SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.34 issue2Utility of EC 3M™ Petrifilm™ and sanitary surveys for source water assessment in Nyabushozi County, south-western Uganda author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Water SA

On-line version ISSN 1816-7950
Print version ISSN 0378-4738

Water SA vol.34 n.2 Pretoria Feb. 2008


Evaluation of an integrated asset life-cycle management (ALCM) model and assessment of practices in the water utility sector



Mehmood HaffejeeI; Alan C BrentII

IGraduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa
IINatural Resources and the Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), South Africa





The water utility sector in South Africa is presently facing numerous challenges. Amongst the most urgent and important priorities is ageing infrastructure, which has the potential to end in failures with detrimental impacts on local communities and the natural environment. Furthermore, to manage the majority of strategic assets in terms of total performance, i.e. environmental, financial, social and technical, is often difficult as a large portion of assets, such as buried pipelines, cannot be easily accessed. These issues highlight the need for a generic asset life-cycle management model for the water utility sector. Such an integrated model is introduced; it was evaluated in the largest water utility in South Africa. Although it was found to have relevance, practicability, applicability, and usability, the model still needs rigorous testing amongst other water utilities in South Africa, and in other countries. The perceptions of the water utility sector were also assessed in terms of the practices of the principles of integrated life-cycle asset management. The results indicate a fairly good understanding of the concept of asset life-cycle management, but allude to challenges with fully implementing all the principles when it comes to asset performance measurements; particular attention must be given to develop mechanisms to measure environmental and social aspects. Nevertheless, it is highlighted that for strategic assets, the practices and principles of ALCM have many benefits, including better maintenance management, infrastructural planning, risk management, and sustainable development.

Keywords: life-cycle management, asset management, sustainable development, South Africa


"Full text available in PDF"



AMADI-ECHENDU JE (2004) Curriculum development and delivery in physical asset management - A case study from South Africa. Proc. 4th Global Congr. Eng. Educ. Bangkok, Thailand, 5-9 July.         [ Links ]

BOTHA A and BRENT AC (2005) Optimising maintenance strategies in the process industry to maximise the environmental performance of assets. Proc. Int. Conf. Maint. Soc. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 31 May - 2 June.         [ Links ]

CAMPBELL JD (1995) Uptime: Strategies for Excellence in Maintenance Management (1st edn.). Productivity Press, New York.         [ Links ]

HAFFEJEE M (2006) Integrated Life Cycle Asset Management: An Innovative Model for the Water Utility Sector. M.Sc. Thesis, Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa.         [ Links ]

KOSTIC T (2003) Asset management in electrical utilities: How many facets it actually has. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen. Meet. 1 275-281.         [ Links ]

LANDU L and BRENT AC (2006) Environmental life cycle assessment of water supply in South Africa: The Rosslyn industrial area as a case study. Water SA 32 (2) 249-256.        [ Links ]

NATIONAL TREASURY (2004) Asset Management Guide. Version 3.3, Republic of South Africa, (Accessed on 19 March 2007).         [ Links ]

RAND WATER (2004) 100 Years of Excellence (1st edn.). Rand Water, Glenvista, South Africa.         [ Links ]

SANCHEZ IG, WENZEL H and JORGENSSEN MS (2004) Models for defining LCM, monitoring LCM practice and assessing its feasibility. GMI 45 (spring). Greenleaf Publishing. (Accessed on 19 March 2007).         [ Links ]

SCHUMAN C and BRENT AC (2005) Asset life cycle management: Towards improving asset performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 25 (6) 566-579.         [ Links ]

SCHWELLNUS WS (2005) Integrated decision making in production asset management in the water supply industry in South Africa. Proc. Final Year Symposium 2. Department of Engineering and Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa.         [ Links ]

STATSDIRECT (2007) Spearman's Rank Correlation. (Accessed on 19 March 2007).         [ Links ]

UNEP (2006) Guide to Life Cycle Management: A Bridge to Sustainable Products. Background report, final draft, (Accessed on 19 March 2007).         [ Links ]

WESTKÄMPER E, ATTING L and ARNDT G (2000) Life cycle management and assessment: Approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing. Ann. CIRP 49 (2) 501-522.         [ Links ]



+27 12 420-3929
Fax: +27 12 362-5307

Received 19 April 2007
Accepted in revised form 28 January 2008

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License