CME
GUEST EDITORIAL

 

Urology care in South Africa: A call for collaboration

 

 

Approximately 10% of all patient consultations in general practice are urological, and urology cases comprise approximately 25% of acute hospital surgical referrals.^[1-3] This demand for urological services is increasing and the pattern of disease is changing, especially in patients aged over 65 years. Despite frequent patient encounters for the non-urologist, the current training platform for junior doctors, which includes a 2-year internship and a year of community service, has highlighted significant areas of weakness in subspecialties such as urology, otorhinolaryngology and ophthalmology.^[4,5] This lack of exposure to clinical urology was further highlighted in a recent survey of 104 interns that showed that urological exposure and training at internship level is below the standard at which it needs to be to produce proficient and competent doctors able to practise efficiently during community service and beyond.^[6] It is therefore of paramount importance that primary care physicians (PCPs) are empowered to manage common urological pathologies, which is of particular importance in the public sector in South Africa (SA). According to the registry on the Health Professions Council of South Africa website,^[7] SA has 347 active urologists registered with the Council, which equates to a urologist-to-population ratio of 0.56 per 100 000. What is worse is that the 52 million South Africans who fall outside the medical aid net^[8] - 84 out of every 100 - are largely dependent on just 50 full-time urologists in the public sector across the country (Fig. 1). The situation in other parts of Africa is even more dire. The College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa, which currently operates in 14 countries in the sub-Saharan region, and the West African College of Surgeons have urologist-to-population ratios of 0.025 and 0.015 per 100 000, respectively.^[9] To put these numbers in perspective, the USA has 13 976 urologists (4.21 per 100 000 population).^[10]

 

 

For these reasons, urologists should seek to engage and empower family practitioners and PCPs to help shoulder our burden. The imminent National Health Insurance, which aims to provide equitable access to healthcare, is in response to the global call for universal health coverage. Family practitioners and PCPs will be at the forefront in delivering high-quality, cost-effective care more rapidly and closer to home, offering patients considerable advantages, and together with strong, appropriate referral management and community-orientated approaches to case management and prevention, may reduce the burden for specialists. The urology pathways in this issue of CME,^[11] which are in line with international and national guidelines,^[12-15] are easy to follow, and, except for a small number of advanced imaging requirements, can be implemented at all levels of care. They provide insights into the decision-making processes for the management of some common urological presentations, including visible and non-visible haematuria, acute urinary retention, male lower urinary tract symptoms, female urinary incontinence, male urethral discharge, acute scrotal pain, and an approach to elevated prostate-specific antigen detected during screening. Although various guidelines and guideline overviews have been published in an SA urology context,^[16-18] these are by far the most practical. They received a national endorsement from the South African Urology Association. We hope that they will be implemented across emergency departments and primary referral centres.

 

 

Jeff John

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Frere Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, East London, South Africa; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Guest Editor; jeffveenajohn@gmail.com

Ahmed Adam

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Academic Co-Chair, South African Urology Association

Shingai Mutambirwa

Division of Urology, School of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa, Academic Co-Chair, South African Urology Association

 

References

1. Kerfoot BP, Turek PJ. What every graduating medical student should know about urology: The stakeholder viewpoint. Urology 2008;71(4):549-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.010        [ Links ]

2. Hunter C, Thorne A, Fallon J, Stevenson AJ. Appropriate medical staffing improves patient safety, training and doctor wellbeing. Cureus 2022;14(11):e32071. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32071        [ Links ]

3. Teichman JM, Weiss BD, Solomon D. Urological needs assessment for primary care practice: Implications for undergraduate medical education. J Urol 1999;161(4):1282-1285.         [ Links ]

4. Jaschinski J, de Villiers M. Factors influencing the development of practical skills of interns working in regional hospitals of the Western Cape province of South Africa. S Afr Fam Pract 2008;50(1):70-70d.         [ Links ]

5. Nkabinde TC, Ross A, Reid S, Nkwanyana NM. Internship training adequately prepares South African medical graduates for community service - with exceptions. S Afr Med J 2013;103(12):930-934. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.6702        [ Links ]

6. Silolo S, van Deventer H, van der Merwe A. Evaluation of views and perceptions of junior doctors on urology training and exposure during internship in South Africa: Are we losing future urologists? S Afr J Surg 2020;58(4):219.         [ Links ]

7. Health Professions Council of South Africa. HPCSA iRegister. 2023. http://isystems.hpcsa.co.za/iregister/ (accessed 18 February 2024).         [ Links ]

8. M'bouaffou F, Buch E, Olorunju S, Thsehla E. Perceived knowledge of scheme members and their satisfaction with their medical schemes: A cross-sectional study in South Africa. BMC Public Health 2022;22(1):1700. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14106-8        [ Links ]

9. Moore M, Mabedi C, Phull M, Payne SR, Biyani CS. The utility of urological clinical and simulation training for sub-Saharan Africa. BJU Int 2022;129(5):563-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15731        [ Links ]

10. American Urology Association. The state of urology workforce and practice in the United States 2022. 22 April 2023. https://www.AUAnet.org/common/pdf/research/census/State-Urology-Workforce-Practice-US.pdf (accessed 16 February 2024).         [ Links ]

11. John J. Urology pathways for the primary care physician. S Afr Med J 2024;114(4):e1670. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i4.1670        [ Links ]

12. Prostate Cancer Foundation of South Africa. South African prostate cancer guidelines. 2017. https://prostate-ca.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017ProstateGuidelinesDraftVersion2016.pdf (accessed 11 February 2024).         [ Links ]

13. National Department of Health, South Africa. Standard treatment guidelines and essential medicines list for South Africa: Primary healthcare level. 2020 edition. Pretoria: NDoH, 2020. https://knowledgehub.health.gov.za/content/standard-treatment-guidelines-and-essential-medicines-list (accessed 28 February 2024).         [ Links ]

14. American Urology Association. Guidelines. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/guidelines (accessed 19 February 2024).         [ Links ]

15. European Association of Urology. Guidelines 2023. https://uroweb.org/guidelines (accessed 22 February 2024).         [ Links ]

16. Adam A, Coetzee J, van Wijk F, Bebington B, Jeffery S. A template for the comprehensive evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse in a South African context. Pelviperineology 2010;29(4).         [ Links ]

17. Adam A, Claassen F, Coovadia A, et al. The South African guidelines on enuresis - 2017. Afr J Urol 2018;24:1-13.         [ Links ]

18. Reddy D, Laher AE, Moeng M, Adam A. Bladder trauma: A guideline of the guidelines. BJU Int 2023; Nov 27. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16236        [ Links ]