SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número5 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


South African Journal of Animal Science

versão On-line ISSN 2221-4062
versão impressa ISSN 0375-1589

S. Afr. j. anim. sci. vol.34 no.5 Pretoria  2004

 

Goat milk production and processing in the NIAYES in Senegal

 

 

A. MissohouI, #; L. DioufI; R.S. SowII; C.B.A. WollnyIII

IService de Zootechnie-Alimentation, Ecole Inter-Etats des Sciences et Médecine Vétérinaires (EISMV), BP 577 Dakar, Sénégal
IIInstitut National de Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire de Hann, Dakar, Sénégal
IIIGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Animal Breeding, Section Animal Breeding &-husbandry in the Tropics and Subtropics, Kellnerweg 6, 37077 Göttingen Germany

 

 


ABSTRACT

This study was carried out from February to December 2003 to analyse goat milk production and processing in the districts of Thies and Mbour located in the Sahelian area, 70 km from Dakar. Among the suppliers of the three processing units identified, 45 milk producers were identified and surveyed. 45 milk samples from farmers and 30 cheese samples from a processor were collected and submitted to chemical and microbiological analysis. The flock sizes averaged 45 animals per household and were equally owned by men (51.1%) and women (48.9%). Feeding was based on extensive grazing under the control of a shepherd. Only 17.7% of the farmers fed agricultural by-products (beans and groundnut haulm) to lactating goats; 4.5% dewormed their animals. The lactating goats were milked once a day, 77.8% by women, 20% by men and 2.2% by children. Average daily milk production was 0.54 ± 0.12 L for the duration of a lactation of 3.6 months. The processing units collected the milk 2-3 times per week and the price paid (350-400 FCFA) was higher compared to cattle milk (300-350 FCFA). Two types of cheese were produced and sold to supermarkets and hotels. The processing yield was 12-15%. The chemical composition of milk (dry matter:169.7 ± 9.56 g/L, protein: 50.5 ± 1.1 g/L, fat: 69 ± 14.2 g/L) was good. The low-input dairy goat system contributes to household income. It is recommended that possible management improvements and interventions be examined to increase the efficiency of production in a sustainable manner. Small changes in feeding and milking management may lead to significant improvements.

Keywords: Goat husbandry, milk processing, cheese, milk and cheese quality, Senegal


 

 

Introduction

Senegal is a country where livestock accounts for 7.4% of the national GDP and 35.5% of the primary sector (Soned Afrique, 1999). Local milk production is low and 60% of domestic demand is met by imports (Metzer et al., 1995). From 1980 to 2003 the quantity of milk products imported rose from 87083 t in 1980 to 120674 t in 2001, while intake of milk products decreased dramatically from 34.6 kg/head/year to 25.4 kg /head/year (FAO, 2002).

Goats could contribute to self-sufficiency in milk and milk products due to their adaptation to the harsh environment of Senegal, their short production cycle and their ease of husbandry. Moreover, the most common Senegalese goat breed, the Sahelian goat, has a good potential for milk production and thus milk processing (Missohou et al., 2003). Despite this, the dairy goat is neglected in milk production improvement schemes, which are focused mainly on cattle (Denis & Mbaye, 1981). Due to private initiatives an industrial sector has evolved during this last decade that is concentrating on the collection and processing of goat milk. In Senegal most of the studies available on goat production are related to rural areas (Faugere, 1990; Moulin et al., 1994; Tourand et al., 1996) while the suburban production and processing systems are poorly documented. The objective of the present work was to analyse goat milk production and processing in the Niayes.

 

Materials and Methods

This study was carried out from February to December 2003 in the Niayes, specifically in districts of Thies and Mbour, about 70 km from Dakar. In this area the climate is Sahelian with one rainy season (July to October) and an annual rainfall and temperature of 600-700 mm and 26 °C, respectively. The vegetation is grassland and the main cultivated crops are millet, sorghum, groundnut and maize, as well as horticulture. Due to intense tourism activities, many hotels are located in the area.

A survey was conducted in 45 households to analyse the characteristics of the goat production and processing systems. The farmers were randomly chosen from a list of suppliers available in the three milk processors identified in the working area. The survey guide was a questionnaire related to socio-economic status of the holders, flock characteristics, management and use. In every household, milk was sampled once while 30 cheese samples were collected from the main cheese producer. All samples were kept in an ice-cooled box and sent to Ecole Inter-Etats des Sciences et Médecine Vétérinaires de Dakar for analysis. The pH was measured by a pH-meter, and milk composition (Dry matter, protein, fat, ashes) was determined as described by Lecoq (1965). For microbiological analysis, dilution rate ranged from 10-1 to 10-7. The isolation and enumeration of mesophilic aerobic, coliforms and Staphylococcus aureus were performed according to IDF (1997). These data were processed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS).

 

Results and Discussion

Goat milk production characteristics of the Niayes are presented in Table 1. Goat holders were equally men (51.1%) and women (48.9%). Crop farmers, stockbreeders or both were mainly of the Fulani ethnic group (93%). The average herd size was 44.6 ± 26.8, and was composed on average of 17 reproductive females, seven reproductive males and 21 young animals. The relatively high number of adult males is in disagreement with previous studies in rural areas where males are used early and intensively (the use started at a very young stage and concerned almost every male) (Tourand, 1996). Animals are grazed on natural pasture under the control of a shepherd and have access to drinking water once a day. Only 17.7% of the farmers fed agricultural by-products (beans and groundnut haulm) to lactating goats. These lactating goats were hand-milked once a day by women (77.8%), men (20%) or children (2.2%), after allowing one to two minutes of suckling by the kid. Deworming of the stock was practised in 4.5% of the surveyed households. Average daily milk production was 0.54 ± 0.12 L for an average length of lactation of 3.6 months. The price of goat milk was 350-400 FCFA/L (1 euro = 656 FCFA). It was higher than the price paid for cattle milk in the area (300-350 FCFA) and provides holders with a substantial income, averaging 2 954 FCFA/day. Two types of cheese were produced (fresh and mature) twice (two processors) or three times (one processor) a week with an average yield of 12-15%. The cheese was conditioned in 100-110 g units and sold to hotels and supermarkets.

 

 

The pH of the milk was 6.71 ± 0.26 (Table 2), within the normal range for fresh goat milk. It could indicate a low incidence of mastitis. The dry matter (169.7 ± 9.56 g/L) and protein (50.5 ± 1.1 g/L) concentrations compared favourably with results reported by Najari et al., (2000) on a local breed, but were higher than those obtained in European breeds by the same authors. This could be the consequence of the low level of milk production. However, Talaki (2002) reported that the Sahelian goat possesses a high frequency of the alleles A and B at the casein locus which, according to Grosclaude et al. (1987), is associated with a high level of as1-casein synthesis, milk protein and cheese yields.

 

 

The milk produced in the Niayes showed a high microbial count (Table 3). The count averaged 19.2 x 107 cfu/mL for mesophilic aerobic, 4.9 cfu/mL for Staphylococcus aureus, and 32.2 x 104 for coliforms. This coliform count was particularly high compared to international standards (103). The high contamination of milk in this study is in agreement with previous results in cattle (Nyaga et al., 1982; Seydi & Ndiaye, 1993) and are related to low hygiene (udder, hand and utensil cleaning) during milking. Contrary to milk, cheese microbiological quality was more acceptable with 22.2 x 107 cfu/mL (mesophilic aerobic), 0 cfu/mL (Staphylococcus aureus) and 296.3 x 104 (coliforms).

 

 

Conclusions

This study shows that in the Niayes the low input goat production system, in conjunction with an evolving processing sector, contributed to household income. It could play a key role in poverty and malnutrition alleviation if some of its constraints are tackled in a sustainable manner. Improving the milking and processing hygiene is of primary importance. Feeding could be improved through, for instance, the use of molasses-urea supplements.

 

References

Denis, J.P. & Mbaye. M., 1981. Les résultats des importations de bovins laitiers au Sénégal. Dakar, LNERV. 10 p.         [ Links ]

FAO, 2002. Statistical database. http://www.fao.org        [ Links ]

Faugere, O., Dokes, A.C., Perrot, C. & Faugere, B., 1990. L'élevage traditionnel des petits ruminants au Sénégal. II. Pratiques de conduite et d'exploitation des animaux chez les éleveurs de la région de Louga. Rev. Elev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 43, 261-273.         [ Links ]

IDF, 1997. International Standards 117B: Enumeration of characteristics of microorganism colony counts at 37 °C. Brussels (Belgium).         [ Links ]

Grosclaude, F., Mahé, M.F., Brignon, G., Di Stasio, L. & Jeunet, R., 1987. A Mendelian polymorphism underlying quantitative variation of goat aS1-casein. Génét. Sél. Evol. 19, 399-412.         [ Links ]

Lecoq, R., 1965. Manuel d'analyses alimentaires et d'expertises usuelles. Tome I et II. ed Doin, Paris France.         [ Links ]

Metzger, R., Centres, J.M., Thomas, L. & Lambert, J.C., 1995. L'approvisionnement des villes africaines en lait et produits laitiers. Etude FAO Production et Santé Animales N° 124, Fao, Rome, Italy.         [ Links ]

Missohou, A., Talaki, E. & Ibrahim, L., 2003. Determination of genetic relationships between West African breeds of goat. 9th World Conf. Anim. Prod., 26-31 October 2003, Porto Alegre, Brésil.         [ Links ]

Moulin, C.H., Faugere, O. & Faugere, B., 1994. L'élevage traditionnel des petits ruminants au Sénégal. III. Pratiques de conduite et d'exploitation des animaux chez les éleveurs de la communauté rurale de Kaymor (Sine-Saloum, Sénégal). Rev. Elev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 47, 223-234.         [ Links ]

Najari, S., Ben Hammouda, M., Khaldi, G., Hatmi, H. & Khorchani, T., 2000. Amélioration de la production caprine en zones arides par l'utiliation des races exotiques. Proc, 7th Int. Conf. on Goats, France, 1521 May 2000.         [ Links ]

Nyaga, P.M., Kagiko, M.M. & Gathuma, J.M., 1982. Milk hygiene in nomadic herds in Kenya, evaluated by bacterial isolation, bacterial viability trials in traditionally fermented milk and drug sensitivity. Bull Animal. Hlth. Prod. Africa 30, 19-24.         [ Links ]

Seydi, M. & Ndiaye, M., 1993. Acidity and microbiological flora contaminating Senegalese reconstituted curdled milk produced on small scale. Bull de la Société Médicale d'Afrique Noire de Langue Francophone 38, 61-67.         [ Links ]

Soned Afrique, 1999. Etude sur le rôle et l'importance du sous secteur de l'élevage dans l'économie nationale, formulation d'une stratégie nationale de développement. Rapport définitif, 90 pages. MRA Ministère chargé des Ressources Animales/1988. Plan d'action pour l'élevage. 39 p.         [ Links ]

Talaki, E., 2002. Caractérisation des chèvres naines (Sénégal), Sahel (Sénégal), Guéra (Mauritanie) et rousse de Maradi (Niger): étude du polymorphisme des microsatellites et des caséines as1 et as2 du lait. Mémoire de DEA Biologie Animale, UCAD, N° 153, 76 p.         [ Links ]

Tourand, J.F. & Landais, E., 1996. Productivités des caprins dans le système de production agricole du Delta du Fleuve Sénégal. Rev. Elev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 49, 168-173.         [ Links ]

 

 

# Corresponding author. E-mail: missohou@refer.sn

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons