SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.21 issue2Hebrew alphabetic acrostics - Significance and translationWho really 'created'? Psalm 19 and evolutionary psychology in dialogue author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Old Testament Essays

On-line version ISSN 2312-3621
Print version ISSN 1010-9919

Old testam. essays vol.21 n.2 Pretoria  2008


Salvation for earth? A body critical analysis of Psalm 74



Philip P. Venter

University of Johannesburg





In Psalm 74 the god metaphor is strictly and forcefully male. In Israel the king was a man, and the man was king. So the God of Psalm 74 is king, a man, and thereby the cult is constituted. Nature, Earth and her components are simply the stage on which the cult is enacted, and does not have intrinsic value. The values underpinning the god construct in Psalm 74 are ethnocentric and androcentric. This text should be regarded as a cultural artefact that renders no contribution towards an ideology which regards Earth and her components as intrinsically valuable.



“Full text available only in PDF format”




Basson, A. 2005. Divine Metaphors in a Selection of Biblical Hebrew Psalms of Lamentation. D Litt Doctoral Thesis. University of Stellenbosch.         [ Links ]

Brown, W. P. 2002. Seeing the Psalms: A Theology of Metaphor. Louisville: Westminster, John Knox.         [ Links ]

Brueggemann, W. 1984. The Message of the Psalms: A Theological Commentary. Minneapolis: Augsburg.         [ Links ]

Caldwell, D. P. 1993. An Investigation of the enemy in the Psalms of Lament. Michigan: Ann Arbor.         [ Links ]

Coetzee, J. H. 2003. Body Symbolisation in Psalm 139. Ekklesiastikos Pharos 85/1-2, 36-46.         [ Links ]

Eilberg-Schwartz, H. 1994. God's Phallus and Other problems for Men and Monotheism. Boston: Beacon.         [ Links ]

Floysvik, I. 1997. When God Becomes My Enemy: The Theology of the Complaint Psalms. Saint Louis, Missouri: Concordia Academic Press.         [ Links ]

Gerstenberger, E. S. 2001. Psalms, Part 2 and Lamentations. Grand Rapids, Michigan: WB Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

Habel, N. (ed.) 2000. Introducing the Earth Bible: Readings from the Perspective of Earth. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. (The Earth Bible 1.         [ Links ])

Human, D. J. 1993. Die Struktuur en Tradisiesamestelling van Psalm 74. Skrif en Kerk 14 (2), 203-221.         [ Links ]

Kim, E. K. 1984. A Study of the Rapid Change of Mood in the Lament Psalms, with a Special Enquiry into the Impetus for its Expression. Ph.D Thesis, Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York. Michigan: University Microfilms International.         [ Links ]

Kraus, H. J. 1992. Theology of the Psalms. Minneapolis: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Malul, M. 2002. Knowledge, Control and Sex. Studies in Biblical Thought, Culture and Worldview. Tel Aviv/Jaffa: Archaelogical Center Publication.         [ Links ]

Rogerson, J. W. & McKay, J. W. 1977. Psalm 1-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

Schaefer, K. 2001. Studies in Hebrew Narrative & Poetry: Psalms. Collegeville, Minnesota: The Liturgical Press. (BERIT OLAM.         [ Links ])

Schroer, S. & Staubli, T. 2001. Body Symbolism in the Bible. Collegeville, Minnesota: The Liturgical Press.         [ Links ]

Venter, P. P. 2007. Vroulikheid by die Skeppergod? 'n Liggaamskritiese Ontleding van Geselekteerde Skeppingstekse in die Ou Testament. Doctoral thesis DLitt et Phil, University of Johannesburg.         [ Links ]

Viviers, H. 2006. God and Man: Who Creates Whom? Inaugural Lecture as Professor. University of Johannesburg. 11 October 2006.         [ Links ]



Phillip Venter
University of Johannesburg

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License