versión On-line ISSN 2072-8050
Herv. teol. stud. vol.64 no.2 Cape Town jun. 2008
The significance of dreams and the star in Matthew's infancy narrative
Francois P Viljoen
North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus)
The phenomena of dreams and the star of Bethlehem in Matthew's birth narrative have intrigued scholars through the ages. Scholarship in this regard went through the stages of identifying the origin of the material and of arguing the historicity of these events. Currently scholarship is moving into a new stage of investigating the meaning of these narratives. Without engaging the arguments developed by the first two stages mentioned, I investigate the significance of these unusual forms of revelation in this article.
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text available only in PDF format.
Allison, D C 2005. Studies in Matthew: Interpretation past and present. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic. [ Links ]
Brown, R E 1975. The meaning of the Magi; the significance of the star. Worship 49(10), 574-582. [ Links ]
Brown, R E 1993. The Birth of the Messiah: A commentary on the Infancy narratives in the Gospel of Matthew and Luke. New York: Doubleday. [ Links ]
Calvin, J 1979 . Commentary on a harmony of the evangelists, Matthew, Mark and Luke, volume 1. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker. [ Links ]
Carter, W 2000. Matthew and the margins: A socio-political and religious reading. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series, 204). [ Links ]
Conrad, E 1985. The annunciation of birth and the birth of the Messiah. CBQ 47, 656-663. [ Links ]
Davies, W D & Allison D C 2004. A critical and exegetical commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew. Volume 1 (Matthew 1-7). London: T & T Clark. (International Critical Commentary. [ Links ])
Dodson, D S 2002. Dreams, the ancient novels, and the Gospel of Matthew: An intertextual study. Perspectives in Religious Studies 29(1), 39-52. [ Links ]
Dunn, D G 1991. The parting of the ways between Christianity and Judaism and their significance for the character of Christianity. Philadelphia, PA: Trinity Press International. [ Links ]
Ellis, E E 1991. The Old Testament in Early Christianity: Canon and interpretation in the light of modern research. Tübingen: Mohr. [ Links ]
France, R T 1985. The Gospel according to Matthew: An introduction and commentary. Leicester: Intervarsity Press. [ Links ]
Gnuse, R 1981. Dreams and their theological significance in the Biblical tradition. Currents in Theology and Mission 8(3), 166-171. [ Links ]
Gnuse, R 1990. Dream genre in the Matthean infancy narratives. Novum Testamentum 32(2), 97-120. [ Links ]
Green, B 2000. Elohist, in D N Freedman (ed), Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible, 402. Grand Rapids , MI: Eerdmans. [ Links ]
Hagner, D A 1993. Word Biblical Commentary, 33A, Matthew 1-13. Dallas, TX: Word Books. [ Links ]
Keener, G S 1999. A commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans. [ Links ]
Knox, W 1957. The sources of the Synoptic Gospels, Vol 2: Saint Luke and Saint Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Links ]
Luz, U 1990. Matthew 1-7: A commentary. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. [ Links ]
Malina, B J 1967. Matthew 2 and Is 41, 2-3: A possible relationship? Studii Biblici Franciscani Liber Annuus 19, 287-299. [ Links ]
Malina, B J & Rohrbach, R L 1992. Social science commentary on the Synoptic Gospels. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress Press. [ Links ]
Miller, J E 1990. Dreams and prophetic visions. Biblica 71, 401-404. [ Links ]
Molner, M R 1999. The star of Bethlehem: The legacy of the Magi. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. [ Links ]
Oster, R 1982. Numistic windows into the social world of early Christianity: A methodological enquiry. Journal of Biblical Literature 101, 195-223. [ Links ]
Paffenroth, K 1994. Science of story?: The star of Bethlehem. The Expository Times, 78-79. [ Links ]
Renan, E 1863. La Vie de Jesus. Berlin: Springer. [ Links ]
Rosenberg, R A 1972. The "Star of the Messiah" reconsidered. Biblica 53, 105-109. [ Links ]
Saldarini, A J 1994. Matthew's Christian-Jewish Community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. [ Links ]
Sim, D C 1998. The Gospel of Matthew and Christian Judaism: The historical and social setting of the Matthean Community: Studies of the New Testament and its world. Edinbrugh: T & T Clark. [ Links ]
Sim, D C 1995. The Gospel of Matthew and the gentiles. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 57(2), 19-48. [ Links ]
Soares Prabhu, G 1976. The formula quotations in the infancy narrative of Matthew: An enquiry into the tradition history of Mt 1-2. Rome: Biblical Institute. [ Links ]
Stanton, G N 1992. Matthew's christology and the parting of the ways, in Dunn, J D G (ed), The parting of the ways AD 70 to 135, 99-116. The second Durham-Tübingen research symposium on earliest Christianity and Judaism (Durham, September 1989). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (WUNT 66. [ Links ])
Strauss, D F 1865. A new life of Jesus. London: Williams & Norgate. [ Links ]
Viljoen, F P 2006a. Jesus' teaching on the Torah in the Sermon on the Mount. Neotestamentica 40(1), 135-156. [ Links ]
Viljoen, F P 2006b. The Matthean community according to the beginning of his gospel. Acta Theologica 26(2), 242-262. [ Links ]
Viljoen, F P 2007. Fulfilment in Matthew. Verbum et Ecclesia 28(1), 301-324. [ Links ]
1 Significantly two very prominent nineteenth-century scholars writing on "the life of Jesus" ignore the Star of Bethlehem without any comment: Ernest Renan, La Vie de Jesus and D F Strauss, A new life of Jesus. In spite of widespread hesitancy concerning the historicity of this narrative there is no insuperable reason why one must deny that the tradition used by Matthew is historical in core (Hagner 1993:25).
2 Scholars delineate dream reports according to form-critical elements: Situation provided by the narrative, an introduction to the dream report, a theophany, a dream reference, a recipient, mentioning of the place, the auditory address formula, the message, termination of the dream and the fulfilment of the command (Gnuse 1990:107). The dreams or visions in Acts lack most of these significant elements.
3 Full accounts are given of three of these (1:20-25; 2:13-15 and 2:19-21), distinguished not only by the presence of the message, but also by reference to the angel of the Lord.
4 Ojnar and ovjneiro~ are the most common dream-vision terminologies (Dodson 2006:40).
5 The Elohist as one of the four sources or strata underlying the Pentateuch is far from assured, nor do those who acknowledge these sources agree on their features. Nevertheless some coherent portrait of the Elohist emerges from scholarship.
6 The Biblical narrative of Moses' birth had undergone substantial expansion by the first century AD as can be seen in the writings of Josephus (Ant 2.205, 206). In the expanded narrative Pharaoh was warned by his scribes that a child was about to be born who would threaten his crown, and he and his advisers decided to kill all the Hebrew male children. At the same time Moses' father had a divine revelation in a dream that his pregnant wife would bear a child who would save Israel the child who escaped Pharaoh's massacre (cf Brown 1975:577).
7 However, to assume that Matthew is unqualified pro-Gentile reveals that not all evidence is taken into account. Sim (1995:19-48) convincingly indicates that Matthew portrays Gentiles both positively as negatively.
8 Matthew's Gospel implies a reader who is rooted in the traditions of Israel Viljoen (2006a:152). Jesus' mission is to Israel. However, converts from all nations are welcomed and expected (Viljoen 2006b:259).
9 Artemidorus divided dreams into five categories; enigmatic dreams, prophetic vision, oracular dreams, nightmares, and apparitions (Dodson 2002:40)
10 Miller (1990:401-4) thinks that early Judaism blurred the older distinction between dreams and night visions.
11 In Matthew's narrative angels only appear in dreams until the appearance of the angel at the empty grave after Jesus' resurrection (Mt 28:2).
12 The parallels between Matthew's infancy and passion narratives are remarkable. Both have formula quotations, Gentiles (Magi and Pilate's wife) who have dreams and Jewish leaders with Herod and Pilate respectively.
13 This allusion could be another example of how Matthew views Jesus as the "new Moses" (cf Allison 1993:137-270).
14 As stated above, I do not engage the argument about the historicity of the events, but discuss the significance of the narrative.
15 Astrologers studied the relative movement of celestial bodies and interpreted their findings as having influence on human affairs and the natural world.
16 The Moses haggadah is very close to the Matthean story. Magi (TgJ pn Ex 1:15; ExR 1:18 on Ex 1:22) or scribes (Josephus, Ant 2.205) predict for Pharaoh the birth of Moses that would become its conqueror. Pharaoh is very upset (Josephus, Ant 2.206) and orders the infanticide (cf Luz 1989, 131). The same cast of characters is present: the wicked ruler, the chief priests and scribes that aligned against the newborn King.
17 Earlier texts apply "King of kings" to the Babylonian ruler (cf Ezr 7:12; Ezk 26:7; Dn 2:37).
18 In New Testament times the word mavgoi covered a wide range of people who practiced occult cults: astrologers, fortunetellers, magicians of varying degrees of plausibility (Brown 1975:577). Matthew refers to astrologers.
19 This formulation as interpretation of the text probably was first used by Augustine, Serm. 200.1 and 202.1.