SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.80 número4 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google


Journal of the South African Veterinary Association

versão On-line ISSN 2224-9435
versão impressa ISSN 1019-9128

J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. vol.80 no.4 Pretoria  2009




An investigation of the quality of meat sold in Lesotho



T M Seeiso; C M E McCrindle

Section Veterinary Public Health, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa




Since the closure of the Lesotho abattoir in 2003, only imported meat can be legally sold. However, it was estimated in 2007 that 80 % of the meat sold at butcheries comes from informal slaughter. The aim of this study was to investigate the situation. The number and location of informal butcheries in Lesotho (n = 143) were recorded and mapped using Geographical Information Systems. Observations (photographs) of informal slaughter indicated a lack of hygiene, unskilled slaughtermen and illegal disposal of offal with possible environmental pollution. In addition, a cross-sectional study was undertaken to determine the microbiological quality of meat from randomly selected carcasses (n = 237) of cattle, sheep and pigs from a sample of 44 butcheries, 4 of which were associated with registered supermarkets. As a control, samples for microbiological assay were taken from imported meat originating from carcasses (n = 20) slaughtered at a registered abattoir in South Africa. Of the 44 butcheries investigated only the 4 commercial butcheries associated with supermarkets sold imported meat only; 3 butcheries sold meat inspected at government slaughter slabs (n = 3), while the rest (n = 37) sold both imported and informally slaughtered meat. In terms of Lesotho legislation, informally slaughtered meat is only for home consumption. The bacteriological counts from all samples showed a total bacterial plate count exceeding 30 organisms per ml in contrast with the controls which all showed a count less than 5 colonies per ml. This was found for both imported and informally slaughtered meat sold in Lesotho. In addition, meat samples from butcheries showed the presence of the potential pathogens Salmonella (n = 2), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 12) and Escherichia coli (n = 15). During the study, anthrax was confirmed in 9 human patients, 5 of whom died, after consumption of informally slaughtered livestock. Although no cases of animal abuse were detected, it was considered that informal slaughter can prejudice livestock welfare. It was concluded that the current situation is not acceptable in terms of meat safety. Thus, the Veterinary Public Health Directorate of the National Veterinary Services has prioritised the monitoring of butchers, registration of slaughter slabs and a general extension campaign to improve hygiene and animal welfare standards for slaughter in Lesotho. This paper highlights the major risks associated with meat consumption without Veterinary Public Health intervention in accordance with international standards.

Keywords: food poisoning, informal slaughter, Lesotho, microbiological hazards in meat, zoonoses



“Full text available only in PDF format”




1. Ahmed S N, Chattopadhyay U K, Sherikar A T, Waskar V S, Paturkar A M, Latha C, Munde K D, Pathare N S 2002 Chemical sprays as method for improvement in microbiological quality and shelf-life of fresh sheep and goat meats during refrigeration storage (5-7°C). Journal of Meat Sciences 339-344        [ Links ]

2. Bacon R, Sofos J N, Belk K E, Smith G C 2004 Incidence of Salmonella spp. on beef cattle hides in eight commercial slaughtering facilities. Journal of Applied Microbiology 95: 753-761        [ Links ]

3. Bell R G, Harrison J C L, Roger A R 1993 Preliminary investigation of the distribution of microbial contamination on lamb and beef carcasses. Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand Technical Report No. 927. Hamilton, New Zealand        [ Links ]

4. Capita R, Prieto M, Alonso-Calleja 2004 Sampling methods for microbiological analysis of red meat and poultry carcasses. Journal of Food Protection 67: 1303-1308        [ Links ]

5. CIA 2008 The world fact book: Lesotho. Online at: (accessed February 2008)        [ Links ]

6. Czaja R, Blair J 1996 Designing surveys: a guide to decision and procedures. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA        [ Links ]

7. Director Veterinary Services: Annual Reports 2004. Maseru, Lesotho        [ Links ]

8. Director Veterinary Services: Annual Reports 2005. Maseru, Lesotho        [ Links ]

9. European Union Commission Decision 2001/471/EC. Official Journal of the European Union 165: 48-53        [ Links ]

10. FAO 2006 Animal production and health manual: good practices for the meat industry. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome        [ Links ]

11. FAO/WHO 1979 Microbiological Criteria for foods. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Working Group on Microbiological Criteria for Foods, Geneva 20-26 February 1979 (Document WG/Microbiol/79/1). World Health Organization, Geneva        [ Links ]

12. FSIS-USDA 1996 Pathogen reduction: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems: final rule. Federal Register 61: 38805-38989, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC        [ Links ]

13. Herenda D, Chamberd P G, Ettriqui A, Seneviratna P Da Solva T J P 2000 Manual on meat inspection for developing countries. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome        [ Links ]

14. Hutchison M L, Thomas D J I, Small A H, Buncic S, Howell M 2007 Implementation of a compulsory HACCP system and its affect on concentration of carcass and environmental surface bacterial indicators in the United Kingdom red meat slaughterhouses. Journal of Food Protection 70: 1633-1639        [ Links ]

15. Index Mundi 2007 Lesotho demographics. Online at: (accessed February 2008)        [ Links ]

16. Katzenellebogen J M, Jourbet G, Abdool Karim S S 1997 Epidemiology: a manual for South Africa. Oxford University Press, Cape Town        [ Links ]

17. McCrindle C M E 1995 The community development approach to animal welfare: an African perspective. Applied Behavioural Science 59: 227-233        [ Links ]

16. Ministry of Communications 2008 Lesotho government portal Online at: (accessed February 2008)        [ Links ]

19. Nel S, Lues J F R, Buys E M, Venter P 2004 Bacterial populations associated with meat from the deboning room of a high throughput red meat abattoir. Meat Science 66: 667-674        [ Links ]

20. Thrusfield M V 2005 Veterinary epidemiology (3rd edn). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford        [ Links ]

21. Warriner K, Aldsworth T G, Kaur S, Dodd C E R 2002 Cross-contamination of carcasses and equipment during pork processing. Journal Applied Microbiology 93: 69-77        [ Links ]

22. WHO Surveillance Programme 1995. Sixth Report of WHO Surveillance Programme for Control of Foodborne Infections and Intoxications in Europe. FAO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Food Hygiene and Zoonoses, Berlin        [ Links ]

23. Zweifel C, Baltzer D, Stephan R 2005 Microbiological contamination of cattle and pig carcasses at 5 abattoirs determined by swab sampling in accordance with EU Decision 2001/471/EC. Meat Science 69: 559-566        [ Links ]



Received: June 2009
Accepted: November 2009



* Author for correspondence. E-mail:

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons