SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 issue1Message from the CCSSA PresidentCommentary: Ethical considerations for COVID-19 research author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Southern African Journal of Critical Care (Online)

On-line version ISSN 2078-676X
Print version ISSN 1562-8264

South. Afr. j. crit. care (Online) vol.39 n.1 Pretoria Mar. 2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2023.v39i1.563 

SOAPBOX

 

The missed art of care?

 

 

They are standing around my bed talking about my heart rate and blood pressure, concerned because it is so high. I know why it is high.

The alarms are going off.

I can feel my heart pumping.

They don't know I can't breathe when I am flat.

They have not asked me if I am ok.

They say I am anxious.

I have pain and can't breathe.

My hands are tied to the bed.

I can't move.

I can't breathe.

Please lift me up so I can breathe.

Someone ... please ... ask me what is wrong.

(Adult critically ill patient with multiple rib fractures)

The intensive care unit offers lifesaving interventions, but these interventions are often accompanied by loss of patient autonomy and, at times, even dignity.[1] Loss of control over one's body, inability to communicate needs, fear, and loss of identity, to name just a few, contribute to patients' vulnerability, suffering and dehumanisation in the ICU.[1-4] Unless we specifically and intentionally attend to these, how are autonomy, non-maleficence and beneficence applied in our care?[5] The harm that may arise is from the neglect of adequate respect and in turn the erosion of one's dignity.[2,6] Perhaps one of the biggest dangers of dehumanisation is that it can occur slowly and silently over time and is perpetuated by a lack of respect of persons - patients, families and staff alike.[1]

The negative effects of such 'care' may be significant and last well beyond the ICU.[3,7,8]

There is growing evidence that measuring survival is not sufficient to determine the effectiveness of our ICU care - is it about the quality of the life saved or the death died?[9] While there many unpreventable risk factors for morbidity following an ICU stay, many are preventable and are care/culture-induced risk factors. A recent systematic review looking at risk factors for increased morbidity following an ICU stay found that a negative patient experience is one of these preventable risk factors. [10] Surely we can all play a role in rehumanising the ICU and returning dignity to the people entrusted to our care?[2]

Communication, and where possible dialogue, is probably the simplest tool we can use to return some dignity, autonomy and identity to the person.[2-4,11] This communication enables healthcare providers to see Bed 5 as more than the polytrauma patient, as someone with a past, present and future; and this communication is essential to person-centred care and to mitigate many of the negative experiences in the ICU.[2,12] When engaging in such communication, we as healthcare providers need to be cognisant of the inevitable power relationship that occurs when one member in the conversation is limited.[13] It is not, however, merely speaking to and listening to the person, but speaking and listening with empathy - engaging with them with compassion from and between all members of the interdisciplinary team.[4,14]

Admittedly ICU environments are not the most personal environments, and as Francis Peabody asked, how one can be more personal (person centred) in an impersonal environment?[15] Perhaps the first port of call is to stand back and look at ourselves. What are we as healthcare providers bringing to our interactions? What are our biases, attitudes and assumptions that we carry with us?[4] How are these impacting on our behaviour?[4] Are we reflective in our practice - aware of our assumptions and behaviours, and able to acknowledge and remedy these?[4] What are our contributions to the environment and the culture in which we work? However, in the same breath, we also need to acknowledge how the environment and culture impact on us as healthcare providers.

As much as the ICU is a stressful environment for patients and family members, its toll on healthcare providers is increasingly being recognised.[16] In our post-pandemic world today, a pandemic during which healthcare providers had little time to breathe, the effects of the ICU environment on staff are likely to be amplified. Disengagement as a result of self-preservation or emotional fatigue may contribute to a decline in empathy, and consequently to the dehumanisation one may experience in the ICU.[2,14] Increasing cynicism around one's job related to systemic culture, process and infrastructure may further perpetuate the healthcare provider's approach to patient care.[1-3,14] To what degree do we feel seen, heard and respected in our environments?[1] The aforementioned factors are likely to be symptoms and/or contributors to staff burnout, which further impacts on the care we provide.['3,16,17] As healthcare workers we need to recognise that we too are human, and part of humanising the ICU is humanising it for us also.[2] Improving care to patients may start with improving care for staff, and calls for leaders and advocates to sound the alarm, and calls for change at systems level as well as with us as individuals.[1,2,4]

How are we embodying care to ourselves, our colleagues and, most importantly, those entrusted to our care?

One of the essential qualities of the clinician is interest in humanity, for the secret of the care of the patient is caring for the patient.

(Francis Peabody,[15] 1927)

Alison Lupton-Smith, PhD, BSc (Physiotherapy)

Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa aluptonsmith@sun.ac.za

 

References

1. Brown SM, Azoulay E, Benoit D, et al. The practice of respect in the ICU. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;197(11):1389-1395. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201708-1676CP        [ Links ]

2. Vaeza NN, Martin Delgado MC, la Calle GH. Humanizing intensive care: Toward a human-centered care ICU model. Crit Care Med 2020;48(3):385-390. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004191        [ Links ]

3. Wilson ME, Beesley S, Grow A, et al. Humanizing the intensive care unit. Crit Care 2019;23(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13054-019-2327-7        [ Links ]

4. Chochinov H. Dignity and the essence of medicine: The A, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. BMJ 2007;335(7612):184-187. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39244.650926.47        [ Links ]

5. Thompson DR. Principles of ethics: In managing a critical care unit. Crit Care Med 2007;35(2 Suppl):S2-S10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000252912.09497.17        [ Links ]

6. Sokol-Hessner L, Folcarelli PH, Sands KEF. Emotional harm from disrespect: The neglected preventable harm. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24(9):550-553. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004034        [ Links ]

7. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: Report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med 2012;40(2):502-509. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75        [ Links ]

8. Harvey MA, Davidson JE. Postintensive care syndrome: Right care, right now ... and later. Crit Care Med 2016;44(2):381-385. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001531        [ Links ]

9. Dunstan GR. Hard questions in intensive care. A moralist answers questions put to him at a meeting of the Intensive Care Society, Autumn, 1984. Anaesthesia 1985;40(5):479-482.         [ Links ]

10. Lee M, Kang J, Jeong YJ. Risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care 2020;33(3):287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2019.10.004        [ Links ]

11. Koksvik GH. Silent subjects, loud diseases: Enactment of personhood in intensive care. Health (London) 2016;20(2):127-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459314567792        [ Links ]

12. Cutler LR, Hayter M, Ryan T. A critical review and synthesis of qualitative research on patient experiences of critical illness. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2013;29(3):147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICCN.2012.12.001        [ Links ]

13. Holm A, Dreyer P. Nurse-patient communication within the context of non-sedated mechanical ventilation: A hermeneutic-phenomenological study. Nurs Crit Care 2018;23(2):88-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12297        [ Links ]

14. Haslam N. Humanising medical practice: The role of empathy. Med J Aust 2007;187(7):381-382. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01305.x        [ Links ]

15. Peabody FW The care of the patient. JAMA 1927;88(12):877-882. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1927.02680380001001        [ Links ]

16. Kerlin MP, McPeake J, Mikkelsen ME. Burnout and joy in the profession of critical care medicine. Crit Care 2020;24(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13054-020-2784-z        [ Links ]

17. Pastores SM, Kvetan V, Coopersmith CM, et al. Workforce, workload, and burnout among intensivists and advanced practice providers. Crit Care Med 2019;47(4):550-557. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637        [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License