SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 issue4The surgical management of spinal tuberculosis in children and adolescentsEarly results of the Ponseti technique for a clubfoot clinic in South Africa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

SA Orthopaedic Journal

On-line version ISSN 2309-8309
Print version ISSN 1681-150X

SA orthop. j. vol.8 n.4 Pretoria Jan. 2009

 

CLINICAL ARTICLE

 

Acromioclavicular joint: Direct arthroscopy, the Mumford procedure

 

 

C AnleyI; J de BeerII

IMBChB(Stell), MPhil(Sportsmedicine)(UCT); Registrar. Dept of Orthopaedics, University of Stellenbosch
IIMBChB, MMed(Ortho); Senior Consultant. Dept of Orthopaedics, University of Stellenbosch

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Isolated degeneration of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is a common cause of ACJ pain in active young to middle-aged athletes and workers performing overhead activities. Once conservative treatment has failed, various surgical options are available. These are an open ACJ excision or an arthroscopic resection, either via a subacromial approach or via direct superior approach.
METHODS: The diagnosis of isolated ACJ pathology was confirmed on history, examination, and special investigation including X-rays and ACJ injection. Patients then underwent an arthroscopic ACJ resection via a superior approach as described by Flatow, a brief description of which is presented in this article.
RESULTS: A total of 168 patients who had undergone a superior ACJ resection were interviewed telephonically to assess their current level of function and satisfaction. In total 81% reported excellent results, with 7% good results and 12% poor results.
CONCLUSION: Although various surgical techniques are available, when considering surgical treatment options for isolated ACJ pathology, resection of the ACJ via a direct superior approach is a safe and effective method.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

References

1. Auge WK, Fischer RA. Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection for isolated atraumatic osteolysis in weight lifters. Am J Sports Med 1998;26:189-92.         [ Links ]

2. Cahill BR. Osteolysis of the distal part of the clavicle in male athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1053-8.         [ Links ]

3. Dupas J, Badilon P, Dayde G. Aspects radiologiques d'une osteolyse essentielle progressive de la main gauge. J Radiology 1936;20:383-7.         [ Links ]

4. Ehricht HG. [Osteolysis of the lateral clavicular end after compressed air damage.]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 1959;50:576-82.         [ Links ]

5. Levine AH, Pais MJ, Schwartz EE. Posttraumatic osteolysis of the distal clavicle with emphasis on early radiologic changes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976;127:781-4.         [ Links ]

6. Brunet ME, Reynolds MC, Cook SD, Brown TW. Atraumatic osteolysis of the distal clavicle: histologic evidence of synovial pathogenesis. A case report. Orthopedics 1986;9:557-9.         [ Links ]

7. Madsen B. Osteolysis of the acromial end of the clavicle following trauma. Br J Radiol 1963;36:822-8.         [ Links ]

8. Pennington RG, Bottomley NJ, Neen D, Brownlow HC. Radiological features of osteoarthritis of the acromiclav-icular joint and its association with clinical symptoms. J Orthop Surg (Hong.Kong) 2008;16:300-2.         [ Links ]

9. Mumford EB. Acromioclavicular dislocation: A new operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surgery (Am) 1941;23:799-802.         [ Links ]

10. Gurd FB. The treatment of complete dislocation of the outer end of the clavicle: A hitherto undescribed operation. Annals of Surgery 1941;113:1094-7.         [ Links ]

11. Schwarzkopf R, Ishak C, Elman M, Gelber J, Strauss DN, Jazrawi LM. Distal clavicular osteolysis: a review of the literature. Bull NYU.Hosp.Jt.Dis. 2008;66:94-101.         [ Links ]

12. LL Johnson. In St Louis, ed. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy, CV Mosby, 1981.         [ Links ]

13. Flatow EL, Cordasco FA, Bigliani LU. Arthroscopic resection of the outer end of the clavicle from a superior approach: a critical, quantitative, radiographic assessment of bone removal. Arthroscopy 1992;8:55-64.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Dr C Anley
Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery
PO Box 19063
Tygerberg
7505
Tel: +27 21 938-9266
E-mail: cam_anley@yahoo.com

 

 

This article is the sole work of the authors. No benefits of any form are to be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License