Facets of the transactional leadership style of black top-managers and employee commitment in state-owned enterprises

 

 

Tabea Mabasa^I; Chukuakadibia Eresia-eke^II

^IDepartment of Business Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Email: tmabasa@me.com; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-4374
^IIDepartment of Business Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Email:chuks. eresia-eke@up.ac.za; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-474X

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The implementation of transformation policies in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in South Africa has catalysed the emergence of Black top-managers. From an organizational perspective, though, it is unclear how specific behaviours linked to the transactional leadership style (TLS), of this cohort of topmanagers, affect employee commitment
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study seeks to explore the nature of the relationship, between transactional leadership behaviours of Black top-managers and employee commitment in SOEs in South Africa
APPROACH: A quantitative approach was utilized and the data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire that was distributed to a purposive sample of employees in identified SOEs. The study's constructs were measured with previously validated instruments, specifically the multifactor leadership scale and the three-component employee commitment model. Subsequently, descriptive and inferential statistical tools were employed to analyse the data
FINDINGS: Statistically significant relationships exist between the Contingent-Reward (CR) facet of the TLS of Black top-managers and the affective, continuance and normative commitment of their employees. Conversely, the Management-by-Exception (Passive) facet of the TLS demonstrated a negative correlation with the affective and normative commitment of employees. Interestingly, no statistically significant relationship was found between the Management-by-Exception (Active) facet of the TLS and any of the three types of employee commitment
RECOMMENDATIONS/VALUE: Black top-managers should consider deploying the CR facet of the TLS to enhance employee commitment in their work groups in order to reap possible collateral benefits
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: The study's results illuminate the importance of reward systems in promoting the commitment levels of employees in South African SOEs. Mindful of the current challenges that encumber the performance of SOEs in South Africa, it is imperative for Black top-managers to continuously explore novel ways to reward the positive contributions of their employees in the quest to increase all forms of employee commitment
JEL CLASSIFICATION: M1

Keywords: Black managers; Contingent-reward; Employee commitment; Transactional leadership.

---

 

 

1. INTRODUCTION

In South Africa's pre-democratic era, when apartheid policies were applied, members of certain racial groups (Black, Coloured and Indian) were barred from playing many roles, including occupying important managerial positions. This discriminatory practice is the reason why these racial groups are labelled as 'previously-disadvantaged' groups. Notably, the South African Employment Equity Act (EEA) (No. 55 of 1998), in its quest to redress apartheid-induced racial skewness and to transform South African workplaces, classifies all previously disadvantaged racial groups as Black people. Partly due to the EEA, more Black people now occupy top leadership positions in various South African organisations.

Indeed, Luthans et al. (2004) acknowledge the entrance of more Black South Africans into all levels of organisations but warn that the resulting cultural diversity needs proactive management. Consequently, it became imperative to establish special interventions such as the South African Management Programmes to bridge gaps in the managerial acumen of targeted Black employees (Black & Geletkanycz, 2006). The whole point of such initiatives was to ensure that Black people who become managers will be able to provide requisite leadership to employees. Buoyed by this understanding, this study seeks to examine the relationship between facets of the transactional leadership style (TLS) of Black top-managers and employee commitment in South African state-owned enterprises (SOEs). It is worth highlighting that in the context of the South African SOEs, this cohort of top-managers, includes C-suite executives and division heads, who are typically responsible for providing strategic leadership (Department of Labour, 2020) and driving work performance.

The study draws impetus from extant literature (see Kumar & Krishnaraj, 2018; Yaseen et al., 2018; Abasilim et al., 2019; Ali et al., 2020; Mulugeta & Pandian, 2020) which suggests that a manager's leadership style influences employee commitment; though studies have not specifically examined the nexus of specific behaviours associated with a single leadership style and employee commitment. Interestingly, however, Oztekin et al. (2015) argue that employee commitment mirrors the quality of leadership within an organisation. Similarly, Katsaros et al. (2020) also opine that employees' commitment depends on how they view the leader and the extent to which their expectations continue to be met within the context of organisational operations.

 

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

Since employee commitment is associated with leadership behaviour in organisations, a rational projection could be that organisations need managers who exhibit leadership behaviour that lends itself to employee commitment. It is unknown whether this situation applies in South African SOEs, which is why this study sought to determine if recognized TLS behaviours demonstrate any relationship with employee commitment in Black-manager-led work units in South African SOEs. The literature review of the study therefore covers the concepts of leadership and employee commitment. Subsequently, the possible connections between facets of the TLS and employee commitment are discussed as part of the process of a deductive approach for hypotheses formulation.

2.1 Leadership

In the context of an organization, leadership refers to the power relationship between managers and their employees, while also encapsulating the process of using power to affect the behaviour of others (Northouse, 2016) with the aim of achieving organizational goals. A leadership style is typically a habitual pattern of displayed behaviours that may be moulded by factors such as philosophy, culture or values, character, education, preparation and experience (Huang et al., 2008; Schermerhorn, 2011). Given that leadership is based on a social exchange relationship between the organization and employees (Fazio etal., 2017) and the managers are drivers in these relationships, their behaviours are inevitably important. This rationale is in line with the concept of the leader-member exchange (LMX) theory which emphasises the employees' dependence on leadership. According to Harb et al. (2020), the LMX theory explicates the reciprocal influence processes within vertical manager-employee dyads in which the managers, who should provide leadership, have direct authority over their employees.

2.1.1 Transactional leadership

Daft and Marcic (2008) contend that the transactional leadership theory is founded on a traditional management process of planning, organising, leading and controlling. In essence, transactional leaders are responsible for creating proper structures, providing rewards and incentives, and considering the needs of employees in decision-making. According to Mufti et al. (2020), this style of leadership is particularly suited to managers who work in organizations in which assignments are simple and routine. It would seem, however, that the TLS involves a process of conditional exchange between a leader and subordinate, given that Pastor and Mayo (2008) argue that both parties perceive the other as being useful for the fulfilment of each other's needs. This belief signals the existence of a psychological contract between the manager and the employees that is characterised by 'give-and-take' dependencies (Mash & Cohen, 2018). In harmony with this position, Daft (2011) posits that the use of the TLS requires managers to provide the guidance that their subordinates value. The fundamental course of transactional leadership is linked to managers' accurate judgement of situational factors which are inclusive of subordinates' expectations (Ramli et al., 2019).

Liu et al. (2011) note that managers with a TLS usually operate within the strict confines of an established system. Indeed, managers who exhibit behaviours linked to the TLS typically rely on legitimate power, which gives them the formal authority to ensure that tasks are executed as directed (Kark, et al., 2018). According to Bass and Avolio (1995), there are three different behavioural facets that characterise the TLS and these are the contingent-reward (CR) behaviour, management-by-exception (Active) (MbE_A) behaviour and the management-by-exception (Passive) (MbE_P) behaviour. The Contingent-Reward (CR) behaviour is expressed when the manager aligns objectives with a reward, clarifies expectations through a discussion with the employees and makes resources available for task-execution.

Studies by Burroughs et al. (2011) as well as Eisenberger and Aselage (2009) affirm that the use of the CR facet of the TLS enhances innovation, especially when employees find the promised rewards attractive. However, Faraz, et al. (2018) warn that with time the controlling effect of rewards diminishes. This is consistent with the view of Folakemi et al. (2017), who opine that the potency of the CR facet of the TLS may be enhanced if it is complemented by other leadership behaviours.

The MbE_A behaviour manifests when a manager exercises control by closely tracking and monitoring the performance of subordinates. Emerging deviations from the set standards are corrected to ensure good performance (Crews, et al., 2019). When the performance falls below the expected standards, the manager often feeds back the information to the subordinates, sometimes with consequences as may be deemed fit. Kark, et al. (2018) aver that this type of leadership behaviour may discourage additional effort on the part of the employees because they are usually interested in fulfilling only basic obligations.

The MbE_P behaviour is evident when the manager does not act, except when there are escalations or when objectives have not been met (Wahyuni et al., 2020). This approach means the manager does not intervene in employees' work, except in the face of a problem that cannot be ignored. Jones and Jones (2017) posit that given that leadership behaviours are transmissible, passive managers send organisationally damaging signals to employees, who might then become passive as well.

2.2 Employee commitment

Allen and Meyer's (1990) study presents employee commitment as the psychological state that differentiates employees' desire to remain within an organization and their likelihood to quit. There are three types of employee commitment: affective commitment, continuous commitment and normative commitment (Al-Jabari & Ghazzawi, 2019). Affective commitment refers to the employees' emotional attachment to, identification with, and involvement in the organization (Riketta & Van Dick, 2005) Continuous commitment stems from considerations of costs associated with leaving the organization (Curtis & Wright, 2001), while normative commitment reflects the employees' feeling of obligation to remain within the organization (Allen & Meyer, 1996). In effect, according to Bergman (2006), employees may choose to remain within an organization because they want to (affective), they have to (normative) or they need to (continuance).

and Meyer's (1990) study presents employee commitment as the psychological state that differentiates employees' desire to remain within an organization and their likelihood to quit. There are three types of employee commitment: affective commitment, continuous commitment and normative commitment (Al-Jabari & Ghazzawi, 2019). Affective commitment refers to the employees' emotional attachment to, identification with, and involvement in the organization (Riketta & Van Dick, 2005) Continuous commitment refers to commitment based on costs associated with leaving the organization (Curtis & Wright, 2001), while normative commitment refers to the employees' feeling of obligation to remain within the organization (Allen & Meyer, 1996). In effect, according to Bergman (2006), employees may choose to remain within an organization because they want to (affective), they have to (normative) or they need to (continuance).

The employee commitment construct can be considered from a multidimensional perspective because as subordinates become involved in different aspects of their work, their depth of involvement varies over time (Baron, 2012). This practice suggests that the application of specific TLS facets by Black top-managers in SOEs may be associated with different employee commitment types. It would be rational to project that the manifestation of a particular commitment type, as observed by Georges (2020), might depend upon the way that employees perceive the specific transactional leadership behaviour of managers. This position is reinforced by the assertion of Landis et al. (2014) that in recognition of the variances in employees' preferences, and in line with the proposition of behavioural and situational leadership theories, effective leadership is contextual. The implication of this submission is that results from previous studies conducted in other settings, particularly in developed countries, cannot provide a veritable premise to determine the nature of the relationships that might exist between different behaviours linked to the TLS and employee commitment in South African SOEs.

