SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue2 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

SA Orthopaedic Journal

Print version ISSN 1681-150X

SA orthop. j. vol.11 no.2 Pretoria Apr. 2012

 

CLINICAL ARTICLE

 

The lift-off sign: further observations on the Lachman test for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture

 

 

Jonathan F GordonI; Philip JH Sloper FRCS(TO)II; Joel TKMelton MSc, FRCS(TO)III; Mervyn J Cross OAM, MD, FRACSIV

IMedical student. Australian Institute of Musculo-Skeletal Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
IIClinical Knee Fellow. Australian Institute of Musculo-Skeletal Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
IIIClinical Knee Fellow. Australian Institute of Musculo-Skeletal Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
IVOrthopaedic Knee Surgeon Australian Institute of Musculo-Skeletal Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia

Reprint requests

 

 


ABSTRACT

The Lachman test is a commonly used clinical test for evaluating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) integrity. When performing the Lachman test we have noted an additional, previously unreported finding, which helps to discriminate between the intact and ruptured ACL. This observation, which we have named the lift-off sign, can be explained using the different classes of lever system operating in each case.

Key words: ACL, knee, knee injuries, Lachman


 

 

Introduction

Torg et al published the first report of the eponymous Lachman test in 1976.1 The test was named after Torg's mentor, John W Lachman MD, Chairman and Professor of Orthopaedics at Temple University, Philadelphia, who popularised the test within his institution, although he did not claim to be the first to use it. Descriptions of similar findings can be found in the works numerous authors, including Trillat, Hey-Groves and Segond, with the earliest description being attributed to Noulis in 1875.2

The Lachman test has been shown to be both sensitive and specific for diagnosis of ACL rupture,3 and other ligamentous injuries have relatively little confounding effect.4 However, as with all clinical tests, there can be occasions when the result is not clear. Torg suggests that, if there is any doubt, the ligament should be considered ruptured, stating: 'A corollary to interpreting the test is that if question remains in the examiner's mind as to whether the test is positive or negative, the ligament is torn'.1

We believe that we have noted an additional examination finding which helps to diminish that doubt and confirm the diagnosis of ACL rupture when performing the Lachman test.

 

Technique

The Lachman Test is performed with the patient supine and the knee flexed to approximately 15 degrees.1 An anterior translation force is then applied to the proximal tibia. Any instability can be graded as mild (less than 5 mm translation), moderate (5-10 mm) or severe (greater than 10 mm translation).4 The quality of the end point should also be noted: a 'hard' end point indicates that at least some fibres are in continuity, while a 'soft' end point indicates complete rupture of the anterior cruciate liga-ment.1 We remind the reader that, when examining the ligamentous integrity of the knee, a posterior cruciate ligament rupture must be excluded before examining the ACL to avoid observing a false positive Lachman test.4

 

Pathomechanics

When performing the Lachman test on patients with an intact ACL, we have noted that the patient's heel is lifted off the table by the anterior translational force applied to the tibia. However, in patients with complete ACL rupture, the patient's heel remains on the examination table despite the same anterior translation force being applied. The explanation of this phenomenon is straightforward when the lever systems and moments involved in each case are considered.

With an intact ACL, excessive anterior translation of the tibia is prevented by tension in the ligament and, when taut, the tibial insertion of the ACL effectively acts as a fulcrum. If the moment generated around this fulcrum by the anterior pull of the examiner's hand overcomes the opposite moment produced by the weight of the leg, the foot is lifted off the table (Figure 1A). The result is a class 3 lever system (Figure 2A).

 


 

 


 

Following ACL rupture, the tibial insertion of the ACL can no longer function as a fulcrum and therefore anterior translation of the tibia is relatively unrestricted. (The ACL has been found to provide 86% of the resistance to anterior translation of the tibia.5) When performing the Lachman test on an ACL-deficient knee, the patient's heel acts as the primary fulcrum and the anterior pull of the examiner's hand produces anterior translation of the tibia and rotation around the heel; there is no significant moment to lift the patient's foot off the table (Figure 1B). The result is a class 2 lever system (Figure 2B).

In the acutely injured knee, where manual examination may be limited by pain, a similar phenomenon can be observed using the 'no touch' ACL test previously described by the senior author.6 Using this technique, the patient is placed supine with the injured knee flexed and bolstered at approximately 30°.

While the examiner observes the lateral aspect of the knee, the patient is instructed to raise the heel off the examination table by flexing the quadriceps and extending the knee. If there is an isolated rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament, the tibial plateau will gently subluxate forward on the femoral condyle as extension is initiated while the heel remains on the table. Even more pronounced will be the posterior reduction of the tibial plateau after the heel is replaced on the table and the patient relaxes the quadriceps.

We recognise that, if a large enough sustained force is applied during the Lachman test, the foot can be lifted off the table by pulling the proximal tibia anteriorly even in the absence of an intact ACL. However, it is not until the secondary restraints to anterior translation become taut, and after significant displacement, that the proximal fulcrum can become effective again. This displacement should be readily observed as a positive Lachman test well before the foot leaves the bed.

 

Future research

Although the biomechanical principles of the lift-off sign are sound, the interpretation of this sign is subject to patient and examiner factors. In our experience, demonstration of the lift-off sign and its corollary is reliable and reproducible when the ACL is completely intact and completely torn, respectively. However, the lift-off sign is likely to be less accurate in cases of partial ACL tears and other concomitant knee injuries. The authors intend to address this with future research to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of the lift-off sign by comparing physical examination findings with magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic results in patients with suspected ACL injury. Until such formal scientific investigation is completed, we believe that this description of the lift-off sign can not only aid clinicians in the diagnosis of ACL injury, but that demonstration of the lift-off sign may enhance students' comprehension of ACL anatomy and mechanics.

Conclusion

In summary, we have noted that, when performing the Lachman test in the presence of an intact ACL, the patient's foot tends to lift off the table, while with a ruptured ACL it remains on the table. This observation, which we have named the lift-off sign, is explained by a difference in the lever systems operating in each case and may aid in the diagnosis of ACL injury.

 

References

1. Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 1976;4(2):84-93.        [ Links ]

2. Paessler HH, Michel D. How new is the Lachman test? Am J Sports Med 1992;20:95-98.        [ Links ]

3. Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, et al. Physical examination of the knee: A review of the original test descriptions and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;Apr(84):592-603.        [ Links ]

4. Donaldson III WF, Warren RF, Wickiewicz T. A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations: Initial versus examination under anaesthesia. Am J Sports Med 1985;13(1):5-10.        [ Links ]

5. Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ED. Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee: A biomechan- ical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;Mar 62-A:259-70.        [ Links ]

6. Cross MJ, Schmidt DR, Mackie IG. A no-touch test for the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;Mar 69(2):300.        [ Links ]

 

 

Reprint requests:
Jonathan Gordon
North Sydney Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Centre
3 Gillies Street
Wollstonecraft NSW
2065 Australia
Tel: + 61 2 9437 5999
Fax: + 61 2 9906 1060
Email: jonathan.gordon@hotmail.com

 

 

No benefits of any form have been received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.