On-line version ISSN 0378-4738
Water SA vol.34 n.1 Pretoria Jan. 2008
W RoetsI; Y XuII; L RaittIII; L BrendonckIV
ISSI Engineers and Environmental Consultants (Pty) Ltd, Postnet suite #200, P/Bag X6590, George 6530, South Africa
IIUniversity of the Western Cape, Department of Earth Sciences, P/Bag X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa
IIIUniversity of the Western Cape, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, P/Bag X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa
IVLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, K.U. Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
This paper reports on a conceptual model that was developed to describe the different groundwater discharge 'types' from the Table Mountain Group (TMG) aquifer, that contributes to the different components of the flow regime in each of the recognised river reaches for streams and rivers associated with the TMG. This model integrates hydrogeological, ecological and geomorphological understandings into an ecohydrological perspective linking ground- and surface water systems. Through geospatial intersections of existing GIS layers a GIS model was also developed to highlight the quaternary catchments containing sensitive aquatic ecosystems that could be vulnerable to groundwater use from the TMG.
The conceptual model demonstrates the intimate link between groundwater from the TMG aquifer and aquatic ecosystems in the mountain and foothill reaches of streams and rivers in the Cape Folded Mountains in particular. It also identifies two primary zones of interaction between groundwater and surface water in the TMG, namely, the 'TMG aquifer daylight-domain', located in the recharge zone, and the 'TMG aquifer surface water interface-domain', located at the discharge end of the aquifer.
The conceptual model clearly indicates the difference between real groundwater, and perceived groundwater contributions to streamflow in the TMG. It is the lower flows of the flow regime that will be most vulnerable to groundwater use from the TMG aquifer in the 'TMG aquifer daylight-domain', which are unfortunately also the most important flows from an ecological perspective. However, any groundwater use from the TMG aquifer will also affect the discharge end of the aquifer, located far from the higher elevation recharge areas, or the point of groundwater abstraction, in lowland settings in the 'TMG aquifer surface water interface-domain'.
The GIS model integrated the conceptual understanding into a management tool by highlight all quaternary catchments associated with TMG containing sensitive aquatic ecosystems and gave the variable vulnerability for each.
Keywords: ecohydrology, ecosystem dynamics, groundwater abstraction, river basin management, streamflow regime, TMG aquifer
"Full text available in PDF"
COMMANDER DP (2000) Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems in the Northern Perth Basin (Jurien and Arrowsmith Groundwater Areas). Water and Rivers Commission, Australia. [ Links ]
COWLING RM, PRESSEY RL, LOMBARD AT, HEIJNIS CE, RICHARDSON DM and COLE N (1999) Framework for a Conservation Plan for the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Institute for Plant Conservation, University of Cape Town. IPC Report 9902, prepared for WWF-SA. [ Links ]
DAVIES BR, O'KEEFFE JH and SNADDON CD (1993) A Synthesis of the Ecological Functioning, Conservation and Management of Southern African River Ecosystems. WRC Report No. TT 62/93. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa. [ Links ]
FORTUIN M (2004) A Geographic Information Systems Approach to the Identification of Table Mountain Group Aquifer 'Type Areas' of Ecological Importance. M.Sc. Thesis, UWC, Cape Town. [ Links ]
GILVEAR DJ, HEAL KV and STEPHEN A (2002) Hydrology and ecological quality of Scottish river ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 294 131-159. [ Links ]
HEYWOOD I, CORNELIUS S and CARVER S (2002) An Introduction to Geographical Information Systems (2nd edn.). Pearson Education Limited, Essex, CM2O 2JE, England. [ Links ]
IMPSON ND, BILLS IR, CAMBRAY JA and LE ROUX A (1999) The Primary Freshwater Fishes of the Cape Floristic Region: Conservation Needs for a Unique and Highly Threatened Fauna. Cape Nature Conservation Report to the University of Cape Town for the CAPE Conservation Planning Analysis. pp 26. [ Links ]
KING JM, BROWN CA and SABET H (2003) A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for regulated rivers. Rivers Res. Appl. 19 (5-6) 619-640. [ Links ]
KING JM, THARME RE and DE VILLIERS MS (2000) Environmental Flow Assessments For Rivers: Manual for the Building Block Methodology. WRC Report No. TT 131/00. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa. [ Links ]
KOTZE JC (2002) Hydrogeology of the Table Mountain Sandstone Aquifer - Klein Karoo. Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. [ Links ].
LOW AB and ROBELO AG (1996) Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria. [ Links ]
MIDGLEY JJ and SCOTT DF (1994) The use of stable isotopes of water (D and 18O) in hydrological studies in the Jonkershoek Valley. Water SA 20 (2) 151-154. [ Links ]
MOON BP and DARDIS GF (1988) The Geomorphology of Southern Africa. Southern Book Publishers (Pty) Ltd., Johannesburg, South Africa. [ Links ]
SEMENIUK CA and SEMENIUK VA (1994) A geomorphic approach to a global classification for inland wetlands. Vegetation 118. [ Links ]
WARD RC and ROBINSON M (1990) Principles of Hydrology (3rd edn.). McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. England. [ Links ]
WINTER TC, HARVEY JW, FRANKE OL and ALLEY WM (1999) Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource. US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. [ Links ]
XU Y and BEEKMAN HE (EDS) (2003) Groundwater Recharge Estimates in Southern Africa. UNESCO IHP Series No.64, UNESCO Paris. ISBN 92-9220-000-3. [ Links ]
XU Y, TITUS R, HOLNESS SD, ZHANG J and VAN TONDER GJ (2002) A hydrogeomorphological approach to quantification of groundwater discharge to streams in South Africa. Water SA 28 (4) 375-380. [ Links ]
+27 44 802 0600;
Fax: +27 44 802 0650
Received 10 September 2007;
Accepted in revised form 27 November 2007.