2.3 Facets of TLS and employee commitment

Several studies (McLaggan et al., 2013; Guyo et al., 2019; Ramli et al., 2019; Alemayehu & Batisa, 2020; Ene, 2020; Khan et al., 2020) have revealed that a positive relationship exists between TLS and employee commitment. Conversely, studies by Cho et al. (2019) as well as Wulani et al. (2019) reveal that managers' TLS demonstrates a negative association with employee commitment. Despite the lack of harmony in research findings pertaining to the direction of the relationship between a TLS and employee commitment, Baloch et al. (2014) insist that TLS, considered as a mono-construct, remains a strong predictor of employee commitment.

More specifically, some studies (Cho et al., 2019; Guyo et al., 2019) have shown that TLS demonstrates a significant relationship with affective commitment. In particular, Yahaya and Ebrahim (2016) assert that managers who adopt the CR facet of the TLS provide followers with material and psychological rewards based on the fulfilment of contractual obligations. In light of theories such as the LMX theory, social exchange theory and organizational justice theory, it is clear that these rewards are personal, and the determination of whether the rewards are equitable or not is dependent upon the employees (Ko & Hur, 2014). In essence, the existence of the employee-organization exchange relationship, facilitated by the manager, does not necessarily ensure employee commitment. As it pertains to the MbE_A facet of the TLS, Emery and Barker (2007) argue that MbE_A may be ineffectual when employees view it as tantamount to micromanagement or disempowerment practices by the manager.

Regarding the MbE_P facet of the TLS, which Sayadi (2016) refers to as a non-leadership approach, Lee et al. (2019) argue that managers who use it are unlikely to invest any effort in-building relationships with employees. The feature of infrequent exchanges characteristic of the use of MbE_P could erode any implications this approach might have for the affective commitment of employees. Cognizant of the different positions in the extant literature with respect to the possible associations between facets of TLS and affective commitment of employees, within the context of South African SOEs, the following null hypotheses are formulated for this study:

H1o: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the CR facet of the TLS and the affective commitment of their employees.

H20: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the MbE_A facet of the TLS and the affective commitment of their employees.

H3o: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the MbE_P facet of the TLS and the affective commitment of their employees.

With respect to continuance commitment, studies by Mash and Cohen (2018) as well as Silva and Mendis (2017) established that a significant positive relationship exists between the TLS and continuance commitment. Conversely, research undertaken by Devi (2016) and Zaraket and Sawma's (2018) found that there is a negative relationship between a manager's use of the TLS and employees' continuance commitment.

More specifically, Bycio et al. (1995) claim that the use of the CR facet of the TLS does not correlate with employees' continuance commitment. This fact may be because CR behaviour of the TLS is displayed by managers who are dependent upon favourable transactions with employees to satisfy both employee and organizational expectations (Judge & Piccolo, 2004). In the specific context of public organizations, Ko and Hur (2014) established that while the use of various tactics, such as performance-contingent rewards, may be prevalent, such organizations are continually grappling with the challenge of increasing financial difficulties, and these problems make it more arduous to continue with the rewards practice.

While the MbE_A behaviour requires managers to monitor deviations and errors in order to maintain workplace stability (Moriano et al., 2014), the MbE_P facet of the TLS is generally considered as a passive-avoidance approach (Ramchunder & Martins, 2014). Given that employee continuance commitment is contingent upon the availability of external opportunities (Meyer et al., Stanley et al., 2002:32), managers' display of behaviours that are concomitant with the facets of a TLS, therefore, may not influence this type of employee commitment. The different positions advanced by scholars highlight the importance of context in the examination of the relationship between managers' use of facets of TLS and employees' continuance commitment. Consequently, with respect to the situation in South African SOEs, this study hypothesises that:

H4o: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the CR facet of the TLS and the continuance commitment of their employees.

H5o: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the MbE_A facet of the TLS and the continuance commitment of their employees.

H6o: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the MbE_P facet of the TLS and the continuance commitment of their employees.

Focusing on normative commitment, the findings of Donkor and Zhou's (2020) study show that a positive relationship exists between the TLS of a manager and the normative commitment of employees, though Biza and Irbo (2020) contend that the identified relationship is weak. In contrast, however, Khan et al. (2020) found no correlation between the manager's TLS and employees' normative commitment.

According to Jabeen et al. (2015), the TLS entails an economic exchange between the organization and its employees. Stemming from this observation, Valaei and Rezaei (2016) found that the CR behaviour of a manager correlates positively with the normative commitment of employees. Notably, the financial strain experienced by organizations compels them to change their focus from a patriarchal employer-employee relationship in which the employer takes care of the employees by providing them with upward mobility and job security to a strict transactional employer-employee relationship (Suazo & Stone-Romero, 2011). This latter relationship implies that it becomes more challenging for managers to display behaviours linked to the TLS with the hope of nurturing normative commitment of employees because doing so may not necessarily encourage employees to remain within the organization. It is against this backdrop that this study proposes that within South African SOEs:

H7o: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the CR facet of the TLS and the normative commitment of their employees.

Hso: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the MbE_A facet of the TLS and the normative commitment of their employees.

Hgo: There is no relationship between Black top-managers' use of the MbE_P facet of the TLS and the normative commitment of their employees.

 

3. METHODOLOGY

This study adopted a positivistic philosophical approach, which is based on the observable social reality acquired independently. The research framework utilized in this study is compatible with comparable studies in the leadership behavioural domain (see Adserias et al., 2017; Frost, 2017; George et al., 2017; Markiz et al., 2017).

In line with research practices based upon the positivism paradigm, this is a quantitative study, and primary data was collected using a survey. A cross-sectional time-horizon was applied to the study because the data was collected at a single point in time through self-administered questionnaires that were distributed electronically.

Purposive sampling was employed to create a respondent pool because the sampling technique allowed the researchers to identify direct reports of Black top-managers who fit Jupp's (2006:245) description of the group of people who can provide relevant data. The details of 130 listed SOEs in South Africa across its nine provinces (Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Northern Cape, North-West and Western Cape) were obtained from the Government Communication and Information System published records. All the SOEs were approached through their human resource departments. A total of 26 SOEs consented to their employees' participation in the study. Reliant on a mix of purposive sampling and the snowball technique, a total of 596 questionnaires were distributed. The study achieved a response rate of 39 percent which equates to 232 returned and usable questionnaires.

The survey instrument comprised an adapted version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), developed by Avolio and Bass (2004) for the measurement of the facets of TLS, as well as Meyer and Allen's (1997) Three Component Model (TCM) questionnaire for measuring types of employee commitment. Items in the MLQ and TCM questionnaires were accompanied by five-point Likert answer options. The results of the reliability test for the MLQ and TCM scales for the current study are comparable to those obtained in previous studies. The Cronbach alpha values resulting from the reliability tests conducted in this study and previous studies are shown in Table 1.

As shown in Table 1, the Cronbach alpha values obtained for the current study are above the 0.7 threshold prescribed by Louangrath (2018) as well as Taber (2018). Further, confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the model fit in the study. The values of RMSEA (0.06), GFI (0.94), AGFI (0.90), GFI (0.94) and CMIN/DF (1.95) meet the minimum threshold as recommended by Hair et al. (2010). Consequent upon the results obtained for the reliability analysis and the confirmatory factor analysis, the scales for measuring the facets of the TLS and types of employee commitment were, therefore, considered to be fit for use in this study.

 

4. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

Figures 1 and 2 show the race and level of education of respondents who partook in this study. The race distribution of participants is 62.1 percent Black, 21.6 percent White, 7.3 percent Coloured and 9.1 percent Indian. This range is not remarkably different from the composition of the overall population at the top-management level in SOEs, which according to the Department of Labour (2020) is 60 percent Black, 22.8 percent White, 6.4 percent Coloured and 9.2 percent Indian, while the rest are foreign nationals. In essence, in the studied population, as well as in the SOEs generally, Black people predominate other racial groups.

Figure 2 indicates that 8.6 percent of the n=232 participants have a Grade 12 (National Senior) certificate, 19.4 percent have a diploma and 72 percent have a bachelor's degree. According to Statistics South Africa (2016), the number of persons who have attained a bachelor's degree across all ages in South Africa has increased. This progress is evident in the respondent population of this study because more than 70 percent of them hold a bachelor's degree. More instructively, 53 percent of all the respondents have a postgraduate qualification.

Bivariate analysis was used to test the possible existence of relationships between the facets of TLS and the three types of employee commitment. The results are presented in Table 2.

In the context of South African SOEs, specifically within the studied population, results indicate that there is a statistically significant positive relationship between Black top-managers' use of the CR facet of the TLS and affective commitment (r = 0.34, p = 0.000); continuance commitment (r = 0.16, p = 0.018); and normative commitment (r = 0.35, p = 0.000). The null hypotheses of the study, H₁o H40 and H70, therefore, are not statistically supported. Interestingly, these results align with those of Alkahtani (2016) and Korir and Kipkebut (2016), who found a relationship between CR and all types of employee commitment.

As it relates to the MbE_A facet of the TLS, the study's results as shown in Table 2 revealed no statistically significant relationships between Black top-managers' use of MbE_A and affective commitment (r = -0.04, p = 0.504), continuance commitment (r = 0.10, p = 0.125), and normative commitment (r = 0.04, p = 0.530) in the studied population of employees in South African SOEs. The null hypotheses of the study, H20, H50 and H₅o, therefore, are statistically supported. This position is congruent with McLaggan et al.'s (2013) finding that there is no statistically significant association between MbE_A and all types of employee commitment. The result, however, contradicts Gardner's (2018) findings that a correlation exists between MbE_A and the affective, normative and continuous commitment of employees.

With respect to the MbE_P facet of the TLS of Black top-managers and its association with employee commitment, this study's results signal that a statistically significant negative relationship exists between MbE_P and affective commitment (r = -0.25, p = 0.000) as well as normative commitment (r = -0.19, p = 0.005). This result resonates with the findings of Al-Yami, et al. (2019) that a negative correlation exists between MbE_P and the affective and normative commitment of employees. As shown in Table 2, there is no statistically significant relationship between MbE_P and continuance commitment (r = -0.08, p = 0.202), which is consistent with the findings of earlier studies conducted by Lee (2005) and Delegach et al. (2017). Based on this study's results, the hypothesised relationships as expressed in H30 and H90 are not statistically supported, while the converse is the case for H₆0.

 

5. DISCUSSION

The study's results point to the existence of a significant relationship between the CR facet of the TLS and employees' affective, normative and continuance commitment. This result means that the use of incentives by Black top-managers' is associated with employees' choice to continue working for the SOE. It may, therefore, be that employees' interest in the rewards offered by Black top-managers in SOEs relates to their continued stay within the SOEs. Lending credence to this position, Arnold et al., (2015:483) contend that CR is the most favourable and effective behavioural facet of a TLS, owing to the connection of reciprocal exchanges between employees and their managers.

In the context of this study, it would appear that the respondents acknowledge and appreciate the rewards offered by Black top-managers, which may be related to personal development and career progression, among others. It would seem, therefore, that Black top-managers have the opportunity to use rewards as leverage to keep employees committed and to retain talent within SOEs. However, it is imperative to recognise that the effects of using the TLS's CR facet are largely temporary, because such effects crystallise only insofar as the rewards are appealing and continue to be offered to employees.

The findings of this study further showed that a negative statistically significant relationship exists between MbE_P and the affective and normative commitment of employees. Indeed, Skogstad et al. (2007) as well as Aasland et al. (2010) conclude that MbE_P has a negative effect on employees' attitudes and performance. This finding can be appreciated against the backdrop of the fact that the use of the MbE_P facet of TLS equates to the absence of interference by a manager in the work of employees and this behaviour inevitably means that hardly any guidance is provided by the manager to support employee efforts. This practice may be feasible because the distinctive context of the South African SOEs is such that the hierarchical structure and function is heavily characterised by strict rules and regulations, which are often documented as part of the SOEs' policies and standard operating procedures.

The implication of working in a setting of this nature is that employees confront automatic restrictions that foist an air of autonomous operations. This results in fewer interactions between Black top-managers and their employees, while the usual recourse to documented procedures reduces the likelihood of employee commitment being associated with a manager's display of MbE_P behaviour. In the context of this study, it may be that although employees have a preference for autonomy, they still expect some interaction with Black topmanagers who should provide structure and direction. The study's revelation that no significant relationship exists between MbE_P and continuance commitment is understandable given that continuance commitment depends on the accessibility of external opportunities (Meyer et al., 2002).

In addition, when the MbE_A facet of the TLS was considered, no statistically significant relationship could be found with affective, normative and continuance commitment. A plausible explanation, in the context of this study, could be that given the study respondents' levels of qualification and comparatively senior positions, it would not be necessary for the Black topmanagers to constantly be involved in their employees' work. These employees, therefore, may prefer autonomy over close monitoring or micromanagement.

 

6. CONCLUSION

The study sought to determine if there were any relationships between facets of the TLS displayed by Black top-managers and particular types of employee commitment in South African SOEs. The findings revealed that the CR facet of the TLS is statistically associated with the three types of employee commitment. These results illuminate the significance of reward systems in promoting the commitment levels of employees in South African SOEs. With the current challenges faced by SOEs in South Africa and the evolving needs of employees, it is even more imperative for leadership to continually seek ways to reward employees, since CR correlates with different types of employee commitment.

This study, therefore, contributes to the body of knowledge within the scope of leadership because it provides insight about specific leadership behaviours among Black top-managers in South African SOEs that could lend themselves to different types of employee commitment. This is critical as it may result in benefits such as talent retention and increased employee performance at SOEs. Further, the study contributes to African leadership and management literature because it expounds various relationships between facets of the TLS and employee commitment in a peculiar African context.

 

7. FUTURE RESEARCH

In this study, the facets of TLS were uniquely treated as sub-constructs relative to previous leadership studies that have tended to bind these sub-constructs into the mono-construct of transactional leadership. Arguably, the prevalent treatment of the TLS as a mono-construct clearly limits the explanatory powers of such studies. It is recommended, therefore, that future studies should test the different facets of the TLS as sub-constructs in order to establish how each facet relates to employee commitment in different work contexts and cultural environments within the African continent. Furthermore, while the study showed that the CR facet of the TLS has a relationship with all types of employee commitment, exploring how specific forms of rewards influence the different strands of employee commitment could prove insightful.

 

REFERENCES

Aasland, M., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. & Einarsen, S. 2010. The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2):438-452. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00672.x].         [ Links ]

Abasilim, U., Gberevbie, D. & Osibanjo. 2019. Leadership styles and employees' commitment: empirical evidence from Nigeria. SAGE Open, 9(3):1-15. [https://doi.org/10/10.1177/2158244019866287].         [ Links ]

Adserias, R., Charleston, L. & Jackson, J. 2017. What style of leadership is best suited to direct organisational change to fuel institutional diversity in higher education? Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(3):315-331. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1260233].         [ Links ]

Alemayehu, A. & Batisa, S. 2020. The effect of leadership style on employee's organizational commitment: the case of Wolaita and Dawro Zone transport private limited companies. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 7(1):12-21.         [ Links ]

Ali, N., Ali, M. & Sheraz, M. 2020. Impact of leadership style on employee's commitment: moderating role of organization politics: a case study of public sector universities of KPK. Global Regional Review, 1:40-50. [http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020 (V-I).06].         [ Links ]

Al-Jabari, B. & Ghazzawi, I. 2019. Organizational commitment: a review of the conceptual and empirical literature and a research agenda. International Leadership Journal, 11(1):78-108.         [ Links ]

Alkahtani, A. 2016. The influence of leadership styles on organisational commitment: the moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Business and Management Studies, 2(1):23-34. [https://doi.org/10.11114/bms.v2i1.1091].         [ Links ]

Allen, N. & Meyer, J. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organisation. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 63(1):1-18. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x].         [ Links ]

Allen, N. & Meyer, J. 1996. Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organisation: an examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 49:252-276. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043].         [ Links ]

Al-Yami, M., Galdas, P. & Watson, R. 2019. Factor analysis and Mokken scaling of the organisational commitment questionnaire in nurses. International Nursing Review, 66(1):52-60. [https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12454https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12454].         [ Links ]

Arnold, K.A., Connelly, C.E., Walsh, M.M. & Martin Ginis, K.A. 2015. Leadership styles, emotion regulation, and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(4):481-490. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039045].         [ Links ]

Avolio, B. & Bass, B. 2004. Multifactor leadership questionnaire: MLQ; manual and sampler set. Mind Garden.         [ Links ]

Baloch, Q., Ali, N. & Zaman, G. 2014. Measuring employees' commitment as outcome of transformational and transactional leadership styles: an empirical study. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2):208-214.         [ Links ]

Baron, A. 2012. What do engagement measures really mean? Strategic Human Resource Review, 12(1):21-25. [https://doi.org/10.1108/14754391311282450].         [ Links ]

Avolio, B. & Bass, B. 1995. Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: a multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The leadership quarterly, 6(2):199-218. [https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90035-7].         [ Links ]

Behery, M. & Al-Nasser, A. 2016. Examining the impact of leadership style and coaching on employees' commitment and trust: mediation effect of bullying and job alienation. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(2):291-314. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2014-0749].         [ Links ]

Bergman, M. 2006. The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 27(5):645-663. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.372].         [ Links ]

Biza, T & Irbo, M. 2020. The impact of leadership styles on employee commitment in Madda Walabu University. African Journal of Business Management, 14(9):291-300. [https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2018.8603].         [ Links ]

Black, S. & Geletkanycz, M. 2006. The new breed of black South African senior managers: helping South African businesses meet the challenge of a transforming economy. Eastern Academy of Management, 3(2):94-114. [https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2006.12].         [ Links ]

Burroughs, J., Dahl, D., Moreau, C., Chattopadhyay, A. & Gorn, G. 2011. Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing, 75(4):53-67. [https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.53].         [ Links ]

Bycio, P., Hackett, R. & Allen, J. 1995. Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4):468-478. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.468].         [ Links ]

Cho, Y., Shin, M., Billing, T. & Bhagat, R. 2019. Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and affective organizational commitment: a closer look at their relationships in two distinct national contexts. Asian Business and Management, 18(3):187-210. [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00059-1].         [ Links ]

Crews, E., Brouwers, M. & Visagie, J. 2019. Transformational and transactional leadership effects on communication styles. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 29(5):421-428. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2019.1675996].         [ Links ]

Curtis, S. & Wright, D. 2001. Retaining employees: the fast track to commitment. Management Research News, 24(8/9):59-64. [https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170110782964].         [ Links ]

Daft, R. 2011. The leadership experience. (5th edn.). Boston, MA: Cengage.         [ Links ]

Daft, R. & Marcic, D. 2008. Management: The new workplace. Florence: Evans Publishing Group.         [ Links ]

Delegach, M., Kark, R., Katz-Navon, T. & Van Dijk, D. 2017. A focus on commitment: The roles of transformational and transactional leadership and self-regulatory focus in fostering organisational and safety commitment. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 26(5):724-740. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1345884].         [ Links ]

Department of Labour. 2020. Commission for employment equity annual report 2018/2019. Retrieved 5 August 2020 from www.labour.gov.za.         [ Links ]

Devi, R. 2016. A study of relationships between leadership styles, job satisfaction and organisational commitment. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(8):508-513.         [ Links ]

Donkor, F. & Zhou, D. 2020. Organisational commitment influences on the relationship between transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles and employee performance in the Ghanaian public service environment. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 30(1):30-36. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1712808].         [ Links ]

Eisenberger, R. & Aselage, J. 2009. Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: Positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity. Journal of Organisational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organisational Psychology and Behavior, 30(1):95-117.[https://doi.org/10.1002/job.543].         [ Links ]

Emery, C. & Barker, K. 2007. The effect of transactional and transformational leadership styles on the organisational commitment and job satisfaction of customer contact personnel. Journal of Organisational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 11(1):77-90.         [ Links ]

Ene, C. 2020. Transactional leadership style and employee intention to stay in insurance companies in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. International Journal of Innovative Social Science and Humanities Research, 8(1):40-47.         [ Links ]

Faraz, N, Yanxia, C., Ahmed, F., Estifo, Z. & Raza, A. 2018. The influence of transactional leadership on innovative work behaviour: a mediation model. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 7(1):51-62. [http://www.ejbss.com/recent.aspx-/].         [ Links ]

Fazio, J., Gong, B., Sims, R. & Yurova, Y. 2017. The role of affective commitment in the relationship between social support and turnover intention. Management Decision, 55(3):512-525. [https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2016-0338].         [ Links ]

Folakemi, O., Anthonia, A. & Dayo, A.I. 2017. Human resource management practices and organisational commitment: Employees' perspectives in the Nigerian hospitality sector. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(10):246-255. [https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v4i10.3090].         [ Links ]

Frost, G. 2017. The impact of leadership on the vision of growth at a pharmaceutical company in South Africa. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research, 2(3):449-471.         [ Links ]

Gardner, A. 2018. The relationship between organisational commitment and transformational and transactional leadership styles in government contract employees. Doctoral dissertation. Lynchburg, VA: Liberty University.         [ Links ]

Garg, A. & Ramjee, D. 2013. The relationship between leadership styles and employee commitment at a parastatal company in South Africa. The International Business & Economics Research Journal, 12(11):1411 -1436. [https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v12i11.8180].         [ Links ]

George, R., Chiba, M. & Scheepers, C. 2017. An investigation into the effect of leadership style on stress-related presenteeism in South African knowledge workers. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1):1-13. [https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v15i0.754].         [ Links ]

Georges, F. 2020. Organisational Commitment: a REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION FROM SIDE-BETS TO THE THREE-COMPONENT CONCEPTUALISATION MODEL. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 20(5):1-7. Retrieved from: [https://www.journalofbusiness.org/index.phpb/GJMBR/article/view/3051].         [ Links ]

Guyo, A. Zeleke, B., Adem, B. & Abera, G. 2019. The link among leadership styles and academic staff organizational commitment: The case of Dire Dawa University. East African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1):91-108.         [ Links ]

Hair, J., Black, W., Barbin, B., Anderson, R. & Tatham, R. 2010. Multivariate data analysis with readings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.         [ Links ]

Harb, B., Hachem, B. & Hamdan, H. 2021. Public servants' perception of leadership style and its impact on organizational commitment. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4):319. [http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.26].         [ Links ]

Huang, Q., Davidson, R.M., Liu, H. & Gu, J. 2008. The impact of leadership on knowledge-sharing intentions in China, Journal of Global Information Management, 16(4):67-91. [https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2008100104].         [ Links ]

Huang, X., Shi, K., Zhang, Z. & Cheung, Y. 2006. The impact of participative leadership behavior on psychological empowerment and organisational commitment in Chinese state-owned enterprises: the moderating role of organisational tenure. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(3):345-367. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9006-3].         [ Links ]

Jabeen, F., Behery, M. & Abu Elanain, H. 2015. Examining the relationship between the psychological contract and organisational commitment: the mediating effect of transactional leadership in the UAE context. International Journal of Organisational Analysis, 23(1):102-122. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2014-0812].         [ Links ]

Jones, E. & Jones, R. 2017. Leadership style and career success of women leaders in non-profit organisations. Advancing Women in Leadership, (37):37-48.         [ Links ]

Judge, T. & Piccolo, R. 2004. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5):755-768. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755].         [ Links ]

Jupp, V. 2006. The sage dictionary of social research methods. London: SAGE Publications. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020116].         [ Links ]

Kark, R., Van Dijk, D. & Vashdi, D. 2018. Motivated or demotivated to be creative: the role of self-regulatory focus in transformational and transactional leadership processes. Applied Psychology, 67(1):186-224. [https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12122].         [ Links ]

Katsaros, K., Tsirikas, A. & Kosta, G. 2020. The impact of leadership on firm financial performance: the mediating role of employees' readiness to change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. [https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2019-0088].         [ Links ]

Khan, M., Yaseen, Z. & Khan, I. 2020. The impact of leadership styles on employees' commitment in higher educational context. Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review, 1(2):54-60. [https://doi.org/10.36902/rJsser-vol1-iss2-2020].         [ Links ]

Ko, J. & Hur, S. 2014. The impacts of employee benefits, procedural justice, and managerial trustworthiness on work attitudes: Integrated understanding based on social exchange theory. Public Administration Review, 74(2):176-187. [https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12160].         [ Links ]

Koech, P. & Namusonge, G. 2012. The effect of leadership styles on organisational performance at state corporations in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 2(1):1-12.         [ Links ]

Korir, I. & Kipkebut, D. 2016. The effect of reward management on employee commitment in the universities in Nakutu Count-Kenya. Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(4):37-48. [https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jh rm.20160404.12].         [ Links ]

Kumar, G. & Krishnaraj, R. 2018. Influence of leadership styles on employees' commitment to service quality. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Systems, 11 (1):38-46. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iJhm.2013.02.001].         [ Links ]

Landis, E., Hill, D. & Harvey, M. 2014. A synthesis of leadership theories and styles. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(2):97-100.         [ Links ]

Lee, J. 2005. Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment. Leadership and Organisational Development Journal, 26(8):655-672. [https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633728].         [ Links ]

Lee, M., Idris, M. & Tuckey, M. 2019. Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3):257-282. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1530170].         [ Links ]

Liu, J., Liu, X. & Zeng, X. 2011. Does transactional leadership count for team innovativeness? The moderating roles of emotional labor and the mediating roles of team efficacy. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 24(3):282-298. [https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132695].         [ Links ]

Lo, M., Ramayah, T., Min, H. & Songan, P. 2010. The relationship between leadership styles and organisational commitment in Malaysia: Role of leader-member exchange. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1-2):79-103. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380903355676].         [ Links ]

Louangrath, P. 2018. Reliability and validity of survey scales. International Journal of Research in Social Science, 4(1):50-62. [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2545006].         [ Links ]

Luthans, F., Van Wyk, R. & Walumbwa, F. 2004. Recognition and development of hope for South African organisational leaders. Leadership & Organisation Development Journal, 25(6):512-527. [https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410556752].         [ Links ]

