SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.49 número1Paediatric laparoscopic surgery issueExciting times: Towards a totally minimally invasive paediatric urology service índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google


South African Journal of Surgery

versión On-line ISSN 2078-5151
versión impresa ISSN 0038-2361

S. Afr. j. surg. vol.49 no.1 Cape Town feb. 2011




'See one, practise on a simulator, do one' - the mantra of the modern surgeon



J. I. Curry

M.B. B.S., F.R.C.S. (eng.), F.R.C.S. (paed. Surg.); Consultant Paediatric Surgeon, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London




Minimally invasive techniques are now well established in paediatric surgery. Training has traditionally been based on an apprenticeship model, as for open surgery. More recently the constraints of litigation, finance and restriction of doctors' working hours have led to a need to rethink this training. Simulation to learn and improve skills is by no means a new concept, but has been suggested as a way to address the above issues because it provides an ideal platform for acquiring the necessary skills for modern laparoscopic surgery. This paper explores some of the current issues of learning minimally invasive surgical skills in a simulated environment, and suggests that such simulation should not be seen in isolation but as a part of a wider and encompassing curriculum of learning for the 21st-century surgeon.



“Full text available only in PDF format”



1. Gallagher AG, Leonard G, Traynor OJ. Role and feasibility of psychomotor and dexterity testing in selection for surgical training. Aust N Z J Surg 2009;79:108-113.         [ Links ]

2. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Dudley HA. Surgeon-related variables and the clinical trial. Lancet 1978;2:778-779.         [ Links ]

3. Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N. Assessing operative skill needs to become more objective BMJ 1999;318:887-888.         [ Links ]

4. Chief Medical Officer. 150 years of the annual report of the Chief Medical Officer: on the state of public health 2008. March 2009. (accessed 11 January 2011).         [ Links ]

5. Qayumi K. Surgical skills lab: A hub for competency training. J Invest Surg 2010;23:48-56.         [ Links ]

6. McRae HM, Satterthwaite L, Reznick RK. Setting up a surgical skills centre. World J Surg 2008;32:1889-1195.         [ Links ]

7. Joint Committee on Surgical Training, Royal College of Surgeons of England. (accessed 11 January 2011).         [ Links ]

8. Gaba DH. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:2-10.         [ Links ]

9. Seymour NE. VR to OR: A review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 2008;32:182-188.         [ Links ]

10. Korndorffer JR, Dunne JB, Sierra R, et al. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:23-29.         [ Links ]

11. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Brit J Surg 2008;95:1088-1097.         [ Links ]

12. Brown DC, Miskovic D, Tang B, Hanna GB. Impact of established skills in open surgery on the proficiency gain process for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1420-1426.         [ Links ]

13. Pugh C, Plachta S, Auyang E, et al. Outcome measures for surgical simulators: Is the focus on technical skills the best approach? Surgery 2010;147:646-654.         [ Links ]

14. Spencer F. Teaching and measuring surgical techniques: the technical evaluation of competence. Bull Am Coll Surg 1978;63:9-12.         [ Links ]

15. Van Nortwick SS, Lendvay TS, Jensen AR, et al. Methodologies for establishing validity in surgical simulation studies. Surgery 2010;147:622-630.         [ Links ]

16. Korndorffer JR, Kasten SJ, Downing SM. A call for the utilization of concensus standards in the surgical education literature. Am J Surg 2010;199:99-104.         [ Links ]

17. Schout BMA, HendrikxAJM, Scheele F, et al. Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of past, present and future. Surg Endosc 2010;24:536-546.         [ Links ]

18. Kneebone R. Simulation, safety and surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:i47-i52.         [ Links ]

19. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 2003;37:267-277.         [ Links ]

20. Stefanidis D, Heniford BT. The formula for a successful laparoscopic skills curriculum. Arch Surg 2009;144:77-82.         [ Links ]

21. Gauger PG, Hauge LS, Andreatta PB, et al. Laparoscopic simulation training with proficiency targets improves practice and performance of novice surgeons. Am J Surg 2010;199:72-80.         [ Links ]

22. Sweet RM, Hananel D, Lawrenz F. A unified approach to validation, reliability, and educational study design for surgical technical skills training. Arch Surg 2010;145:197-201.         [ Links ]

23. Satava RM. Surgical education and surgical simulation. World J Surg 2001;25:1484-1489.         [ Links ]

24. Grant J. Principles of Curriculum Design. ASME Report. Edinburgh: Association for the Study of Medical Education, 2006.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons