On-line version ISSN 2221-4062
S. Afr. j. anim. sci. vol.41 n.4 Pretoria Jan. 2011
Prediction of energy requirements of Murciano-Granadina preruminant female kids using the National Research Council
A.L. Martínez Marín#; M. Pérez Hernández; L.M. Pérez Alba; D. Carrión Pardo; A.G. Gómez Castro
University of Córdoba, Department of Animal Production Madrid-Cádiz road, km. 396. 14071 Córdoba, Spain
Data collected on metabolizable energy (ME) intake and growth performance of preruminant female kids of the Murciano-Granadina breed was used to assess the accuracy of the latest U. S. National Research Council (NRC) recommendations to predict their energy requirements. Female kids were fed a milk replacer individually, according to appetite three times a day from two to five weeks of age. The mean initial body weight and average daily weight gain (± SE) were 3.31 ± 0.08 kg/d and 120 ± 3 g/d. Daily ME intake, expressed relative to metabolic body weight (BW0.75), decreased linearly with age from 1085 to 970 kJ/kg BW0.75/d, and there was nearly a constant ratio of ME requirements for maintenance. The observed ME intake was 5.4% higher than the ME requirements, calculated according to NRC, probably due to the energy content of the weight gain. It was concluded that the energy system model of the NRC is accurate enough to calculate the ME requirements of preruminant female kids of the Murciano-Granadina breed.
Keywords: Goats, pre-weaning period, suckling female kids, NRC
Replacement female kids are the basis for a healthy and productive goat herd in the future. However, studies on their energy intake and growth performance are scarce. Most studies conducted on preruminant kids have focused on metabolizable energy (ME) intake and growth performance of male kids (Jagusch et al., 1983; Sanz Sampelayo et al., 1988; Bezabih & Pfeffer, 2003). Other studies have reported on feed intake and growth of preruminant male and female kids (Peña et al., 1985; Ugur et al., 2007) and on their carcass characteristics (Kutchik et al., 2002; Peña et al., 2009).
The U.S. National Research Council recommendations on energy requirements of suckling goats (NRC, 2007) are based on the research at Langston University (Sahlu et al., 2004). A close examination of the database of the experiments used to derive the ME requirements of suckling goats (Luo et al., 2004) shows (1) a wide range of body weights (BW) (mean: 7.88 ± 3.34 kg; minimum: 2.8 kg; maximum: 21.8 kg); (2) a wide age range, since the experiments lasted between 21 and 106 days; and (3) some animals were not strictly preruminants as they consumed solid feeds. In addition, gender differences were taken into account only to calculate the ME requirements for maintenance (MEm) and a common value for all sex classes was used to calculate the ME content of the weight gain.
Clearly, there is no combined data on energy intake and growth performance of preruminant female kids. Such data could be useful to evaluate how well the energy system of the NRC (2007) predicts the ME requirements of very young, strictly preruminant female kids. The aim of this study was to examine the data collected on ME intake and growth performance of preruminant female kids of the Murciano-Granadina breed, and assess the accuracy of the NRC (2007) to predict the ME requirements of female kids.
The experiment was carried out in the Animal Production building (Centre of Experimental Animals CO/5/U) of the University of Córdoba, in accordance with the Spanish normative for the protection of animals used for experimental purposes (RD 1201/2005). Fifteen Murciano-Granadina female kids were used. The kids were born within a 24-hour interval on a commercial farm, removed from the dams before first suckling, individually identified, fed colostrum and moved to the research facility. The experiment began when the kids were seven days old, and lasted for 35 days. All kids were vaccinated with a polyvalent vaccine (Basquin Plus CP, Laboratorios Ovejero, Leon, Spain) when they were three weeks old.
The kids were placed in 1 x 1.4 m cages with slatted floors elevated to 50 cm above the ground. The cages were in a 13 x 8 x 3 m room with a forced ventilation system (10 times the room volume per hour), by means of a suction fan with four outlets placed 25 cm above room floor level and four air inlets placed at ground level on the opposite wall, and an air conditioning system with two air inlets and thermostats able to control the temperature between 18 and 32 ºC. Environment temperature was maintained at 24 - 25 ºC and relative humidity was monitored daily and observed to change between 60 and 65%.
The kids were given colostrum according to appetite during the first two days; then they were abruptly changed to a milk replacer (Guyolait 50, INA, Madrid, Spain). The milk replacer was rich (>70%) in skimmed milk and whey. The chemical composition was (g/kg): dry matter (DM), 948; crude protein, 216; fat, 215; ash, 68; carbohydrates (by difference), 449. The ME content of the milk replacer was calculated as 19.8 MJ/kg DM, according to Yeom et al. (2002). The milk replacer was prepared in warm water (40 ºC) at a concentration of 130 g/kg immediately before feeding. It was individually fed by bottle to appetite three times a day, at 08:30, 14:30 and 20:30. The exact intake was determined by weighing the bottles before and after suckling. The ME intake was calculated from the DM intake and ME content of the milk replacer. The kids were weighed once a week just before their morning suckling.
The statistical software SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL) was used. Linear effects of age on growth and intake traits were analyzed using the repeated measures procedure. The correlation procedure was used when appropriate. The linear regression and paired t-test were used to examine the relationship between the observed and NRC (2007) predicted ME intake. One sample t-test was used to compare the energy content of the weight gain (specified constants: 13.4 and 14.8 kJ/g weight gain). The level of significance was set at P <0.05 in all the tests.
The data collected on feed and energy intake and growth performance of preruminant Murciano-Granadina female kids are shown in Table 1.
Liquid feed and DM intake expressed relative to BW decreased (P <0.05) linearly with age. This pattern was different from Allegretti et al. (1998) who found that liquid feed intake of Murciano-Granadina male kids increased until they were 15 days old, reached a maximum of 20 and 30 days of age, and then decreased slightly. In our experiment, liquid feed intake between two and five weeks of age was 18% higher than that reported by Allegretti et al. (1998) despite the reconstituted milk replacer having the same ME content in both experiments (2.57 MJ/kg).
The daily ME intake decreased linearly (P <0.05) when expressed relative to the BW0.75 . Sanz Sampelayo et al. (1990) found that the ME intake in preruminant Murciano-Granadina male kids, up to 30 days of age, fed milk replacer was 2.4 times the MEm requirements. Assuming that the MEm requirements are 429 kJ/kg BW0.75 (Sanz Sampelayo et al., 1990) or 449 kJ/kg BW0.75 (Luo et al., 2004), it was calculated that ME intake was 2.39 ± 0.17 or 2.28 ± 0.16 times the MEm requirements. Both the MEm and ME intake were correlated (r = 0.91, P <0.05), supporting Sanz Sampelayo et al. (1990).
Body weight development of the kids followed a linear trend during the pre-weaning period (Peña et al., 1985; Prieto et al., 1991; Yeom et al., 2002). However, an average daily weight gain (ADG) of 120 g/d which is lower than 180 g/d, was reported for Malagueña (Subires et al., 1991), 169 g/d for Alpine (Goetsch et al., 2001) and 162 g/d for Florida (Peña et al., 2009). This is due to the fact that the Murciano-Granadina breed has a smaller adult BW than the other breeds mentioned (Daza Andrada et al., 2004). The observed ADG was lower than that reported by Sanz Sampelayo et al. (1997, 2003) on Murciano-Granadina male kids fed a milk replacer for up to 30 to 40 days of age (162 and 135 g/d ADG). This difference was probably due to a lower daily ME intake in the present study (1025 vs. 1244 and 1068 kJ/kg BW0.75/d). Correcting for an MEm of 429 kJ/kg BW0.75 (Sanz Sampelayo et al., 1990), the ME per gram of ADG was similar in the three experiments (4.97 vs. 5.03 and 4.73 kJ/kg BW0.75/d).
All the data on BW, weight gain and ME intake (n = 60) was used to assess the accuracy of NRC (2007) to predict the ME requirements. It was observed that the NRC (2007) underpredicted the ME requirements (Figure 1). The regression equation obtained was: ME intake observed (kJ/d) = 904 + 0.76 x ME intake predicted (kJ/d); r2 = 0.62 and P <0.05. The standard errors (SE) of the y-intercept and the slope were 236 and 0.08, respectively. The root mean square prediction error (the average vertical distance of each point to line y = 0 in Figure 1) was 268 kJ/d and the mean bias (the average inaccuracy of the predictions across all data) was 171 kJ/d or 5.4%.
The observed bias could be due to overestimation of the ME intake, underestimation of the ME requirements in NRC (2007), or both. The overestimation of ME intake due to the calculated ME content of the milk replacer was not likely. The ME content of the milk replacer used, calculated according to Yeom et al. (2002), was lower than calculated according to NRC (2001) and Moran (2002), i.e. 19.8 vs. 20.4 and 20.3 MJ/kg DM, respectively. Moreover, our estimate is conservative, since milk replacers that are rich in skimmed milk and milk products are highly digestible (Chiou & Jordan, 1973; Mantecón & Lavín, 1999); thus the ME : gross energy ratio is comparable to that of whole milk (NRC, 2001). On the other hand, ME requirements have two components, MEm and ME for weight gain (MEg). In respect to MEm, the value used by NRC (2007) is in agreement with Bezabih & Pfeffer (2003), which was not included in the dataset of Luo et al. (2004): 449 vs. 458 kJ/kg BW0.75. Therefore, the difference between predicted ME requirements and observed ME intake is probably due to MEg. Moreover, if the MEm requirements equaled 449 kJ/kg BW0.75, it can be calculated that MEg was 15.2 kJ/g (SE = 0.4) in this study. This value is higher (P <0.05) than 13.4 kJ/g used by NRC (2007) but is not different (P >0.05) to the 14.8 kJ/g observed in Murciano-Granadina male kids by Sanz Sampelayo et al. (1988). Energy content of the weight gain is not a constant. Sanz Sampelayo et al. (1995) and Bezabih & Pfeffer (2003) observed that the energy retained as fat in suckling male kids increased with an increasing ME intake, and so did the energy content of weight gain. Therefore, the use of a unique figure for MEg when calculating the ME requirements can cause some error.
In conclusion, the NRC (2007) underprediction was low enough to support the use of this system to calculate the ME requirements of strictly preruminant female kids of the Murciano-Granadina breed. More research is needed to split ingested ME exceeding MEm between energy retained as fat, protein, and the corresponding heat increment.
Allegretti, L., Sanz Sampelayo, M.R., Gil, F. & Boza, J., 1998. Feed intake and abomasal size in the pre-ruminant kid goat of the Granadina breed. Effect of the milk replacer dry matter concentration and animal age. Invest. Agr.: Prod. San. Anim. 13, 45-54. (in Spanish, English abstract). [ Links ]
Bezabih, M. & Pfeffer, E., 2003. Body chemical composition and efficiency of energy and nutrient utilization by growing pre-ruminant Saanen goat kids. Anim. Sci. 77, 155-163. [ Links ]
Chiou, P.W.S. & Jordan, R.M., 1973. Ewe milk replacer diets for young lambs. I. Effect of age of lamb and dietary fat on digestibility of the diet, nitrogen retention and plasma constituents. J. Anim. Sci. 36, 597-603. [ Links ]
Daza Andrada, A., Fernández Martínez, C. & Sánchez López, A., 2004. Goats: Production, Feeding and Health. 1st ed. Ed. Agrícola Española, Madrid, Spain. (in Spanish). [ Links ]
Goetsch, A.L., Detweiler, G., Sahlu, T. & Dawson, L.J., 2001. Effects of different management practices on preweaning and early postweaning growth of Alpine kids. Small Rumin. Res. 41, 109-116. [ Links ]
Jagusch, K.T., Duganzich, D.M., Kido, G.T. & Church, S.M., 1983. Efficiency of goat milk utilisation by milk-fed kids. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 26, 443-445. [ Links ]
Kuchtík, J., Sedláčková, H., Chládek, G. & Kućera, J., 2002. Evaluation of growth and carcass value of kids nursed on a milk replacer for calves. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 47, 502-510. [ Links ]
Luo, J., Goetsch, A.L., Sahlu, T., Nsahlai, I.V., Johnson, Z.B., Moore, J.E., Galyean, M.L., Owens, F.N. & Ferrell, C.L., 2004. Voluntary feed intake by lactating, Angora, growing and mature goats. Small Rumin. Res. 53, 357-378. [ Links ]
Mantecón, A.R. & Lavín, P., 1999. The artificial rearing of lambs. Proc. Sheep Vet. Soc. 23, 43-46. [ Links ]
Moran, J., 2002. Calf Rearing: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. Landlinks Press. Collingwood. Australia. [ Links ]
NRC, 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. (7th rev. ed.), National Academy Press. Washington D.C., USA. [ Links ]
NRC, 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants. National Academy Press. Washington D.C., USA. [ Links ]
Peña, F., Doménech, V., Acero, R., Perea, J. & García, A., 2009. Effect of sex and feed (maternal milk vs. milk substitute) on the growth and carcass characteristics in Florida goat kids. Rev. Cient. (Maracaibo) 19, 619-629. (in Spanish, English abstract). [ Links ]
Peña, F., Herrera, M., Subires, J. & Aparicio, J.B., 1985. Milk consumption and growth of Malagueña suckling kids. Arch. Zootec. 34, 301-314. (in Spanish, English abstract). [ Links ]
Prieto, I., Ruiz, I., Sanz, M.R., Gil, F. & Boza, J., 1991. Regulation of voluntary intake in preruminant goat kids. In: Actas del XIV Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Ovinotecnia y Caprinotecnia. Ed. Diputación Provincial, Jaén, Spain. pp. 139-145. (in Spanish). [ Links ]
Sahlu, T., Goetsch, A.L., Luo, J., Nsahlai, I.V., Moore, J.E., Galyean, M.L., Owens, F.N., Ferrell, C.L. & Johnson, Z.B., 2004. Nutrient requirements of goats: developed equations, other considerations and future research to improve them. Small Rumin. Res. 53, 191-219. [ Links ]
Sanz Sampelayo, M.R., Muñoz, F.J., Guerrero, J.E., Gil Extremera, F. & Boza, J., 1988. Energy metabolism of the Granadina breed goat kid. Use of goat milk and a milk replacer. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 59, 1-9. [ Links ]
Sanz Sampelayo, M.R., Ruiz, I., Gil, F. & Boza, J., 1990. Body composition of goat kids suckling: Voluntary feed intake. Br. J. Nutr. 64, 611-617. [ Links ]
Sanz Sampelayo, M.R., Ruiz, I., Gil, F. & Boza, J., 1995. Dietary factors affecting the maximum feed intake and the body composition of pre-ruminant kid goats of the Granadina breed. Br. J. Nutr. 74, 335-345. [ Links ]
Sanz Sampelayo, M.R., Allegretti, L., Gil Extremera, F. & Boza, J., 1997. Growth and development of pre-ruminant kid goats of the Granadina breed. Use of a milk replacer determining maximum feed intake. In: Recent Advances in Goat Research. Ed. Morand-Fehr, P., Zaragoza, Spain. pp. 75-78. [ Links ]
Sanz Sampelayo, M.R., Allegretti, L., Gil, F. & Boza, J., 2003. Growth, body composition and energy utilisation in pre-ruminant goat kids: Effect of dry matter concentration in the milk replacer and animal age. Small Rumin. Res. 49, 61-67. [ Links ]
Subires Vázquez, E., González Martínez, A. & Herrera García, M., 1991. Comparison of growth curves in Malagueña kids reared with goat milk or milk replacer. In: Actas del XIV Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Ovinotecnia y Caprinotecnia. Ed. Diputación Provincial, Jaén, Spain. pp. 199-209. (in Spanish). [ Links ]
Ugur, F., Atasoglu, C., Tolu, C., Diken, F. & Pala, A., 2007. Effects of different weaning programs on growth of Saanen kids. Anim. Sci. J. 78, 281-285. [ Links ]
Yeom, K.H., Van Trierum, G., Hache, A., Lee, K.W. & Beynen, A.C., 2002. Effect of protein: energy ratio in milk replacers on growth performance of goat kids. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 86, 137-143. [ Links ]
Copyright resides with the authors in terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 South African Licence. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/za
Condition of use: The user may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, but must recognise the authors and the South African Journal of Animal Science.
# Corresponding author: e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org