SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número1The impact of electricity crises on the consumption behaviour of small and medium enterprisesLife cycle energy analysis of environmental management reports in the Japanese automotive industry: Learning from the Japanese experience índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Journal of Energy in Southern Africa

versión On-line ISSN 2413-3051
versión impresa ISSN 1021-447X

J. energy South. Afr. vol.19 no.1 Cape Town  2008

 

A review of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol's clean development mechanism and prospects for Southern Africa

 

 

M LotzI; A C BrentII

IPromethium Carbon. Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria
IISustainable Energy Futures, Natural Resources and the Environment, CSIR Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria

 

 


ABSTRACT

The clean development mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol is a financial incentive intended to make economically marginal greenhouse gas (GHG) prevention projects more feasible. Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration (CCS) is a possible GHG mitigating strategy. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) defines a CCS project as a process consisting of three phases: the separation of carbon dioxide from industrial and energy-related sources; transportation of the carbon dioxide to a storage location; and long-term isolation of the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This paper focuses on prospects of CCS as CDM projects in general and in the context of Southern Africa. Currently there is no evidence of a long term proven track record of integrated CCS systems; only three industrial scale CCS projects exist globally. Nevertheless, new concepts have been proposed for CCS CDM projects such as long-term liability and certified emission reduction (CER) cancellation. However, these concepts are not in the current CDM framework at present. It is thus difficult to prove CCS as an eligible CDM project without first addressing possible expansion and shortfalls of the current CDM structure. More research is also required to quantify the trade offs presented between mitigating carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at the possible detriment of the areas of storage in the Southern Africa context. Only then may CCS projects be deemed more viable in the CDM context. Finally, although the potential for CCS in South Africa has been noted due to major point sources, the cost of capture and storage is a major obstacle; matching point sources and geological storage options is problematic for South Africa and neighbouring countries due to large transport distances. The regulatory risks associated with CCS are further deterrents for the implementation of CCS CDM projects in Southern Africa in the near future.

Keywords: clean development mechanism, capture, sequestration, carbon dioxide capture and sequestration, South Africa


 

 

Full text available only in pdf format.

 

 

References

Beyond Petroleum (BP) (2007). Putting carbon capture technologies to work in Algeria. www.bp.com, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Bode, S., Jung, M., 2005. Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS): Liability for non-permanence under the UNFCCC. Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) discussion paper, no. 325, www.hwwa.de, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Brent, A.C., Heuberger, R., Manzini, D., 2005. Evaluating projects that are potentially eligible for Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) funding in the South African context: A case study to establish weighting values for sustainable development criteria. Environment and Development Economics 10 (5): 631-649.         [ Links ]

Bru, J.G., 1996. The pioneering Sleipner West project. Euroil 7 (12): 39-40.         [ Links ]

Capoor, K., Ambrosi, P., 2007. State and trends of the carbon market 2007. World Bank Institute, http://carbonfinance.org/, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Cloete, M., 2006. Draft framework for geological and mineralogical storage of CO2 in South Africa. Council for Geoscience, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Engelbrecht, A., Golding, A., Hietkamp, S., Scholes, B., 2004. The potential for sequestration of carbon dioxide in South Africa. CSIR report for the Department of Minerals and Energy 86DD / HT339, Pretoria, South Africa.         [ Links ]

Geotimes, 2007. Geotimes: Earth, Energy and Environment News, www.geotimes.org/mar03/wey-burn.jpg, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Gnansounou, E., Dong, J., Bedniaguine, D., 2004. The strategic technology options for mitigating CO2 emissions in power sector: assessment of Shanghai electricity-generating system. Ecological Economics 50 (1-2): 117-133.         [ Links ]

Grönkvist, S., Bryngelsson, M., Westermark, M., 2006a. Oxygen efficiency with regard to carbon capture. Energy 31 (15): 3220-3226.         [ Links ]

Grönkvist, A., Möllersten, K., Pingoud, K., 2006b. Equal opportunity for biomass in greenhouse gas accounting of CO2 capture and storage: A step towards more cost-effective climate change mitigation regimes. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11 (5-6): 1083-1096.         [ Links ]

Gustavsson, L., Karjalainen, T., Marlandc, G., Savolainend, I., Schlamadingere, B., Apps, M., 2000. Project-based greenhouse-gas accounting: guiding principles with a focus on baselines and additionality. Energy Policy 28 (13): 935-946.         [ Links ]

Illman, A.M., Scragg, A.H., Shales, S.W., 2000. Increase in Chlorella strains calorific values when grown in low nitrogen medium. Enzyme Microbiology Technology 27 (8): 631-635.         [ Links ]

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage: Full report, www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index.htm, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2002. The IEA GHG Weyburn CO2 storage and monitoring. Greenhouse Issues, 61, www.ieagreen.org.uk/ghissues.htm, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2007. CO2 Capture and Storage. CCS-CDM Methodology Working Group, www.co2captureandstorage.info/networks/CCS-CDM.htm, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Leaf, D., Verolme, H.J., Hunt, W.F., 2003. Overview of regulatory / policy / economic issues related to carbon dioxide. Environment International 29 (2-3): 303-310.         [ Links ]

Lindeberg, E., Bergmo, P., 2003. The long-term fate of CO2 injected into an aquifer. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies I: 489-494, Kyoto, Japan.         [ Links ]

Mwakasonda, S., Winkler, H., 2005. Carbon capture and storage in South Africa. Chapter 6 in: Bradley, R., Baumert, K., Pershing, J., (eds.). Growing in the greenhouse: Protecting the climate by putting development first. World Resources Institute: 94-109.         [ Links ]

OSPAR Commission (2004). Welcome to the OSPAR Commission. www.ospar.org/eng/html/welcome.html, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Riddiford, F.A., Wright, I., Bishop, C.D., Espie, A.A., Tourqui, A. 2005. Monitoring geological storage: The in Salah gas CO2 storage project. In: Rubin, E.S., Keith, D.W., Gilboy, C.F. (eds.). Proceedings of seventh international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies. Contributed papers and panel discussion 2: 1353-1359.         [ Links ]

Sainz, A.P, 2006. Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power: Generation and the EC RTD Framework Programmes. European Commission Workshop on Clean Coal Technologies and Carbon Capture and Storage, London.         [ Links ]

Scragg, A.H., Illman, A.M., Carden, A., Shales, S.W., 2002. Growth of microalgae with increased caloric values in a tubular bioreactor. Biomass and Bioenergy 23 (1): 67-73.         [ Links ]

Sedjo, R.A., Marland, G., 2003. Inter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives. Climate Policy 3 (4): 435-444.         [ Links ]

Sims, R.E.H., 2004. Renewable energy: A response to climate change. Solar Energy 76 (1-3): 9-17.         [ Links ]

Statoil, 2006. Facts about Sleipner West. http://www.statoil.com, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Stephens, J.C., van der Swaan, B., 2005. CO2 capture and storage: Exploring the research, development, demonstration and deployment continuum. BCSIA discussion paper 2005-08, Energy Technology Innovation Project, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.         [ Links ]

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2007. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). http://cdm.unfccc.int/index.html, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

Unruh, G.C., Carrillo-Hermosillab, J., 2004. Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 34 (10): 1185-1197.         [ Links ]

Whittaker, S., Gilboy, C., 2003. IEA Weyburn CO2 monitoring and storage project: Geoscience framework update. In: Summary of investigations 2003, Volume 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Saskatchewan Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2003-4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-7.         [ Links ]

Winkler, H., van Es, D., 2007. Energy efficiency and the CDM in South Africa: Constraints and opportunities. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 18 (1): 28- 38.         [ Links ]

Winnie, J.C., 2007. www.jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/imageSnag/carson_plant.jpg, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

World Bank, 2007. Catalyzing markets for climate protection and sustainable development. http://carbonfinance.org/, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

World Energy Council (WEC) (2007). Focus on carbon capture and storage. www.worldenergy.org/wecgeis/focus/ccs/, accessed 1 June 2007.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received 8 August 2007
Revised 18 October 2007

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons