SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue2Salvation for earth?: A body critical analysis of Psalm 74 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Old Testament Essays

On-line version ISSN 2312-3621
Print version ISSN 1010-9919

Old testam. essays vol.21 n.2 Pretoria  2008

 

Who really 'created'? Psalm 19 and evolutionary psychology in dialogue1

 

 

H. Viviers

University of Johannesburg

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

The beauty and awe that the natural world evokes lead humans intuitively to believe in an all powerful creator as is convincingly exemplified by Psalm 19. The author allows both nature and law to communicate elatedly about this god, who is believed to exist objectively. This ease with which human beings conceptualize counterintuitive beings ('gods'), has lately been confirmed by Evolutionary Psychology as well. The 'Theory of Mind' mental tool especially, plays a primary role in this regard. To 'think up' a god(s), responsible for the world and its functioning, comes naturally and intuitively. Evolutionary Psychology, however, differs from Psalm 19, namely therein that 'god' is a subjective construct. Bringing Darwinian evolution into the conversation, the problem of the 'existence of god' becomes even more critical, as evolution does not need a creator god. But god(s) persists. In reaction to the personal 'god' of theism and the no-god of atheism, seeking the 'godly' (atheism) becomes quite attractive.


 

 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alston, W. P. 1998. Religion, history of philosophy of, in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge. Retrieved September 29, 2008, from http://0-www.rep.routledge.com.ujlink.uj.ac.za:80/article/K067SECT7        [ Links ]

Armstrong K. 1993. A History of God: From Abraham to the Present - the 4000-year Quest for God. London: Heinemann.         [ Links ]

Barrett, J. L. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God. Walnut Creek: AltaMira. (Cognitive Science of Religion Series.         [ Links ])

_____ 2007. Is the spell really broken? Bio-psychological Explanations of Religion and Theistic Belief. Theology and Science 5 (1), 57- 72.         [ Links ]

Barrett, J. L., Richert, R. A. & Driesenga, A. 2001. God's Beliefs versus Mother's: The Development of Nonhuman Agent Concepts. Child Development 72 (1), 50-65.         [ Links ]

Barrett, J. L. & Richert, R. A. 2003. Anthropomorphism or Preparedness? Exploring Children's God Concepts. Review of Religious Research 44 (3), 300-312.         [ Links ]

Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.         [ Links ]

Carruthers, P. & Chamberlain, A. (eds) 2000. Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

Clines, D. J. A. 1974. The Tree of Knowledge and the Law of Yahweh (Psalm XIX). VT 24, 8-14.         [ Links ]

Craigie, P. C. 1983. Psalms 1-50. Waco: Word Books. (WBC 19.         [ Links ])

Dawkins, R. 2006. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.         [ Links ]

Eaton, J. 2005. The Psalms: A Historical and Spiritual Commentary with an Introduction and New Translation. London: Continuum.         [ Links ]

Evans, E. M. 2000. Beyond Scopes: Why Creationism is here to stay? in Rosengren, K. S., Johnson C. N. & Harris, P. L. (eds), Imagining the Impossible: Magical, Scientific, and Religious Thinking in Children, 305-333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

Gregersen, N. H. 2006. What Theology might learn (and not learn) from Evolutionary Psychology: A Post-foundationalist Theologian in conversation with Pascal Boyer, in Shults, F. L. (ed.), The Evolution of Rationality: Interdisciplinary Essays in Honour of J. Wentzel van Huyssteen, 306-326. Michigan: WB Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

Guthrie, S. E. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning in Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.         [ Links ]

Johnson, S. C., Booth, A. & O'Hearn, K. 2001. Inferring the Goals of a Nonhuman Agent. Cognitive Development 16, 637-656.         [ Links ]

Kelemen, D. 1999. Why are Rocks Pointy?: Children's Preference for Teleological Explanations of the Natural World. Developmental Psychology 35, 1440-1452.         [ Links ]

_____ 2004. Are Children 'Intuitive Theists'? Reasoning about Purpose and Design in Nature. Psychological Science 15 (5), 295-301.         [ Links ]

Kraus, H.-J. 1972. Psalmen, 1. Teilband, Psalmen 1-63, 4. Aufl. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag. (BKAT XV/1.         [ Links ])

Kruger, P. 2002. 'Die Hemel vertel die Eer van God': Natuur, Skriftuur en die Bidder in Psalm 19. Verbum et Ecclesia 23 (1), 111-124.         [ Links ]

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.         [ Links ]

Lawson, E. T. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Science of Religion. Numen 47 (3), 338-349.         [ Links ]

Mays, J. L. 1994. Psalms. Louisville: John Knox. (Interpretation.         [ Links ])

Morell, V. 2008. Minds of Their Own: Animals are Smarter than You Think. National Geographic 213 (3), 36-61.         [ Links ]

Nakhnikian, G. 2004. It Ain't Necessarily So: An Essay Review of Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives. Philosophy of Science 71 (4), 593-604.         [ Links ]

Ratzsch, D. 2005. Teleological Arguments for God's Existence, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved September 23, 2008 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/Fall2008/entries/teleologicalarguments/        [ Links ]

Ruse, M. 2007. Creationism, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved September 23, 2008 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/Fall2008/entries/creationism/        [ Links ]

Schaefer, K. 2001. Psalms. Minnesota: The Liturgical Press. (Berit Olam.         [ Links ])

Spong, J. S. 2005. The Sins of Scripture. San Francisco: Harper.         [ Links ]

Van Dyk, P. 2007. So-called Intelligent Design in Nature: A Discussion with Richard Dawkins. OTE 20 (3), 847-859.         [ Links ]

Viviers, H. 2008. Afwesigheid van God en teenwoordigheid van 'god(e)' in Hooglied. HTS 64 (1), 447-460.         [ Links ]

Vorster, J. N. 1997a. Construction of culture through the construction of person: The Acts of Thecla as an example, in Porter, S. E. & Olbricht, T. H. (eds), The rhetorical analysis of Scripture: Essays from the 1995 London Conference, 445-473. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. (JSNT Suppl 146.         [ Links ])

_____ 1997b. The body as strategy of power in religious discourse. Neotestamentica 31(2), 388-410.         [ Links ]

_____ 1998. The study of religion at the 'multi-versity': probing problems and possibilities. Neotestamentica 32 (1), 203-240.         [ Links ]

Vos, C. J. A. 2005. Theopoetry of the Psalms. Pretoria: Protea Book House.         [ Links ]

Weiser, A. 1962. The Psalms: A Commentary. London: SCM. (OTL.         [ Links ])

Wynn, T. 2000. Symmetry and the Evolution of the Modular Linguistic Mind, in Carruthers, P. & Chamberlain, A. (eds), Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition, 113-139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
H. Viviers
Department of Biblical and Religious Studies, University of Johannesburg
PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa
E-mail:hviviers@uj.ac.za

 

 

1 This article was presented in slightly altered form as a paper at the SBL International Meeting in Auckland, New Zealand, 6-11 July 2008.