SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.102 issue2 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

Print version ISSN 0256-9574

SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. vol.102 no.2 Cape Town Feb. 2012

 

CORRESPONDENCE

 

Akhenaten, a unique pharaoh

 

 

To the Editor: Retief and Cilliers1 suggest an interesting new theory about Akhenaten's physical appearance, but omitted to refer to previously suggested differential diagnoses: for example, schistosomiasis,2 myotonic dystrophy,3 elephantiasis4 and Antley-Bixler syndrome have also been suggested.5 More recently, we proposed homocystinuria as a possible cause.6 Since Kallman's syndrome is a hereditary disease, it is important to see how this diagnosis fits into Akhenaten's family tree. The fact that Akhenaten's wife, Nefertiti, and their children were similarly depicted implies that they suffered from the same disease. Akhenaten's parents, Amenhotep III and Tiye, were most probably healthy. The genetics of Kallman syndrome are still not fully understood.7 However, two of the best-described forms of Kallman syndrome are inherited autosomal dominant and X-linked disorder.7 An obvious problem with this diagnosis is the healthy father, although it cannot be fully rejected because the phenotype of these patients varies from partial to complete. However, as we explained in our article, an autosomal recessive disease, such as homocystinuria, is the most probable explanation. Although, admittedly, all proposed diagnoses have their advantages and drawbacks, it is important to note that all of them are made under one assumption: that art from the Amarna period was realistic, i.e. that this was not just a form of artistic expression creating a distance from traditional Egyptian art. The authors do not cite an investigation by Hawass et al., in which it was suggested that a mummy found in KV55 was actually Akhenaten;8,9 they also suggest that the depictions of Akhenaten exaggerate his actual appearance. However, the definitive confirmation of both the identity of the KV55 mummy and a possible diagnosis can be made only by DNA analysis. Unfortunately, the method for DNA sampling is the subject of heavy criticism, and the results do not appear to be totally trustworthy.10

 

Tomislav Kelava
Department of Physiology
University of Zagreb Medical School
Croatia

Mislav Cavka
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Dubrava University Hospital
Zagreb
mislav.cavka@yahoo.com

 

1. Retief FP, Cilliers L. Akhenaten, a unique pharoh. S Afr Med J 2011;101:628-630.        [ Links ]

2. Ghalioungui P. Health and Healing in Ancient Egypt. Cairo: Centre of Documentation and Studies on Ancient Egypt, 1965.        [ Links ]

3. Cattaino G, Vicario L. Myotonic dystrophy in Ancient Egypt. Eur Neurol 1999;41:59.        [ Links ]

4. Velikovsky I. Oedipus and Akhnaton, Myth and History. New York: Doubleday & Company Inc, 1960.        [ Links ]

5. Braverman IM, Redford DB, Mackowiak PA. Akhenaten and the strange physiques of Egypt's 18th dynasty. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:556-560.        [ Links ]

6. Cavka M, Kelava T, Cavka V, Busic Z, Olujic B, Brkljacic B. Homocystinuria, a possible solution of the Akhenaten's mystery. Coll Antropol 2010;34 supp1:255-258.        [ Links ]

7. Sarfati J, Dodé C, Young J. Kallmann syndrome caused by mutations in the PROK2 and PROKR2 genes: pathophysiology and genotype-phenotype correlations. Front Horm Res 2010;39:121-132.        [ Links ]

8. Hawass Z, Gad YZ, Ismail S, et al. Ancestry and pathology in King Tutankhamun's family. JAMA 2010;303:638-647.        [ Links ]

9. Eshraghian A. Akhenaten's mystery remains. S Afr Med J 2011;101:780.        [ Links ]

10. Marchant J. Ancient DNA: Curse of the Pharaoh's DNA. Nature 2011;472:404-406.        [ Links ]