SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número3Job satisfaction amongst teachers at special needs schoolsGirls' career choices as a product of a gendered school curriculum: the Zimbabwean example índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
    • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

    Bookmark

    South African Journal of Education

    versão impressa ISSN 0256-0100

    S. Afr. j. educ. v.32 n.3 Pretoria  2012

     

    ARTCILES

     

    Exploring rural high school learners' experience of mathematics anxiety in academic settings

     

     

    Dipane Hlalele

    School of Education Studies, University of the Free State, Qwaqwa Campus, South Africa hlaleledj@qwa.ufs.ac.za

     

     


    ABSTRACT

    The purpose of the study was to explore rural high school learners' experience of mathematics anxiety in academic settings. Mathematics anxiety has been found to have an adverse effect on confidence, motivation and achievement. This quantitative study is exploratory and descriptive in nature. The participants were 403 learners doing mathematics in 18 rural schools in the Free State province of South Africa. Participants completed a 20-item questionnaire and 373 (92.5%) questionnaires were found to contain valid responses and were analysed by a professional statistician at the University of the Free State using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 17.0. The questionnaire was testedfor reliability using the Cronbach alpha coefficient and was found to have a reliability score of .841, indicating an acceptable reliability coefficient. Findings reveal that all learners sometimes, often, or always experience mathematics anxiety in academic settings. It is therefore important for teachers and authorities in education to observe its prevalence and to implement strategies toward the alleviation of the effects ofmathematics anxiety.

    Keywords: academic settings; achievement; confidence; habitus; learners; mathematics anxiety; rural


     

     

    Introduction

    There exists a crisis in mathematics education in South Africa. Central to economic prosperity is that a numerically literate citizenry be able to engage, manipulate, and understand mathematics as it constitutes an indispensible facet of our daily lives (Adler, Brombacher & Shan, 2000). Disparities in mathematics achievement between urban and rural learners are well documented (e.g. Bassey, Joshua & Asim, 2009). According to Rossnan (2006) mathematics anxiety could develop as a result of the learners' prior negative experiences of learning mathematics in the classroom or at home. Many learners experience, to varying degrees, mathematics anxiety. Chikodzi and Nyota (2010) and Sahin (2008) argue that mathematics anxiety may not necessarily be experienced by learners enrolled for the subj ect (mathematics) only, since every learner irrespective of the subject enrolled for, makes use of mathematical knowledge in one way or another. Chikodzi and Nyota further contend that the misconception of the non-utility of mathematics in actual life arises from the practice of teaching mathematics divorced from real life, whilst mathematics is deemed to be inseparable from organised life.

    City Press (2012) reports that one in six Grade 12 mathematics learners scored less than 10% in the subject Mathematics in 2011. There has also been a massive decline in the number of learners enrolling for mathematics in recent years. For example, 300,000 learners wrote the mathematics paper in 2008, compared to only 225,000 in 2011. Many South Africans involved in education and business view the decline in passes and enrolments in scarce or gateway subjects as a worrying trend. This study was conducted in rural school settings owing to the reality that I face as a teacher-educator attached to a higher education campus that enrols students who not only come from, but also return to teach in, predominantly rural school settings. I am of the opinion that the trend will continue for many years. In addition, this study sought to contribute to rurality and rural education. Historically, rurality and rural education have been marginalised bodies of knowledge in South Africa (Nkambule, Balfour, Pillay & Moletsane, 2011:341). Nkambule et al. (2011) further state that despite several interventions, education in rural areas continues to face a set of challenges owing to, among other factors, the diverse geographic location of the schools, diverse learners' backgrounds and diverse learning styles.

    Dieltiens (2008:40) states that "rural schools certainly have problems particular to them; predicaments which require systemic effort and creative ideas" but argues against the assertion that the problem with rural schools is that they fail to provide a relevant education. In order to build a democratic South Africa, rural learners need the same level of autonomy and critical thinking skills as their urban counterparts. In the end, there are rural schools, but not rural education (Dieltiens, 2008). A few analytical frameworks pertinent to the study are discussed next.

    Analytical frameworks

    Tsanwani (2009) views mathematics anxiety as an irrational and impedimental dread of mathematics. This term is used to describe the panic, helplessness, mental paralysis and disorganisation that arise among some individuals when they are required to solve a problem of a mathematical nature. The literature further indicates that mathematics anxiety refers to a person's feelings of tension and anxiety that interfere with the manipulation of numbers and the solving of mathematical problems in a wide variety of ordinary and academic settings (Khatoon & Mahmood, 2010; Leppavirta, 2011; Newstead, 1995; 2006; Perry, 2004). It can also be viewed that the sense of discomfort observed while working on mathematical problems, is associated with fear and apprehension to specific mathematics related settings (Khatoon & Mahmood, 2010; Ma, 2003) and seems ubiquitous. The literature shows that learners across all levels (grades) of schooling experience it, in some way or another (Hembree, 1990).

    Hadfield and McNeil (1994) proposed a model of mathematics anxiety which revolves around three main factors: environmental, intellectual and personality variables. Environmental factors include classroom issues, parental pressure and the perception of mathematics as a rigid set of rules. Intellectual variables include a mismatch of learning styles and self-doubt, whilst personality factors include a reluctance to ask questions in class and low self-esteem. Chinn (2008) argues that the advantage of this tripartite model is that it considers several, often inter-related factors. However, besides parents, other individuals who either contribute to or are experiencing mathematics anxiety are not clearly stated. A further classification by Baloglu and Kocak (2006) cite three anchors of mathematics anxiety, namely: dispositional, situational, and environmental. In addition to Hadfield and McNeil's elements of the environmental variable, Baloglu and Kocak view the elements thereof as issues that affect learners prior to their mathematical engagements; these include age, gender, academic subjects, and previous mathematics experience. The dispositional anchor deals with psychological and emotional features such as attitudes towards mathematics, self-concept, and learning styles. The self-concept refers to the learners' perception of their own ability to perform well in mathematics and to learn new topics. The situational anchor refers to direct features that result from the mathematics subject which include the design, topics, how the subject is presented, and the availability or lack of feedback.

    McAnallen (2010) conceptualised mathematics anxiety as an effective response that includes avoidance of mathematics, subsequent failure to learn mathematics skills, and thus negative career and school-related decisions. Tobias (1978) described mathematics anxiety as "sudden death" for some individuals and later defined it in Tobias and Weissbrod (1980a; 1980b) as: the panic, helplessness, paralysis, and mental disorganisation that arise among some people when they are required to solve a mathematical problem. Ferguson (1986) identified three common types of mathematics anxiety which include: mathematics test anxiety (associated with anticipating, taking, and receiving mathematics tests); numerical anxiety (associated with number manipulation); and abstraction anxiety (associated with abstract mathematical content). Vinson (2001) states that mathematics anxiety should be regarded as something more than a mere dislike for mathematics. Moreover, Mohamed and Tarmizi (2010) are of the opinion that it should be seen from a broader perspective as a complex construct of affective, behavioural, and cognitive accentuations to a perceived threat to self-esteem, which occur as responses to settings involving mathematics.

    Mathematics anxiety may also be associated with the social learning theory (Erdogan, Kesici & §ahin, 2011). Social learning theory focuses on learning that occurs within a social context. It considers that people learn from one another. Negative or positive perceptions of mathematics from parents and/or teachers are likely to give learners some messages (Sahin, 2008). Parents and teachers might emphasise how difficult mathematics is and, at the same time, tell how mathematical skills are essential for learners' future achievements (Thomas & Furner, 1997). Vann (1993) observed that mathematics anxiety in the mother was significantly predictive of mathematics anxiety in children. This implies that mathematics anxiety could be learned behaviour.

    Bourdieu's (1992, cited in Brown & Duku, 2008) notion of social practice focuses attention on habituated activities of ordinary living that people acquire through socialisation. Habitus is created through a social, rather than an individual process leading to patterns that are enduring and transferable from one context to another, but which also shifts in relation to specific contexts over time. Habitus is not fixed or permanent and can be changed in unexpected situations or over a long period of time (Navarro, 2006). Bourdieu (1984) views habitus as neither a result of free will, nor determined by structures, but created by a kind of interplay between the two over time; dispositions that are both shaped by past events and structures, and that shape current practices and structures and also, most importantly, that condition our very perceptions. Habitus is conceived as "the mental structures through which (an individual) apprehend (s) the social world. ..essentially the product of the internalisation of the structures of that world" (Bourdieu, 1986:130). It is an "ensemble of schemata of perception, feeling, evaluating, speaking, and acting that structures all the expressive, verbal, and practical manifestations and utterances of a person" (Cann, 1996:11). This study sought to address the question: Do rural high school learners experience mathematics anxiety in academic settings?

    Education in rural contexts

    The definition of 'rural' still eludes us due to its ambiguous connotations and the obvious and somewhat fallible comparison with 'urban' contexts. According to Sauvageot and da Graca (2007) rurality may be defined in various ways and no universal definition has been adopted. Most rural dwellers work in agriculture, often for meagre rates of compensation. From a learner diversity perspective, public schools in rural areas do not have a good track record in meeting the needs of diverse student populations (Powell, Sobel, Hess & Verdi, 2001). A great deal of diversity among rural students indicates both a challenge to and an opportunity for the state to contribute to closing the many national achievement gaps (DoE, 2005; Ludlow & Brannan, 2010). Most rural areas already face tremendous barriers to high learner attainment and operate in less than favourable policy environments (Johnson & Strange, 2007; Malhoit, 2005).

    Mathematics anxiety and academic performance

    It is generally accepted that teachers impact learners in many ways. Levine (2008) found that teachers with mathematics anxiety emphasise rule-based strategies and treat mathematics as an arbitrary collection of facts, perhaps to promote an illusion of their expertise and disciplinary power to students. Furthermore, there is often limited classroom interaction, resulting in students' questions not being asked or answered, and knowledge presented as limited and confusing. Frequently, these teaching strategies perpetrate and perpetuate mathematics anxiety in learners. Mathematics anxiety has been found to relate to mathematics performance of learners (Zakaria & Nordin, 2008; Karimi & Venkatesan, 2009). Mathematics anxiety has been found to decrease the efficiency of an individual's working memory because intrusive thoughts and worries take the focus away from the mathematics tasks at hand. This makes it difficult for individuals to think logically and results in increased errors and longer processing times when solving problems mentally. In the long-term, mathematics anxiety leads to decreased competence, reduced completion rates and lower academic performance in the subject (Ho, Senturk, Lam, Zimmer, Hong, Okamoto & Chiu, 2000). Ho et al. (2000) found that learners with higher levels of mathematics anxiety tend to have lower levels of performance in mathematics, suggesting the existence of a negative correlation between mathematics anxiety and performance.

    Hembree (1990) concurs that reducing mathematics anxiety is consistent with improving mathematics achievement. Furthermore, Nashon (2006) found that learners, whose mathematics anxiety decreased, experienced an increase in their level of self-efficacy. In addition, learners who experience mathematics anxiety, a subjective discomfort, in academic settings are more likely to delay completion or not do tasks assigned to him/her at all (Owens & New-begin, 1997). As an irrational fear towards mathematical operations in mathematics classes, mathematics anxiety is found to hinder learners' positive thinking about mathematics learning and feeling calm. This fear causes low self-esteem, disappointment and academic failure (Tobias, 1998; Gresham, 2004; Akin & Kurbanoglu, 2011). Other than achievement, mathematics anxiety has been found to be related to confidence and motivation.

    Mathematics anxiety, confidence and motivation

    Tapia (2004) and Zakaria and Nordin (2008) reported that learners having little or no mathematics anxiety scored significantly higher in motivation than learners with some or higher anxiety. One of the factors attributable to mathematics anxiety is a lack of confidence, which often leads to decreased motivation. According to Edelmuth (2006), and Kesici and Erdogan (2004; 2009) learners with mathematics anxiety will often perceive their skills in mathematics as less than those in other subjects and will not enjoy mathematics or will not have the desire to master it. Motivation is another factor that may play a significant role in the experience of mathematics anxiety. Linnenbrink and Pintrich (2002) define motivation as an academic enabler. Pintrich (2004) further stresses the importance of motivational beliefs in the learning process. Learners' effective learning is positively related to their motivational beliefs. Accor- ding to Atkinson and McClelland's Achievement Theory, individuals possess a disposition towards a tendency to achieve success and avoid non-achievement (Kesici & Erdogan, 2004; 2010). In some cases, a belief exists in some quarters of society that 'some people can do maths and others can't' (Wilson, 2009a, 2009b).

     

    Research design and methodology

    This section focuses on approach, participants, and reliability and validity.

    Approach

    This primarily exploratory and descriptive study uses a quantitative design to explore rural high school learners' experience of mathematics anxiety in academic settings. An exploratory study is conducted to gain insight into a situation, phenomenon, or community or individuals (Bless & Higson-Smith, 1995; De Vos, Strydom, Fouché & Delport, 2011). The need for such a study could arise out of a lack of understanding of a new area of interest, or in order to be acquainted with a situation (Fouché, 2005). According to Neuman (2011) we use exploratory research when the subject is very new or if we know little or nothing about it. As mentioned earlier, rurality and rural education have been marginalised bodies of knowledge in South Africa; therefore, more research needs to be done and reported on. The overall goal of this study fits well with the general intention of the exploratory aspect as it sought to provide a basis for formulating more precise questions about rural high school learners' experience of mathematics anxiety in academic settings that can be used to conduct further research. A descriptive study provides a picture of the specific details of a situation, a social setting, a relationship (Neuman, 2011) or a picture of a phenomenon as it naturally occurs (Bickman & Rog, 2009). The descriptive nature of this study blends well with its exploratory orientation as it (the study) begins with a well-defined subject/issue (i.e. mathematics anxiety) and sought to illuminate the basic facts and to create a general picture of the learners' experience (De Vos et al., 2011; Neuman, 2011).

    Participants

    A 20-item questionnaire was distributed to 403 high school learners doing mathematics in 18 rural schools in the Free State province of South Africa. Learners were requested to indicate their experience of mathematics according to the following alternatives: 1 never; 2 sometimes; 3 often; 4 always. It was found that 373 (92.55%) questionnaires contained valid responses. These were analysed by a professional statistician at the University of the Free using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 17.0. Since this exploratory study did not intend to focus on, among other things, factors such as gender, age, or ethnic differences, such considerations will not be discussed.

    Reliability and validity

    Reliability and validity are concerns that are approached through careful attention to a study's conceptualisation and the way in which the data are collected, analysed, and interpreted and the way in which findings are presented (Merriam, 2009). Contrary to some perceptions that suggest that issues of reliability and validity are concerned with data gathering instruments only, Merriam suggests that the researcher(s) need to constantly monitor compliance throughout the study. Reliability refers to the degree of consistency of the data gathering instrument in measuring that which it is supposed to measure. Cronbach's alpha coefficient is a measure of internal consistency that shows the degree to which all the items in a test measure the same attribute (Huysamen, 1993; Masitsa, 2008; 2011). Santos (1999:2) adds that the higher the value, the more reliable the instrument. He indicates that 0.7 is an acceptable reliability coefficient. In this study, the Cronbach alpha was calculated for the 20-item questionnaire and found to be .841.

    Since the Cronbach alpha coefficient average for rural high school learners' experience of mathematics anxiety in academic settings was .841, and that .7 is deemed as an acceptable reliability coefficient, the coefficient for this study suggests that the data gathering instrument was reliable. To observe content validity, the questionnaire was adopted and structured so that the questions posed were clearly articulated and directed. All statements were formulated in the positive to alleviate the possibility of misinterpretations. It was pre-tested on 34 rural high school learners who belonged to a group that was excluded from the participants in the study and, thereafter, amendments were made to ensure the simplicity and clarity of some questions, making it fully understandable to the participants (Masitsa, 2008; 2011). Furthermore, the researcher was present when the questionnaire was administered and could respond to any uncertainties the respondents may have had.

     

    Results

    The study investigated rural high school learners' experience of mathematics anxiety in academic settings. An analysis of these results is presented in Table 1. The mean scores represented the following alternatives: 1 never; 2 sometimes; 3 often; and 4 always.

     

     

    In Table 1, means ranging from 2.09 to 2.47 indicate that rural high school learners sometimes experience mathematics anxiety in academic settings, whilst means ranging from 2.53 to 2.79 indicate that they often experience mathematics anxiety and means ranging from 2.82 to 3.21 indicate that they always experience mathematics anxiety. There are no means (1.99 and below) indicating that the participants never experience mathematics anxiety in academic settings. The spread of the means indicates that all the learners sometimes, often, and/or always experience mathematics anxiety in academic settings. They always experience anxiety when writing mathematics examinations, doing mathematics assignments and when looking at the marks they received for a mathematics assignment.

    Results further indicate that learners often experience mathematics anxiety when: following their teacher's explanation of a new mathematics topic; answering questions teachers ask during classes; waiting to hear their score on a mathematics test; and doing mathematical activities such as fractions. The use of a calculator shows an interesting dynamic. Participants indicated that they sometimes experience mathematics anxiety (mean 2.11) when they do long division questions without using a calculator; when doing long multiplication questions without a calculator (mean 2.10); and often experience mathematics anxiety when doing long division with a calculator (mean 2.53). This means that the use of calculators evokes more anxiety. This seems to support the work of Zakaria and Nordin (2008) who cautioned that mathematics anxiety does not appear to have a single cause, but is a result of a plethora of factors such as truancy, poor self-image, poor coping skills, teacher attitude and an emphasis on learning mathematics through drill (without understanding).

     

    Discussion

    Results gleaned from the questionnaire and presented above will now be discussed. Mathematical anxiety affects all aspects of teaching and learning (Mohamed & Tarmizi, 2010). That observation is consistent with the results of this study where no participants indicated that they never experience mathematics anxiety in academic settings. Swanson (2006) concurs that feelings of anxiety do come into play in academic settings. Martinez (1987, cited in Piercey, 2011) asserts that anxiety may be a greater block to learning in mathematics than any supposed deficiencies in our school curricula. Through repeated exposure to recurring stimuli and to common structures, certain behavioural strategies and psychological orientations are rehearsed, modified and eventually embodied, becoming part of the habitus (see analytical frameworks). Unfortunately, this is likely to be radiated out to those in close proximity. The social environment offers certain stimuli while withholding others; it recognises certain behaviours but not others; it demonstrates how certain aspirations are both appropriate and attainable; how others lead to frustration and disappointment; and it confers taste and an environment-specific common-sense (Cann, 1996). This is consistent with the social learning theory. According to Orcutt and Schwabe (2012) social learning variables such as the conduct of the teacher, utterances by parents and significant others, and a lack of role models can encourage or discourage learners' like or dislike of mathematics. Learners' experience of mathematics anxiety suggests that their irrational fear of mathematics is likely to lead to behaviour problems (Furner & Duffy, 2002). Mancil and Maynard (2007) maintain that such learners usually engage in behaviour problems to escape mathematics lessons and work.

     

    Conclusion

    The purpose of this study was to explore rural high school learners' experience of mathematics anxiety in academic settings. The study revealed that, overall, rural high school learners sometimes, often and always experience mathematics anxiety. This implies that teachers do not only need to be aware of the prevalence of mathematics anxiety among learners, but also its effects on learners' achievement and motivation. Teachers need to help learners realise that mathematics is a ubiquitous and indispensible facet of human existence. Furner and Berman (2003) posit that learners need to view mathematics as a human endeavour so that they learn to value and realise the application for learning mathematics both inside and outside the classroom. Making such connections may help learners realise that it is not something from which they can escape. The next section presents recommendations derived from the findings of the study and the relevant literature.

    Recommendations

    The current study found that rural high school learners generally experience mathematics anxiety. Research suggests that if anxiety levels are decreased, there will be improvements in cognitive, behavioural and attitudinal aspects of mathematics learning by, for example, manipulating teaching variables such as teacher behaviours, task structure, and classroom atmosphere (Perry, 2004; Jain & Dawson, 2009; Cavanach & Sparrow, 2011). It is generally accepted that preventive or proactive measures lessen damage or effect; therefore, it is vital that the teacher be made aware of factors that may lead to mathematics anxiety. Baloglu and Kocak (2006) and Cavanach and Sparrow (2011) assert that these factors can be classified as attributes of the learner, the family, the teacher and teaching, and the nature of mathematics. This implies a holistic approach to mathematics anxiety.

    Rossnan (2006) suggests that academic settings that seek to reduce mathematics anxiety should strive to create space that encourages each individual's strengths and successes. Teaching and learning in mathematics should address a variety of learning styles. The theory of multiple intelligences advocates the notion that all learners can learn, but in different ways.

    Mancil and Maynard (2007) suggest the modification of four aspects; firstly, to modify mathematics content. This can be accompanied by altering the type or amount of content presented to the learner. For example, the teacher may give five mathematical problems at a time rather than 50 problems at once. Secondly, modify teacher behaviour. To reiterate, Levine (2008) found that teachers with mathematics anxiety emphasise rule-based strategies and treat mathematics as an arbitrary collection of facts, perhaps to promote an illusion of their expertise and disciplinary power to students. In modifying teacher behaviour, teachers can verbally restate directions, write them on the board and provide learners with a task card to aid in completing assignments. Thirdly, task demands can be modified. This can be accomplished by allowing learners to respond to questions in different ways. For example, allowing the learner to respond by pointing rather than giving oral responses or oral rather than written responses. Lastly, modifying the mode content delivery can be done by changing the teaching agents, teaching format, and teaching context. Learners may be exposed to computer-assisted instruction, for example.

    A six-day workshop for mathematics teachers in rural districts of New Mexico, designed around manipulatives (concrete objects used to teach a concept), was found to yield a statistically significant reduction in mathematics anxiety among the participants (Piercey, 2011). So, the study recommends an engagement of such a nature for South African Mathematics teachers in rural contexts. Levine (2008) recommends the existence of clear and well-articulated academic expectations. Participation by learners in an academic endeavour with unclear or unar- ticulated norms may appear overwhelming to the learner and resultantly increase experiences of mathematics anxiety. Constructivist theory maintains that learners, in the construction of knowledge, become active participants. Learners therefore need to be actively involved and mathematics should be made relevant to their everyday lives. Furthermore, teachers need to create inviting academic settings that will help learners feel more successful, that they can do better, despite failures. Such academic settings are more likely to reduce mathematics anxiety, encourage learner participation, and enhance motivation, confidence and improved academic performance.

     

    References

    Adler J, Brombacher A & Shan 2000. Submission by the Mathematics Education Community to the Council of Education Ministers. AMESA. Available at http://amesa.org.za/NGO. Accessed 29 December 2011.        [ Links ]

    Akin A & Kurbanoglu IN 2011. The relationship between math anxiety, math attitudes, and self-efficacy: A structural equation model. StudiaPsychologica, 53:263-273.         [ Links ]

    Baloglu M & Kocak R 2006. A multivariate investigation of the differences in mathematics anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 40:1325-1335.         [ Links ]

    Bassey SW, Joshua MT & Asim AE 2009. Gender differences and mathematics achievement of rural senior secondary students in Cross River State, Nigeria. Proceedings of the EpiSTEME 3 Conference, January 5-9. Mumbai, India.         [ Links ]

    Bickman L & Rog DJ 2009. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.        [ Links ]

    Bless C & Higson-Smith C 1995. Fundamentals of social research methods: an African perspective (2nd edn). Cape Town: Juta.        [ Links ]

    Bourdieu P 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.         [ Links ]

    Bourdieu P 1986. The forms of capital. In JG Richardson (ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of capital. New York: Greenwood Press.         [ Links ]

    Brown B & Duku N 2008. Negotiated identities: dynamics in parents' participation in school governance in rural Eastern Cape schools and implication for school leadership. South African Journal of Education, 28:431-450.         [ Links ]

    Cann BG 1996. Other people's knowledge: The politics of mathematics anxiety. Unpublished MEd dissertation. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.         [ Links ]

    Cavanach R & Sparrow L 2011. Measuring mathematics anxiety: Developing a construct model. Unpublished manuscript. Curtin University of Technology.         [ Links ]

    Chikodzi I & Nyota S 2010. The interplay of culture and mathematics: The rural Shona classroom. Journal of Pan African Studies, 3:3-15.        [ Links ]

    Chinn S 2008. Mathematics anxiety in secondary students in England. Dyslexia, 15:61-68.         [ Links ]

    City Press 2012. 1 in 6 matrics got less than 10% for maths. January 29, 2012:1.

    De Vos AS, Strydom H, Fouché CB & Delport CSL 2011. Research at grass roots: for the social and human sciences. Pretoria: Van Schaik.         [ Links ]

    Dieltiens V 2008. "As long as the rain still falls we must cultivate": Afiicanist challenges to liberal education. Journal of Education, 45:29-42.         [ Links ]

    Department of Education (DoE) 2005. Reflections on rural education in South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printers.        [ Links ]

    Edelmuth JE 2006. Acknowledging math anxiety: Techniques for teachers, parents, and students. Unpublished MA dissertation. San Diego: University of California.         [ Links ]

    Erdogan A, Kesici S & Çahin I 2011. Prediction of high school students' mathematics anxiety by their achievement motivation and social comparison. Elementary Education Online, 10:646-652.         [ Links ]

    Ferguson RD 1986. Abstraction anxiety: A factor of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17:145-150.        [ Links ]

    Fouché CB 2005. Research Strategies. In AS De Vos, H Strydom, CB Fouché & CSL Delport (eds). Research at grass roots for the social sciences and human service professions (2nd edn). Pretoria: Van Schaik.        [ Links ]

    Furner JM & Duffy ML 2002. Equity for all students in the new millennium. Disabling math anxiety. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38:67-74.         [ Links ]

    Furner JM & Berman BT 2003. Maths anxiety: Overcoming a major obstacle to the improvement of student performance. Childhood education, 79:170-175.         [ Links ]

    Gresham G 2004. Mathematics anxiety in elementary students. CMC Communicator, 29:28-29.         [ Links ]

    Hadfield OD & McNeil K 1994. The relationship between Myerss-Briggs personality type and mathematics anxiety among pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 2:375-384.        [ Links ]

    Hembree R 1990. The nature, effect and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21:33-46.         [ Links ]

    Ho HZ, Senturk D, Lam AG, Zimmer JM, Hong S, Okamoto Y & Chiu SY 2000. The affective and cognitive dimensions of math anxiety: A cross-national study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31:362-379.         [ Links ]

    Huysamen GK 1993. Metodologie vir die sosiale en gedragswetenskappe. Halfweghuis. Southern Boekuitgewers.        [ Links ]

    Jain S & Dawson M 2009. Mathematics anxiety as a function of multidimensional self regulation and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34:240-249.         [ Links ]

    Johnson J & Strange M 2007. Why rural matters in 2007: The realities of rural education growth. Rural Trust Policy Brief Series on Rural education. Arlington, VA: The Rural School and Community Trust.        [ Links ]

    Karimi A & Venkatesan, S 2009. Mathematics anxiety, mathematics performance and academic hardiness in high school students. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 1:33-37.        [ Links ]

    Kesici S & Erdogan A 2004. Mathematics anxiety according to middle school students'achievement motivation and social comparison, Education. Available at http://www.findarticles.com. Accessed February 14, 2012.        [ Links ]

    Kesici S & Erdogan A 2009. Predicting college students' mathematics anxiety by motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. College Student Journal, 43:631-642.         [ Links ]

    Kesici S & Erdogan A 2010. Mathematics anxiety according to middle school students' achievement motivation and social comparison. Education, 131:54-63.         [ Links ]

    Khatoon T & Mahmood S 2010. Mathematics anxiety among secondary school students in India and its relationship to achievement in mathematics. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16:75-86.         [ Links ]

    Leppavirta J 2011. The impact of mathematics anxiety on the performance of students of Electromagnetics. Journal of Engineering Education, 100:424-443.         [ Links ]

    Levine G 2008. A Foucaultian approach to academic anxiety. Educational Studies, 44:62-76.         [ Links ]

    Linnenbrink EA & Pintrich PR 2002. Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 5:257-266.         [ Links ]

    Ludlow BL & Brannan SA 2010. Distance education programs preparing personnel for rural areas: Current practices, emerging trends, and future directions. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 9:4-15.        [ Links ]

    Ma X 2003. Effect of early acceleration of students in mathematics on attitude toward mathematics and mathematics anxiety. Teachers College Record, 15:438-464.        [ Links ]

    Malhoit GC 2005. Providing rural students with a high quality education: The rural perspective on the concept of educational adequacy. Arlington: Rural Education and Community Trust.         [ Links ]

    Mancil GR & Maynard KL 2007. Mathematics instruction and behavior problems: Making the connection. Beyond Behavior, 24-28.        [ Links ]

    Masitsa MG 2008. Discipline and disciplinary measures in the Free State township schools: unresolved problems. Acta Academica, 40:234-270.         [ Links ]

    Masitsa MG 2011. Exploring safety in township secondary schools in the Free State province. South African Journal of Education, 31:163-174.        [ Links ]

    McAnallen RR 2010. Examining mathematics anxiety in elementary classroom teachers. Unpublished PhD thesis: Connecticut: University of Connecticut. Meriam SB 2009. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.        [ Links ]

    Mohamed SH & Tarmizi RA 2010. Anxiety in mathematics learning among secondary school learners: A comparative study between Tanzania and Malaysia. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 8:498-504.        [ Links ]

    Nashon S 2006. Constructivism in the mathematics classroom: Towards a new approach. Available at. http://christinateskey.ca/metcourses. Accessed December 29, 2011.         [ Links ]

    Navarro Z 2006. In search of cultural interpretation of power. IDS Bulletin, 37:11-22.         [ Links ]

    Newstead K 1995. Comparison of young children's mathematics anxiety across different teaching approaches. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Cambridge: Cambridge University.         [ Links ]

    Newstead K 2006. Aspects of children's mathematics anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36:53-71.        [ Links ]

    Neuman WL 2011. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.        [ Links ]

    Nkambule T, Balfour RJ, Pillay G & Moletsane R 2011. Rurality and rural education: Discourses underpinning rurality and rural education research in South Africa in South African postgraduate education research. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25:341-357.        [ Links ]

    Orcutt JD & Schwabe AM 2012. Gender, race/ethnicity, and deviant drinking: A longitudinal application of social structure and social learning theory. Sociological Spectrum, 32:20-26.        [ Links ]

    Owens AM & Newbegin I 1997. Procrastination in high school achievement: A causal structural model. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 12:869-887.        [ Links ]

    Perry AB 2004. Decreasing mathematics anxiety in college students. College Student Journal, 38:321-325.        [ Links ]

    Piercey VI 2011. Reducing elementary teachers' mathematics anxiety. Unpublished MA dissertation.        [ Links ]

    Arizona: University of Arizona. Pintrich PR 2004. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16:219-215.         [ Links ]

    Powell RR, Sobel D, Hess RS & Verdi M 2001. The relationships between situated cognition and rural pre-service teachers' knowledge and understanding of diversity. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17:71-83.        [ Links ]

    Richardson FC & Suinn RM 1972. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19:551-554.         [ Links ]

    Rossnan S 2006. Overcoming mathematics anxiety. Mathitudes, 1:1-4.        [ Links ]

    Sauvageot C & da Graca PD 2007. Using indicators in planning education for rural people: A practical guide. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.        [ Links ]

    Santos JRA 1999. A tool for assessing reliability of scales. Journal of Extension, 37:1-5.         [ Links ]

    Sahin FY 2008. Mathematics anxiety among 4th and 5th grade Turkish elementary school students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3:179-192.         [ Links ]

    Swanson D 2006. Math anxiety: What can teachers do to help their students overcome the feeling? Unpublished MA dissertation: Nebraska: University of Nebraska.         [ Links ]

    Tapia M 2004. The relationship of math anxiety and gender. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8:187-195.         [ Links ]

    Thomas H & Furner JM 1997. Helping high ability students overcome mathematics anxiety through bibliotherapy. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8:164-179.         [ Links ]

    Tobias S 1978. Math anxiety — what it is and what can be done about it. New York: WW Norton.         [ Links ]

    Tobias S 1998. Anxiety and mathematics. Harvard Education Review, 50:88-97.         [ Links ]

    Tobias S & Weisbrodd C 1980a. Anxiety and mathematics: An update. Harvard Education Review, 50:73-70.        [ Links ]

    Tobias S & Weisbrodd C1980b. Stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain: A factor in females non-participation in Mathematics. Unpublished MA dissertation. Columbia: University of Columbia.        [ Links ]

    Tsanwani AR 2009. Tracing factors that facilitate achievement in mathematics in traditionally disadvantaged secondary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.        [ Links ]

    Vann BDN 1993. Mathematics anxiety: parental anxiety as it relates to children. Proquest Dissertations and Theses, 53:DAI-A.        [ Links ]

    Vinson B 2001. A comparison of pre-service teachers' mathematics anxiety before and after a methods class emphasising manipulatives. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29:89-94.        [ Links ]

    Wilson S 2009a. Bibliotherapy: Mathematics anxiety and meta-affect. Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education and Research Group in Australasia. Palmerston North NZ: MERGA.        [ Links ]

    Wilson S 2009b. 'Better you than me': Mathematics anxiety and bibliotherapy in primary teacher professional learning. Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education and Research Group in Australasia. Palmerston North NZ: MERGA.         [ Links ]

    Zakaria E & Nordin NM 2008. The effect of mathematics anxiety on matriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4:27-30.        [ Links ]