SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número2Optimisation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Vectobac®) applications for the blackfly control programme on the Orange River, South AfricaApplication of geographic weighted regression to establish flood-damage functions reflecting spatial variation índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Water SA

versão On-line ISSN 1816-7950
versão impressa ISSN 0378-4738

Water SA vol.34 no.2 Pretoria Fev. 2008

 

Prediction of groundwater levels from lake levels and climate data using ANN approach

 

 

Ahmet DoganI; Husnu DemirpenceI; Murat CobanerII

IDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta 32260, Turkey
IIDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, Cukurova University, Adana 01330, Turkey

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

There are many environmental concerns relating to the quality and quantity of surface and groundwater. It is very important to estimate the quantity of water by using readily available climate data for managing water resources of the natural environment. As a case study an artificial neural network (ANN) methodology is developed for estimating the groundwater levels (upper Floridan aquifer levels) as a function of monthly averaged precipitation, evaporation, and measured levels of Magnolia and Brooklyn Lakes in north-central Florida. Groundwater and surface water are highly interactive in the region due to the characteristics of the geological structure, which consists of a sandy surficial aquifer, and a highly transmissive limestone-confined aquifer known as the Floridan aquifer system (FAS), which are separated by a leaky clayey confining unit. In a lake groundwater system that is typical of many karst lakes in Florida, a large part of the groundwater outflow occurs by means of vertical leakage through the underlying confining unit to a deeper highly transmissive upper Floridan aquifer. This provides a direct hydraulic connection between the lakes and the aquifer, which creates fast and dynamic surface water/groundwater interaction. Relationships among lake levels, groundwater levels, rainfall, and evapotranspiration were determined using ANN-based models and multiple-linear regression (MLR) and multiple-nonlinear regression (MNLR) models. All the models were fitted to the monthly data series and their performances were compared. ANN-based models performed better than MLR and MNLR models in predicting groundwater levels.

Keywords: groundwater, surface water, interaction, artificial neural network


 

"Full text available in PDF"

 

References

ALP M and CIGIZOGLU HK (2007) Suspended sediment load simulation by two artificial neural network methods using hydrometeorological data. Environ. Model. Software 22 2-13.         [ Links ]

ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I. Preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 5 (2) 115-123.         [ Links ]

AZIZ ARA and WANG KFV (1992) Neural network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters. Ground Water 30 (2) 164-166.         [ Links ]

BATENI SM, BORGHEI SM and JENG DS (2007) Neural network and neuro-fuzzy assessments for scour depth around bridge piers. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20 401-414.         [ Links ]

CHIBANGA R, BERLAMONT J and VANDEWALLE J (2003) Modelling and forecasting of hydrological variables using artificial neural networks: the Kafue River sub-basin. Hydrol. Sci. J. 48 (3) 363-379.         [ Links ]

CHOI SU and CHEONG S (2006) Prediction of local scour around bridge piers using artificial neural networks. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 42 (2) 487-494.         [ Links ]

CIGIZOGLU HK and KISI O (2005) Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data. Nordic Hydrol. 36 (1) 49-64.         [ Links ]

CLARK WE, MUSGROVE RH, MENKE CG and CAGLE JW (JR) (1964) Water Resources of Alachua, Bradford, Clay and Union Counties, Florida. Florida Geological Survey Rep. of Investigations No. 35. Tallahassee, Florida.         [ Links ]

DAWSON WC and WILBY R (1998) An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrol. Sci. J. 43 (1) 47-66.         [ Links ]

DIAS WPS and POOLIYADDA SP (2001) Neural networks for predicting properties of concretes with admixtures. Constr. Build. Mat. 15 371-379.         [ Links ]

DOGAN A and MOTZ LH (2005) Saturated-unsaturated 3D groundwater Model I: development. J. Hydrol. Eng. 10 (6) 492-504.         [ Links ]

FANG YC and WU BW (2007) Neural network application for thermal image recognition on flow-resolution objects. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 9 (2) 134-144.         [ Links ]

FRENCH MN, KRAJEWSKI WF and CUYKENDAL RR (1992) Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. J. Hydrol. 137 1-37.         [ Links ]

GARR WL, NAGIN D and SZCZYPULA J (1994) Comparative study of artificial neural networks and statistical models for predicting student grade point averages. Int. J. Forecast. 10 17-34.         [ Links ]

GOH ATC (1995) Back-propagation neural networks for modeling complex systems. Artif. Intell. Eng. 9 143-151.         [ Links ]

HAGAN MT and MENHAJ MB (1994) Training feed forward techniques with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Network 5 (6) 989-993.         [ Links ]

KAMBEKAR AR and DEO MC (2003) Estimation of pile group scour using neural networks. Appl. Ocean Res. 25 225-234.         [ Links ]

KISI O (2005) Suspended sediment estimation using neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches. Hydrol. Sci. J. 50 (4) 683-696.         [ Links ]

KISI O and CIGIZOGLU HK (2007) Comparison of different ANN techniques in river flow prediction. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 24 (3) 211-231.         [ Links ]

LEE TL, JENG DS, ZHANG GH and HONG JH (2007) Neural network modeling for estimation of scour depth around bridge piers. J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B 19 (3) 378-386.         [ Links ]

MAIER HR and DANDY GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and applications. Environ. Model. Software 15 101-124.         [ Links ]

MERRITT ML (2001) Simulation of the Interaction of Karstic Lakes Magnolia and Brooklyn with the Upper Floridan Aquifer, Southwestern Clay County, Florida, U.S.G.S. Water-Res. Invest. Report 00-4204, Tallahassee, FL.         [ Links ]

MILLER JA (1986) Hydrogeologic Framework of the Floridan Aquifer System in Florida and in Parts of Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Profile Paper 1403-B, Washington DC.         [ Links ]

MOTZ LH (1998) Vertical Leakage and vertically averaged vertical conductance for karst lakes in Florida. Water Resour. Res. 34 (2) 159-167.         [ Links ]

NAM K and SCHAEFER T (1995) Forecasting international airline passenger traffic using neural networks. Logist. Transport. 31 (3) 239-251.         [ Links ]

RUMELHART DE, MCCLELLAND JL and the PDP RESEARCH GROUP (1986) Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (Vol. 1) Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.         [ Links ]

SHA W (2007) Comment on: 'Flow forecasting for a Hawaii stream using rating curves and neural networks' by GB Sahoo and C Ray [J.         [ Links ] Hydrol. 317 (2006) 63-80], J. Hydrol. 340 (1-2) 119-121.

SOUSA GD (1997) Investigation of Lake and Surficial Aquifer Interaction in the Upper Etonia Creek Basin. Master of Engineering Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL., U.S.A.         [ Links ]

SUDHEER KP, GOSAIN AK and RAMASASTRI KS (2003) Estimating actual evapotranspiration from limited climatic data using neural computing technique. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 129 (3) 214-218.         [ Links ]

TAYFUR G (2002) Artificial neural networks for sheet sediment transport. Hydrol. Sci. J. 47 (6) 879-892.         [ Links ]

TOKAR AS and JOHNSON PA (1999) Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 (3) 232-239.         [ Links ]

WATSON BJ, MOTZ LH and ANNABLE MD (2001) Water budget and vertical conductance for Magnolia Lake. J. Hydrol. Eng. 6 (3) 208-216.         [ Links ]

YANG CC, PRASHER SO, LACROIX R, SREEKANTH S, PATNI NK and MASSE L (1997) Artificial neural network model for subsurface-drained farmland. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE 123 (4) 285-292.         [ Links ]

YAGCI O, MERCAN DE, CIGIZOGLU HK and KABDASLI MS (2005) Artificial intelligence methods in breakwater damage ratio estimation. Ocean Eng. 32 2088-2106.         [ Links ]

YANG HC and CHANG FJ (2005) Modelling combined open channel flow by artificial neural networks. Hydrol. Process 19 (18) 3747-3762.         [ Links ]

ZEALAND CM, BURN DH and SIMONOVIC SP (1999) Short term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. 214 32-48.         [ Links ]

ZHANG G, PATUWO BE and HU MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks: The state of the art. Int. J. Forecast. 14 35-62.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
(90) 246 211 1211
Fax: (90) 246 237 0859
E-mail: dogan@mmf.sdu.edu.tr, adogan@hawaii.edu

Received 24 November 2005
Accepted in revised form 25 March 2008

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons