SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.34 número4Redressing inequities of the past from a historical perspective: The case of the Olifants basin, South AfricaCollaboration and modelling - Tools for integration in the Motueka catchment, New Zealand índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google


Water SA

versión On-line ISSN 1816-7950
versión impresa ISSN 0378-4738

Water SA vol.34 no.4 Pretoria abr. 2008


Use of participatory scenario modelling as platforms in stakeholder dialogues



Lotta AnderssonI; Johanna Alkan OlssonII; Berit ArheimerI; Anna JonssonIII

ISwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, SE-601 76 Norrköping, Sweden
IILund University, Sweden
IIILinköping University, Sweden





A participatory methodology, based on dialogues between stakeholders and experts has been developed and tested in the drainage area to Kaggebo Bay in the Baltic Sea. This study is focused on the EU Water Framework Directive, with emphasis on reduction of eutrophication. The drainage area is included in the WFD administrative area of the Motala Strom River basin. A similar approach is now applied in a recently initiated project in the Thukela River basin, with focus on impacts of climate change on water resources. The methodology is based on the idea that a catchment model serves as a platform for the establishment of a common view of present conditions and the causes behind these conditions. In the following steps, this is followed by model-assisted agreement on environmental goals (i.e. what do we want the future to look like?) and local agreement on a remedy or mitigation plans in order to reduce environmental impact (e.g. eutrophication); alternatively to adapt to conditions that cannot be determined by local actions (e.g. climate change). By involving stakeholder groups in this model-supported stepwise process, it is ensured that all stakeholder groups involved have a high degree of confidence in the presented model results, and thereby enable various actors involved to share a common view, regarding both present conditions, goals and the way to reach these goals. Although this is a process that is time- (and cost-) consuming, it is hypothesised that the use of this methodology is two-pronged: it increases the willingness to carry out remedies or necessary adaptations to a changing environment, and it increases the level of understanding between the various groups and therefore ameliorates the potential for future conflicts. Compared to traditional use of model results in environmental decision-making, the experts' role is transformed from a one-way communication of final results to assistance in the various steps of the participatory process.

Keywords: participatory, catchment, coastal zone, modelling, nutrients


 "Full text available in PDF"



ALKAN OLSSON J and ANDERSSON L (2007) Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management. Water Resour. Manage. 21(1) 97-110.         [ Links ]

ANDERSSON L, ROSBERG J, PERS BC, OLSSON J and ARHEIMER B (2005) Estimating catchment nutrient flow with the HBV-NP model: Sensitivity to input data. Ambio 34 (7) 521-532.         [ Links ]

ARONSSON H and TORSTENSSON G (2004) Beskrivning av ett pedagogiskt verktyg for beräkning av kväveutlakning frán enskilda fält och gårdar. Ekohydrologi 78, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Water Quality Management. In Swedish with English abstract.         [ Links ]

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2000) Directive 2000/60/EG of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J. Eur. Commun. 22.12.2000, L327/1.         [ Links ]

DUVAIL S and HAMERLYNCK O (2003) Mitigation of negative ecological and socio-economic impacts of the Diama dam on the Senegal River Delta wetland (Mauritania), using a model based decision support system. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 7 (1) 133-146.         [ Links ]

EAKIN H, MAGENA V, SMITH J, MORENO JL, MARTINEZ JM and Landavazo O (2007) A stakeholder driven process to reduce vulnerability to climate change in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. Mitigation Adapt. Strat. Global Change. 12(5) 935-955.         [ Links ]

GADDIS EJB, VLADICH H and VOINOV A (2007) Participatory modelling and the dilemma of diffuse nitrogen management in a residential watershed. Environ. Model. Software. 22(5) 619-629.         [ Links ]

HORLITZ T (2007) The role of model interfaces for participation in water management. Water Resour. Manage. 21 (7) 1091-1102.         [ Links ]

JONSSON A and ALKAN OLSSON J (2005) Participatory modelling- (how) can computer generated information affect the 'room of action' of local stakeholders? Kulturstudier i Sverige, June 13-15, 2005, Norrkoping, Sweden.         [ Links ]

LARSSON MH, PERSSON K, ULÉN B, LINDSJO A and JARVIS NJ (2007) A dual porosity model to quantify phosphorus losses from macroporous soils. Ecol. Model. 205 123-134.         [ Links ]

LAUBER TB and KNUT BA (2000) Citizen participation in Natural Resource Management: A Synthesis of HDRU Research. HDRU Series No 00-7. Department of Natural Resources, Human Dimensions Research Unit, Cornell University.         [ Links ]

MARMEFELT E, HAKANSSON B, ERICHSEN AC and HANSEN IS (2000) Development of an Ecological Model System for the Kattegat and the Southern Baltic. SMHI Report Oceanografi No 29, Norrkoping, Sweden.         [ Links ]

PAHL-WOSTL C (2002) Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modelling Processes. Integrated Assess. 3(1) 3-14.         [ Links ]

PAHL-WOSTL C (2007) The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environ. Model. Software 22(5) 561-569.         [ Links ]

SCHULZE RE (2001) Managing water as a resource in Africa: Are we asking the right questions? Chapter 2 in: Gash JHC, Odada EO, Oyebande L and Schulze RE (2001) Freshwater Resources in Africa. BAHC International Project Office, PIK, Potsdam, Germany. 9-14.         [ Links ]

SHERWILL T, ARENDSE L, ROGERS K, SIHLOPHE N, VAN WILGEN B, VAN WYK E and ZEKA S (2007) Stakeholder connectedness and participatory water resource management in South Africa. Water SA 33 (4) 505-512        [ Links ]



+46 11 495 81 44
Fax: +46 11 495 80 01

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons