SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.80 issue4An investigation of the quality of meat sold in LesothoInadequate thickness of the weight-bearing surface of claws in ruminants author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Journal of the South African Veterinary Association

On-line version ISSN 2224-9435
Print version ISSN 1019-9128

J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. vol.80 n.4 Pretoria  2009




A comparison of epidural anaesthesia with lignocaine, bupivacaine and a lignocaine-bupivacaine mixture in cats



F M Lawal; A Adetunji

Department of Veterinary Surgery and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria




A mixture of 2 % lignocaine (LIG) and 0.5 % bupivacaine (BUP), at respective dose rates of 2 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg (LIG-BUP), was compared to LIG (4 mg/kg) and BUP (1 mg/kg) for lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia in 5 sedated cats. Each cat received all 3 treatment regimens at 1-week intervals. The cats were premedicated with an intramuscular injection of atropine sulphate (0.04 mg/kg) and ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg). Onset and duration of analgesia, and time to walking were determined. Associated changes in heart rate (HR), respiratory frequency (fr) and rectal temperature (RT) were recorded. Onset of analgesia with epidurally administered LIG-BUP (4.5 ± 0.7 min), LIG (3.9 ± 1.0 min) and BUP (5.0 ± 1.0 min) was similar. Duration of analgesia with LIG-BUP (49.4 ± 4.5 min) was significantly (P <0.05) longer than with LIG (40.2 ±1.0 min) but shorter than with BUP (79.4 ± 6.3 min). There were no significant differences in times to standing with LIG-BUP (26.3 ± 6.4 min), LIG (20.4 ± 4.7 min) and BUP (22.6 ± 10.3 min). Minimal changes were observed in HR, fR and RT. In conclusion, duration of analgesia produced by LIG-BUP was shorter compared with BUP but longer compared with LIG. Neither LIG nor LIG-BUP has any advantage over epidural BUP in terms of onset of analgesia, time to standing and physiological responses. Therefore, lumbosacral epidural administration of BUP appears to be the best choice for a long surgical procedure lasting more than 1 hour when compared with either LIG or LIG-BUP.

Keywords: Epidural, lignocaine, bupivacaine, ketamine, cats



“Full text available only in PDF format”




1. Adetunji A, Adewoye C O, Ajadi R A 2002 Comparison of epidural anaesthesia with lignocaine or xylazine in cats. Veterinary Journal 163: 335-336        [ Links ]

2. Adetunji A, Ajadi R A, Aladesawe T A 2001 A comparison of epidural anaesthesia with lignocaine, bupivacaine and lignocaine/bupivacaine mixture in dogs. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 56: 85-89        [ Links ]

3. Adetunji A, Nweke R I, Akinade S A, Ajao O A 2003 Comparison of epidural lignocaine and medetomidine in ketamine-sedated cats. Nigerian Veterinary Journal 24: 111-116        [ Links ]

4. Bromage P R 1962 Spread of analgesic solutions in the epidural space and their site of action. British Journal of Anaesthesia 34: 361-365        [ Links ]

5. Cruz M L, Luna S P L, Clark R M O, Massone F, Castro G B 1997 Epidural anaesthesia using lignocaine, bupivacaine or a mixture of lignocaine and bupivacaine in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia 24: 30-32        [ Links ]

6. Dawson B, Trapp R G 2004 Basic and clinical biostatistics (4th edn). Lange Medical Publication/McGraw Hill, New York        [ Links ]

7. DeJang R T, Bonin J D 1981 Mixtures of local anaesthetics are no more toxic than the parent drugs. Anaesthesiology 54: 177-181        [ Links ]

6. Duce B R, Zelechowski K, Camougis G, Smith E R 1969 Experimental epidural anaesthesia in the cat with lignocaine and amethocaine. British Journal of Anaesthesia 41: 579-587        [ Links ]

9. Feldman H S, Dvoskin S, Arthur G R, Doucette A M 1996 Antinociceptive and motor-blocking efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration in the dog. Regional Anaesthesia 21: 318-326        [ Links ]

10. Hall L W, Clarke K W, Trim C M 2001 Veterinary anaesthesia (10th edn). W B Saunders, London        [ Links ]

11. Heath R B, Broadstone R V, Wright M, Grandy J L 1985 Bupivacaine and mepivacaine lumbosacral epidural analgesia in dogs. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Veterinary Anaesthesia, Sacramento, California, 7-10 October 1985: 162-163        [ Links ]

12. Jones R S 1979 Injectable anaesthetic agents in the cat: a review. Journal of Small Animal Practitioners 20: 345-352        [ Links ]

13. Jones R S 2001 Epidural analgesia in the dog and cat: a review. Veterinary Journal 161: 123-131        [ Links ]

14. Klide A M, Soma LR1968 Epidural analgesia in the dog and cat. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 153: 165-172        [ Links ]

15. Lebeaux M I 1973 Experimental epidural anaesthesia in the dog with lignocaine and bupivacaine. British Journal of Anaesthesia 45: 549-555        [ Links ]

16. Seow L T, Lips E J, Cousins M J, Mather L E 1982 Lidocaine and bupivacaine mixtures for epidural blockade. Anaesthesiology 56: 177-183        [ Links ]

17. Skarda R T 1996 Local and regional anaesthetic and analgesic techniques: Dogs. In Thurmon J C, Tranquilli W J, Benson G J (eds) Lumb and Jones' veterinary anaesthesia (3rd edn). Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore: 434-447        [ Links ]

18. Tung A S, Yaksh T L 1982 The antinociceptive effects of epidural opiates in the cat: studies on the pharmacology and the effects of lipophilicity in spinal analgesia. Pain 12: 343-356        [ Links ]



Received: August 2009
Accepted: November 2009



* Author for correspondence. E-mail:

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License