SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.7 issue4Accessory features of frozen shoulderThe position of the 'bare spot' - not central in the glenoid author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


SA Orthopaedic Journal

On-line version ISSN 2309-8309
Print version ISSN 1681-150X

SA orthop. j. vol.7 n.4 Centurion Oct./Dec. 2008




Bifacet dislocations of cervical spine: Acute management and outcome



Dr Albert B du ToitI; Dr Robert DunnII

IDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stellenbosch University, UCT rotation
IIHead Orthopaedic Spinal Services, Acute Spinal Cord Injury Unit, University of Cape Town





INTRODUCTION: Although the goal in treating bilateral facet dislocations remains the early realignment of the spine, there is controversy regarding the timing and method of reduction, as well as the optimal approach for stabilisation. A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 36 consecutive patients treated for bilateral cervical facet dislocations (BCFD) at the Groote Schuur Hospital Acute Spinal Cord Injury Unit (ASCI) is presented.
METHODS: Case notes and radiographs of 36 BCFD patients managed from April 2003 to January 2007 were reviewed with reference to reduction, stabilisation, radiographic measurements, union, neurology and complications.
RESULTS: There were 27 males and 9 females. MVAs were the cause in 26 cases. C6/7 was the commonest level of dislocation, followed by C5/6. Seventy-five per cent of the patients had a complete neurological deficit, with only three limited to radiculopathy. Thirteen out of 21 had successful closed reductions, while 14/17 underwent successful open reduction via an anterior approach. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was utilised in 25 cases, posterior fixation in five, anterior and posterior in four, and conservative management in two cases. There were three cases of fixation failure, with two requiring revision. There were two transient recurrent nerve palsies but no sepsis. There was a 100% confirmed union rate. There were three deaths related to respiratory compromise. There was no difference in outcome between the posterior and anterior approaches. Although only a few patients improved neurologically, there were no patients with deteriorating motor function at last follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Early aggressive surgical management for cervical bifacet dislocations yields good results. Open reduction followed by immediate stabilisation by ACDF is highly successful in the acute case and obviates the need for traction and possible associated neurological complications. In highly unstable cases or cases with poor screw purchase, supplemental posterior fixation may be required. Posterior alone surgery is occasionally indicated, such as delayed presentation and cervico-thoracic junction. Closed reduction with delayed stabilisation remains an acceptable option in the resource-restricted environment.



“Full text available only in PDF format”




1. Greg Anderson D, Voets C, Ropiak R, et al. Analysis of patient variables affecting neurologic outcome after traumatic cervical facet dislocation. Spine J 2004; 4:506-12.         [ Links ]

2. Hadley MN, Fitzpatrick BC, Sonntag VK, et al. Facet fracture-dislocation injuries of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 1992; 30:661-6.         [ Links ]

3. Beatson TR. Fracture and dislocations of the cervical spine. JBJS Br 1983;45:21-35.         [ Links ]

4. Carrino et al. Posterior longitudinal ligament status in cervical spine bifacet dislocations. Skeletal Radiology 2006;35:510-4.         [ Links ]

5. Grant GA, Mirza SK, Chapman JR, et al. Risk of early closed reduction in cervical spine subluxation injuries. J Neurosurg 1999;90:13-8.         [ Links ]

6. Star AM, Jones AA, Cotler JM, et al. Immediate closed reduction of cervical spine dislocations using traction. Spine 1990;15:1068-72.         [ Links ]

7. Vital JM, Gille O, Senergas J, et al. Reduction technique for uni- and bi-articular dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine 1998;23:949-54.         [ Links ]

8. Fehlings MG, Sekhon LH, Tator C. The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury: What do we know? What should we do? Spine 2001;26:S101-10.         [ Links ]

9. Robertson PA, Ryan MD. Neurological deterioration after reduction of cervical subluxation. Mechanical compression by disc tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:224-7.         [ Links ]

10. Rizzolo SJ, Piazza MR, Cotler JM. Intervertebral disc injury complicating cervical spine trauma. Spine 1991;16:5187-9.         [ Links ]

11. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Flanders AE, et al. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the intervertebral disc, spinal ligaments and spinal cord before and after closed traction reduction of cervical spine dislocations. Spine 1999;24:1210-7.         [ Links ]

12. Doran SE, Papadopoulos SM, Ducher TB, Lillekei KO. Magnetic resonance imaging documentation of coexistent traumatic locked facets of the cervical spine and disc herniation. J Neurosurg 1993;79:341-5.         [ Links ]

13. Eismont FJ, Arena MJ, Green BA. Extrusion of an intervertebral disc associated with traumatic subluxation or dislocation of cervical facets. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:1555-60.         [ Links ]

14. Lu K, Lee TC, Chen HJ. Closed reduction of bilateral locked facets of the cervical spine under general anaesthesia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:1055-61.         [ Links ]

15. Cotler JM, Herbison GJ, Nasuti JF, et al. Closed reduction of traumatic cervical spine dislocation using traction weights up to 140 pounds. Spine 1993;18:386-90.         [ Links ]

16. Lee AS, Maclean JC, Newton DA. Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations. JBJS (Br) 1994;76:352-6.         [ Links ]

17. Braakman R, Vinken PJ. Unilateral facet interlocking in the lower cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967;49:249-57.         [ Links ]

18. Keynan O, Dvorak M, Fisher C. Reduction techniques in cervical facet dislocations. Techniques in Orthopaedics 2003;17:336-44.         [ Links ]

19. Ludwig SC, Vaccaro AR, Balderston RA, et al. Immediate quadriparesis after manipulation for bilateral cervical facet subluxation. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:587.         [ Links ]

20. Carlson GD, Minato Y, Okada A, et al. Early time-dependent decompression for spinal cord injury: vascular mechanisms of recovery. J Neurotrauma 1997;14:951-62.         [ Links ]

21. Delamarter RB, Sherman J, Carr JB. Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Recovery after immediate and delayed decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1042-9.         [ Links ]

22. Jacobs R. MRI pre- and post rapid heavy weight closed reduction. SAOJ2006;5:40-8.         [ Links ]

23. Key AG, Retief PJ. Spinal cord injuries. An analysis of 300 new cases. Paraplegia 1970;7:243-9.         [ Links ]

24. Sears W, Fazl M. Prediction of stability of cervical spine fracture managed in the halo vest and indications for surgical intervention. J Neurosurg 1990;72:426-32.         [ Links ]

25. Bohlman HA. Adult fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. JBJS (Am) 1979;61A:1119.         [ Links ]

26 Cheshire DJ. The stability of the cervical spine following the conservative treatment of fractures and fracture dislocations. Paraplegia 1969;2:193.         [ Links ]

27. Stathoutis B and Govender S. The triple wire technique for bifacet dislocation of the cervical spine injury. Injury 1997;28(2):123-5.         [ Links ]

28. Brodke D, MD and Zdeblick T, MD. Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 1992;17(105):427-30.         [ Links ]

29. Doh Koh Y, Lim T, Won You J. A biomechanical comparison of modern anterior and posterior plate fixation for the cervical spine. Spine 2001;26:15-21.         [ Links ]

30. Johnson MG, Fisher CG, Boyd M, et al. Radiographic failure of single segment anterior cervical plate fixation in traumatic cervical flexion injuries. Spine 2004;29(24):2815-20.         [ Links ]

31. Burns AS, Ditunno JF. Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a review of current and future directions in rehabilitation management. Spine 2001;26:S137-45.         [ Links ]

32. Lintler DM, Knight RQ, Cullen JP. The neurologic sequellae of cervical spine facet injuries. The role of canal diameter. Spine 1993;18(6):775-9.         [ Links ]

33. Anderson DG, et al. Analysis of patient variables affecting neurological outcome after traumatic cervical facet dislocation. Spine 2004;4:506-12.         [ Links ]



Reprint requests:
Dr DN Dunn
Head of Spinal Services, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery. University of Cape Town
PO Box 30086, Tokai, Cape Town, 7966
Tel: (021) 404-5108; Fax: 086 671 5294



This article was not submitted to an ethical committee for approval. The content of this article is the sole work of the authors. No benefits of any form have been derived from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License