SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número2A comparison of satellite hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing imagery for improved classification and mapping of vegetationPhysical and chemical characteristics of thermal springs in the Waterberg area in Limpopo Province, South Africa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Water SA

versión On-line ISSN 0378-4738

Water SA vol.34 no.2 Pretoria feb. 2008

 

The quality of environmental impact reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands in South Africa

 

 

LA Sandham; MJ Moloto; FP Retief

Environmental Assessment Research Group, School of Environmental Sciences, North West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

In South Africa certain development activities, which may have a substantial detrimental effect on the environment, require an environmental impact assessment (EIA), including projects with the potential of affecting wetlands. A key element of the EIA process is the submission of an environmental impact report (EIR) for review in order to determine whether the report is adequate and/or whether a greater quantity of information is required before the project can be authorised. The information available to decision-makers in the EIR is a major determinant in the outcome of wetland protection and/or destruction.
The quality of 4 environmental impact reports of large projects with the potential of impacting on wetlands was assessed using an EIA report quality review checklist. It is concluded that the quality of the 4 reports was generally satisfactory but certain areas were found to be poorly performed, i.e. identification and evaluation of impacts to the potential detriment of the wetlands for which the EIAs were performed
To improve the quality of the reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands it is recommended that a quality review checklist be used by EIA practitioners and authorities as an additional tool to the EIA regulations and the integrated environmental management series. This should assist in ensuring that key aspects are addressed before submission to the relevant authority, and will also contribute to establishing a baseline of EIR quality for evaluation of wetlands EIA practice under the new regulations promulgated in 2006.

Keywords: environmental impact report (EIR), environmental impact assessment, quality review, wetlands


 

"Full text available in PDF"

 

References

BARBIER EB, ACREMAN MC and KNOWLER D (1996) Economic Valuation of Wetlands: A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland. 138 pp.         [ Links ]

BARDECKI (1984) Effective wetlands conservation efforts require careful reasoning and strong incentives to landowners. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39 166-169.         [ Links ]

BARKER A and WOOD C (1999) An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 19 387-404.         [ Links ]

CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY (1996) A Guide on Biodiversity and Environmental Assessment. Biodi- versity Convention Office, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Quebec: http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/012/newguidance_e.htm (Accessed on 18/02/08).         [ Links ]

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS and TOURISM (DEAT) (1998) Guideline Document: EIA Regulations, Implementation of Sections 21, 22 and 26 of the Environment Conservation Act, DEAT, Pretoria, South Africa. 48 pp.         [ Links ]

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS and TOURISM (DEAT) (1999) State of the Environment in South Africa - An Overview. DEAT, Pretoria, South Africa. 17 pp.         [ Links ]

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS and TOURISM (DEAT) (2002) Integrated Environmental Management Series, Information Series 1-6. DEAT, Pretoria, South Africa.         [ Links ]

DUGAN P (1994) Wetland Conservation - A Review of Current Issues and Required Action. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. 96 pp.         [ Links ]

EISENHARDT K (2002) Building theories from case study research. In: Huberman A and Miles M (eds.) The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. Sage Publications, London. 5-36.         [ Links ]

ELKIN TJ and SMITH PGR (1988) What is a good environmental impact statement? Reviewing screening reports from Canada's national parks. J. Environ. Manage. 26 71-89.         [ Links ]

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1996) Evaluation of the Performance of the EIA Process. Wood C, Barker A, Jones CE, Hughes J (authors) Vol. 1: Main Report. European Commission, Brussels; http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/eia-support.htm (Accessed on 18/02/08).         [ Links ]

FURTER L (2003) Floods, storm water management and wetlands. IEMSA 28 (3) 17-18.         [ Links ]

GERAGTHY PJ (1996) Environmental impact assessment practice in Ireland following the adoption of the European directive. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 16 (3) 189-211.         [ Links ]

GLASSON J, THERIVEL R and CHADWICK A (1995) Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. Principles and Procedures, Process, Practise and Prospects. UCL Press, London, UK. 141-165.         [ Links ]

HICKIE D and WADE M (1998) Development of guidelines for improving the effectiveness of environmental assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 18 (3) 267-287.         [ Links ]

IBRAHIM A (1992) An Analysis of Quality Control in the Malaysian Environmental Impact Assessment Process. M.Sc. dissertation, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.         [ Links ]

KOTZE DC (2000) Wetlands and Water Quality (Paper compiled for the Mondi Wetlands Project), www.wetland.org.za/wetpeople.htm (Accessed on 17/11/04).         [ Links ]

LEE N and BROWN D (1992) Quality control in environmental assessment. Proj. Appraisal 7 (1) 41-45.         [ Links ]

LEE N AND COLLEY R (1992) Review of the Quality of Environmental Statements. Occasional Paper No. 24 (2nd edn.). EIA Centre, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.         [ Links ]

LEE N, COLLEY R, BONDE J and SIMPSON J (1999) Reviewing the Quality of Statements and Environmental Appraisals. Occasional Paper No. 55. EIA Centre, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.         [ Links ]

LEE N and DANCEY R (1993) The quality of environmental impact statements in Ireland and the United Kingdom: A comparative analysis. Proj. Appraisal 8 (1) 31-36.         [ Links ]

LEE N (2000) Reviewing the quality of environmental assessments (Chapter 8). In: N Lee and C George (eds.) Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK. 137-147.         [ Links ]

LEU WS, WILLIAMS WP and BARK AW (1996) Development of an environmental impact assessment evaluation model and its application. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 16 (2) 115-133.         [ Links ]

MWALYOSI R and HUGHES R (1998) The Performance of EIA in Tanzania: An Assessment. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.         [ Links ]

ODUM P (1983) Wetlands and Values. J. Soil Water Conserv. 38 380.         [ Links ]

RAMSAR CONVENTION (1994) Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. The Convention on Wetlands text, as amended in 1982 and 1987. http://www.ramsar.org/key_conv_e.htm (Accessed on 18/02/08).         [ Links ]

RAMSAR CONVENTION SECRETARIAT (2007) Impact assessment: Guidelines for incorporating biodiversity-related issues into environmental impact assessment legislation and/or processes and in strategic environmental assessment. Ramsar Handbooks for the Wise Use of Wetlands (3rd edn.) Vol. 13. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.         [ Links ]

ROBSON C (2002) Real World Research (2nd edn.). Blackwell, Oxford, UK.         [ Links ]

ROUT D (1994) An Analysis of the EIA Process and EIA Reports produced for Selected Industrial Developments in the State of Orissa in India. M.Sc. dissertation, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.         [ Links ]

ROSS WA (1987) Evaluating environmental impact statements. J. Environ. Manage. 25 137-147.         [ Links ]

SADLER B (1996) Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. Final report of the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. www.ea.gov.au/assessments/eianet/eastudy/final/chapter2.html (Accessed on 30/06/03).         [ Links ]

SANDHAM LA and PRETORIUS HM (2007) A review of EIA report quality in the North West Province of South Africa. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (4-5) 229-240. DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.07.002.         [ Links ]

SILVIUS MJ, ONEKA M and VERHAGEN A (2000) Wetlands: Lifeline for people on the edge. Phys. Chem. Earth 25 (7- 8) 645-652.         [ Links ]

SIMPSON J (2001) Developing a review package to assess the quality of EA reports of local authority structure and local plans in the UK. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 21 (1) 83-95.         [ Links ]

SOUTH AFRICA (1989) The Environment Conservation Act, Act No. 73 of 1989. Pretoria, Government Printer, South Africa.         [ Links ]

SOUTH AFRICA (1997) Regulations under the Environment Conservation Act, Act No. 73 of 1989 - GN 1182, 1183, 1184, Government Gazette 18261:387, 5 September. Pretoria, Government Printer, South Africa.         [ Links ]

SOUTH AFRICA (1998) The National Environmental Management Act, Act No. 107 of 1998. Pretoria, Government Printer, South Africa.         [ Links ]

SOUTH AFRICA (2006) Regulations under the National Environmental Management Act, Act 107of 1998 - GN R385, GN R386 and GN R387 of 21 April 2006. Pretoria, Government Printer, South Africa.         [ Links ]

SOWMAN L, FUGGLE R and PRESTON G (1995) A review of the evolution of environmental evaluation procedures in South Africa. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 15 (1) 45-67.         [ Links ]

THE WORLD BANK (1997) Biodiversity and Environmental Assessment. Environmental Assessment Source Book Update No. 20: http://go.worldbank.org/541FG6IVA0 (Accessed on 18/02/08).         [ Links ]

THE WORLD BANK (2002) Wetlands and Environmental Assessment. Environmental Assessment Source Book Update No. 28: http://go.worldbank.org/541FG6IVA0 (Accessed on 18/02/08).         [ Links ]

WALMSLEY RD (1988) A Description of the Wetlands Research Programme. South African National Scientific Programmes Report (145) 1- 26. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria.         [ Links ]

WESTON J (2000) Reviewing environmental statements: New demands for the UK's EIA procedures. Planning, Practice and Res. 15Issue 1/2.         [ Links ]

WOOD C (1988) EIA in the plan making. In: Wathern P (ed.) Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice. Unwin Hyman, London, UK. 161-196.         [ Links ]

WOOD C (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review (2nd edn.). Pearson, Harlow, England.         [ Links ]

YIN R (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd edn.) Applied Social Research Methods Series - Volume 5. Sage Publications, London, UK.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
+27 18 299-1585
Fax: +27 18 299-1580
E-mail: luke.sandham@nwu.ac.za

Received 16 October 2007
Accepted in revised form 19 February 2008