SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.49 issue2The service quality of the PUK Rugby InstituteColonial names of countries in Africa before and after uhuru author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe

On-line version ISSN 2224-7912

Tydskr. geesteswet. vol.49 n.2 Pretoria  2009

 

Die self-waargenome lewensgehalte van versorgings-personeel by 'n fasiliteit vir volwassenes met intellektuele gestremdheid

 

The self-perceived quality of life of staff caring for adults with intellectual disabilities

 

 

Sindi Wahl; Rona Newmark

Adres
Departement Opvoedkundige Sielkunde, Universiteit Stellenbosch

 

 


OPSOMMING

Hierdie artikel doen verslag oor 'n studie wat gedoen is oor die persepsies van versorgingspersoneel by 'n fasiliteit vir volwassenes met intellektuele gestremdheid aangaande hul lewensgehalte. Die doel van die studie was om die lewensgehalte te verstaan van versorgingspersoneel wat na volwassenes met intellektuele gestremdheid omsien. Daar is gebruik gemaak van teorieë met betrekking tot die positiewe sielkunde, met spesifieke verwysing na fortigeniese aannames. Hierdie kwalitatief interpreterende studie is uitgevoer in 'n fasiliteit vir volwassenes met intellektuele gestremdheid en 12 versorgers by die fasiliteit het vrywillig deelgeneem. Data is ingesamel deur gestruktureerde oop-einde vrae, asook informele en fokusgroeponderhoude, en later tematies geanaliseer. Die temas wat in die studie aangespreek is, wentel om die versorgers se 1) definisie van lewensgehalte, 2) hul persepsie van hul huidige lewensgehalte, 3) hul persepsie van die negatiewe faktore, stressore, positiewe ervarings en psigofortologiese faktore wat 'n uitwerking op hul lewensgehalte uitoefen en 4) moontlikhede om hul lewensgehalte te verbeter.. Die bevindings toon 'n paradoks van sorgverskaffing aan waar die deelnemers nie slegs oor sorgverskaffing rapporteer nie, maar ook oor die ontvangs van sorg in hul verhoudinge met volwassenes met intellektuele gestremdheid. In hierdie verhouding blyk dit dat sorgverskaffing 'n fortigenese faktor en ook 'n wyse vir interpersoonlike. florering is vir die meeste van die deelnemers. Gegrond op die bevindings word verskeie aanbevelings gedoen rakende verdere navorsing ten einde die lewensgehalte te verbeter van die personeel wat sorg verskaf aan volwassenes met intellektuele gestremdhede.

Trefwoorde: Lewensgehalte, versorgingspersoneel, positiewe sielkunde, fortologie, volwassenes, intellektuele gestremdheid, interpersoonlike geluk


ABSTRACT

The concept "quality of life" is a product of as well as a means to the universal movement towards empowerment of individuals, equity and "health for all" (World Health Organisation, 1995, 1998). As a sensitising concept and social construct, quality of life facilitates programmatic, community and societal change. Within the field of intellectual disabilities there is a rising interest in improving the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. This is enhanced by the movement towards deinstitutionalisation, which generally sees staff caregivers as providers of a quality product. Accordingly, there is a growing emphasis on staff stress and well-being in order to improve service delivery. Within the field of positive psychology there is a need for a greater emphasis on staff well-being and positive experiences. It is argued, however, that there is not sufficient theory crediting the range of experiences and perceptions of staff caregivers (Hastings & Horne, 2004). Prior research on staff caregivers generally focused on pathology, for example stress and burnout. The study on which the article is based, focused on the perceptions of formal caregivers in an institution for the intellectually impaired about their quality of life. The aim was to understand the self-perceived quality of life of staff caring for adults with intellectual disabilities using Positive Psychology theories, and, more specifically, fortigenic principles. We focused on negative factors, pure positive experiences and fortigenic factors that enable movement to the wellness or disease poles of a health/disease continuum. It was envisaged that the study could make a contribution to the field of intellectual disabilities by expanding the focus on staff well-being and thereby enhancing service delivery. It could also possibly add to the field of positive psychology by increasing our understanding of what makes for health (quality) and not disease. This qualitative interpretive study was conducted in an institution for adults with intellectual impairment. Twelve caregivers at the institution willingly participated. Purposive sampling was used and data were generated through structured open-ended, informal questions and a focus group interview. The results were subsequently analysed thematically. The aim of the analysis was to investigate the caregivers 'perceptions regarding their quality of life. The themes discussed in the study centre on 1) the caregivers' definition of quality of life, 2) their perception of their current quality of life, 3) their perception of the negative factors, stressors, positive experiences and psychofortological factors that impact on their quality of life, and 4) possibilities for improving their quality of life. The findings indicate a paradox of caregiving where the participants report not only on caregiving, but also on care-receiving within their relationship with the adults with intellectual disabilities. What they receive from the relationship with the adults with intellectual disabilities is unconditional acceptance and meaningfulness that seems to protect them against the stressors of everyday life. Therefore, in this relationship, caregiving seems to be a fortigenic factor for most of the participants and also a means towards interpersonal flourishing. On the basis of these findings several recommendations are made for further research, with a view to striving towards improving the quality of life of staff caring for adults with intellectual disabilities. Further research could possibly focus on caregiving as a fortigenic factor with specific reference to meaningfulness and unconditional acceptance received by staff caregivers in their relationship with the adults with intellectual disabilities. Another possibility would be to focus on the similarities and differences between these results on the one hand, and the perceptions of formal caregivers of individuals with more severe disabilities on the other. The possible pathogenic side to caregiving as a fortigenic factor also leaves room for further exploration.

Key concepts: Quality of life, self-perceived, positive psychology, fortology, staff, caregivers, intellectually disabled, adults, interpersonal flourishing


 

Full text available only in PDF format.

 

 

BIBLIOGRAFIE

Aitken, C.J. & Schloss, J.A. 1994. Occupational stress and burnout amongst staff working with people with an intellectual disability. Behavioral Interventions, 9(4):225-234.         [ Links ]

Antonovsky, A. 1979. Health, Stress and Coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.         [ Links ]

Antonovsky, A. 1990. Studying health vs. studying disease. Lecture at the Congress for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Berlin.         [ Links ]

Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. 2001. The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37:122-147.         [ Links ]

Berscheid, E. 2003. The human's greatest strength: Other humans. In: Aspinwall, L.G. & Staudinger, U.M. (eds). A Psychology of Human Strengths: Fundamental Questions and Future Directions for a Positive Psychology (37-47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.         [ Links ]

Cocco, E.; Gatti, M.; Lima, C.A.M. & Camus, V. 2003. A comparative study of stress and burnout among staff caregivers in nursing homes and acute geriatric wards. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18:78-85.         [ Links ]

Cowen, E.L. 1994. The enhancement of psychological wellness: Challenges and opportunities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(2):149-179.         [ Links ]

Cummins, R.A. 2005. Caregivers as managers of subjective wellbeing: A homeostatic perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(4):335-344.         [ Links ]

Dempsey, I. & Arthur, M. 1998. Characteristics and professional development needs of staff working in employment services for people with a disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 23(4):333-343.         [ Links ]

Dempsey, I. & Arthur, M. 2002. Support staff in a sample of Australian community-based services for people with a disability: Career intentions, personal characteristics and professional development needs. Journal of Intellectual Disability, 27(3):201-214.         [ Links ]

Donald, D.; Lazurus, S. & Lolwana, P. 2002. Educational Psychology in Social Context (2nd Edition). Cape Town: Oxford South Africa.         [ Links ]

Evans, S.; Huxley, P.; Gately, C.; Webber, M.; Mears, A.; Pajak, S.; Medina, J.; Kendall, T. & Katona, C. 2006. Mental health and job satisfaction among mental health social workers in England and Wales. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188:45-80.         [ Links ]

Evers, G. 2003. Comments on "The quality of life: Design and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for use with cancer patients". International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40:521-523.         [ Links ]

Ford, J. & Honnor, J. 2000. Job satisfaction of community residential staff serving individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 25(4):343-362.         [ Links ]

Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.         [ Links ]

Glozman, J.M. 2004. Quality of life of caregivers. Neuropsychological Review, 14(4):183-196.         [ Links ]

Harris, P. & Rose, J. 2002. Measuring staff support in services for people with intellectual disability: The Staff Support and Satisfaction Questionnaire, Version 2. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(2):151-157.         [ Links ]

Hastings, R. & Home, S. 2004. Positive perceptions held by support staff in community mental retardation services. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109(1):53-62.         [ Links ]

Hastings, R.P.; Horne, S. & Mitchell, G. 2004. Burnout in direct care staff in intellectual disability services: A factor analytic study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3):268-273.         [ Links ]

Hatton, C. & Emerson, E. 1993. Organizational predictors of staff stress, satisfaction and intended turnover in a service for people with multiple disabilities. Mental Retardation, 31:388-296.         [ Links ]

Hatton, C.; Emerson, E.; Rivers, M.; Mason, H.; Mason, L.; Swarbrick, R.; Kiernan, C.; Reeves, D. & Alborz, A. 1999. Factors associated with staff stress and work satisfaction in services for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43(4):253-267.         [ Links ]

Hauber, F.A. & Bruininks, R.H. 1986. Intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction among direct care staff in residential facilities for mentally retarded people. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46:95-105.         [ Links ]

Holmes, S. 2005. Assessing the quality of life - reality or impossible dream? A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42(4):493-501.         [ Links ]

Kritzinger, A. & Magaqa, V.L.L. 2000. Deinstitutionalising the mentally ill in rural areas: A case study of the official caregiver. Maatskaplike Werk, 36(3):290-309.         [ Links ]

Lefort, S. & Fraser, M. 2002. Quality of life measurement and its use in the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6(3):223-238.         [ Links ]

Levert, T.; Lucas, M. & Ortlepp, K. 2000. Burnout in psychiatric nurses: Contributions of the work environment and a sense of coherence. South African Journal of Psychology, 30:36-41.         [ Links ]

McEwen, A.; Mayo, N. & Wood-Dauphinee, S. 2000. Inferring quality of life from performance-based assessments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(10):456-463.         [ Links ]

Merriam, S.B. 2002. Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion andAnalysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.         [ Links ]

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.         [ Links ]

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. 2002. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. London: Sage Publications.         [ Links ]

Mitchell G. & Hastings, R.P. 2001. Coping, burnout, and emotion in staff working in community services for people with challenging behaviours. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106:448-459.         [ Links ]

Neuman, W.L. 2003. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. United States of America: Pearson Education.         [ Links ]

Parahoo, K. & Barr, O. 1994. Job satisfaction of community nurses working with people with a mental handicap. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20:1046-1055.         [ Links ]

Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. California: Sage Publications.         [ Links ]

Potgieter, J.C. 2000. Die sielkundige behoeftes van die versorgers van pasiënte met Alzheimer se siekte. Bloemfontein: Universiteit van die Vrystaat. (MSc Kliniese Sielkunde tesis).         [ Links ]

Pretorius, T.B. 1997. Salutogenic resistance resources: The role of personal and environmental characteristics in stress-resistance. Bloemfontein: University of the Free State. (MPhil proefskrif).         [ Links ]

Rose, J. 1999. Stress and residential staff who work with people who have an intellectual disability: A factor analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43(4):268-278.         [ Links ]

Ruddick, L. 2005. Health of people with intellectual disabilities: A review of factors influencing access to health care. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(4):559-570.         [ Links ]

Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52:141-166.         [ Links ]

Ryff, C.D. & Singer, B. 2000. Interpersonal flourishing: A positive health agenda for the new millennium. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4:30-44.         [ Links ]

Shaddock, A.J., Hill, M. & Van Limbeek, C. 1998. Factors associated with burnout in workers in residential facilities for people with an intellectual disability. Journal ofIntellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 23:309-318.         [ Links ]

Schalock, R.L. 1990 (ed). Quality of Life: Perspectives and Issues. Washington: American Association of Mental Retardation.         [ Links ]

Schalock, R.L. 1996. Reconsidering the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life. In: Schalock, R.L. (ed.). Quality of life. Vol 1. Conceptualization and Measurement (123-139). Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Retardation.         [ Links ]

Schalock, R.L. 2000. Three decades of quality of life. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(2):116-127.         [ Links ]

Schalock, R.L. 2004. The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3):203-216.         [ Links ]

Seligman, M.E.P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2000. Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1):5-14.         [ Links ]

Sheldon, K.M. & King, L. 2001. Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56(3):216-217.         [ Links ]

Silverman, D. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.         [ Links ]

Snyder, C.R. & Lopez, S.J. 2002. Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.         [ Links ]

Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.         [ Links ]

Strumpfer, D.J.W. 1990. Salutogenesis: A new paradigm. South African Journal of Psychology, 20(4):45-52.         [ Links ]

Strumpfer, D.J.W. 1995. The origins of health and strength: From 'salutogenesis' to 'fortigenesis'. South African Journal of Psychology, 25(2):81-89.         [ Links ]

Strumpfer, D.J.W. 2006. Positive emotions, positive emotionality and their contribution to fortigenic living. South African Journal of Psychology, 36(1):144-167.         [ Links ]

Strumpfer, D.J.W. 2006. The strengths perspective: Fortigenesis in adult life. Social Indicators Research, 77(1):11-36.         [ Links ]

Swart, E. & Pettipher, R. A framework for understanding inclusion. In: Landsberg, E.; Krüger, D. & Nel, N. (eds) 2005. Addressing Barriers to Learning. A South African Perspective. Pretoria: Van Schaik.         [ Links ]

Taylor, S.J. & Bogdan, R. 1990. Quality of life and the individual's perspective. In: Schalock, R.L. (ed). Quality of Life: Perspectives and Issues (27-40). Washington: American Association of Mental Retardation.         [ Links ]

The WHOQOL Group. 1994. The development of the World Health Organisation quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley, J. & Kuyken, W. (eds). Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.         [ Links ]

Van Hooren, R.H.; Widdershoven, G.A.M.; Van den Borne, H.W. & Curfs, M.G. 2002. Autonomy and intellectual disability: The case of prevention of obesity in Prader-Willi syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(7):560-568.         [ Links ]

Venter, H. 2003. Die lewenskwaliteit van verpleegkundige versorgers van Alzheimer-pasiënte. Bloemfontein: Universiteit van die Vrystaat. (M-tesis).         [ Links ]

Von Essen, L. & Sjoden, P. 1993. Perceived importance of caring behaviours to Swedish psychiatric inpatients and staff, with comparison to somatically ill samples. Research in Nursing and Health, 16:293-303.         [ Links ]

Wilkinson, S. 2004. Focus group research. In: Silverman, D. (ed). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (177-200). London: Sage Publications.         [ Links ]

Wissing, M.P. & Van Eden, C. 1997. Psychological well-being: A fortigenic conceptualization and empirical clarification, paper presented at Annual Congress of the Psychological Society of South Africa, Durban, South Africa.         [ Links ]

World Health Organisation. 1995. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science Medicine, 14(10):1403-1409.         [ Links ]

World Health Organisation. 1998. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science Medicine, 46(12):1569-1585.         [ Links ]

 

 

1 Vergelyk Hastings, Home & Mitchell, 2004; Cocco Gatti, Lima & Camus, 2003; Rose, 1999; Hatton, Emerson, Rivers, Mason, Swarbrick, Kiernan, Reeves & Alborz, 1999; Aitken & Schloss, 1994.
2 Vergelyk Strumpfer, 1995, 1990; Wissing & Van Eden, 1997, Strumpfer, 2006.
3 Vergelyk Hatton, Emerson, Rivers, Mason, Mason, Swarbrick, Kiernan, Reeves en Alborz (1999).
4 Vergelyk Hatton et al. 1999; Parahoo & Barr 1994; Hatton & Emerson 1993; Hauber & Bruininks 1986.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License