SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número2EditorialPhenomenological philosophy and Orthodox Christian scientific ecological theology índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology

versão On-line ISSN 2079-7222

Indo-Pac. j. phenomenol. (Online) vol.8 no.2 Grahamstown Set. 2008

 

Leaving the "real Hume" in peace and reading the dialogues from a moral perspective

 

 

Alon Segev

 

 


ABSTRACT

This paper offers a new reading of Hume's much discussed Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779/2000) which shows that, in contrast to what commentators tend to ascribe to Hume, the crux of the text is not epistemological-ontological - that is, not the arguments in favour of and against God's existence - but moral. It is shown that, although most of the epistemological-ontological pro-and-contra arguments are quite weak, Hume's interlocutors nevertheless cling to their theses from beginning to end, with the reason for their dogmatism shown to be moral rather than epistemological-ontological. The paper is divided into four sections. The introduction to the argument is followed by a discussion of Hume's rejection of substance as epistemologically-ontologically superfluous and as morally bad. Thereafter, it is first shown how the concept of a transcendental God undergoes deflation and consequently disappears. It is then shown that, even though their arguments are wrong, Cleanthes and Philo cling dogmatically to their starting points instead of trying to improve their claims and to rebuff the criticisms made against them. In conclusion, it is shown that the only way to account for their dogmatic inflexibility is in terms of their moral position: Cleanthes thinks that society and morals will collapse without the belief in a transcendental God, while Philo thinks it will function better if we discard this belief.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

References

Craig, W. L. (2002). The Kalam cosmological argument. In W. L. Craig (Ed.), Philosophy of religion: A reader and guide (pp. 92-113). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.         [ Links ]

Descartes, R. (1986). Meditationes de prima philosophia [Meditations on first philosophy] (G.         [ Links ] Schmidt, Ed. & Trans.). Stuttgart: Reclam. (Original work published 1641)

Everitt, N. (2005). The non-existence of God: An introduction. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

Gaskin, J. C. A. (1988). Hume's philosophy of religion (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.         [ Links ]

Hume, D. (1913). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals (Reprinted from the edition of 1777). Leipzig: Meiner. (Original work published 1751)        [ Links ]

Hume, D. (2000a). Dialogues concerning natural religion. In A. Flew (Ed.), David Hume: Writings on religion (pp. 185-292). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1779)        [ Links ]

Hume, D. (2000b). The natural history of religion. In A. Flew (Ed.), David Hume: Writings on religion (pp. 109-182). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1757)        [ Links ]

Hume, D. (2003a). A treatise of human nature. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1739-1740)        [ Links ]

Hume, D. (2003b). Of the immortality of the soul. In A. Flew (Ed.), David Hume: Writings on religion (pp. 29-37). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1783)        [ Links ]

Hume, D. (2004). An enquiry concerning human understanding (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1748/1777)        [ Links ]

Livingston, D. W. (1986). Hume's conception of true religion. In M. Hester (Ed.), Hume's philosophy of religion: The sixth James Montgomery Hester seminar (pp.33-73). Winston-Salem, NC: Wake Forest University Press.         [ Links ]

Livingston, D. W. (2006, August). Hume and the human scale of political order. Plenary lecture presented at the 33rd International Hume Conference held at the University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany.         [ Links ]

Mackie, J. L. (1982). The miracle of theism: Arguments for and against the existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.         [ Links ]

Maimonides, M. (1974). The guide of the perplexed (S. Pines, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work produced 1190)        [ Links ]

Nietzsche, F. (1996). Der Wille zur Macht: Versuch einer Umwertung aller Werte [The Will to Power].         [ Links ] Stuttgart, Germany: Alfred Kröner Verlag. (Original work published 1901)

O'Connor, D. (2001). Hume on religion. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

Penelhum, T. (2000). Themes in Hume: The self, the will, religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.         [ Links ]

Plantinga, A. (1990). The problem of evil. In God and other minds: A study of the rational justification of belief in God (pp. 115-130). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.         [ Links ]

Russell, B. (2008). Why I am not a Christian. USA: Barlow Press. (Original work published 1927)        [ Links ]

Segev, A. (2008). Rätselhafte Wunder: Neue Einsichten über Wunder und religiöse Phänomene bei Hume [Enigmatic miracles: New insights concerning miracles and religious phenomena in Hume]. Aufklärung und Kritik, 29(1), 152-177.

Smith, N. Kemp (1948). Introduction. In N. Kemp Smith (Ed.), David Hume: Dialogues concerning natural religion (pp. 1-123). New York: Social Sciences Publishers.         [ Links ]

Spinoza, B. (2007). Die Ethik [Ethics].         [ Links ] Stuttgart: Reclam. (Original work published 1677)

Tweyman, S. (1986). Scepticism and belief in Hume's dialogues concerning natural religion. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.         [ Links ]

Voltaire [Arouet, F. M.] (1986). Candide, ou l' Optimisme [Candide,         [ Links ] or Optimism]. Stuttgart: Reclam. (Original work published 1759)

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License