ARTICLES

 

Appraisal of Selected Themes on the Impact of International Standards on Labour and Social Security Law in South Africa

 

 

CI Tshoose^*

University of Limpopo, South Africa. Email: itumeleng.tshoose@ul.ac.za

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

For many years, South African courts have relied on International Labour Organisation conventions to interpret and give meaning to the fundamental social security and labour law rights enshrined in the Constitution, 1996. Social security and labour law has been one of the ILO's major initiatives of promoting decent work agenda since its inception in 1919. Decent work refers to the availability of employment in conditions of freedom, justice, security and human dignity. This is a multidimensional concept introduced by the ILO in 1999. It has four key components, namely, employment conditions, social security, workplace rights and social dialogue. To this end, the preamble to the ILO Constitution sets out several objectives in this regard, including the protection of workers from illness, accidents, the protection of children, women, and the support of the elderly. The ILO pursues these noble values and goals by developing international labour and social security standards, which member states must ratify and incorporate into their national law. The purpose of these ILO standards is to provide a standard framework or regulatory tool to guide member states in establishing, improving and maintaining social security and labour law systems domestically, regionally and internationally. Against this background, this article examines selected themes on the impact of international standards on labour and social security rights enshrined in the Constitution. It looks at some of the relevant international instruments which have influenced the promotion and protection of these rights. Furthermore, it shows how the courts have infused these standards into their judgments in South Africa.

Keywords: International Labour Organisation; international standards; decent work; social justice; social security; labour standards; human rights; South African courts.

---

 

 

1 Introduction

Since its inception in 1919 the International Labour Organisation (hereafter the ILO) has played an important role in the development of an internationally defined regulatory framework that guides the creation, development and maintenance of social security and labour law systems worldwide and has become a leading global starting point for efforts to this end.¹

The ILO sets international standards in the form of conventions and concomitant recommendations. These international standards are international agreements that can be ratified by the member states. ² The ILO standards set out the basic principles to be followed by a ratifying State, whilst the relevant recommendations complement the Convention by providing detailed guidance on its implementation. In this context, ILO labour and social security standards are a unique set of legal instruments that give concrete meaning to the trait of human right to labour and social security contained in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, 1948 and in the International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966.

Considering the above, this article has the following three objectives. First, it gives a concise overview of how the ILO sets the international standards. Secondly, it scrutinises the impact of these international standards in the context of social security and labour law, and touches on the human rights framework that has shaped South Africa's labour and social security law. Thirdly, it discusses the application of international standards in domestic courts, and refers to judicial decisions where courts have used universal sources of the ILO's international labour and social security standards.

 

2 A brief background, motivation and conceptual clarification of the notion social security

South Africa's social security system is comprised of contributory and non-contributory social protection programmes, the former requires contribution from both the employer and the employee while the latter is tax financed, administered by the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA), with the Department of Social Development playing an oversight and management role. To a certain extent labour law and social security law are intrinsically linked as one field of study. Social security is therefore provided through social insurance and social assistance which requires means testing to determine eligibility. Whereas labour rights are entitlements that relate specifically to the role of being a worker. Some of these rights are exercised individually and others collectively. They can include a right to work in a job freely chosen, a right to fair working conditions, which may encompass issues as diverse as a just wage or protection of privacy; a right to be protected from arbitrary and unjustified dismissal; a right to belong to and be represented by a trade union; a right to strike.

To this end, this article examines the impact of international standards on labour and social security law in South Africa. The evaluation is important in order to determine whether the national legislation is in line with international instruments which allude to social security and labour law as a fundamental human right to which every human being is entitled.

As outlined in section 27(1)(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (hereafter the Constitution), social security is a fundamental right. However, the Constitution is silent on how it is meant to be understood. Consequently, academic discourse, governmental policies and the jurisprudence of courts is used to provide conceptual understanding of social security. Accordingly, social security encompasses a wide array of public and private initiatives that provide cash or in-kind benefits, or both, in response to an individual's earnings capacity ceasing to exist.³ The glossary in the Social Welfare White Paper⁴ defines social security as the policies which ensure that all people have adequate economic and social protection during times of unemployment, ill health, maternity, child rearing, disability and old age, by means of contributory and non-contributory schemes that provide for their basic needs.⁵ In light of the above, South Africa has incorporated some of the principles of the ILO's social security instruments into its domestic law, as will be shown later in this article.

 

3 A constitutional perspective to international social security and labour standards

In its 2019 Centenary Declaration, the ILO recognised that general and sustainable peace can only be achieved if it is based on social justice, and the need to improve conditions for the rights of workers around the world, including the right to social security.⁶ The ILO has captured succinctly the motivation behind the international labour and social security standards when it stated that:

An international legal framework on social standards ensures a level playing field in the global economy. It helps governments and employers to avoid the temptation of lowering labour standards in the belief that this could give them a greater comparative advantage in international trade. Because international labour standards are minimum standards adopted by governments and the social partners, it is in everyone's interest to see these rules applied across the board, so that those who do not put them into practice do not undermine the efforts of those who do.⁷

These standards comprise of conventions, protocols, and recommendations.⁸ ILO conventions play an important role in creating baseline labour and social security standards. Scholars acknowledge that the ILO conventions hold significant importance in setting decent work standards.⁹ It is through the international standards that conventions, and recommendations are formulated.¹⁰ The ILO crafts these international standards through its annual International Labour Conference, in Geneva. This International Labour Conference involves representatives of governments, trade unions, as well as workers and employers around the world.¹¹ At the conference member states identify the problem, and put the issues on the agenda. Then a report on the laws and practices of member states is prepared by the International Labour Office. Following this, the report is circulated to member states as well as to the ILO for comments. The International Labour Office also prepares a draft instrument for comments, which is then submitted to the Conference in which the draft is amended as necessary and offered for adoption. At the Conference participants can examine the draft instrument for comment during the double discussion. It is important to note that two-thirds of the standard votes are needed for acceptance.¹² Once the two thirds is achieved then the convention is normally adopted. Once adopted, the ILO member states are obliged to submit any convention or protocol to their national competent authority for the enactment of relevant legislation or other actions, including ratification.

In the South African context, the forefathers of the Constitution must be commended for showing an interest in belonging to the family of nations¹³by ratifying and agreeing to be bound by internationally and regionally recognised instruments in the area of social security and labour law. In this context, international law is viewed as a pillar of South Africa's legal system since it became a member of the international community with the advent of democracy.¹⁴ According to Olivier, South Africa's Constitution of 1993¹⁵accorded international law recognition for the first time in the country's history, which helped motivate the application of international law in the country. In his view, this step signified to the international community that South Africa would adhere to internationally accepted rules and norms in the wake of the end of the apartheid law system.¹⁶

To put things into perspective, it is important to note that international conventions do not form part of the domestic law of our country and are not enforceable at the instance of private individuals in our courts unless they are legislated in municipal law.¹⁷

Several provisions of the Constitution specifically mention international law and international agreements, supporting these interpretations.¹⁸ Therefore, when interpreting the Bill of Rights, any court, tribunal or forum must consider international law and foreign law.¹⁹ Section 231(3) of the Constitution makes it clear that when Parliament agrees to the ratification of, or accession to, an international agreement such agreement becomes part of the law of the country only if Parliament expressly so provides and the agreement is not inconsistent with the Constitution.

With the aforesaid provision in mind, it becomes apparent that an Act of Parliament can override any contrary rights or obligations under international agreements entered into before the commencement of the Constitution. The same provision is evident in section 231(4) of the Constitution which provides that:

any international agreement becomes law in the Republic when it is enacted into law by national legislation; but a self-executing provision of an agreement that has been approved by parliament is law in the Republic unless it is inconsistent with the Constitution or an Act of Parliament.

South Africa supports the principle that customary international law may be applied directly as part of the common law.²⁰ In Republic of Angola v Springbok Investments (Pty) Ltd,²¹ Kirby J held that South Africa has embraced the doctrine of incorporation, which holds that the rules of international law (the ius gentium) are considered to be part of the law unless they conflict with statutes or the common law.

In addition, section 35(1) of the Constitution is also perfectly consistent with these conclusions. It reads as follows:

in interpreting the provisions of this chapter a court of law shall promote the values which underlie an open and democratic society based on freedom and equality and shall, where applicable, have regard to public international law applicable to the protection of the rights entrenched in this chapter, and may have regard to comparable foreign case law.

With regard to the interpretation of international law, section 35(1) of the 1993 Constitution provided that:

In interpreting the provisions of this chapter a court of law shall promote the values which underlie an open and democratic society based on freedom and equality and shall, where applicable, have regard to public international law...

This provision was incorporated in section 233 of the final Constitution. In its relevant part section 233 of the Constitution provides that:

when interpreting any legislation, every court must prefer any reasonable interpretation of the legislation that is consistent with international law over any alternative interpretation that is inconsistent with international law.²²

In this context, the courts are directed only to "have regard" to public international law if it is applicable to the protection of the rights entrenched in the Constitution. Quite often, judicial interpretation of domestic law in South Africa has been influenced by international law. For example, in the case of S v Makwanyane,²³ it was argued on behalf of the accused that the imposition of the death penalty for murder was a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment that should be declared unconstitutional. Chaskalson used international law extensively and creatively to interpret the constitutional right to life. In doing so, he came to the conclusion that the documents used during the negotiation process (specifically those related to the position of the death penalty), had become part of the context in which the Constitution should be interpreted.²⁴

Furthermore, Chaskalson referred to the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations Committee on Human Rights, whose deliberations are informed by traveaux preparatoires, as described in article 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.²⁵ Furthermore, the Constitutional Court in Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom, ²⁶ remarked that relevant international law can be a guide to interpretating the socio-economic rights in the Constitution but the weight to be attached to any particular principle or rule of international law will vary. However, the Court indicated that where the relevant principle of international law binds South Africa, it may be directly applicable.

International standards as a component of labour and social security are, intrinsically, endowed with a human rights element.²⁷ Consequently, human rights are valued in terms of political ethics²⁸ and their existence does not depend on legal recognition.²⁹ Because they are human rights they are considered to be the highest standard in the world and therefore they have a minimalist character.³⁰

Islam argues that human rights are "inborn and inherent in all human beings by virtue of their birth as human beings and by the nature of their humanity".³¹ He further asserts that human beings bear these rights wherever they go, and anywhere they are.³² According to him, nationality is immaterial to human rights.³³ Nickel³⁴ provides a comprehensive definition of human rights, which can be summarised as follows:

... rights are claims by right-holders against addressees,³⁵ who are usually, though not only States, that are held by all persons, are high priority or urgent norms, with a specific claims (for example, the right to fair trial, and the right to social security) instead of few and highly abstract claims (for example, the right to dignity and equality), are normative claims whose truth is not dependent on legal recognition, and are meant to be minimum standards instead of a complete statement of what is just (for example, to say our human rights are satisfied is not to say that some situation is just, any more than that a minimum wage is a just wage).

In view of the above, it is apt to consider human rights as privileges which belong to the individual because of being human, and for no other reason.³⁶Some scholars argue that this definition of human rights is a significant unique feature of human rights.³⁷ Mpedi³⁸ asserts that the right to have access to social security, is a fundamental right which should be enjoyed by everyone. Other scholars consider social rights as having an aspirational or "manifesto" character.³⁹ It is argued that critics who regard human rights as pure desire have now been persuaded by human rights philosophers that social security rights are an integral part of human rights. This has also been acknowledged by international lawyers and the United Nations.⁴⁰ The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states:

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security. Article 25 formulates this provision in a more precise way, and reads ... the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his/her control.⁴¹

The right to social security as a human right is enshrined in major international human rights instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)⁴² and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).⁴³ As alluded to above, it has also been recognised by the international community as a basic human right.⁴⁴ As such, it is not only individual member states who ought to ensure the correct application of labour and social security law within their national boundaries; but also the global community has the responsibility of ensuring the implementation of the social security and labour law standards across the world.

As discussed above, one of the main objectives of the ILO, as articulated in the Declaration of Philadelphia⁴⁵ and further restated at the International Labour Conference of 2001,⁴⁶ is to provide for the establishment of social security systems of a universal nature. In a similar vein, the need for increased international solidarity in order to achieve progress in the development of national social security systems was reaffirmed by the World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalisation in 2004.⁴⁷

While social security is the basic right of all people, it invokes an interesting question which relates to human rights discourse?⁴⁸ One is dignity,⁴⁹ or natural rights. The link between universal social security and the concepts of human rights, democracy and the rule of law might best be understood by referring to the notions of human dignity and social cohesion.⁵⁰ Mishra agrees that social [security] rights are not about reducing inequality per se, but rather about ensuring that a minimum of basic resources and opportunities are available to all, in order to ensure a life of human dignity and social inclusion.⁵¹ The ILO General Conference concluded in 2001 that:

Social security is very important for the well-being of workers, their families and the entire community. It is a basic human right and a fundamental means for creating social cohesion, thereby helping to ensure social peace and social inclusion. It is an indispensable part of government social policy and an important tool to prevent and alleviate poverty. It can, through national solidarity and fair burden sharing, contribute to human dignity, equity and social justice. Finally, it is also important for political inclusion, empowerment and the development of democracy.⁵²

The constitutional approach to social security as a human right is a very effective tool for extending its reach to those in need, in particular the precariat (workers excluded by labour and social security law partly because of the nature of their employment, e.g. atypical or non-standard workers and workers engaged in the gig economy). ⁵³ This is more likely to happen in a society where legal culture, services, enforcement actions and litigation processes greatly enhance the bargaining power of local communities in terms of state bureaucracy and other power centers. It is argued that a rights-based approach to social security and labour law can empower individuals to protect themselves from social risks.⁵⁴

 

4 A synopsis of selected ILO's instruments relating to social security and labour law

As previously mentioned, social security and labour law are fundamental human rights recognised by various international conventions, some of which are endorsed in South Africa. In most cases, ILO conventions and recommendations provides a reference against which the South African system can be measured. This benchmark is relevant in respect of, among others, evaluating the general responsibility of the state, and the developmental and integrated approach towards the system of social security and labour law.⁵⁵

International instruments protecting social security rights generally adopt a holistic approach to social security, and provide a minimum core protection for social security. The minimum core approach seeks to establish the minimum legal content for claims related to economic and social rights.⁵⁶Various international bodies have developed detailed standards on social security and socio-economic rights in general. For example, independent experts and the UN Special Rapporteur on economic, social and cultural rights, as well as bodies such as the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, have played an important role in protecting, monitoring and defining the content and scope of international law on economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to social security.⁵⁷

The next section provides a synopsis of selected ILO's conventions and recommendations on social security and labour law. These international instruments have had a far-reaching impact on the drafting of legislation and policies relevant to social security and labour law in South Africa.

41 ILO Convention 102 of 1952

The ILO Convention 102 is colloquially referred to as the "ILO mother Convention". This Convention provides a point of reference to the core set of principles and minimum benchmark for building and maintaining progressively comprehensive social security systems. Convention 102 covers nine (9) classical risks, and provides for the qualifying criteria. The risks covered by the Convention include, inter alia, (a) medical care; (b) sickness; (c) unemployment benefit; (d) old-age benefit; (e) employment injury; (f) family allowance; (g) maternity; (h) invalidity; and (i) survivor benefits. To ratify the Convention, a member state must operate three of the nine branches, but there is an additional provision that must be present which is at least one of the following risks, namely unemployment, old age or injury.

It is important to note that all these classical risks have been operationalised and employed in various ILO conventions.⁵⁸ These conventions provide a definition of the contingency/risk, the scope of personal coverage, the amount of the benefit, and the qualifying period. For example, the Invalidity, Old-Age and Survivors' Benefits Convention of 1967 provides the "possibility of fixing higher age with due regard to working ability of elderly persons in a country". This provision is important, considering the scourge of unemployment and its impact on the labour market.

In summary, ILO Convention 102 provides a framework for establishing comprehensive social security systems.⁵⁹ Once ratified and implemented through law and applied in practice, Convention 102 can contribute greatly to decent work and poverty alleviation, by providing for adequate minimum levels of benefits for the nine main social security contingencies, in order to guarantee the replacement of earnings and access to medical care. Furthermore, the ILO Convention 102 provides a set of standards that guarantee good governance, financial sustainability, rights of beneficiaries, respect for the rule of law, equality of treatment, non-discrimination, and policy coherence.

Consequently, it is submitted that South Africa can learn valuable lessons if it can ratify and apply this convention. First, this would afford the country the ability to obtain a wide range of coverage, which among other benefits can also provide guarantees for a health system, which can reduce poverty. In addition, the goal of Convention 102 is for ratifying states to seek universal social security for all citizens. To this end, the Convention provides ratifying member states with some degree of flexibility in achieving universal social security for all citizens in respect of the nine branches indicated above. This is based on the fact that there is no adequate social security model for all countries, as countries differ in social and cultural values, its unique history, institutions and different economic developments.

Furthermore, this Convention may be ratified by a country, without agreement to abide by it in its entirety. The Convention is composed of two parts: the general social security principles, and agreed upon minimum standards across the nine branches. To ratify the Convention, a country must accept the general social security principles but only the minimum standards for at least three of the social security branches, including at least one of the following: (1) unemployment, (2) old age, (3) employment injury, (4) invalidity or (5) survivors. Furthermore, under the Convention, article 9 expressly provides for three alternatives for countries to provide universal social security under the branches it agrees to. The country can choose to protect 50 per cent of all citizens, or 20 per cent of all citizens of the economically active population and finally 50 per cent of all employees.⁶⁰Lastly, countries, in committing to provide social security across chosen branches, can opt to administer through public or private means.

The Convention, with respect to the countries who have ratified it, sets minimum social security standards across the branches agreed to with regard to the following. First, the percentage of the country's population to be at least protected in case of occurrence of one of the specified contingencies. Second, a minimum level of benefits to be paid to citizens in case of occurrence of one of the contingencies and third, the conditions for and periods of entitlement to the prescribed benefits.

4.2 United Nations Charter of 1945 (UN Charter)

In its preamble, the UN Charter clearly states that:

We the people of the United Nations determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life...

With the foregoing statement in mind, it becomes clear that the member states of the UN Charter sought to address collectively the issues of human rights protection, promotion of higher standards of living, full employment, conditions of economic and social progress and development, and solutions to global economic, social, health, and related difficulties.⁶¹

In the field of social security and labour law, this meant that nations were committed to achieving international cooperation to resolve global problems of an economic, social, cultural or humanitarian nature, and to promote and encourage respect for human rights, and fundamental freedoms for all, regardless of race, sex, language or religion.⁶² Furthermore, the forefathers of the United Nations sought to:

establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and lastly to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all people.⁶³

4.3 Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948

The UDHR states that:

everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realisation, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organisation and resources of each state, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his/her dignity and the free development of his/her personality.⁶⁴

The Declaration recognises that the ILO, based on the mandate contained in its Constitution, including the 1944 Declaration of Philadelphia, has the obligation to develop programmes which will achieve the objectives of full employment, raising standards of living, establishing a minimum living wage, and extending social security measures to provide a basic income to all in need, along with all the other objectives set out in the Declaration of Philadelphia.

In recent years, the ILO's work on social security has been conducted within the framework of the global campaign on social security and coverage for all, as mandated by the International Labour Conference of 2001.⁶⁵ The Campaign highlights the fact that most people in developing countries are regarded as poor.⁶⁶

The ILO considers that the best strategy for progress is for these countries to put in place a set of basic social security guarantees for all residents,⁶⁷while planning to move towards higher levels of provision as their economies develop, as envisaged in the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention. Even though social security is recognised as a human right,⁶⁸ the minority of the world's population actually enjoys this right,⁶⁹ while the majority lacks adequate and comprehensive coverage.⁷⁰

The ILO encourages all member states to develop strategies to enhance their levels of social security, guided by its social security standards, as their economies mature and their fiscal space widens.⁷¹ According to the ILO, social security systems contribute not only to human security, dignity, equity and social justice, but also provide a foundation for political inclusion, empowerment and the development of democracy.⁷² The ILO strategy for the extension of social security includes the following key elements:

establishing and maintaining social protection floor as a fundamental element of national social security systems (horizontal dimension); and pursuing strategies for the extension of social security that progressively ensure higher levels of social security to as many people as possible, guided by ILO social security standards (vertical dimension).⁷³

In April 2009, at one of its joint Crisis Initiatives, the UN System Chief Executives Board for Coordination adopted the social protection floor initiative.⁷⁴ The ILO, together with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and several collaborating agencies, are leading this initiative.⁷⁵ Its core mandate is to support countries in their efforts to plan and implement sustainable social transfer schemes and essential social services.⁷⁶

This concept was endorsed as part of the Global Jobs Pact adopted by the International Labour Conference in June 2009.⁷⁷ This Pact requires countries that do not have extensive social security to build adequate social protection for all, drawing on a basic social protection floor that includes the following: access to health care, income security for the elderly and persons with disabilities, child benefits and income security, as well as public employment guarantee schemes for the unemployed and the working poor. It urges the international community to provide development assistance, including budgetary support, to establish a basic social protection floor on a national basis.⁷⁸

In recent years, the ILO and other agencies have published a number of reports and related documents discussing the need for social security and gathering evidence on its positive economic and social impacts, as well as the costs and affordability of providing the minimum of basic social protection for all in need in the poorest countries.⁷⁹

Wilson⁸⁰ asserts that the UDHR, in particular article 22, is often quoted because of its reference to everyone's "right to social security". However, the substance is contained in article 25's reference to 'the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and wellbeing of everyone'.

In short, it is submitted that the UDHR is a guiding instrument, which sets a benchmark against which member states should gauge their domestic laws, in particular the fulfilment of their citizens' human rights and social security protection.⁸¹ In the words of Hannum,⁸² the UDHR remains the primary source of global human rights standards and is the basis for most human rights instruments.

4.4 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 1996

The most important international instrument relating to social security is the ICESCR.⁸³ At the time of writing this article there were approximately 173 member states who have ratified this Convention.⁸⁴ South Africa has signed and ratified the ICESCR, together with its Optional Protocol.⁸⁵ The South African Human Rights Commission believes that this ratification will enhance the ability of the government to play a meaningful role as one of the key advocates for social, economic and cultural rights in the international arena.⁸⁶ It will also enable the country to increase and improve the respect and observance of [social security] rights.

The substantive rights that are recognised by the Covenant include the following; the right to work, the right to social security,⁸⁷ the right to special protection for the family,⁸⁸ mothers and children, the right to an adequate standard of living, including food, clothing, and housing, and the right to health care services.⁸⁹ The basic obligation imposed by the Covenant on a member states is to take steps "to the maximum of its available resources, with a view to achieving progressively the full realisation of the right by all appropriate means, including the adoption of legislative measures".⁹⁰ This provision has been described as imposing an obligation to move as expeditiously and effectively as possible towards realising the listed objectives.⁹¹ The primary responsibility for the enforcement of the Covenant lies with the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The Committee was established in 1987 to monitor the compliance of member states with their obligations under the Covenant.⁹² The Committee consists of eighteen independent experts, who are elected by the Economic and Social Council of the UN for a four-year term.⁹³

The Committee does not have adjudicative functions. Its principal activities are the adoption of "General Comments" on the content of the ICESCR and the examination of reports submitted by member states.⁹⁴ Since 1991, the Committee has drafted the Optional Protocol to the ICESCR, in order to help reinforce the protection of economic and cultural rights.⁹⁵ In addition, in terms of the ICESCR, member states have to submit periodic reports to the Committee on the measures taken and progress made with respect to their obligations.⁹⁶ A first report is normally due within two years of ratification of the Covenant, and subsequent reports are required within a four-year cycle.⁹⁷

It is important to note that although the General Comments do not bind member states, however, they are generally regarded as a primary source for determining the content of international social security and labour law rights, and have regularly been referred to by the Constitutional Court.⁹⁸Furthermore, according to the Committee, a state's obligations under the Covenant do not end with the duty to refrain from interference with the enjoyment of these rights. The rights have an additional positive dimension, in that they can only be adequately realised by taking positive steps towards fulfilling them.⁹⁹

In terms of the Covenant, the state is required to adopt "legislative measures in order to realise these rights".¹⁰⁰ This involves the creation of a legal framework that grants individuals the legal status, rights and privileges that will enable them to pursue their rights domestically. Furthermore, the state is required to implement other measures and programmes designed to assist individuals in realising their rights.¹⁰¹

The positive dimension of international social security rights is qualified by the use of the phrase "to the maximum of its available resources", and with a view to achieving "progressively the full realisation of the right". The concepts "to the maximum of its available resources" and "progressive realisation of the right" are understood to grant the state some degree of discretion in selecting the means of achieving social security rights.¹⁰²Nevertheless, it is argued that this discretion has its own limitations. For example, Currie and De Waal¹⁰³ argue that although the full realisation of [such] rights can only be achieved progressively, this does not change the state's obligation to take those steps that are within its power immediately, and other steps as soon as possible.

According to the authors, the burden is on the state to show that it is making progress towards the full realisation of these rights. They further maintain that the requirement for states to take "appropriate" steps towards the realisation of the rights gives states a considerable amount of discretion, and that they have an obligation to justify the appropriateness of the measures that they adopt.

Currie makes three crucial inferences regarding the enforcement of [social security] rights.¹⁰⁴ First, he states that argument about scarcity of resources does not relieve states of what the Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights term 'core minimum obligations'. Secondly, he maintains that:

violations of [social security] rights will occur when the state fails to satisfy obligations to ensure the satisfaction of minimum essential levels of each of the rights, or fails to prioritise its use of its resources so as to meet its core minimum obligations.

These core minimum obligations apply, unless the state can show that its resources are "demonstrably inadequate" to allow it to fulfil its obligations. Thirdly, Currie indicates that because the obligations are to be realised progressively does not mean that states may postpone their obligations to some distant or unspecified time in the future. A state that claims to be unable to carry out its obligations because of resource scarcity must prove that this is the case. For example, in General Comment 3, the Committee affirms that:

... any deliberately retrogressive measures in that regard would require the most careful consideration and would need to be fully justified by reference to the totality of the rights provided for in the Covenant and in the context of the full use of the maximum available resources.... In order for a state party to be able to attribute its failure to meet at least its minimum core obligations to a lack of available resources, it must demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at its disposition, in an effort to satisfy, as a matter of priority, those minimum obligations.¹⁰⁵

4.5 ILO's Maternity Protection Convention, 183 of 2000

The ILO's Maternity Protection Convention, provides that all employed women, including those in atypical forms of dependent work, must be covered for pregnancy, childbirth and their consequences. In particular, protected persons should be entitled to maternity benefits for a minimum period of 14 weeks (including six weeks of compulsory leave after childbirth) for a minimum of two thirds of their previous income. Medical care provided to protected persons must include antenatal, childbirth and postpartum care. This convention also establishes the right to work breaks for breastfeeding, as well as provisions on health protection, job protection and non-discrimination.

It is unfortunate that South Africa is yet to ratify the Maternity Protection Convention, 2000 and the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952.¹⁰⁶ It is argued that this is a missed opportunity to address the current social security gaps relating to the inclusion of self-employed workers or independent contractors from the framework of most employment legislation, like the Basic Conditions of Employment Act.¹⁰⁷

4.6 Equality of Treatment (Social Security) Convention, 118 of 1962

It is important to note that South Africa has not ratified this convention. Be that as it may, this convention examines the issue of social security for migrant workers globally. The convention requires a ratifying state to accord equal treatment to nationals of other ratifying states (and their dependents) with its own nationals (including refugees and stateless persons), if expressly accepted) in its territory. Equally, the convention also establishes the principle of the provision of benefits abroad and the need to make every effort to participate in plans for the maintenance of acquired rights and rights in the process of being acquired according to the legislation of the citizens of the states for which the Convention is in force.

Similarly, the Equal Treatment Convention reinforces the principles espoused by Convention on Discrimination in relation to Employment and Occupation, 1958. This convention has been ratified by South Africa. The convention requires each member state for which the convention is in force, to declare and pursue a national policy designed to promote any methods appropriate to national conditions and practice, equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of employment and occupation, with a view to eliminating any discrimination in respect thereof. It is important to note that Convention, 1958 was recognised by the courts in South Africa as a point of reference in defining, discrimination. For example, in SACWU v Sentrachem Ltd,¹⁰⁸ the Industrial Court, faced with a case of alleged wage discrimination based on race, quoted the Convention as follows:

Discrimination is defined in the convention as including any distinction, exclusion or preference made on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation'. There are, however, limits, [with] art 1 s 1(2) stating: Any distinction, exclusion or preference in respect of a particular job based on the inherent requirements thereof is not deemed to be discrimination.

4.7 Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention, 168 of 1988

This convention covers two cardinal issues. In the main, it addresses the protection of the unemployed through the provision of benefits in the form of periodic allowances and the promotion of employment. Furthermore, it also recognises the value of linking social security to broader social and economic policies aimed at the promotion of full, productive and freely chosen employment. In addition to the benefits provided in the event of unemployment, the signatory states are also called upon to take appropriate measures to coordinate their unemployment protection system and their employment policy. Therefore, the unemployment protection system should encourage employers to offer and workers to seek productive employment.

4.8 Medical Care and Sickness Benefits Convention, 130 of 1969

Convention 130 incorporates the health care and cash benefits, reflecting the trend towards the establishment of a comprehensive medical insurance system. It provides that all employees, including interns, or at least 75 percent of the population who are fully financially active, or all residents who do not meet certain criteria must be subject to both conditions. Convention 130 extends the health care required under Convention 102 for dental care and medical rehabilitation, including the provision of care and upgrades to prosthetics and orthotics. It gives the right to random benefits and confines the possibility of limiting the duration of disease benefits. The corresponding limit of 26 weeks will no longer fall into the category of individuals protected by the beneficiary and will only be granted if the beneficiary remains in this category if the disease begins.

4.9 Maintenance of Social Security Rights Convention, 157 of 1982 and Maintenance of Social Security Rights Recommendation, 167 of 1983

Convention 157 and Joint Recommendation 167 specifically address the issue of supporting the social security rights of migrant workers and supplementing Convention 118, which focuses on equality of treatment and export. Unlike Convention 118, which allows states parties to select one or more of the nine contingencies, this Convention apply to all sectors, regardless of scheme type: general and special, with and without contributions and with defined employer obligations by law. The purpose of this Convention is to promote flexible and comprehensive coordinated arrangement between national security projects, in particular through the conclusion of bilateral or multilateral agreements on social security. Convention 157 also establishes a system based on the principles of redemption and the right of redemption. Recommendation 167 provides a model rule for concluding bilateral or multilateral agreements on social security in all circumstances and provides for respect for social security rights and export benefits. It also provides model agreements on the coordination of bilateral or multilateral instruments of social security.

4.10 Income Security Recommendation, 67 of 1944 and Medical Care Recommendation, 69 of 1944

Recommendations 67 and 69 form the basis for the development of social security in ILO instruments and can be considered as a project of an integrated social security system. Together, they formulate a comprehensive system of income security and health care protection for each of the nine categories of social security in addition to reduction and prevention of poverty. Guidelines 67 and 69 are based on the guiding principles of general governance, and then, by incorporating social insurance and social assistance, income insurance and health care services.

4.11 Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 202 of 2012

Recommendation 202 is the first international instrument to offer guidance to countries to close social security gaps and progressively achieve universal protection through the establishment and maintenance of comprehensive social security systems. To this aim, the Recommendation calls for the attainment of the following issues. First, the implementation, as a priority, of social protection floors as a fundamental element of national social security systems and as a starting point for countries that do not have a minimum level of social protection; and second, the extension of social security with a view to progressively ensuring higher levels of social security to as many people as possible according to national economic and fiscal capacity and as guided by ILO's other social security standards. This Convention provides that social protection floors should comprise at least four basic social security guarantees including access to essential health care and basic income security for children, benefits for persons of active age who are unable to earn sufficient income, and older persons and should be set at a level that allows people to live in dignity. Through the social protection floors concept, Recommendation 202 provides the minimum core content of the human right to social security.

The great achievement of Recommendation 202 is the policy guidelines that offer states to fulfil their common and overall responsibility for the establishment and maintenance of these comprehensive social security systems. This is done through a set of principles that provide guidance for the development and implementation of social security programmes. These guiding principles deliberately reflect both the basic principles of human rights and the basic principles relating to the good governance, provision and financing of the social security system.

4.12 Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy Recommendation, 204 of 2015

Recommendation 204 identifies the lack of protection for workers in the informal economy and provides advice on improving their protection and facilitating the transition to a formal economy. It also includes guidelines for expanding social security coverage for workers in the informal economy and its role in facilitating the transition to a formal economy.

In summation, it is clear that the ILO conventions play a crucial role of assisting member states to develop and fortify their local legislation on labour and social security law. Be that as it may, the ILO has noted with concern cases of serious failure by member states to respect their reporting with regard to the domestication of ratified Conventions and other standards-related obligations.¹⁰⁹

 

5 Application of international labour and social security standards: A survey of selected courts' jurisprudence in South Africa

As evinced in the discussion above, the ILO has played a major role of shaping the labour law and social security system in South Africa.¹¹⁰ The essence of ratifying ILO Conventions means that the ratifying state confirms its intention to comply with the ILO standards. Consequently, South Africa has become a signatory to several ILO Conventions. In this regard, South African labour and social policy must therefore be aligned with international labour and social security standards and conventions. The alignment of South Africa's labour and social security legislation with international standards is underscored in section 233 of the Constitution, which provides that when a court interprets any legislation, it must prefer any reasonable interpretation of the legislation that is consistent with international law over any alternative interpretation that is inconsistent with international law.

Furthermore, section 233 of the Constitution is given effect in the Labour Relations Act (the LRA)¹¹¹ and the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (the BCEA).¹¹² For example, in its preamble, the LRA provides that its purpose is, amongst others, to give effect to the public international law¹¹³ obligations of the Republic with regard to labour relations. Specific examples that are provided in the LRA include sections 1 and 3, which clearly state that the purpose of the Act is to give effect to obligations imposed on South Africa as a member state of the ILO, and that the Act must be interpreted in line with the public international law obligations of the Republic.¹¹⁴ In addition, the Code of Good Practice¹¹⁵ requires that in interpreting the presumption of employment or defining the notion of an employee, such provisions must be interpreted in accordance with international labour standards.

As discussed above, sections 1 and 3 of the LRA recognises South Africa's international law obligation as a member state of the ILO. Budeli acknowledges that these objectives seek to, inter alia, protect rights in section 27 of the Constitution, provide a framework for collective bargaining between employees, employers, their respective organisation, and to ensure employee participation in decision-making and the effective resolution of labour disputes.¹¹⁶

Before the adoption of the ILO Recommendation concerning the Employment Relationship in 2006, South Africa had taken some initiatives to address the new development in the labour market.¹¹⁷ In early 2000 the dominant impression test was modified as focus shifted to the existence of an employment relationship rather than the traditional common law contract of employment.¹¹⁸ Nemusimbori concedes that the dominant impression test has failed to adequately capture the diversity of the modern labour market and the rise of non-standards employment associated with innovative business models.¹¹⁹ In the authors view, it was partly in response to these developments that the rebuttable presumption of employment was incorporated in the amendment to the LRA under section 200A in 2002. South Africa's compliance with the ILO Recommendation was further evinced in NEDLAC's work. NEDLAC has issued a code entitled the "Code of Good Practice: Who is an Employee?" to assist parties in determining the existence of an employment relationship. The presumption applies regardless of the form of the contract, and therefore gives effect to the ILO Recommendation. This was South Africa's initiative to fulfil its international obligation under the ILO and to ensure that vulnerable workers receive legal protection within the ambit of the labour legislation.¹²⁰

Similarly, South Africa has ratified some international human rights legal instruments including those giving effect to freedom of association.¹²¹Consequently, South Africa has an obligation to ensure that its labour laws and policies are transformed, among others, to conform to ILO Conventions it has ratified.¹²² ILO's Conventions 87 and 98 remain critical as they relate to the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining and continue to be sources of collective labour law.

The influence of international labour standard and the Constitution gave rise to Chapter II of the LRA. As earlier stated, one of the purposes of section 1 of the LRA is to give effect to obligations incurred by the Republic as a member state of the ILO. The following articles of Convention 87 discussed below address freedom of association.¹²³ Article 2 of Convention 87 provides: Workers and employers, without distinction whatsoever, shall have the right to establish and, subject only to the rules of the organisation concerned, to join organisations of their own choosing without previous authorisation. Article 3(1) of Convention 87 provides:

Workers' and employers' organisations' shall have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organise their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes.

Article 5 of Convention 87 provides:

Workers' and employers' organisations' shall have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and any such organisation, federation or confederation shall have the right to affiliate with international organisations of workers and employers.

The above articles point to their similarities to sections 4(1), 4(2) and 4(3) of the LRA. It is submitted that this description above provides telling examples of the influence the ILO had in South Africa's labour legislation.

Furthermore, the ILO provided technical assistance in the drafting of new labour legislation. In July 1994, a Ministerial Legal Task Team was appointed to draft a new LRA. The Task Team headed by Thompson Cheadle was commissioned to draft a Bill that align labour legislation in line with various International Labour Organisation Conventions and the Constitution.¹²⁴

Likewise, the BCEA stipulates that one of its objectives is to give effect to the right to fair labour practices referred to in section 23(1) of the Constitution, by establishing and making provision for the regulation of basic conditions of employment, thereby complying with its obligation as a member state of the ILO.

As discussed above, international labour standards are important for two reasons. First, they represent an international endorsement of a minimum of best practices, whether in labour law related matters in general or in social security matters in particular. Secondly, when ratified by member states, these standards constitute a binding legal obligation under national and international law and can be incorporated into national law. At the international level, labour and social security standards are often set by laws and regulations. Others can also be found in bilateral agreements. Often it only binds parties, unions and employers, but if they are adopted in some countries, they gain the force of law.

The courts have constantly referred to international labour and social security standards, conventions and recommendations for guidance in their interpretation of the fundamental constitutional rights.¹²⁵ In S v Makwanyane,¹²⁶ Chief Justice Chaskalson (as he was then) described the role of international law as follows:

(P)ublic international law would include non-binding as well as binding law. They may both be used . as tools of interpretation. International agreements and customary international law accordingly provide a [interpretative] framework. [The Constitution] can be evaluated and understood [juxtapose international law], and for that purpose, decisions of tribunals dealing with comparable instruments, such as the United Nations Committee on Human Rights, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the European Commission on Human Rights, and the European Court of Human Rights, and, in appropriate cases, reports of specialised agencies such as the ILO, may provide guidance as to the correct interpretation of particular provisions of [the Bill of Rights].¹²⁷

In Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom,¹²⁸ the Constitutional Court per Justice Yacoob held that the relevant international law can be a guide to interpretation, but the weight attached to any particular principle or rule of international law will vary. However, where the relevant principle of international law binds South Africa, it may be directly applicable.¹²⁹ In SA National Defence Union v Minister of Justice,¹³⁰ the court held that:

Section 39 of the Constitution provides that, when a court is interpreting chapter 2 of the Constitution, it must consider international law. [In the courts view], the conventions and recommendations of the ILO ... are important resources [that can be used in employment law] for conside[ring] the meaning and scope of 'worker' as used in s 23 of the Constitution.¹³¹

In Discovery Health Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration,¹³² the Labour Court emphasised that the Constitution accords international law a particular status and requires the application of international law when interpreting South African legislation.

In National Education Health and Allied Workers Union v University of Cape Town,¹³³ the court had to determine the scope and meaning of section 23(1) of the Constitution, which provides that: "everyone has the right to fair labour practices".¹³⁴ In this context, Ngcobo J held that in giving content to this concept, courts and tribunals will have to seek guidance from domestic and international experience.¹³⁵ He further held that:

international experience is reflected in the conventions and recommendations of the ILO. Additionally, Ngcobo held that other comparable foreign instruments such as the European Social Charter 1961 as revised may provide guidance.¹³⁶

Similarly, in Rural Maintenance (Pty) Ltd v Maluti-A-Phofung Local Municipality,¹³⁷ which dealt with section 197 of the LRA (transfer of a business as a going concern), the court acknowledged that international developments in relation to so-called 'service provision changes', as opposed to standard transfer of businesses, necessitated the reformulation or development of South African law.¹³⁸

In other cases, such as Avril Elizabeth Home for the Mentally Handicapped v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration,¹³⁹ the court recognised that "the nature and extent of the fair procedure requirements established by the LRA and the Code is supported by international labour standards". The court further held that ILO Convention 158 requires procedures to promote compliance with the obligation to ensure that dismissals are based on valid reasons.¹⁴⁰ Lastly, in the courts' view, the ILO convention[s] provides an important point of reference in the interpretation and application of the LRA.¹⁴¹

In summation, it is clear that the ILO's international standards played and continue to play a crucial role in the development and interpretation of labour and social security law in South Africa. These international standards established through the conventions and recommendations ensures that the fundamental human rights and freedoms of all persons are respected, fulfilled and protected. It is unfortunate that the links between social security and labour institutions are not fully developed in South Africa. Consequently, labour and social policies ought to be complementary and contribute to an integrated strategy for improving livelihoods and establishing an inclusive society. In essence, labour and social security policies must be developed and implemented in unison, requiring an all-encompassing strategy linking the two.

 

6 Conclusion

This article, exploring selected themes on the impact of international standards on labour and social security law in South Africa, has aimed to revisit and challenge certain preconceptions about the role of international labour organisation in the setting of labour and social security standard in South Africa and across the world. It has attempted to showcase how selected international law instruments on labour and social security law has shaped South Africa's jurisprudence and legislation on labour and social security law.

After exploring several pathways to using international law in labour and social security interpretation, all of which rigorously adhere to the tenets of international standard setting and benchmarking. It can be deduced that the ILO through its rich history and work ought to be commended for the milestones it has achieved over the years. Certainly, it has extraordinarily developed conventions and recommendations which have not only shaped the labour and social security systems of the majority of member states, but provided the baseline standard framework within which their domestic laws can be measured. Furthermore, these conventions extend the conceptualisation of social security, and also contribute to the development of a more comprehensive social security policy for South Africa.

The role of the ILO in standard setting has been expanded upon over the years by the courts, and academic discourse in South Africa. Finally, over and above the complementary role played by the courts, there is a need for the ILO to respond to the current needs, realities and emergence of new risks which have the potential of affecting the social security systems and the precariat in the world of work.¹⁴² To conclude, in its standard setting role the ILO ought to also grapple with the emerging labour and social security challenges associated with, inter alia, atypical employment, emergence of gig economy in light of the 4^th industrial revolution, the impact of long-covid19 in the livelihoods of employees and the effectiveness of member states in enforcing their international obligations.¹⁴³

 

Bibliography

Literature

Alston P and Simma B "First Session of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights" 1987 AJIL 747-756        [ Links ]

Barber J "An Historical and Persistent Interest: Britain and South Africa" 1991 International Affairs 723-738        [ Links ]

Barrientos A and Leisering L "Social Citizenship for the Global Poor? The Worldwide Spread of Social Assistance" 2013 International Journal of Social Welfare 50-67        [ Links ]

Berdyev S et al Reporting Human Rights Violations to UN Special Procedures: An Introductory Guide (CIVICUS Geneva 2011)        [ Links ]

Boswell R and Boswell B "Motherhood Deterred: Access to Maternity Benefits in South Africa" 2009 Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity 76-84        [ Links ]

Budeli M "Understanding the Right to Freedom of Association at the Workplace: Components and Scope" 2010 Obiter 16-33        [ Links ]

Budeli-Nemakonde M "Organisational Rights for Minority Trade Unions: A Reflection on Ngcobo J's Judgment in NUMSA v Bader Bop (Pty) Ltd 2003 (24) ILJ 305 (CC)" 2017 SAPL 1-18        [ Links ]

Campbell T and Miller S Human Rights and the Moral Responsibilities of Corporate and Public Sector Organisations (Springer Dordrecht 2005)        [ Links ]

Chenwi L "Unpacking Progressive Realisation, Its Relation to Resources, Minimum Core and Reasonableness, and Some Methodological Considerations for Assessing Compliance" 2013 De Jure 742-769        [ Links ]

Currie I and De Waal J The Bill of Rights Handbook 6^th ed (Juta Cape Town 2014)        [ Links ]

Davy 2014 Washington University of Global Studies Law Review Davy U "How Human Rights Shape Social Citizenship: On Citizenship and the Understanding of Economic and Social Rights" 2014 Washington University of Global Studies Law Review 201 -263        [ Links ]

De Schutter O Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Human Rights (Edward Elgar Cheltenham 2013)        [ Links ]

Devine D "The Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law in the Light of the Interim South African Constitution 1993" 1995 ICLQ 1-18        [ Links ]

Dugard J "The Role of International Law in the Struggle for Liberation in South Africa" 1991 Social Justice 83-94        [ Links ]

Dugard J "International Law and the South African Constitution" 1997 EJIL 77-92        [ Links ]

Dugard J International Law: A South African Perspective (Juta Cape Town 1994)        [ Links ]

Fombad C "An Overview of the Constitutional Framework of the Right to Social Security with Special Reference to South Africa" 2013 AJICL 1-31        [ Links ]

Fourie E "Non-standard Workers: The South African Context, International Law and Regulation by the European Union" 2008 PELJ 110-152        [ Links ]

Gericke E "The Interplay Between International Law and Labour Laws in South Africa: Piercing the Diplomatic Immunity Veil" 2014 PELJ 2600-2634        [ Links ]

Glendon A "Knowing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights" 1998 Notre Dame L Rev 1153-1182        [ Links ]

Griffin J On Human Rights (Oxford University Press Oxford 2008)        [ Links ]

Gruskin S "Introduction: Fifty Years of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights" 1998 Health and Human Rights 3-6        [ Links ]

Hahlo H and Kahn E The South African Legal System and Its Background (Juta Cape Town 1968)        [ Links ]

Hannum H "The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law" 1996 Ga J Intl & Comp L 287-397        [ Links ]

Hodges J "The Role of the International Labour Organisation in Balancing Work and Family in the 21^st Century" 2014 Journal of Industrial Relations 566-576        [ Links ]

Hopkins K "Nowhere to Hide: The Case Against PW Botha" 2003 CILSA 289-307        [ Links ]

Huber J "What Makes Human Rights Political? A Kantian Critique" 2013 Journal of Human Rights 127-141        [ Links ]

International Labour Office Assessment of the South African Legislation in View of a Possible Ratification of the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention 102 of 1952 (ILO Geneva 2014)        [ Links ]

International Labour Office Democratisation and the ILO: Report of the Director-General (Part 1) (ILO Geneva 1992)        [ Links ]

International Labour Office The Employment Relationship (ILO Geneva 2005)        [ Links ]

International Labour Office Resolution and Conclusions Concerning Social Security - International Labour Conference, 89th Session (ILO Geneva 2001)        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation Rules of the Game: A Brief Introduction to International Labour Standards (ILO Geneva 2009)        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation Social Protection Floor Initiative, the Sixth Initiative of the CEB on the Global Financial and Economic Crisis and Its Impact on the Work of the UN System (ILO/WHO Geneva 2009)        [ Links ]

International Labour Office Social Security for All: Building Social Protection Floors and Comprehensive Social Security Systems (ILO Geneva 2012)        [ Links ]

International Labour Office Summit on the Global Jobs Crisis (Geneva, 1517 June 2009) (ILO Geneva 2009)        [ Links ]

International Labour Office World Social Protection Report 2014/15: Building Economic Recovery, Inclusive Development and Social Justice (ILO Geneva 2014)        [ Links ]

Islam R International Law and Current Concepts and Future Directions (Butterworth Chatswood 2014)        [ Links ]

Kannan K "Social Security in a Globalising World" 2007 International Social Security Review 19-23        [ Links ]

Kasuso T The Definition of an "Employee" Under Labour Legislation: An Elusive Concept (LLM-dissertation University of South Africa 2015)        [ Links ]

King J Judging Social Rights (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2012)        [ Links ]

Krennerich M "Social Security - Just as Much a Human Right in Developing Countries and Emerging Markets" 2014 VRÜ 105-123        [ Links ]

Kulke U "The Present and Future Role of ILO Standards in Realising the Right to Social Security" 2007 International Social Security Review 119-141        [ Links ]

Lehmann K "In Defence of the Constitutional Court: Litigating Socioeconomic Rights and the Myth of the Minimum Core" 2006 Am U Int'l L Rev 163-197        [ Links ]

Marshall R "The Importance of International Labour Standards in a More Competitive Global Economy" in Sengenberger W and Duncan C (eds) International Labour Standards and Economic Interdependence: Essays in Commemoration of the 75th Anniversary of the International Labour Organization and the 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Philadelphia (International Institute for Labour Studies Geneva 1994) 65-70        [ Links ]

Masanque I "Progressive Realisation Without the ICESCR: The Viability of South Africa's Socio-economic Rights Framework, and its Success in the Right to Access Health Care" 2012 Cal W Int'l LJ 462-487        [ Links ]

Mishra R "Social Rights as Human Rights: Globalising Social Protection" 2005 International Social Work 9-20        [ Links ]

Mpedi G "Charity Begins - But Does Not End - At Home, Khosa v Minister of Social Development; Mahlaule v Minister of Social Development 2004 (6) BCLR 569 (CC)" 2005 Obiter 173-186        [ Links ]

Mubangizi J The Protection of Human Rights in South Africa: A Legal and Practical Guide 2^nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2013)        [ Links ]

Munro L "Risk, Needs and Rights: Compatible or Contradictory Bases for Social Protection" in Barrientos A and Hulme D Social Protection for the Poor and the Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics (Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke 2008) 27-46        [ Links ]

Nemusimbori N An Appraisal of the Status of Uber Drivers in South African Labour Law (LLM-dissertation University of Pretoria 2017)        [ Links ]

Nickel J Making Sense of Human Rights 2^nd ed (Blackwell Oxford 2007)        [ Links ]

Olivier M "Interpretation of the Constitutional Provisions Relating to International Law" 2003 PELJ 26-42        [ Links ]

Olivier M "International Labour and Social Security Standards: A Developing Country Critique" 2013 IJCLLIR 21-38        [ Links ]

Olivier M et al Introduction to Social Security (Butterworths Durban 2004)        [ Links ]

Olivier M et al Social Security: A Legal Analysis (Butterworths Durban 2003)        [ Links ]

Openshaw K and Mansell W International Law: A Critical Introduction (Hart Oxford 2013)        [ Links ]

Papisca A "Relevance of Human Rights in the Global Space of Politics: How to Enlarge Democratic Practice Beyond State Boundaries and Build Up a Peaceful World Order" in De Feyters K et al (eds) The Local Relevance of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2011) 82-108        [ Links ]

Pawar M "The Adoption of a Rights-based Approach to Welfare in India" 2012 Journal of Comparative Social Welfare 35-47        [ Links ]

South African Law Reform Commission Project 143: Maternity and Paternity Benefits for Self-employed Workers (SALRC Pretoria 2017)        [ Links ]

Saul B et al The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, Cases and Materials (Oxford University Press Oxford 2014)        [ Links ]

Schwelb E "The Influence of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on International and National Law" 1959 ASIL Proceedings 217-229        [ Links ]

Sen A " Elements of a Theory of Human Rights" 2004 Philosophy and Public Affairs 315-356        [ Links ]

Simpson R "Minimalism, Determinacy, and Human Rights" 2021 CJLJ 149169        [ Links ]

Smit P and Van Eck BPS "International Perspectives on South Africa's Unfair Dismissal Law" 2010 CILSA 46-67        [ Links ]

Swepston L "International Labour Law" in Blanpain R (ed) Comparative Labor Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies 10^th ed (Kluwer Alphen aan den Rijn 2010) 141-145        [ Links ]

Trebilcock A "International Labour Standards and the Informal Economy" in Javillier JC, Gernigon B and Politakis G (eds) Les Normes Internationales du Travail: Un Patrimoine pour L'avenir; Mélanges en Lhonneur de Nicolas Valticos (International Labour Office Geneva 2004) 585-613        [ Links ]

Tshoose C and Kruger J "The Impact of the Labour Relations Act on Minority Trade Unions: A South African Perspective" 2013 PELJ 285-326        [ Links ]

United Nations The Human Rights Council: A Practical Guide (United Nations Geneva 2014)        [ Links ]

Veit-Wilson J "Some Social Policy Implications of a Right to Social Security" in Langendonck J et al (eds) The Right to Social Security (Intersentia Antwerp 2007) 57-83        [ Links ]

Vierdag E "The Legal Nature of the Rights Granted by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights" in De Schutter O (ed) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Human Rights (Edward Elgar Cheltenham 2013) 3-39        [ Links ]

Waas B "How to Improve Monitoring and Enforcement of International Labour Standards" in Halonen T and Liukkunen U (eds) International Labour Organization and Global Social Governance (Springer Cham 2021) 79-94        [ Links ]

Weiss M "International Labour Standards: A Complex Public-private Policy Mix" 2013 IJCLLIR 7-20        [ Links ]

Weiss T et al The United Nations and Changing World Politics 7^th ed (Westview Boulder 2014)        [ Links ]

Wellman C The Moral Dimensions of Human Rights (Oxford University Press Oxford 2010)        [ Links ]

Case law

Avril Elizabeth Home for the Mentally Handicapped v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration 2006 27 ILJ 1644 (LC)

Binga v Cabinet for South West Africa 1988 3 SA 155 (A)

Certification of the Amended Text of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1997 1 BCLR 1 (CC)

Discovery Health Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration 2008 29 ILJ 1480 (LC)

Governing Body of the Juma Musjid Primary School v Essay 2011 7 BCLR 651 (CC)

Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC)

Harksen v Lane 1997 11 BCLR 1489 (CC)

Hoffmann v South African Airways 2000 12 BLLR 1365 (CC)

HOSPERSA obo Venter v SA Nursing Council 2006 6 BLLR 558 (LC)

Leonard Dingler Employee Representative Council v Leonard Dingler (Pty) Ltd 1997 11 BLLR 1438 (LC)

Madzodzo v Minister of Basic Education 2014 3 SA 441 (ECM)

Maluleke v Minister of Internal Affairs 1981 1 SA 707 (B)

Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg 2010 4 SA 1 (CC)

Mias v Minister of Justice 2002 1 BLLR 1 (LAC)

Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign (No 2) 2002 5 SA 721 (CC)

Murray v Minister of Defence 2006 11 BCLR 1357 (C)

National Education Health and Allied Workers Union v University of Cape Town 2003 24 ILJ 95 (CC)

National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa v Bader Bop (Pty) Ltd 2003 3 SA 513 (CC)

Pan American World Airways Incorporated v SA Fire and Accident Insurance Co Ltd 1965 3 SA 150 (A)

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Brind 1991 1 AC 696 (HL)

Republic of Angola v Springbok Investments (Pty) Ltd 2005 2 BLR 159 (HC)

Rural Maintenance (Pty) Ltd v Maluti-A-Phofung Local Municipality 2017 38 ILJ 295 (CC)

S v Makwanyane 1995 3 SA 391 (CC)

S v Petane 1988 3 SA 51 (C)

SA National Defence Union v Minister of Justice 1999 20 ILJ 2265 (CC)

SACWU v Sentrachem Ltd 1988 9 ILJ 410 (IC)

Legislation

Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

Skills Development Act 97 of 1998

Government publications

GN 1108 in GG 18166 of 8 August 1997 (White Paper for Social Welfare)

GN 1774 in GG 29445 of 1 December 2006 (Code of Good Practice: Who is an Employee)

International instruments

CESCR General Comment No 3, The Nature of States Parties' Obligations UN Doc E/1991/23 (1990)

CESCR General Comment No 19, The Right to Social Security UN Doc E/C.12/GC/19 (2008)

Charter of the United Nations (1945)

Declaration of Philadelphia (1944)

Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention (1958)

Employment Injury Benefits Convention 121 of 1964

Employment Promotion and Protection Against Unemployment Convention 168 of 1988

Equality of Treatment (Social Security) Convention 118 of 1962

Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention 87 of 1948

Income Security Recommendation 67 of 1944

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1996)

Invalidity, Old-Age and Survivors' Benefits Convention 128 of 1967

Maintenance of Social Security Rights Convention 157 of 1982

Maintenance of Social Security Rights Recommendation 167 of 1983

Maternity Protection Convention 183 of 2000

Medical Care and Sickness Benefits Convention 130 of 1969

Medical Care Recommendation 69 of 1944

Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2008)

Social Protection Floors Recommendation 202 of 2012

Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention 102 of 1952

Termination of Employment Convention 158 of 1982

Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy Recommendation 204 of 2015

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Internet sources

Anon 2003 A Universal Challenge: Social Security for the World https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/world-of-work-magazine/articles/WCMS_081319/lang--en/index.htm accessed 20 October 2019        [ Links ]

Anon 2009 Stemming the Crisis: World Leaders Forge Global Jobs Pact https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/world-of-work-magazine/articles/WCMS_115059/lang--en/index.htm accessed 21 April 2022        [ Links ]

Bailey C 2004 Extending Social Security Coverage in Africa http://www.ilo.int/public/english/protection/socsec/pol/campagne/files/addispaper.pdf accessed 20 October 2019        [ Links ]

Bhoola U 2002 National Labour Law Profile: South Africa https://www.ilo.org/ifpdial/information-resources/national-labour-law-profiles/WCMS_158919/lang--en/index.htm accessed 20 November 2019        [ Links ]

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights date unknown Fact Sheet No 16 (Rev 1) https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/FactSheet16rev.1en.pdf accessed 20 October 2019        [ Links ]

Chirwa D date unknown An Overview of the Impact of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Africa http://aihr-resourcescenter.org/administrator/upload/documents/Socio-economic_rights_in_Africa.pdf accessed 20 November 2019        [ Links ]

Bonnilla-Garcia A and Gruat JV 2003 Social Protection: A Life Cycle Continuum Investment for Social Justice, Poverty Reduction and Sustainable http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/download/lifecycl/lifecycle.pdf accessed 20 October 2019        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation date unknown NORMLEX (Information System on International Labour Standards) https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:11200:0::NO::P11200_COUNTRY_I D:102888 accessed 20 November 2019        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation date unknown Conventions and Recommendations https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/conventions-and-recommendations/lang--en/index.htm accessed 25 January 2020        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation 2003 ILO Launches Global Campaign on Social Security for All https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_005285/lang--en/index.htm accessed 20 October 2019        [ Links ]

International Labour Office 2011 Social Security for Social Justice and a Fair Globalization https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_152819.pdf accessed 25 October 2020        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation 2019 ILO Social Security Standards: Learn, Ratify and Apply https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/RessourcePDF.action?id=55196 accessed 25 January 2020        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation 2021 Building the Future of Social Protection for a Human-centred World of Work - International Labour Conference 109th Session, 2021 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_780953.pdf accessed 25 June 2021        [ Links ]

International Labour Organisation 2021 Report of the Committee on the Application of Standards - International Labour Conference, 109th Session, 2021 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_804622.pdf accessed 20 July 2021        [ Links ]

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights 2021 Status of Ratification Interactive Dashboard https://indicators.ohchr.org/ accessed 29 July 2021        [ Links ]

South African Human Rights Commission 18 January 2015 SAHRC Welcomes Government's Decision to Ratify the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/305-sahrc-welcomes-government-s-decision-to-ratify-the-international-covenant-on-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-icescr accessed 22 November 2019        [ Links ]

Samson M 2004 Cash Transfers to Improve the Protection and Care of Vulnerable Children and to Empower Families in the Context of the HIV Epidemic in Pappua New Guinea: Conceptual Framework http://www.inapng.com/pdf_files/Social%20Cash%20Transfers%20-Concept%20-Samson%20UNICEF-INA-DfCD.pdf accessed 22 November 2019        [ Links ]

List of Abbreviations

AJICL African Journal of International and Comparative Law

AJIL American Journal of International Law

Am U Int'l L Rev American University International Law Review

ASIL Proceedings Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Annual Meeting

BCEA Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997

Cal W Int'l LJ California Western International Law Journal

CESCR Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

CILSA Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa

CJLJ Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence

EJIL European Journal of International Law

Ga J Int'l & Comp L Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law

ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

ICLQ International and Comparative Law Quarterly

IJCLLIR International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations

IJERPH International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

ILO International Labour Organisation

LRA Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

NEDLAC National Economic Development and Labour Council

Notre Dame L Rev Notre Dame Law Review

OHCHR United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

PELJ Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal

SAHRC South African Human Rights Commission

SALRC South African Law Reform Commission

SAPL Southern African Public Law

UDHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights

UN United Nations

VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee

 

 

Date Submitted: 10 August 2021
Date Revised: 9 May 2022
Date Accepted: 9 May 2022
Date Published: 3 June 2022

 

 

Editor:Prof O Fuo
* Clarence Itumeleng Tshoose. LLB LLM (NWU) LLD (UNISA). Professor, Department of Mercantile and Labour Law, School of Law, University of Limpopo, South Africa. E-mail: itumeleng.tshoose@ul.ac.za. This article is partly based on the author's unpublished LLD thesis entitled Social Assistance: Legal Reforms to Improve Coverage and Quality of Life for the Poor People in South Africa submitted at the University of South Africa, 2017. I would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments. The views or opinions expressed therein are those of the author alone.
1 See Trebilcock "International Labour Standards" 585-613.
2 Swepston "International Labour Law" 141-145.
3 Olivier et al Social Security 23-24.
4 GN 1108 in GG 18166 of 8 August 1997 (White Paper for Social Welfare).
5 Chapter 7 of the White Paper for Social Welfare (GN 1108 in GG 18166 of 8 August 1997).
6 ILO 2021 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-ed_norm/-relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_780953.pdf9.
7 ILO Rules of the Game 10-11.
8 ILO 2019 https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/RessourcePDF.action?id=551962.
9 Compare Weiss 2013 IJCLLIR 7-19; Olivier 2013 IJCLLIR 21-38; Fombad 2013 AJICL 7-11; Hodges 2014 Journal of Industrial Relations 566-575.
10 ILO date unknown https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/conventions-and-recommendations/lang--en/index.htm.
11 ILO date unknown https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/conventions-and-recommendations/lang--en/index.htm.
12 ILO Rules of the Game 10-11.
13 Smit and Van Eck 2010 CILSA 46; see Marshall "Importance of International Labour Standards" 65-70.
14 Dugard 1997 EJIL 77-80; see Barber 1991 International Affairs 723; Dugard 1991 Social Justice 83-92.
15 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993 (the Interim Constitution); Devine 1995 ICLQ 1-5.
16 Olivier et al Introduction to Social Security 163-164. See Hopkins 2003 CILSA 292298.
17 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Brind 1991 1 AC 696 (HL) 761G-762D; Pan American World Airways Incorporated v SA Fire and Accident Insurance Co Ltd 1965 3 SA 150 (A) 161C; Maluleke v Minister of Internal Affairs 1981 1 SA 707 (B) 712G-H; Binga v Cabinet for South West Africa 1988 3 SA 155 (A) 184H-185D; S v Petane 1988 3 SA 51 (C) 56F-G; Hahlo and Kahn South African Legal System 114; Dugard International Law 339-446.
18 See Olivier 2003 PELJ 26-42.
19 See ss 39(1)(b) and (c) of the Constitution.
20 Gericke 2014 PELJ 2601-2604.
21 Republic of Angola v Springbok Investments (Pty) Ltd 2005 2 BLR 159 (HC) 162.
22 National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa v Bader Bop (Pty) Ltd 2003 3 SA 513 (CC) para 37, where the Constitutional Court held that an interpretation that takes into account principles contained in relevant ILO Conventions is to be preferred.
23 S v Makwanyane 1995 6 BCLR 665 (CC) (S v Makwanyane).
24 S v Makwanyane paras 12-17.
25 S v Makwanyane paras 16 and 17.
26 Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC) para 26.

28 Campbell and Miller Human Rights and the Moral Responsibilities 1 -26.
29 Social Protection Floors Recommendation 202 of 2012.
30 Simpson 2021 CJLJ 149-169.
31 Islam International Law and Current Concepts 556.
32 Islam International Law and Current Concepts 556.
33 Islam International Law and Current Concepts 556.
34 Nickel Making Sense of Human Rights 9-10.
35 See Barrientos and Leisering 2013 International Journal of Social Welfare 59-61.
36 Mubangizi Protection of Human Rights in South Africa 4-13. See also Huber 2013 Journal of Human Rights 129; Weiss et al United Nations and Changing World Politics 165-166.
37 Nickel Making Sense of Human Rights 7-36; Griffin On Human Rights 33; see Papisca "Relevance of Human Rights" 91.
38 Mpedi 2005 Obiter 174.
39 Davy 2014 Washington University of Global Studies Law Review 207-212; see Openshaw and Mansell International Law 126-135.
40 Sen 2004 Philosophy and Public Affairs 345-348; Wellman Moral Dimensions of Human Rights 12-13.
41 Article 22 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (the UDHR).
42 Article 22 of the UDHR.
43 Article 9 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1996) (the ICESCR).
44 CESCR date unknown https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/FactSheet16rev.1en.pdf. See also CESCR General Comment No 19, The Right to Social Security UN Doc E/C.12/GC/19 (2008) (art 9).
45 Declaration of Philadelphia (1944), adopted by the International Labour Conference, 26th session, 1944. Art III(f) recognises the "solemn obligation of the ILO to further among the nations of the world programmes which will achieve the extension of social security measures to provide a basic income to all in need of such protection and comprehensive medical care".
46 See ILO Resolution and Conclusions Concerning Social Security.
47 In this respect, the Commission further stated that basic social security constitutes a recognised human right and a global responsibility.
48 See Munro Risk, Needs and Rights 30-34.
49 The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the CESCR) describes the purpose of the right to social security in General Comment No 19 as follows: "The right to social security is of central importance in guaranteeing human dignity for all persons when they faced with circumstances that deprive them of their capacity to fully realise their Covenant rights". (CESCR General Comment No 19, The Right to Social Security UN Doc E/C.12/GC/19 (2008)).
50 King Judging Social Rights 22-23.
51 Mishra 2005 International Social Work 17-18.
52 ILO Resolution and Conclusions Concerning Social Security.
53 See Krennerich 2014 VRÜ 105-122.
54 See Pawar 2012 Journal of Comparative Social Welfare 35-38.
55 See Samson 2004 http://www.inapng.com/pdf_files/Social%20Cash%20Transfers%20-Concept%20-Samson%20UNICEF-INA-DfCD.pdf.
56 Lehmann 2006 Am U Int'l L Rev 163-196. See also De Schutter Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 293-450.
57 See Berdyev et al Reporting Human Rights Violations 3-19.
58 All these risks are covered under the following conventions: (a) Income Security Recommendation 67 of 1944; (b) Medical Care Recommendation 69 of 1944; (c) Equality of Treatment (Social Security) Convention 118 of 1962; (d) Employment Injury Benefits Convention 121 of 1964; (e) Invalidity, Old-Age and Survivors' Benefits Convention 128 of 1967; (f) Medical Care and Sickness Benefit Convention 130 of 1969; (g) Maintenance of Social Security Rights Convention 157 of 1982; (h) Employment Promotion and Protection Against Unemployment Convention 168 of 1988; (i) Maternity Protection Convention 183 of 2000; (j) Social Protection Floors Recommendation 202 of 2012.
59 ILO Assessment of the South African Legislation.
60 Article 9 of the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention 102 of 1952.
61 See Art 55(a) of the Charter of the United Nations (1945) (the UN Charter).
62 See Arts 55(b) and (c) of the UN Charter.
63 See the Preamble of the UN Charter.
64 Article 22 of the UDHR.
65 ILO Social Security for All 1 -41. See Kulke 2007 International Social Security Review 124-127; Kannan 2007 International Social Security Review 19-23.
66 Kannan 2007 International Social Security Review 19-23.
67 ILO Social Security for All VI.
68 Anon 2003 https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/world-of-work-magazine/articles/WCMS_081319/lang--en/index.htm.
69 ILO World Social Protection Report 2014/15 2.
70 Bailey 2004 http://www.ilo.int/public/english/protection/socsec/pol/campagne/files/addispaper.pdf 2-3.
71 ILO Social Security for All.
72 ILO 2003 https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_005285/lang--en/index.htm.
73 ILO Social Security for All.
74 ILO Social Protection Floor Initiative 1 -4.
75 ILO Social Protection Floor Initiative 1 -4.
76 ILO Social Protection Floor Initiative.
77 ILO Summit on the Global Jobs Crisis. See also Anon 2009 https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/world-of-work-magazine/articles/WCMS_115059/lang--en/index.htm 4-7.
78 See also Anon 2009 https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/world-of-work-magazine/articles/WCMS_115059/lang--en/index.htm 4-7.
79 Garcia and Gruat 2003 http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/download/lifecycl/lifecycle.pdf 13-120.
80 Veit-Wilson "Some Social Policy Implications of a Right to Social Security" 65.
81 See also Glendon 1998 Notre Dame L Rev 1153-1164; Schwelb 1959 ASIL Proceedings 217-229.
82 Hannum 1996 Ga J Int'l & Comp L 287-290. See also Gruskin 1998 Health and Human Rights 3-6.
83 Vierdag "Legal Nature of the Rights Granted by the International Covenant" 3-39.
84 OHCHR 2021 https://indicators.ohchr.org/.
85 SAHRC 2015 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/305-sahrc-welcomes-government-s-decision-to-ratify-the-international-covenant-on-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-icescr.
86 SAHRC 2015 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/305-sahrc-welcomes-government-s-decision-to-ratify-the-international-covenant-on-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-icescr.
87 Article 25(1) of the ICESCR.
88 Article 10 of the ICESCR.
89 Masanque 2012 Cal W Int'l LJ 462-487.
90 Article 2(1) of the ICESCR; Saul et al International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 133-172. See Madzodzo v Minister of Basic Education 2014 3 SA 441 (ECM) and Governing Body of the Juma Musjid Primary School v Essay 2011 7 BCLR 651 (CC). Citing the decision of Juma Musjid case the court in Madzodzo highlighted that the "right to basic education provided for in section 29 (1) (a) of the Constitution is an unqualified right which is immediately realizable and is not subject to the limitation of progressive realization". The right to basic education is also "an empowerment right". In order to comply with its obligation to respect the right to basic education, the government is required to "take all reasonable measures to realize" the right with "immediate effect".
91 See Article 2 of the ICESCR.
92 Alston and Simma 1987 AJIL 747-749.
93 Alston and Simma 1987 AJIL 747-749.
94 Alston and Simma 1987 AJIL 747-749.
95 Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2008).
96 Article 2 of the ICESCR.
97 For further reading on the Human Rights Council and its mechanisms, see UN Human Rights Council 5-24.
98 Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign (No 2) 2002 5 SA 721 (CC); Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC); Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg 2010 4 SA 1 (CC). See also Chirwa date unknown http://aihr-resourcescenter.org/administrator/upload/documents/Socio-economic_rights_in_Africa.pdf.
99 Fombad 2013 AJICL 9-10.
100 Fombad 2013 AJICL 9-10.
101 CESCR General Comment No 3, The Nature of States Parties' Obligations UN Doc E/1991/23 (1990) para 4.
102 Chenwi 2013 De Jure 742-769.
103 Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights Handbook 572.
104 Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights Handbook 572. See Jacoob in Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC) para 31.
105 CESCR General Comment No 3, The Nature of States Parties' Obligations UN Doc E/1991/23 (1990) paras 9 and 10. See also Constitutional Court judgment of Certification of the Amended Text of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1997 1 BCLR 1 (CC) para 19.
106 See Boswell and Boswell 2009 Agenda 76-84.
107 For further reading, see SALRC Project 143.
108 108 SACWU v Sentrachem Ltd 1988 9 ILJ 410 (IC) 429. For a detailed discussion on post democratic judgments which have infused the requirements of Convention 111 on the interpretation of the constitutional prohibition of unfair discrimination in the workplace. See Hoffmann v South African Airways 2000 12 BLLR 1365 (CC); Harksen v Lane 1997 11 BCLR 1489 (CC); Mias v Minister of Justice 2002 1 BLLR 1 (LAC); HOSPERSA obo Venter v SA Nursing Council 2006 6 BLLR 558 (LC); Leonard Dingler Employee Representative Council v Leonard Dingler (Pty) Ltd 1997 11 BLLR 1438 (LC).
109 ILO 2021 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-ed_norm/-relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_804622.pdf 63.
110 Fourie acknowledges that the new forms of work have been recognised by the ILO, and in terms of its standard setting, it covers employees outside the traditional employment relationship. See Fourie 2008 PELJ 133-134; Smit and Van Eck 2010 CILSA 46-51.
111 Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (the LRA).
112 Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (the BCEA).
113 See National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa v Bader Bop (Pty) Ltd 2003 3 SA 513 (CC) para 27.
114 These legislative provisions have a similar status in the BCEA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, and the Skills Development Act 97 of 1998.
115 See part 3 of GN 1774 in GG 29445 of 1 December 2006 (Code of Good Practice: Who is an Employee).
116 Budeli-Nemakonde 2017 SAPL 6-7.
117 See ILO Employment Relationship 35-36.
118 Kasuso Definition of an "Employee" 29.
119 Nemusimbori Appraisal of the Status of Uber Drivers 16.
120 Nemusimbori Appraisal of the Status of Uber Drivers 16.
121 For further discussion, see Tshoose and Kruger 2013 PELJ 299-306; Budeli 2010 Obiter 16-33.
122 On the status of the ILO Conventions that South Africa has ratified, see ILO date unknown https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:11200:0::NO::P11200_COUNTRY_ID:102888.
123 Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention 87 of 1948.
124 Bhoola 2002 https://www.ilo.org/ifpdial/information-resources/national-labour-law-profiles/WCMS_158919/lang--en/index.htm.
125 National Education Health and Allied Workers Union v University of Cape Town 2003 24 ILJ 95 (CC) paras 34, 41 and 47-51.
126 S v Makwanyane.
127 S v Makwanyane para 35.
128 Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC).
129 Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC) para 26.
130 SA National Defence Union v Minister of Justice 1999 20 ILJ 2265 (CC).
131 SA National Defence Union v Minister of Justice 1999 20 ILJ 2265 (CC) para 35. See also Murray v Minister of Defence 2006 11 BCLR 1357 (C) 1358.
132 Discovery Health Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration 2008 29 ILJ 1480 (LC) para 38 and 42.
133 National Education Health and Allied Workers Union v University of Cape Town 2003 24 ILJ 95 (CC) (National Education Health & AWU).
134 National Education Health & AWU para 34.
135 National Education Health & AWU para 34.
136 National Education Health & AWU para 34.
137 Rural Maintenance (Pty) Ltd v Maluti-A-Phofung Local Municipality 2017 38 ILJ 295 (CC) (Rural Maintenance (Pty) Ltd case).
138 Rural Maintenance (Pty) Ltd case para 21.
139 Avril Elizabeth Home for the Mentally Handicapped v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration 2006 27 ILJ 1644 (LC) (Avril Elizabeth Home case).
140 Avril Elizabeth Home case. The security of employment provision is buttressed by the Termination of Employment Convention 158 of 1982, which provides that a worker's employment shall not be terminated unless there is a valid reason.
141 Avril Elizabeth Home case.
142 See ILO Democratisation and the ILO 28.
143 See Waas "How to Improve Monitoring and Enforcement" 79-94.