SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.64 issue1 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


HTS Theological Studies

On-line version ISSN 2072-8050
Print version ISSN 0259-9422

Herv. teol. stud. vol.64 n.1 Pretoria Mar. 2008


Eskatologie en koninkryk in die Markusevangelie



Ernest van Eck

Departement Nuwe-Testamentiese Wetenskap, Universiteit van Pretoria




Eschatology and kingdom in Mark
This article investigates the concepts of eschatology and kingdom in Mark from a narratological point of view. Special attention is given to the narrator’s use of story time and plotted time, the narrative function of Mark 13, and the Son of man sayings in the Gospel. The two most important conclusions reached are that Mark uses the Son of man sayings in a non titular way, and that the coming of the son of man (parousia) refers to Jesus’ vindication by God at his resurrection. In Mark the kingdom is equated with Jesus’ new household, a household that replaces the temple. The concepts of kingdom (new household), eschatology and son of man are thus so closely linked in Mark’s narrative that eschatology is the kingdom and the kingdom is eschatology. A possible socio-historical setting for Mark’s community, in which the above understanding of the concepts of kingdom, eschatology and Son of man sayings would have made sense, is also postulated.



Full text available only in PDF format.




Achtemeier, P J 1986. Mark. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress. (Proclamation Commentaries.         [ Links ])

Adams, E 2005. The coming Son of man in Mark’s gospel. Tyndale Bulletin 56(2), 39-61.         [ Links ]

Aune, D E 1975. The significance of the delay of the parousia for early Christianity, in Hawthorne (ed), Current issues in Biblical and patristic interpretation: Studies in honor of Merrill C Tenney, 87-109. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

Aune, D E 1986. The apocalypse of John and the problem of genre, in Collins, A Y (ed), Early Christian apocalyptism: Genre and social setting, 65-96. Decatur, GA: Scholars Press. (Semeia 36.         [ Links ])

Balabanski, V 1997. Eschatology in the making: Mark, Matthew and the Didache. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 97.         [ Links ])

Bauckham, R J 1980. The delay of the parousia. Tyndale Bulletin 31, 3-36.         [ Links ]

Bauckham, R J 1983. Jude, 2 Peter. Waco, TX: Word. (WBC 50.         [ Links ])

Best, E 1970. Discipleship in Mark: Mark 8:22-10:52. Scottish Journal of Theology 23, 323-337.         [ Links ]

Best, E 1983. Mark: The Gospel as story. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.         [ Links ]

Bietenhard, H 1982. Der Menschensohn – ho huios to anthropoi: Sprachliche und religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zun einem Begriff der synoptichen Evangelien, I, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, II.25.1.265-350.         [ Links ]

Bolt, P G 1995. Mark 13: An apocalyptic precursor to the passion narrative. The Reformed Theological Review 54, 10-33.         [ Links ]

Bornkamm, G 1951. Die verzögerung der parusie: Exegetische bemerkungen zu zwei synoptischen texten, in Schmauch, W (Hrsg), Memoriam E Lohmeyer, 116-126. Stuttgart: Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk.         [ Links ]

Bultmann, R 1931. Die geschichte der synoptischen Tradition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.         [ Links ]

Bultmann, R 1948. Theologie des Neuen Testaments. Tübingen: Mohr.         [ Links ]

Burkett, D 1999. The Son of man debate: A history and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (SNTS Monograph Series 107.         [ Links ])

Carrol, J T 2000. The parousia of Jesus in the synoptic Gospels and Acts, in Carrol, J T et al (eds), The return of Jesus in early Christianity, 5-45. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.         [ Links ]

Casey, M 1979. Son of man: The interpretation and influence of Daniel 7. London: SPCK.         [ Links ]

Casey, M 1987. General, generic and indefinite: The use of the term “Son of man” in Aramaic sources and in the teaching of Jesus. JSNT 29, 17-43.         [ Links ]

Casey, M 1991. Method in our madness, and madness in our methods: Some approaches to the Son of man problem in recent scholarship. JSNT 42, 17-43.         [ Links ]

Casey, M 1994. The use of the term bar (e)nash(a) in the Aramaic translations of the Hebrew Bible. JSNT 54, 87-118.         [ Links ]

Chatman, S 1978. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.         [ Links ]

Collins, A Y 1996. Cosmology and eschatology in Jewish and Christian apocalypticism. Leiden: Brill. (JSJ Suppl 50.         [ Links ])

Conzelmann, H 1959. Geschichte und Eschaton in Mark 13. ZNW 50, 210-221.         [ Links ]

Conzelmann, H 1960. The theology of St Luke. London: Faber.         [ Links ]

Crossan, J D 1991. The historical Jesus: The life of a Jewish Mediterranean Jewish peasant. San Francisco, CA: Harper.         [ Links ]

Cullmann, O 1971. The Christology of the New Testament. London: C A M Hall.         [ Links ]

Dewey, J 1980. Marcan public debate: Literary technique, concentric structure, and theology in Mark 2:1-3:6. Chico, CA: Scholars Press.         [ Links ]

Dodd, C H 1936. The parables of the kingdom. London: Nesbit & Co.         [ Links ]

Duling, D C 1994. The Gospel of Mark: A mysterious apocalyptic drama, in Duling, D C & Perrin, N, The New Testament: Proclamation and paranesis, myth and history, 295-327. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.         [ Links ]

Ehrman, B D 1999. Jesus: apocalyptic prophet of the new millennium. New York: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Farrer, A 1951. A study in Mark. London: Dacre.         [ Links ]

Fitzmeyer, J A 1984. Another view of the “Son of man” debate. JSNT 4, 58-68.         [ Links ]

Fowler, R M 1981. Loaves and fishes: The function of the feeding stories in the Gospel of Mark. Chico, CA: Scholars Press.         [ Links ]

France, R T 1971. Jesus and the Old Testament: His application of Old Testament passages to himself and his mission. London: Tyndale.         [ Links ]

France, R T 1990. Divine government: God’s kinship in the Gospel of Mark. London: SPCK.         [ Links ]

France, R T 2002. The Gospel of Mark: A commentary on the Greek text. (Grand Rapids, MI: Paternoster. (NIGNT.         [ Links ])

Geddert, T J 1989. Watchwords: Mark 13 and Markan eschatology. Sheffield: JSNT. (JSNT Suppl.         [ Links ])

Grässer, E 1977. Das problem der Parusieverzögerung in der synoptischen Evangelien und in der Apostelgeschichte. New York: De Gruyter.         [ Links ]

Herzog, W R 2000. Jesus, justice and the reign of God: A ministry of liberation. Louisville, KY: Westminister John Knox.         [ Links ]

Hurtado, L W 2005. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.         [ Links ]

Kelber, W H 1974. The kingdom of Mark: A new place and a new time. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Kingsbury, J D 1989. Conflict in Mark: Jesus, authorities, disciples. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Kloppenborg, J S 2005. Evocatio deorum and the date of Mark. JBL 124(3), 419-450.         [ Links ]

Lightfoot, R H 1950. The gospel message of St Mark. Oxford: Clarendon.         [ Links ]

Lindars, B 1983. Jesus Son of man: A fresh examination of the Son of Man sayings in the Gospels in light of recent research. London: Society of Promoting Christian Knowledge.         [ Links ]

Loba-Mkole, J-C 2003. “Son of man” and exegetical myths. HTS 59(3), 837-858.         [ Links ]

Lohmeyer, E 1936. Galiläa und Jerusalem. Göttiingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.         [ Links ]

Lohmeyer, E 1942. Kultus und Evangelium. Göttiingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.         [ Links ]

Malbon, E S 1982. Galilee and Jerusalem: History and literature in Marcan interpretation. CBQ 44, 242-255.         [ Links ]

Malbon, E S 1986. Narrative space and mythic meaning in Mark: New voices in biblical studies. San Francisco, CA: Harper.         [ Links ]

Malina, B J 1989. Christ and time: Swiss or Mediterranean? CBQ 51, 1-31.         [ Links ]

Malina, B J 1991. Reading theory perspective: Reading Luke-Acts, in Neyrey, J H (ed), The social world of Luke-Acts: Models for interpretation, 1-23. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.         [ Links ]

Malina, B J 2001. The social gospel of Jesus: The kingdom of God in Mediterranean perspective. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Malina, B J 2002a. Exegetical eschatology, the peasant present and the final discourse genre: The case of Mark 13. BTB 32(2), 49-59.         [ Links ]

Malina, B J 2002b. Social-scientific models on historical Jesus research, in Stegemann, W, Malina, B J & Theissen, G (eds), The social setting of Jesus and the Gospels, 3-26. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Marcus, J 1992. The Jewish war and the Sitz im Leben of Mark. JBL 111(3), 441-462.         [ Links ]

Marshall, I H 1992. The parousia in the New Testament and today, in Wilkins, M J & Paige, T (eds), Worship, theology and ministry in the early church: Essays in honor of Ralph P Martin, 194-211. Sheffield: JSNT. (JSNT Suppl 87.         [ Links ])

Marxsen, W 1959. Der Evangelist Markus: Studien zur Redaktionsgeschichte des Evangeliums. Göttiingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.         [ Links ]

Montgomery, J A 1927. A critical and exegetical commentary on the book of Daniel. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. (ICC.         [ Links ])

Perrin, N 1966. The Son of Man in ancient Judaism and primitive Christianity: A suggestion. Biblical Research 11, 17-28.         [ Links ]

Pesch, R 1968. Naherwartungen: Tradition und Redaktion in Mk 13. Düsseldorf: Patmos. (KBANT.         [ Links ])

Petersen, N R 1980a. The composition of Mark 4:1-8:26. HThR 73, 185-217.         [ Links ]

Petersen, N R 1980b. When is the end not the end? Literary reflections on the ending of Mark’s narrative. Interpretation 34, 151-166.         [ Links ]

Radcliffe, T 1987. The coming of the Son of Man: Mark’s gospel and the subversion of “the apocalyptic imagination”, in Davies, B (ed), Language, meaning and God: Essays in honor of Herbert McCabe, 176-189. London: Chapman.         [ Links ]

Rhoads, D & Michie, D 1982. Mark as story: An introduction to the narrative of a gospel. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.         [ Links ]

Schröter, J 2001. The Son of man as the representative of God’s kingdom: On the interpretation of Jesus in Mark and Q, in Labahn, M & Schmidt, A, Jesus, Mark and Q: The teaching of Jesus and its earliest records, 34-68. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. (JSNTS Suppl Series 214.         [ Links ])

Schweitzer, A 1954. The quest of the historical Jesus: A critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede. London: A & C Black.         [ Links ]

Shepherd, M B 2006. Daniel 7:13 and the New Testament Son of man. WTJ 68, 99-111.         [ Links ]

Smith, M 1981. The composition of Mark 11-16. HeyJ 22(4), 364-375.         [ Links ]

Svendlund, G 1974. Aramaic portions of the Pesiqta de Rab Kahana. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.         [ Links ]

Tannehill, R C 1980. The Gospel of Mark as narrative Christology. Semeia 16, 57-95.         [ Links ]

Tannehill, R C 1983. The disciples in Mark: The function of narrative role. JR 75, 386-405.         [ Links ]

Van Aarde, A 2002. Die uitdrukking “seun van die mens” in die Jesus-tradisie: ’n Ontwikkeling vanaf ’n landbou-omgewing na die wêreld van skrifgeleerdes. HTS 58(4), 1625-1653.         [ Links ]

Van Aarde, A G 2004. Jesus and the Son of Man: A shift from the “Little tradition” to the “Great tradition”. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 80(4), 423-438.         [ Links ]

Van Eck, E & Van Aarde, A G 1989. A narratological analysis of Mark 12:1-12: The plot of the Gospel of Mark in a nutshell. HTS 45(4), 778-800.        [ Links ]

Van Eck, E 2000. A Sitz for the Gospel of Mark? A critical reaction to Bauckham’s theory on the universality of the Gospels. HTS 56(4), 973-1008.        [ Links ]

Van Eck, E 1995. Galilee and Jerusalem in Mark's story of Jesus: A narratological and social-scientific reading. Pretoria: Kital. (HTS Suppl 7.)        [ Links ]

Van Iersel, B 1988. Reading Mark. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical.        [ Links ]

Vermes, G 1967. The use of bar nash/bar nasha in Jewish Aramaic, in Black, M (ed), An Aramaic approach to the Gospels and Acts, 310-328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.        [ Links ]

Vorster, W S 1983. Die Evangelie volgens Markus, in Du Toit, A B (red), Handleiding by die Nuwe Testament, Band IV: Die Sinoptiese evangelies en Handelinge: Inleiding en teologie, 109-155. Pretoria: NGKB.        [ Links ]

Vorster, W S 1987. Literary reflection on Mark 13:5-37: A narrated speech of Jesus. Neotestamentica 21, 203-224.        [ Links ]

Weiss, J 1971. Jesus’ proclamation of the kingdom of God. London: SCM.        [ Links ]

Wright, N T 1996. Jesus and the victory of God: Christian origins and the question of God, Vol II. London: SPCK.        [ Links ]

Wright, N T 2001. Mark for everyone. London: SPCK.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License