SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.48 issue3Malignant melanoma of the skin in black South Africans: A 15-year experienceSuccessful conservative treatment of chylothorax following oesophagectomy - a clinical algorithm author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


South African Journal of Surgery

On-line version ISSN 2078-5151
Print version ISSN 0038-2361

S. Afr. j. surg. vol.48 n.3 Cape Town Aug. 2010




Laparoscopic splenectomy: Consensus and debatable points



Mohammed N. Bani HaniI; Ghazi R. QasaimehI; Kamal E. Bani-HaniII; Nizar R. AlwaqfiI; Abdel Rahman A. Al ManasraI; Yousef S. MataniI; Khled M. El-RadaidehI

IM.D. King Abdullah University Hospital, Jordan
IIM.D., F.R.C.S. King Abdullah University Hospital, Jordan




INTRODUCTION: The emergence of minimally invasive techniques has broadened interest in splenectomy for a variety of haematological illnesses. Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is currently considered the gold standard for the treatment of various haematological disorders.
PURPOSE: The literature was reviewed to highlight points of consensus and debatable points regarding best practice in LS, looking at issues such as bleeding and conversion, splenomegaly, splenic retrieval techniques, types of instruments used, hand-assisted LS (HALS), complications, approaches, accessory spleen and splenosis. Our goal was to share our experience with LS and compare it with other reports.
BACKGROUND: LS has emerged as the standard of care for elective splenectomy for benign haematological diseases. However, doubts have been raised regarding the suitability of patients with splenomegaly for LS. There is also uncertainty about its efficacy in major trauma. HALS has emerged as an option for safe manipulation and splenic dissection.
METHOD: We performed 25 consecutive LSs at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Jordan, from 2001 to 2008. Patient demographics, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate, additional procedures and length of hospital stay were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 38.8 years (range 11 - 77 years), mean operative time was 132 minutes (90 - 170 minutes), and length of hospital stay was 2.9 (standard deviation 2.7) days. One case was converted to open surgery (5%). There was 1 case of superficial wound infection in the series (5%), and no deaths.
CONCLUSION: LS is a well-accepted minimally invasive procedure, but knowledge and skill are required to perform it with minimal morbidity and mortality.


“Full text available only in PDF format”



1. Delaitre B, Maignien B. Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach: report of a case. Presse Med 1991; 20: 2263.         [ Links ]

2. Grahn W Sarah MD, Alvarez III Jesus MS, Kirkwood K. Trends in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 755-762.         [ Links ]

3. Glasgow RE, Yee LF, Mulvihill SJ. Laparoscopic splenectomy: the emerging standard. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 108-112.         [ Links ]

4. Park A, Marcaccio M, Sternbach M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1263-1269.         [ Links ]

5. Velanovich V. Laparoscopic vs open surgery: a preliminary comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 16-21.         [ Links ]

6 Katkhouda N, Mavor E. Laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80: 1285-1297.         [ Links ]

7. Klingler PJ, Tsiotos GG, Glaser KS, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: evolution and current status. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1999; 9: 1-8.         [ Links ]

8. Targarona EM, Balague C, Ceradam G, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) in cases of splenomegaly: a comparison analysis with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 426-430.         [ Links ]

9. Walsh RM, Heniford BT, Brody F, et al. The ascendance of laparoscopic splenectomy. Am Surg 2001; 67: 48-53.         [ Links ]

10. Rosen M, Brody F, Walsh RM, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy based on hematologic indication. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 272-279.         [ Links ]

11. Schulze S,Thorup J. Pulmonary function, pain, and fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 1993; 159: 361-364.         [ Links ]

12. Hinder Ra, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 472-481.         [ Links ]

13. Adachi Y, Suematsu T, Shiraishi N, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Br F Surg 1999; 86: 541-544.         [ Links ]

14. Ohta M, Nishizaki T, Matsumoto T. Analysis of risk factors for massive intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy. F Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005; 12: 433-437.         [ Links ]

15. Poulin EC, Thibault C, Mamazza J. Laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 172-177.         [ Links ]

16. Poulin EC, Thibault C, Mamaza J, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: Clinical experience and the role of preoperative splenic artery embolization. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993; 3: 445-450.         [ Links ]

17. Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Herman P, et al. Exposure of splenic hilum increases safety of laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004; 14: 23-25.         [ Links ]

18. Kercher KW, Novitsky YW, Czerniach DR. Staple line bleeding following laparoscopic splenectomy: intraoperative prevention and postoperative management with splenic artery embolization. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13: 353-356.         [ Links ]

19. Iwase K, Higaki J, Yoon HE. Splenic artery embolization using contour emboli before laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12: 331-336.         [ Links ]

20. Totte E, Van Hee R, Kloeck I. Laparoscopic splenectomy after arterial embolisation. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 773-776.         [ Links ]

21. Takahashi T, Arima Y, Yokomuro S, et al. Splenic artery embolization before laparoscopic splenectomy in children. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1345-1348.         [ Links ]

22. Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM. Splenic artery embolization before laparoscopic splenectomy: an update. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 870-875.         [ Links ]

23. Flowers JL, Lefor AT, Steers J, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with hematologic diseases. Ann Surg 1996; 2124: 19-128.         [ Links ]

24. Palanivelu C, Kalpesh J, Vijaykumar M, et al. Early ligation of the splenic artery in the leaning spleen approach to laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006; 16: 339-344.         [ Links ]

25. Boddy P, Mahon D, Rhodes M. Does open surgery continue to have a role in elective splenectomy? Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1094-1098.         [ Links ]

26. Terrosu G, Baccarani U, Bresadola V, et al. The impact of splenic weight on laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 103-107.         [ Links ]

27. Smith L, Luna G, Mery AR, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenomegaly. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 618-620.         [ Links ]

28. Patel AG, Parker JE, Wallwork B. Massive splenomegaly is associated with significant morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 235-240.         [ Links ]

29. Mahon D, Rhodes M. Laparoscopic splenectomy: size matters. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85: 248-251.         [ Links ]

30. Kercher K, Matthews BD, Walsh RM. Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Am F Surg 2002; 183: 192-196.         [ Links ]

31. Hellman P, Arvidsson D, Rastad J. Handport-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in massive splenomegaly. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 1177-1179.         [ Links ]

32. Targarona EM, Espert JJ, Balague C. Splenomegaly should not be considered a contraindication for laparoscopic splenectomy. Ann Surg 1998; 288: 35-39.         [ Links ]

33. Ailawadi G, Yahanda A, Dimick JB, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with splenomegaly or prior upper abdominal. Surgery 2002; 132: 689-694.         [ Links ]

34. Cordera F, Long KH, Nagorney DM. Open versus laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: clinical and economic analysis. Surgery 2003; 134: 45-52.         [ Links ]

35. Vereczkei A, Illenyi L, Arany A, et al. Transvaginal extraction of the laparoscopically removed spleen. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 157.         [ Links ]

36. Gelmini R, Romano F, Quaranta N, et al. Sutureless and stapleless laparoscopic splenectomy using radiofrequency. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 991-994.         [ Links ]

37. Targarona EM, Esper JJ, Bombuy E, et al. Complications of laparoscopic splenectomy. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 1137-1140.         [ Links ]

38. Kavic SM, Segan RD, Park AE. Laparoscopic splenectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1561-1564.         [ Links ]

39. Chand B, Walsh RM, Ponsky J, et al. Pancreatic complications following laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1273-1276.         [ Links ]

40. Saber AA, Khaghany K, Nirmit G, et al. Safety zone for splenic hilar control during splenectomy: a computed tomography scan mapping of the tail of the pancreas in relation to the splenic hilum. Am Surg 2007; 73: 890-894.         [ Links ]

41. Katkhouda N, Hurwitz MB, Rivera RT. Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcome and efficacy in 103 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 568-578.         [ Links ]

42. Torelli P, Cavaliere D, Casaccia M. Laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological diseases. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 965-971.         [ Links ]

43. Katkhouda N, Manhas S, Umbach TW, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy. F Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001; 11: 383-390.         [ Links ]

44. Rickert CH. A unique case of cerebral spleen. Am F Surg Pathol 1998; 22: 894-896.         [ Links ]

45. Kumar RJ, Borzi PA. Splenosis in a port site after laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 413-414.         [ Links ]

46. Kirshtein B, Lantsberg S, Hatskelzon L, et al. Laparoscopic accessory splenectomy using intraoperative gamma probe guidance. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17: 205-208.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License