SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.9 número1Husserl's evidence problemMothers' life-worlds in a developing context when a child has special needs índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google


Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology

versão On-line ISSN 1445-7377
versão impressa ISSN 2079-7222

Indo-Pac. j. phenomenol. (Online) vol.9 no.1 Grahamstown Mai. 2009


Phenomenology of consciousness in Adi Samkara and Edmund Husserl



Surya Kanta Maharana




The philosophical investigation of consciousness has a long-standing history in both Indian and Western thought. The conceptual models and analyses that have emerged in one cultural framework may be profitably reviewed in the light of another. In this context, a study of the notion of consciousness in the transcendental phenomenology of Edmund Husserl is not only important as a focus on a remarkable achievement in the context of Western thought, but is also useful for an appreciation of the concern with this question in the Indian philosophical tradition, and especially in the tradition of Advaita Vedänta of Adi Samkara. The starting point for this paper is the belief that phenomenology has a recognizably common face for both these traditions.
This paper investigates the possibility of a parallel notion of consciousness in the transcendental phenomenology of Husserl and the Advaita Vedänta of Samkara, with particular emphasis on Husserl's 'Transcendental I' and Samkara's 'Witness Consciousness' (Sakshi Caitanya). In the process, it explores the phenomenological relevance of the concept of consciousness in Indian philosophy, with special reference to the concept of pure consciousness as one of the essential criteria for any sound theory of knowledge. It more importantly highlights the Advaitic understanding ofpure consciousness as one of the major contributions to the field of comparative philosophy that forms a vantage point for cross-cultural comparison. While pointing to significant differences in their respective approaches to understanding the nature of consciousness, the exploration finally unveils the common thesis for both Samkara and Husserl that 'pure consciousness' is essentially foundational, evidencing and absolute for any epistemic act.



“Full text available only in PDF format”




Bhattacharyya, K. C. (1958). The subject as freedom. In Studies in philosophy (Gopinath Bhattacharyya, Ed.) (Vol. 2, pp. 3-94). Calcutta, India: Progressive Publishers. (Original work published 1929)        [ Links ]

Bilimoria, P. (Ed.). (1993). J. N. Mohanty, Essays on Indian philosophy: Traditional and modern. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Fink, E. (1970). Husserl's philosophy and contemporary criticism. In R. O. Elveton (Ed. & Trans.), The phenomenology of Husserl: Selected critical readings (pp. 73-147). Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Press. (Original work published 1933)        [ Links ]

Gupta, B. (1982). Phenomenological analysis in Husserl and Rämänuja: A comparative study. International Studies in Philosophy, 14(2), 19-32.         [ Links ]

Gurwitsch, A. (1966/ Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press        [ Links ]

Husserl, E. (1925). Über die Reden Gotamo Buddhos [On Buddha's teaching] (A meditation on Karl Eugen Neumann's translation of various parts of the classical Buddhist Suttapitaka). Der Piperbote für Kunst und Literatur, 2, 18.

Husserl, E. (1969). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology [Ideen zu einer reinen Phä         [ Links ]nomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie] (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin. (Original work published in German 1913; first English edition published 1931)

Husserl, E. (1973). Cartesian meditations (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1931)        [ Links ]

Mohanty, J. N. (1972). The concept of intentionality: A critical study. St. Louis, MO: Warren H. Green.         [ Links ]

Mohanty, J. N. (1988). Phenomenology and Indian philosophy: The concept of rationality. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 19(3), 269-281.         [ Links ]

Mohanty, J. N. (1992). Reason and tradition in Indian thought: An essay on the nature of Indian philosophical thinking. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.         [ Links ]

Samkara, Adi (1965). Brahma-Sutra-Bhashya of Samkaracarya (Swami Gambhirananda, Trans.). Calcutta, India: Advaita Ashrama.         [ Links ]

Samkara, Adi (1995). Mandukya Upanishad with the Karika of Gaudapada and commentary of Samkaracarya (Swami Gambhirananda, Trans.). Calcutta, India: Advaita Ashrama.         [ Links ]

Schuhmann, K. (1992). Husserl and Indian thought. In D. P. Chattopadhyaya, L. Embree, & J. N. Mohanty (Eds.), Phenomenology and Indian philosophy (pp. 20-43). New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Philosophical Research & Motilal Banarsidass.         [ Links ]

Sharma, D. (1968). Buddhist theory of meaning (Apoha) and negative statement. Journal of Philosophy East and West, 18(1/2), 3-10.         [ Links ]

Sinha, D. (1974). Phenomenology and existentialism: An introduction. Calcutta, India: Progressive Publishers.         [ Links ]



Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons