SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.103 número5Artesunate v. quinine for severe malariaLate termination of pregnancy: Maternal counselling and fetal rights índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

versão On-line ISSN 2078-5135
versão impressa ISSN 0256-9574

SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. vol.103 no.5 Cape Town Mai. 2013

 

CORRESPONDENCE

 

Asthma guidelines: Why aminophylline?

 

 

Lee A WallisI; Melanie StanderII

IHead of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa lee.wallis@westerncape.gov.za
IIPresident, Emergency Medicine Society of South Africa

 

 

To the Editor: While it is always encouarging to see new clinical guidelines to help direct therapy for important clinical conditions, the 'Guidelines for the management of acute asthma in adults'[1] are disappointing in two regards.

Firstly, a majority of acute asthma attacks in adults are managed in the emergency centre and/or emergency medical services (EMS) setting, and yet no emergency medicine inputs - including those of the Emergency Medicine Society of South Africa - were sought or included in the guidelines.

Secondly, while the majority of recommendations are well- formulated and evidence-based, it is surprising to see the use of intravenous aminophylline still promoted: it was removed from international guidelines many years ago and the lack of benefit has been well proven. Unlike the majority of the recommendations in these guidelines, the use of this drug is not accompanied by a supporting evidence level. Multiple studies have shown that it adds no value over the use of beta-agonists in acute management, including the fact that it provides no further bronchodilation above that achieved with beta-agonists.[2-4] In addition, it increases the incidence of adverse effects when combined with bronchodilators.[3,4]

To quote from the latest Cochrane review on the matter:[4] 'The use of intravenous aminophylline did not result in significant additional bronchodilation compared to standard care with inhaled beta2-agonists ... or in a significant reduction in the risk of hospital admission. For every 100 people treated with aminophylline an additional 20 people had vomiting and 15 people arrhythmias or palpitations. No subgroups in which aminophylline might be more effective were identified.'

The continuation of maintenance oral theophylline appears reasonable, but the use of intravenous aminophylline has no therapeutic benefit, is associated with increased adverse events, and should be removed from the guideline. The international and local emergency medicine communities did so long ago.

 

 

1. Lalloo UG, Ainslie GM, Abdool-Gaffar MS et al. Guidelines for the management of acute asthma in adults. S Afr Med J 2013;103(3):189-198. [http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.6526]         [ Links ]

2. Appel D, Shim C. Comparative effect of epinephrine and aminophylline in the treatment of asthma. Lung 1981;159(5):243.         [ Links ]

3. Siegel D, Sheppard D, Gelb A, Weinberg PF. Aminophylline increases the toxicity but not the efficacy of an inhaled beta-adrenergic agonist in the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;132(2):283.         [ Links ]

4. Nair P, Milan SJ, Rowe BH. Addition of intravenous aminophylline to inhaled beta2-agonists in adults with acute asthma. Cochrane Database Sys Rev:2012. CD002742.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons