEUBLEIN D and STEINHAUSER A (2008) Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources: An Introduction. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. 578 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527621705        [ Links ]

DIAZ I, LOPES AC, PEREZ SI and FDZ-POLANCO M (2010) Performance evaluation of oxygen, air and nitrate for the microaerobic removal of hydrogen sulphide in biogas from sludge digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 101 7724-7730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.062        [ Links ]

ERDIRENCELEBI D and OZTURK I (2006) A comparative study of sulfidogenic and methanogenic activities during the treatment of landfill leachate:Part I. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 41 687-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520600575093        [ Links ]

ERDIRENCELEBI D and KUCUKHEMEK M (2015) Diagnosis of the anaerobic reject water effects on WWTP operational characteristics as a precursor of bulking and foaming. Water Sci. Technol. 71 (4) 572-579. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.528        [ Links ]

ERDIRENCELEBI D, KÜCÜKHEMEK M and SARI S (2015) Havasiz (anaerobik) çamur çürütücülerde karsilasilan ijletim problemleri ve çözüm önerileri (operational problems and solutions coupled to anaerobic sludge digesters). Selcuk Univ. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 3 (3) 51-58.         [ Links ]

FEDOROVICH V, LENS P and KALYUZHNYI S (2003) Extension of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 with processes of sulfate reduction. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 109 (1-3) 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:33        [ Links ]

HIGGINS MJ (2010) Evaluation of aluminum and iron addition during conditioning and dewatering for odor control Phase IV. Water Environment Research Foundation, Report No.03-CTS-9A. WERF, Alexandria, VA.         [ Links ]

JANSSEN AJH, MEIJER S, BONTSEMA J and LETTINGA G (1998) Application of the redox potential for controling a sulfide oxidizing bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 60 (2) 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981020)60:2<147::AID-BIT2>3.0.CO;2-N        [ Links ]

JOHNSON DB and HALLBERG KB (2005) Acid mine drainage options: A review. Sei. Total Environ. 338 (1-2) 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002        [ Links ]

LAR JS and LI X (2009) Removal of H2S during anaerobic bioconversion of dairy manure. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 17 (2) 273-277.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60205-0        [ Links ]

TCHOBANOGLOUS G, BURTON FL and STENSEL HD (2003) Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse.McGraw Hill Press, New York.         [ Links ]

NOVAK JT, VERMA N and MULLER CD (2007) The role of iron and aluminum in digestion and odor formation. Water Sci. Technol. 56 (9) 59-65. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.705        [ Links ]

NOVAK JT and PARK CM (2010) Effect of aluminum and iron on odors, digestion efficiency, and dewatering properties. Report 03-CTS-9b, WERF, IWAP. ISBN: 978-1-84339-283-5/1-84339-283-6. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780403557        [ Links ]

PARK CM, ABU-ORF MM, MULLER C and NOVAK JT (2006) The effect of cations on activated sludge characteristics: analysis and effects of iron and aluminum in floc. Water Environ. Res. 78 (1) 31-40. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143005X84495        [ Links ]

RAMOS I and FDZ-POLANCO M (2014) Microaerobic control of biogas sulphide content during sewage sludge digestion by using biogas production and hydrogen sulphide concentration. Chem. Eng. J. 250 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/jxej.2014.04.027        [ Links ]

SPEECE RE (1996) Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters. Archae Press, Nashville.         [ Links ]

STAMS AJM, OUDE ELFERINK SJWH and WESTERMANN P (2003) Metabolic interactions between methanogenic consortia and anaerobic respiring bacteria. Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 81 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45839-5_2        [ Links ]

VAN DER ZEE FP, VILLAVERDE S, GARCIA PA and FDZ-POLANCO F (2007) Sulfide removal by moderate oxygenation of anaerobic sludge environments. Bioresour. Technol. 98 518-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.011        [ Links ]

YU B, ZHANG D, SHAN A, LOU Z, YUAN H, HUANG X, YUAN W, DAIC X and ZHU N (2015) Methane-rich biogas production from waste activated sludge with the addition of ferric chloride under a thermophilic anaerobic digestion system. RSC Adv. 5 38538-38546. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA02362A        [ Links ]

 

 

Received 20 January 2017
Accepted in revised form 14 March 2018

 

 

* To whom all correspondence should be addressed. +27 903322238677 e-mail: dbaktil@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons