SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número4A car air-conditioning system based on an absorption refrigeration cycle using energy from exhaust gas of an internal combustion enginePerformance analysis for flat plate collector with and without porous media índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Journal of Energy in Southern Africa

versión On-line ISSN 2413-3051
versión impresa ISSN 1021-447X

J. energy South. Afr. vol.19 no.4 Cape Town  2008

 

Evaluating the costs and achievable benefits of extending technologies for uneconomical coal resources in South Africa: The case of underground coal gasification

 

 

M ZieleniewskiI; A C BrentII

IGraduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria
IIGraduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria; and Sustainable Energy Futures, Natural Resources and the Environment, CSIR

 

 


ABSTRACT

As the South African economy relies heavily on its coal resources, these resources should be utilised and managed in the best possible manner. Underground coal gasification (UCG) is one of the leading technologies used where conventional mining techniques are uneconomical. UCG delivers gas suitable for synthesis, production of fuels and electricity, or for home usage. The method is perceived as being environmentally friendly and safer than traditional mining. The study summarised in this paper was conducted so as to create a simple model that would allow for the evaluation of UCG process-related costs versus expected benefits in a wider context and under different circumstances. The parameters of the model are: feasibility definition, i.e. maximum possible gas calorific value, based on geological surveys and gasification agents for a predefined need; direct process-related costs that are derived from the expected capital and operational expenditures and compared to the value and volume of the gas produced; and assessment of externality costs, i.e. the indirect economic value of environmental, safety and health benefits. The externalities concept should encourage governmental agencies to consider further investment in UCG technology as a vehicle for delivering, potentially, high savings in terms of the reduction in the costs of environmental damage resulting from gaseous emissions into the atmosphere, specifically expenditure on national health.

Keywords: underground coal gasification (UCG), externalities, cost benefit model


 

 

Full text available only in pdf format.

 

 

References

Brand, J., 2006. Secunda Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Cost. Preliminary feasibility study presentation, Sasol, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Brent, A.C., van Erck, R.PG., Labuschagne, C., 2006. Sustainability Cost Accounting: Part 1 - A monetary procedure to evaluate the sustainability of technologies in the South African process industry. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 17(2): 35-51.         [ Links ]

Brent, A.C., van Erck, R.PG., Labuschagne, C. 2007. Sustainability Cost Accounting: Part 2 - A case study to demonstrate and assess the introduced monetary procedure to evaluate the sustainability of technologies in the South African process industry. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18(1): 1-17.         [ Links ]

Burton, E., Friedmann, J., Upadhye, R., 2006. Best practices in underground coal gasification. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), US DoE contract no. W-7405-Eng-48, https://eed.llnl.gov/co2/pdf/BestPracticesinUCG-draft.pdf, accessed 22 October 2008.         [ Links ]

Council for Geoscience, 2008. South African Coal Database. Available from: www.geoscience.org.za.         [ Links ]

Creedy, D.P, Garner, K., Holloway, S., Jones, N., Ren, T.X. 2001. Review of underground coal gasification technological advancements. UK DTI Cleaner Coal Technology Transfer Programme, Report No. COAL R211 DTI/Pub URN 01/1041, www.berr.gov.uk/files/file18660.pdf, accessed 22 October 2008.         [ Links ]

Ergo Exergy Technology Inc., 2005. UCG history. www.ergoexergy.com/eUCG_his.htm, accessed 8 Aug 2006.         [ Links ]

Fick, N., 2006. Personal communication.         [ Links ]

Jie, L., 2003. An overview of the Chinese program on UCG. Study report, Underground Gasification Engineering Research Centre of the Coal Industry, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China.         [ Links ]

Lloyd, P., 2006. South African energy reserves and the future. Presentation at GSSA DPP South African Energy Resources and the Future, Johannesburg, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Makwakwa, Z., van der Merwe, K., 2003. Coal fields of South Africa: Depositional characteristics, exploitation, and markets. Highveld coal field: structural-geological features and the distribution of coal seams, Presentation at Sasol Synfuels, Secunda, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Nyoka, M., Brent, A.C., 2007. Application of an environmental valuation approach to incorporate externality costs in the metallurgical sector. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 107(10): 663-669.         [ Links ]

Perkins, G., 2004. Underground Coal Gasification modelling. University of New South Wales, Australia.         [ Links ]

Pinchero, H.J., Pretorius, C.C., Boshoff, H.P., 1999. Analyses of coal product samples of South African collieries 1998-1999. Bulletin 113, South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) Coal and Mineral Services, Pretoria.         [ Links ]

Prevost, X.M., 2004. SA coal reserves, after the act. Presentation at the Fossil Fuel Foundation 10th Southern African Conference on Coal Science and Technology, Sandton, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Provincial Development Council (PDC), 2003. Review of the effectiveness of energy subsidies and related taxation policies in South Africa. PDC in co-operation with Science Consultancy Enterprises, www.pasasa.org/pasasa/research/Review%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20energy%20subsidies%20and%20related%20.pdf, accessed 7 September 2006.         [ Links ]

Shackley, S., Mander, S., Reiche, A., 2006. Public perceptions of underground coal gasification in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 34(18): 3423-3433.         [ Links ]

Shoko, E., McLellan, B., Dicks, A.L., Diniz da Costa, J.C., 2006. Hydrogen from coal: Production and utilisation technologies. International Journal of Coal Geology, 65(3-4): 213-222.         [ Links ]

Simeons, C., 1978. Coal: Its role in tomorrow's technology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.         [ Links ]

Sparrow, J., 2006, Personal communication.         [ Links ]

Spurr, M., 2006 The coalfields of South Africa. Presentation at GSSA DPP South African Energy Resources and the Future, Johannesburg, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Sury, M., White, M., Kirton, J., Carr, P, Woodbridge, R., Mostade, M., Chappell, R., Hartwell, D., Hunt, D., Rendell, N. 2004. Review of environmental issues of underground coal gasification. UK DTI Cleaner Coal Technology Transfer Programme, Report No. COAL R272 DTI/Pub URN 04/1880, www.berr.gov.uk/files/file19154.pdf, accessed 22 October 2008.         [ Links ]

Venter, E., 2006. Waterberg coal. Quo vadis? Presentation at GSSA DPP South African Energy Resources and the Future, Johannesburg, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Walker, L.K., Blinderman, M. S., Brun, K., 2001. An IGCC Project at Chinchilla, Australia based on underground coal gasification (UCG). Paper presented at the 2001 Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco, USA.         [ Links ]

UK Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), 2004. Review of the feasibility of underground coal gasification in UK. Cleaner Fossil Fuels Programme, http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file19143.pdf, accessed 22 October 2008.         [ Links ]

US Department of Energy (US DOE), 2005. Energy Information Administration. South Africa Country Analysis Briefs. www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/safrica.html, accessed 31 March 2006.         [ Links ]

Zieleniewski, M., 2006. Selection and deployment of a method to evaluate the achievable benefits of extending technologies for uneconomical coal resources in South Africa. Masters project, Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa, Available from: www.up.ac.za/dspace/handle/2263/4005, and alan.brent@up.ac.za.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received 13 September 2007
Revised 24 October 2008

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons