SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número3Ideology, History and Translation Theories: A critical Analysis of the TshiVenḓa Bible Translation of 1 Kings 21:1-16Rape and the case of Dinah: Ethical responsibilities for reading Genesis 34 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Old Testament Essays

versão On-line ISSN 2312-3621
versão impressa ISSN 1010-9919

Old testam. essays vol.25 no.3 Pretoria  2012

 

A fourth paradigm? Some thoughts on atheism in Old Testament scholarship

 

 

Jaco Gericke

NWU, Vaal Triangle Campus

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

In recent decades, OT scholarship has witnessed the emergence of undercurrents of what may be called a fourth paradigm. In contrast to the three familiar faith-based "paradigms, " this one is essentially atheistic. Scholars working in the fourth paradigm do not believe that the Bible is the Word of God, God's Word in human speech, or human words about God. On this view, the texts are just human words and have no transcendental signified. In addition, a plurality of atheistic approaches to the text is operative within the varieties of atheism that can be distinguished. Ultimately though, this paradigm too has its pros and cons, both of which have implications with regard to future prospects for local atheist OT scholars. This article aims to present only a brief, personal, and introductory take on a controversial subject.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format” 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Avalos, Hector. A Brief Report on a Secular Criticism of the Bible Group for the SBL. No Pages. Cited May 2012. Online: http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2009/11/brief-report-on-secular-biblical.html .         [ Links ]

_____. Why Biblical Studies Must End" in The End of Christianity. Edited by John W. Loftus. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2011.         [ Links ]

_____. The End of Biblical Studies. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2007.         [ Links ]

Barr, James. History and Ideology in the Old Testament: Biblical Studies at the End of a Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.         [ Links ]

_____. Beyond Fundamentalism. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1984.         [ Links ]

_____. Fundamentalism. London: SCM Press Ltd, 1977.         [ Links ]

Berlinerblau, Jacques. How to be Secular: A Field Guide for Religious Moderates, Atheists and Agnostics. Houghton-Mifflin Harcourt, forthcoming 2012.         [ Links ]

_____. "The Unspeakable in Biblical Scholarship." SBL Forum. No Pages. Cited 11 February 2012. Online: http://sbl-site.org/Article.aspx?ArticleID=503.         [ Links ]

_____. The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.         [ Links ]

Brueggemann, Walter. Old Testament Theology: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997.         [ Links ]

Carroll, Robert P. Wolf in The Sheepfold: The Bible as Problem for Christianity. London: SPCK, 1991.         [ Links ]

Clines, David J. A. On the Way to the Postmodern: Old Testament Essays 1967-1998. Volume 2. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament: Supplement Series 292. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.         [ Links ]

Cupitt, Don. Philosophy's Own Religion. London: SCM Press, 2001.         [ Links ]

Coetzee, Johan H. Practicing Pre-Modern, Modern and Post-Modern Biblical Sciences under One South African Roof. Inaugural lecture as professor of Old Testament Studies in the Department of Biblical and Religious Studies at the Rand Afrikaans University on 13 March 2002.         [ Links ]

Coleridge, Mark. "Life in the Crypt or Why Bother with Biblical Studies." Biblical Interpretation: A Journal of Contemporary Approaches 2/2 (1994): 139-151.         [ Links ]

Collins, John J. The Bible After Babel: Historical Criticism in a Postmodern Age. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.         [ Links ]

Davies, Philip R. Whose Bible is it Anyway? Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 204. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995.         [ Links ]

Claassen, George. "Claassen Tree uit Debat oor Godsdiens in Skole." Die Burger. No pages. Cited 15 May 2012, Online: http://152.111.L87/argief/berigte/dieburger/2009/09/24/SK/1/BOLjgSkeptieseGeorge.html .         [ Links ]

Fox, Michael V. "Bible Scholarship and Faith-Based Study: My View." SBL Forum. No Pages. Cited: 24 February 2012. Online: http://sbl-site.org/Article.aspx?ArticleID=490        [ Links ]

_____. "Response from Michael V. Fox." No pages. Cited 4 June 2012. Online: http://www.sbl-site.org/Article.aspx?ArticleId=521.         [ Links ]

Gaskin, John C. A. Varieties of Unbelief: From Epicurus to Sartre. University of Michigan: Macmillan, 1989.         [ Links ]

Gericke, Jaco W. "Realism and Non-Realism in Old Testament Theology: A Formal-Logical and Religious Philosophical Assessment." Old Testament Essays 19/1 (2006): 47-57.         [ Links ]

_____. "The 'Died-Again Christian' Syndrome: Its Etiology as Manifested among Fundamentalist Students of the Old Testament in South Africa." Nederduits Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif 47/3-4 (2006): 477-488.         [ Links ]

_____ . "Does Yahweh Exist? The Case Against Realism in Old Testament Theology." Old Testament Essays 17/1 (2004): 30-57.         [ Links ]

Hyman, Gary A Short History of Atheism. London: I. B. Tauris, 2010.         [ Links ]

Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1970.         [ Links ]

Linville, James. "James Linville." No Pages. Cited 4 June 2012. Online: http://uleth.academia.edu/JamesLinville .         [ Links ]

Martin, Michael. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.         [ Links ]

McGrath, Alister. The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World. New York: Doubleday, 2004.         [ Links ]

McKinsey, Dennis. The Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1995.         [ Links ]

Nietzsche, Frederich W. The Gay Science. Translated by J. Nauckhoff and A. Del Caro. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.         [ Links ]

_____. Human, All Too Human. Translated By M. Faber, with S. Lehmann. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1984.         [ Links ]

_____ . On Truth and Lies in the Non-Moral Sense. London: SCM, 1873. Price, Robert M. "Biblical Criticism." Pages 123-134 in The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Edited by T. Flynn. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2007.         [ Links ]

Spangenberg, Izak J. J. "Can a Major Religion Change? Reading Genesis 1-3 in the 21st Century." Verbum et Ecclesia 28/1 (2007): 259-279.         [ Links ]

_____. "Paradigm Changes in the Bible Sciences and the Teaching of Biblical Studies in the New South Africa." Scriptura 52 (1995): 1-10.         [ Links ]

Thrower, James. The Alternative Tradition - A Study of Unbelief in the Ancient World. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 1980.         [ Links ]

Wilson, Andre N. God's Funeral. London: W. W. Norton, 1999.         [ Links ]

Yahoo Questions. "Is it Possible to be a Bible Scholar and an Atheist at the Same Time?" No Pages. Cited 4 June 2012. Online: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080718165507AAUOaQa .         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Jaco W. Gericke
North-West University (Vaal Triangle Campus), Faculty of Humanities
P.O. Box 1174, Vanderbijlpark, 1900
Email: 21609268@nwu.ac.za

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons