Print version ISSN 1681-150X
SA orthop. j. vol.9 n.2 Pretoria Jan. 2010
CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
TG TshitakeI; R GoleleII; KC SkosanaIII; MN BidaIV
IMBChB(Medunsa), FC Orth(SA) Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Dr George Mukhari Hospital
IIMBChB(Natal), MFGP(SA), MMed(Orth), FCS(Orth)(SA) Professor and Head of Department Orthopaedics Surgery, University of Limpopo (Medunsa campus)
IIIMBChB Senior registrar, Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of Limpopo (Medunsa campus)
IVMBChB, MMed(Anat Path) FF(Path)(SA), MRC(Path)(UK), MFC(UK), MPH(UP), Cert Mol Bio(UP) Consultant Pathologist, University of Limpopo (Medunsa campus)
Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is an entity first described in 1959 by Lichtenstein and Bernstein.1 It is rare and comprises approximately 1% of all chondrosarcomas, with a peak incidence in the second and third decade of life.3 There is a comparable male-to-female sex ratio with two-thirds of cases arising from bone and a third from the soft tissues mainly in central areas such as the head and neck or the axial skeleton. We present a case of this highly malignant lesion arising from skeletal muscles of the thigh having already metastasised to multiple unusual areas.
A 41-year-old woman with no remarkable past medical history presented initially to her primary care physician with a painless, slow-growing mass on the medial aspect of her left thigh (appearing as a benign lesion). Two years later the mass grew bigger and she started experiencing numbness, a tingling sensation of the left leg, followed by pain and cold intolerance. She was then referred to a surgeon who diagnosed a second mass from the thyroid gland associated with weight loss, loss of appetite, palpitations and hypochromic microcytic anaemia with gradual thrombocytopaenia. A left thyroid lobectomy was done and the histological features suggestive of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MC) were established.
On presentation to our orthopaedic oncology services she had metastases to the right shoulder and pancreas, and a painful thigh primary that looked malignant. Due to encasement of the superficial femoral vessels, her distal pulses dwindled in character and volume as compared to the contralateral extremity. Plain radiography demonstrated a tumour arising from the soft tissues with associated calcifications (stippled in nature) and a soft tissue component. Angiographic findings were those of a lesion with a vascular component to it in close relationship with the superficial femoral artery (Figure1).
The tumour showed an increased uptake on the pool phase of the technetium-99 and MiBi scan with associated lesions in the neck and retroperitoneal regions (Figure 2).
Surgical excision of the tumour was done by a team comprising vascular and orthopaedic surgeons. En block resection was performed with a 10 cm segment of superficial femoral artery replaced by a graft harvested from the long saphenous vein.
Grossly, the tumour was well-circumscribed with a heterogeneous cut surface composed of white fibrous areas, cartilaginous areas and dark brown haemorrhagic areas (Figure 3). The tumour measured 21 x 14 x 11 cm in size.
Histologically, the tumour showed a biphasic pattern made up of solid areas of round and spindle-shaped mesenchymal cells interspersed with islands of well-differentiated cartilage. The mesenchymal component often exhibits a haemangiopericytic pattern with multiple vascular spaces (Figure 4).The tumour cells were immunohistochemically reactive for CD99 and negative for S100.
A week later the patient was ambulant with marked improvement of the lower limb symptoms. She was subjected to radiation therapy for all other inoperable lesions. At re-evaluation 6 months postoperatively, she had no recurrence of the thigh tumour and the other lesions, although still present, had diminished in size.
Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is a rare entity originally described in the literature as a biphasic tumour consisting of spindle cell mesenchyme mixed with areas of chondroid differentiation. Of the few cases that have been reported in the literature, the head and neck area is the most commonly involved. It is a subtype of chondrosarcoma, a term that includes a heterogeneous group of lesions with varied clinical behaviour and morphological features that share the common feature arising from ossified cartilage or cartilaginous rests.1 The cells are uniform, round to spindle shaped and resemble those of Ewing's tumour with a perivascular arrangement of cells which results in a haemangiopericytoma pattern of cellular arrangement.2 This lesion comprises 1% of all chondrosarcomas and has a very wide range of distribution with a peak incidence in the second decade of life.3
Molecular pathology of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma has been evaluated with respect to differentiating it from other small cell sarcomas. Muller and co-workers4 have found that it expresses type II collagen which differentiates it from other small cell sarcomas such as Ewing's, synovial sarcoma and haemangiopericytoma.
These investigators also noted that mesenchymal chondrosarcoma that is largely composed of small cells lacked the S-100 protein expression which is atypical of other chondrosarcomas. It has also been established that mesenchymal chondrosarcoma expresses Sox-9 gene, a regulator in mesenchymal cell differentiation, which is not the case with other small cell tumours.5 Huvos et al6 histologically classified mesenchymal chondrosarcomas into two groups: the haemangiopericytoid variant and the less well-differentiated small cell variety.
A small or insufficient biopsy specimen obtained from where chondroid matrix is absent results in several other small cell neoplasias becoming part of the differential diagnosis. These tumours include haemangiopericytoma, synovial sarcoma, PNET, neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, small cell osteosarcoma, leukaemic deposits (granulocytic sarcoma) and malignant lymphoma.3,7-10
As with other bony sarcomas, surgery remains the primary treatment modality for mesenchymal chondrosarcoma regardless of anatomic site. In a true oncologic en block resection, the intended tissue margins of excision should be designed to extend well beyond the actual tumour, as it may exhibit small pseudo pod-like projections into the surrounding soft tissues.11
The benefit of neo-adjuvant modalities for MC has not been proven. However the use of preoperative radiotherapy prior to radical resection has been shown to reduce tumour bulk.7,12 Postoperative radiotherapy has been reported to increase survival rates although the studies done did not have statistically significant numbers of patients.13,14 The overall survival rate at 5 and 10 years is 55% and 27% respectively.3 Nussbeck et al15 have suggested that proliferative activity, as measured by specialised immunohistochemical staining, may be an important prognostic factor. MiBi has also been shown to be of prognostic relevance16 while cell type is of no prognostic importance.11
1. Lichtenstein L, Bernstein D. Unusual benign and malignant chondroid tumors of bone. A survey of some mesenchymal cartilage tumors and malignant chondroblastic tumors, including a few multicentric ones, as well as many atypical benign chondroblastomas and chondromyxoid fibromas. Cancer 1959;12:1142-57. [ Links ]
2. Bollough P. Cartilage producing tumours. In Orthopaedic Pathology 4th edition. Mosby 2004 pp. 4201. [ Links ]
3. Nakashima Y, Unni KK, Shives T, Swee C, Dahlin DC. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of bone and soft tissue. A review of 111 cases. Cancer 1986;57:2444-453. [ Links ]
4. Muller S, Soder S, Oliveira AM, Inwards CY, Aigner T. Type II collagen as specific marker for mesenchymal chondrosarcomas compared to other small cell sarcomas of the skeleton. Mod Pathol 2005;18:1088-94. [ Links ]
5. Wehrl BM, Huang W, De Combrugghe B, Ayala AG, Czerniak B. Sox9, a master regulator of chondrogenesis, distinguishes mesenchymal chondrosarcoma from other small blue round cell tumours. Human pathology 2003;34(3):263-9. [ Links ]
6. Huvos AG, Marcove RC. Chondrosarcoma in the young. A clinicopathologic analysis of 79 patients younger than 21 years of age. Am J Surg Pathol 1987;11:930-42. [ Links ]
7. Knott PD, Gannon FH, Thompson LDR. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the sinonasal tract: a clinicopathological study of 13 cases with a review of the literature. Laryngoscope 2003;113:783-90. [ Links ]
8. Salvadro AH, Beabout JW, Dahlin DC. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: observations on 30 new cases. Cancer 1971;28:605-15. [ Links ]
9. Bertoni F, Picci P, Bacchini P, Capanna R, Innao V and Bacci G et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of bone and soft tissues. Cancer 1983;52:533-41. [ Links ]
10. Devaney K, Vinh TN, Sweet DE. Small cell osteosarcoma. An immunohistochemical study with differential diagnostic considerations. Hum Pathol 1993;23:1211-25. [ Links ]
11. Pelliteri P, Ferlito A, Fagan J, Suarez C, Devaney K, Rinaldo A. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncology 2007;819-26. [ Links ]
12. Shapeero LG, Vanel D, Couanet D, Contesso G, Ackerman LV. Extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Radiology 1993;186:819-26. [ Links ]
13. Aryoshi Y, Shimahara M. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the maxilla: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:733-7. [ Links ]
14. Christensen RE Jr. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Md Oral Pathol 1982;54:197-206. [ Links ]
15. Nussbeck W, Neureiter D, Soder S, Inwards C and Aigner T. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: and immunohistochemical study of 10 cases examining prognostic significance of proliferative activity and cellular differentiation. Pathology 2004;36:230-3.
16. Daugaard S, Myhre-Jensen O, Schiodt T, Jurik AG, Keller J, Mouridsen HT, et al. Clinical and histopathological prognostic factors in chondrosarcomas. Sarcoma 1997;1:47-54. [ Links ]
17. Shaoyi LI, Siegal PG. Small cell tumors of bone. Adv Anat Pathol 2010;17:1-11. [ Links ]
Dr TG Tshitake
PO Box 224 Medunsa 0204
Tel: (012) 521-4049 Fax: (012) 521-4029
No benefits of any form have been received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.