God images, ethical effects and the responsibility of Systematic Theology

 

 

R. Venter

Prof R. Venter, Head: Department of Systematical Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein. e-mail: rianventer@mweb.co.za

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

This article registers an important shift that is occurring in contemporary theistic reflection: greater sensitivity to the function of God images, and the consequent ethical impacts. Three texts by Gunton, Johnson and McFague are discussed that exemplify this focus in an emphatic way. From this treatment the implications for Systematic Theology crystallise clearly. The rest of the article entails an exploration of the dynamics of the causal relationship between a specific God image and its corresponding effect. The ramifications for the task and responsibility of Systematic Theology are identified and in conclusion some normative guidelines are suggested.

Keywords: Systematic Theology, God images, Ethics, Colin E. Gunton, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Sallie McFague

---

Trefwoorde: Sistematiese Teologie, Godsbeelde, Etiek, Colin E. Gunton, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Sallie McFague

---

 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Birch, B.C. 1995. Moral agency, community, and the character of God in the Hebrew Bible. Semeia 66:23-41.         [ Links ]

Brueggemann, W. 1995. 'In the image of God' ... pluralism. Modern Theology 11:455-469.         [ Links ]

Brueggemann, W. 1997. Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, dispute, advocacy. Minneapolis: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Das, A.A. & Matera, F.J (Eds .) 2002. The forgotten God: Perspectives in Biblical Theology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.         [ Links ]

Durand, A. 1972. Political implications of the God question. In: J.B. Metz (ed.), New questions on God (New York: Herder & Herder), pp. 67-74.         [ Links ]

Glock, C.Y. 1972. Images of "God", images of man, and the organization of social life. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 11:1-15.         [ Links ]

Gunton, CE. 1993. The one, the three and the many: God, creation and the culture of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

Johnson, E.A. 1992. She who is: The mystery of God in feminist theological discourse. New York: Crossroads.         [ Links ]

Lacugna, CM. 1993. God in communion with us: The trinity. In: Idem (ed.), Freeing theology: The essentials of theology in feminist perspective (San Francisco: Harper), pp. 83-114.         [ Links ]

McFague, S. 1987. Models of God: Theology for an ecological nuclear age. London: SCM.         [ Links ]

Nicholls, D. 1981. Images of God and the state: Political analogy and religious discourse. Theological Studies 42:195-215.         [ Links ]

Patrick, D. 1981. The rendering of God in the Old Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Piazza, T. & Glock, C.Y. 1979. Images of God and their social meanings. In: R. Wuthnow (ed.), The religious dimension: New directions in quantitative research (New York: Academic Press), pp. 69-91.         [ Links ]

Pohier, J. 1986. God in fragmenten. Hilversum: Gooi en Sticht.         [ Links ]

Schaap-Jonker, H. 2004. The varieties of God: Een overzicht van onderzoek naar godsbeelden. Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift 58:124-141.         [ Links ]

Schneider, G. 1989. Imitatio Dei als Motiv der "Ethik Jesus". In: H Merklein (Hrsg.), Neues Testament und Ethik (Freiburg: Herder), pp. 71-83.         [ Links ]

Tracy, D. 1994. The return of God in contemporary theology. In: C. Geffré & W. Jeanrond (eds.), Why theology? (London: SCM), pp. 37-46.         [ Links ]

Tracy, D. 2000. Form and fragment: The recovery of the hidden and the incomprehensible God. CTI Reflections 3:62-88.         [ Links ]

Van den Brink, G. & Sarot, M. (Reds .) 1995. Hoe is uw naam? Opstellen over de eigenschappen van God. Kampen: Kok.         [ Links ]

Van Jaarsveld, F.J. & Janse van Rensburg, J. 2002. Godskonsepte tydens pastorale gesprekvoering. Acta Theologica 22:179-197.         [ Links ]