SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.23 issue4 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Journal of Energy in Southern Africa

On-line version ISSN 2413-3051
Print version ISSN 1021-447X

J. energy South. Afr. vol.23 n.4 Cape Town  2012


Estimating the opportunity cost of water for the Kusile and Medupi coal-fired electricity power plants in South Africa



Roula Inglesi-Lotz; James Blignaut

Department of Economics, University of Pretoria




In South Africa, water is considered a limited source, not only because of the country's arid nature, but also because of the relatively skew distribution of the resource and the fact that 98% of the resource is already allocated. Eskom, the South African electricity supplier, commenced with the construction of two new coal-fired power stations namely Kusile and Medupi. The question is: what is the opportunity cost of investing in these power stations from a water perspective? We do not argue here against the need for power plants and additional electricity generation capacity per se, but consider the opportunity cost of using this specific technology. We estimate the shadow price of water for different power generation technologies as an indicator of the opportunity cost of water. We apply a production function approach for a baseline case (coal-fired power generation using the Medupi and Kusile parameters), and four alternative technologies. The only alternative that performs worse than the baseline case is the traditional wet-cooling coal-fired power process. The baseline case, however, does show a high opportunity cost when compared to renewable alternatives (solar, wind and biomass) ranging from R0.66/kWh (biomass) to R0.83/kWh (solar) to R1.31/kWh (wind).

Keywords: opportunity cost, water, coal-fired energy generation, Kusile, Medupi



Full text available only in PDF format.




Action Sierra Club. (n.d.). South African Kusile 4 800-MW coalfired power project background information and fact sheet. Available at: (accessed on 7 July 2011).         [ Links ]

African Development Bank (AfDB) (2009). Executive summary of South Africa: environmental impact assessment for the Medupi power plant project of Eskom. Available at: (accessed on 7 August 2011).         [ Links ]

Aronson, J., Blignaut, J. & Milton, J.C. (2006). Natural capital: the limiting factor. Ecological Engineering, 28:1-5.         [ Links ]

Asthon, P & Haasbroek, B. (2002). Water demand management and social adaptive capacity: A South African case study. In Turton, A.H. (ed.). Hydropolitics in the developing world: A southern African perspective. African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU) and International Water Management Institute (IWMI).         [ Links ]

Blignaut, J. (2012). Climate change: the opportunity cost of Medupi and Kusile power stations. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 23(4): 67-75.         [ Links ]

Blignaut, J. & Van Heerden, J. (2009). The impact of water scarcity on economic development initiatives. Water SA, 35(4):415 - 420.         [ Links ]

Blignaut, J., Ueckerman, L. & Aronson, J. (2009). Agriculture production's sensitivity to changes in climate in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 105:61 - 68.         [ Links ]

Dennen, B., Larson, D., Lee, C., Lee, J. & Tellinghuisen, S. (2007). California's energy-water nexus: Water use in electricity generation. Santa Barbara: Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management University of California.         [ Links ]

DoE (Department of Energy) (2011). Water - 2010 input parameter data (externality). Pretoria, South Africa: South African Department of Energy.         [ Links ]

DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry) (1997). Overview of water resources availability and utilisation in South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.         [ Links ]

DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry) (2004). Internal strategic perspective: Upper Vaal Water Management Area. Report number: P WMA 08/000/00/0304. Available at: (accessed on 2 September 2011).         [ Links ]

Eberhardt, R. & Pegram, G. (2000). The water sector. Midrand: Development Bank of Southern Africa.         [ Links ]

Eskom. (2009). Annual Report 2008. Johannesburg: Eskom.         [ Links ]

Eskom. (2010). Cooling techniques at Eskom power stations. Available at: (accessed on 7 July 2011).         [ Links ]

Eskom. (2011). Eskom Integrated Report 2011. Johannesburg: Eskom.         [ Links ]

Eskom. (n.d.). Medupi power station. Available at: (accessed on 11 July 2011).         [ Links ]

Feeley, T. & Ramezan, M. (2003). Electric utilities and water: Emerging issues and R&D needs. Water Environment Federation, 9th Annual Industrial Wastes Technical and Regulatory Conference, San Antonio, 2003.         [ Links ]

Feeley, T., Skone, T., Stiegel, G., McNemar, A., Nemeth, M. & Schimmoler, B. (2008). Water footprint of bio-energy and other primary energy carriers. Energy, 33:1 - 11.         [ Links ]

Frontiers Insight. (n.d.). Kusile power station. Available at: (accessed on 6 July 2011).         [ Links ]

Inglesi-Lotz, R. and Blignaut, J. (2012). Estimating the opportunity cost of water for the Kusile and Medupi coal-fired electricity power plants in South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 23(4): 76-84.         [ Links ]

Kanazawa, M. (1993). Pricing subsidies and economic efficiency: The US bureau of reclamation. Journal of Law and Economics, 36:205 - 234.         [ Links ]

King, C., Holman, A. & Webber, M. (2008). Thirst for energy. Nature Geoscience, 1:283 - 286.         [ Links ]

Larson, D., Lee, C., Tellinghuisen, S. & Keller, A. (2007). California's energy-water nexus: Water use in electricity generation. Southwest Hydrology, Sept - Oct: 20-22.         [ Links ]

Macknick, J., Newmark, R., Heath, G. & Hallett, K. (2011). A review of operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity-generating technologies. Washington DC: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of Energy.         [ Links ]

Moolman, C., Blignaut, J. & Van Eyden, R. (2006). Modelling the marginal revenue of water in selected agricultural commodities: A panel data approach. Agrekon, 45(1):78 - 88.         [ Links ]

Moore, M. & Dinar, A. (1995). Water and land as quantity-rationed inputs in California agriculture: Empirical tests and water policy implications. Land Economics, 74(4):445 - 461.         [ Links ]

Moore, M. (1999). Estimating irrigators' ability to pay for reclamation water. Land economics, 75(4):652 - 578.         [ Links ]

NCC Environmental Services. (n.d.). Environmental management for Eskom. Available at: (accessed on 7 July 2011).         [ Links ]

Ninham Shand (2007). Proposed coal-fired power station and associated infrastructure in the Witbank area: Final environmental impact report. Report No 4284/401281. Available at: (accessed on 2 September 2011).         [ Links ]

Nkambule, N.P. and Blignaut, J. (2012). The external costs of coal mining: the case of collieries supplying Kusile power station. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 23(4): 85-93.         [ Links ]

Quantec. (2011). Quantec: Mineral statistics. Pretoria: Quantec.         [ Links ]

Rausser, G. & Zusman, P (1991). Organizational failure and the political economy of water resources management. In Dinar, A. & ZIlberman, D. (eds). Economics and Management of water and drainage in agriculture. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.         [ Links ]

Republic of South Africa (RSA) (2011). Integrated Resource Plan 2010 - 2030. Government Gazette. Pretoria: Government Printers.         [ Links ]

Roth, I. & Ambs, L. (2004). Incorporating externalities into a full-cost approach to electric power generation life-cycle costing. Energy, 29:2125 - 2144.         [ Links ]

Sovacool, B. & Sovacool, K. (2009). Identifying future electricity-water tradeoffs in the United States. Energy Policy, 37:2763 - 2773.         [ Links ]

Spalding-Fecher, R. & Matibe, D. (2003). Electricity and externalities in South Africa. Energy Policy, 31:721 - 734.         [ Links ]

Turton, A. (2008). Three strategic water quality challenges that decision-makers need to know about and How the CSIR should respond. CSIR Conference: Science Real and Relevant, Pretoria, South Africa, 2008.         [ Links ]

Van Heerden, J., Blignaut, J. & Horridge, M. (2008). Integrated water and economic modelling of the impacts of water market instruments on the South African economy. Ecological economics, 66:105 - 116.         [ Links ]

Van Horen, C. (1996). Counting the social costs: Electricity and externalities in South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press and Elan Press.         [ Links ]

Von Uexkull, O. (2004). Energy and water: The ignored link. Refocus, March - April: 40-44.         [ Links ]

Wassung, N. (2010). Water scarcity and electricity generation in South Africa. Part 1: Water use in the coal-to-electricity process. MPhil thesis, University of Stellenbosch, School of Public Management and Planning, Stellenbosch, South Africa.         [ Links ]

World Water Council. (n.d.). World Water Council: Water crisis. Available at: (accessed on 7 August 2011).         [ Links ]



Received: 30 November 2011
Revised 10 October 2012

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License