SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.48 número1Damage control surgeryPancreaticoduodenal injuries: Re-evaluating current management approaches índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


South African Journal of Surgery

versão On-line ISSN 2078-5151

S. Afr. j. surg. vol.48 no.1 Cape Town Fev. 2010

 

TRAUMA

 

Predicting mortality in damage control surgery for major abdominal trauma

 

 

Joep TimmermansI; Andrew NicolII; Nick KairinosIII; Joep TeijinkIV; Martin PrinsIV; Pradeep NavsariaV

IM.D.; Department of Surgery, Atrium Medical Centre, University of Maastricht, Holland
IIF.C.S. (S.A.); Trauma Centre, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town
IIIM.B. CH.B.Trauma Centre, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town
IVM.D.; Department of Surgery, Atrium Medical Centre, University of Maastricht
VM.MED. (SURG.), F.C.S. (S.A.); Trauma Centre, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town

 

 


ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Damage control surgery (DCS) has become well established in the past decade as the surgical strategy to be employed in the unstable trauma patient. The aim of this study was to determine which factors played a predictive role in determining mortality in patients undergoing a damage control laparotomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing a laparotomy and DCS in a level 1 trauma centre over a 3-year period was performed. Twenty-nine potentially predictive variables for mortality were analysed.
RESULTS: Of a total of 1 274 patients undergoing a laparotomy for trauma, 74 (6%) required a damage control procedure. The mean age was 28 years (range 14 - 53 years). The mechanism of injury was gunshot wounds in 57 cases (77%), blunt trauma in 14 (19%) and stabs in 3 (4%). Twenty patients died, giving an overall mortality rate of 27%. Factors significantly associated with increased mortality were increasing age (p=0.001), low base excess (p=0.002), pH (p<0.001), core temperature (p=0.002), and high blood transfusion requirement over 24 hours (p=0.002).
CONCLUSION: The overall survival of patients after damage control procedures for abdominal trauma was excellent (73%). The main factors that are useful in deciding when to initiate DCS are age, base excess, pH and the core temperature.


 

“Full text available only in PDF format”

 

REFERENCES

1. Garrison JR, Richardson JD, Hilakos AS, et al. Predicting the need to pack early for severe intra-abdominal hemorrhage. J Trauma 1996; 40: 923-929.         [ Links ]

2. Hirshberg A, Mattox KL. Planned reoperation for severe trauma. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 3-8.         [ Links ]

3. Kouraklis G, Spirakos S, Glinavou A. Damage control surgery: an alternative approach for the management of critically injured patients. Surg Today 2002; 32: 195-202.         [ Links ]

4. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. 'Damage control': an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 1993; 35: 375-383.         [ Links ]

5. Carrillo C, Fogler RJ, Shaftan GW. Delayed gastrointestinal reconstruction following massive abdominal trauma. J Trauma 1993; 34: 233-235.         [ Links ]

6. Hirshberg A, Wall MJ Jr, Mattox KL. Planned reoperation for trauma: a two year experience with 124 consecutive patients. J Trauma 1994; 37: 365369.         [ Links ]

7. Loveland JA, Boffard KD. Damage control in the abdomen and beyond. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1095-1101.         [ Links ]

8. American College of Surgeon's Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support Manual. Chicago: ACS, 1997: 11-242.         [ Links ]

9. Reed RL, Bracey AW, Hudson JD, et al. Hypothermia and blood coagulation: dissociation between enzyme activity and clotting factor levels. Circ Shock 1990; 32: 141-152.         [ Links ]

10. Patt A, McCroskey BL, Moore EE. Hypothermia-induced coagulopathies in trauma. Surg Clin North Am 1988; 68: 775-785.         [ Links ]

11. Aoki N, Wall MJ, Demsar J, et al. Predictive model for survival at the conclusion of a damage control laparotomy. Am J Surg 2000; 180: 540-545.         [ Links ]

12. Sharp KW, Locicero RJ. Abdominal packing for surgically uncontrollable hemorrhage. Ann Surg 1992; 215: 467-475.         [ Links ]

13. Arthurs Z, Cuadrado D, Beekley A, et al. The impact of hypothermia on trauma care at the 31st combat support hospital. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 610614.         [ Links ]

14. Burch JM, Ortiz VB, Richardson RJ, et al. Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients. Ann Surg 1992; 215: 476484.         [ Links ]

15. Johnson JW, Gracias VH, Schwab CW, et al. Evolution in damage control for exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 2001; 51: 261-271.         [ Links ]

16. Morris JA, Eddy VA, Blinman TA, et al. The staged celiotomy for trauma. Issues in unpacking and reconstruction. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 576-586.         [ Links ]

17. Nicholas JM, Rix EP, Easley KA, et al. Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same. J Trauma 2003; 55: 1095-1110.         [ Links ]

18. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ. Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg 1983; 197: 532-535.         [ Links ]

19. Cosgriff N, Moore EE, Sauaia A. Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidoses revisited. J Trauma 1997; 42: 857-862.         [ Links ]

20. Hirshberg A, Sheffer N, Barnea O. Computer simulation of hypothermia during 'damage control' laparotomy. World J Surg 1999; 23: 960-965.         [ Links ]

21. Jurkovich GJ, Greiser WB, Luterman A, Curreri PW. Hypothermia in trauma victims: an ominous predictor of survival. J Trauma 1987; 27: 10191024.         [ Links ]

22. Asensio JA, McDuffie L, Petrone P, et al. Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome. Am JSurg 2001; 182: 743-751.         [ Links ]

23. Falcone RE, Santanello SA, Schulz MA, et al. Correlation of metabolic aci-dosis with outcome following injury and its value as a scoring tool. World JSurg 1993; 17: 575-579.         [ Links ]

24. Rutherford EJ, Morris JA Jr, Reed GW, Hall KS. Base deficit stratifies mortality and determines therapy. J Trauma 1992; 33: 417-423.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License