Markiz, Y., Margono, S., Wirawan, I. & Ainur, R. 2017. The influences of leadership styles, organisational communication, and job satisfaction toward employees' job performance in doing construction jobs: A study on three construction companies in Jakarta. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 65(5):168-180. [https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2017-05.23].         [ Links ]

Mash, R. & Cohen, L. 2018. Followers' perception of leadership style, organisational commitment and regulatory focus, moderated by organisational types. Asian Journal of Social Science and Management Studies, 5(3):137-146. [https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.500.2018.53.137.146].         [ Links ]

McLaggan, E., Botha, C. & Bezuidenhout, A. 2013. Leadership style and organisational commitment in the mining industry in Mpumalanga. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1):1-9. [https://doi/pdf/10.4102/saJhrm.v11i1.483].         [ Links ]

Meyer, J. & Allen, N. 1997. Commitment in the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.         [ Links ]

Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. 2002. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organisation: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1):20-52. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842].         [ Links ]

Moriano, J., Molero, F., Topa, G. & Mangin, J. 2014. The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1):103-119. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0196-x].         [ Links ]

Muenjohn, N. & Armstrong, A. 2008. Evaluating the structural validity of the multifactor leadership questionnaire (MLQ), capturing the leadership factors of transformational-transactional leadership. Contemporary Management Research, 4(1):3-14. [https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.704].         [ Links ]

Mufti, M., Xiaobao, P., Shah, S., Sarwar, A. & Zhenqing, Y. 2020. Influence of leadership style on job satisfaction of NGO employee: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1):1-11. [https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1983].         [ Links ]

Mulugeta, A. & Pandian, A. 2020. The relationship between leadership styles and employee commitment in public organizations of Dire Dawa administration, Ethiopia. Leadership, 29(8):2018-2025.         [ Links ]

Northouse, P. 2016. Leadership: theory and practice. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.         [ Links ]

Öztekin, Ö., iççi, S. & Karadag, E. 2015. The effect of leadership on organizational commitment. In Leadership and Organizational Outcomes, 57-79. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14908-0-4].         [ Links ]

Pastor, J. & Mayo, M. 2008. Transformational leadership among Spanish upper echelons. Leadership & Organisation Development Journal, 29(4):340-358. [https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810876140].         [ Links ]

Ramchunder, Y. & Martins, N. 2014. The role of self-efficacy, emotional intelligence and leadership style as attributes of leadership effectiveness. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1):1-11. [https://doi/abs/10.4102/sajip.v40i1.1100].         [ Links ]

Ramli, Y., Magito, S. & Khotimah, M. 2019. The role of transactional leadership towards organisational commitment. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 20(5):50-57.         [ Links ]

Riketta, M. & Van Dick, R. 2005. Foci of attachment in organisations: a meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organisational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 67:490-510. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.06.001].         [ Links ]

Sayadi, Y. 2016. The effect of dimensions of transformational, transactional, and non-leadership on the job satisfaction and organisational commitment of teachers in Iran. Management in Education, 30(2):57-65. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020615625363].         [ Links ]

Schermerhorn, J. 2011. Introduction to management. 11th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.         [ Links ]

Silva, D. & Mendis, B. 2017. Male vs female leaders: Analysis of transformational, transactional & laissez-faire women leadership styles. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(9):19-26.         [ Links ]

Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M., & Hetland, H. 2007. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1):80-92. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.8080].         [ Links ]

Statistics South Africa. 2016. Community survey. Statistical release P0301. Retrieved 12 August 2020 from www.statssa.gov.za.         [ Links ]

Stum, D. 1999. Workforce commitment: Strategies for the new work order. Strategy & Leadership, 27(1):4-7. [https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054623].         [ Links ]

Suazo, M. & Stone-Romero, E. 2011. Implications of psychological contract breach: a perceived organisational support perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(5):366-382. [https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941111138994].         [ Links ]

Taber, K. 2018. The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6):1273-1296.         [ Links ]

Valaei, N. & Rezaei, S. 2016. Job satisfaction and organisational commitment: an empirical investigation among ICT-SMEs. Management Research Review, 39(12):1663-1694. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216].         [ Links ]

Wahyuni, N., Purwandari, D. & Syah, T. 2020. Transactional leadership, motivation and employee performance. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic, 3(5):156-161.         [ Links ]

Wulani, F., Supriharyanti, E. & Agustian, B. 2019. Leadership style, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior on Credit Union in Indonesia. European Journal of Business and Management, 11(14):80-88. [https://doi.org/10.7176/EJBM/11-14-09].         [ Links ]

Yahaya, R. & Ebrahim, F. 2016. Leadership styles and organizational commitment: Literature review. Journal of Management Development, 35(2):190-216. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2015-0004].         [ Links ]

Yaseen, S., Ali, H. & Asrar-ul-Haq, M. 2018. Impact of organisational culture and leadership style on employee commitment towards change in higher education institutions of Pakistan. Paradigms, 12(1): 44-53. [https://org/10.24312/paradigms120107].         [ Links ]

Yousef, D. 2017. Organisational commitment, job satisfaction and attitudes toward organisational change: a study in the local government. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1):77-88. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1072217].         [ Links ]

Zaraket, W. & Sawma, A. 2018. The effect of transactional and transformational leadership styles on the components of organisational commitment: case of the banking sector in Lebanon. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 7(2):131 -142.         [ Links ]