SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.106 número4Budget squeeze: Cutting clinicians hurts patientsWhere are the males? Diversity, proportionality and Health Sciences admissions índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

versión On-line ISSN 2078-5135
versión impresa ISSN 0256-9574

SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. vol.106 no.4 Pretoria abr. 2016

http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/samj.2016.v106i4.10764 

IZINDABA

 

'My advice was evidence based' - Noakes

 

 

The Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) this February closed its case against University of Cape Town emeritus professor Tim Noakes on a charge of unprofessional conduct and will resume with cross-examination of the controversial A-rated scientist on 17 October.

Noakes was allegedly unprofessional in giving unconventional, non-evidence-based advice to a breastfeeding mother on a social network. The charge followed two tweets Noakes made to breastfeeding mother Pippa Leenstra on 4 February 2014, saying that good first foods for infant weaning are low carbohydrate, high fat. Johannesburg dietitian Claire Julsing Strydom, then president of the Association for Dietetics in South Africa, responded to Leenstra on Twitter, lodging a complaint with the HPCSA on 5 February. The HPCSA formally charged Noakes in September 2014.

The HPCSA's last expert witness at the February hearing was Stellenbosch University psychiatry professor Willie Pienaar, a part-time bioethics lecturer. At the earlier (November 2015) session, the HPCSA called Julsing Strydom as a factual witness and heard testimony by retired North-West University nutrition professor Este Vorster, North-West University nutrition professor Salome Kruger, Medical Research Council unit head and paediatrics professor Muhammed Ali Dhansay, and HPCSA legal officer Nkagiseng Madube. Vorster, Kruger, Dhansay and Pienaar suggested that Noakes was in a doctor/patient relationship with Leenstra and that the advice he gave was unconventional because it was not evidence based. Madube contended that the HPCSA had followed due process in charging him, which Noakes' legal team strongly contested.

Noakes himself began testifying to the HPCSA Professional Conduct Committee, chaired by Pretoria advocate Joan Adams, on 10 February. He denied that he was in a doctor-patient relationship with Leenstra, saying he had not practised medicine for more than 10 years. As a scientist, his main concern was to give people evidence-based information from which they could make up their own minds. His testimony lasted nearly 40 hours and was supplemented by 4 000 pages and 900 slides with study references to suggest that his advice was evidence based. Noakes stressed that his advice was only 'unconventional' to anyone who failed to study the evidence. The case is being heard in Newlands, Cape Town.

Marika Sboros
BizNews.com, Johannesburg and London sborosm@gmail.com

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons