SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.117 issue1-2A revised approach for estimating informally disposed domestic waste in rural versus urban South Africa and implications for waste managementPsycho-hormonal effects of aerobic fatigue on collegiate female soccer players author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

S. Afr. j. sci. vol.117 n.1-2 Pretoria Jan./Feb. 2021

http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/6846 

RESEARCH LETTER

 

Teatime in Kruger: Tailoring the application of the Tea Bag Index approach to an African savanna

 

 

Loewan L. Erasmus; Helga van Coller; Frances Siebert

Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Attempts to obtain standardised decomposition data to determine potential drivers of carbon release have evolved from the use of cotton strips and standardised leaf litter mixtures to the most recent Tea Bag Index (TBI). The TBI is an internationally standardised method to collect comparable, globally distributed data on decomposition rate and litter stabilisation, using commercially available tea bags as standardised test kits. As this index was developed as a citizen science project in the northern hemisphere, we aimed to highlight the potential value - and pitfalls - of its application in a subtropical African savanna. We furthermore aimed to expand on existing protocol details and propose amendments to achieve an enhanced understanding of decomposition dynamics across temporal and spatial scales in African ecosystems. Proposed adaptations include extended incubation periods for long-term monitoring studies, the burial of more tea bags to account for potential losses, and the use of additional equipment to enhance effective sampling. These adaptations provide a system-specific protocol which can facilitate studies aimed to understand the interactions between top-down drivers (e.g. herbivory, fire, climate variability) and bottom-up controls (e.g. decomposition) in carbon flux dynamics of savanna ecosystems. Application of the proposed extended protocol in a semi-arid savanna provided results which reinforce the potential value of the TBI in an African context.
SIGNIFICANCE:
The TBI is a relatively easy and cost-effective approach to gather globally distributed data on potential decomposition rate and inherent carbon flux, yet it was developed and primarily tested in boreal and temperate ecosystems.
The use of more paired tea bag replicates and additional equipment is a viable means to mitigate tea bag losses to several savanna-based agents of disturbance, while enabling confident conclusions made from statistical results and improved estimates of the TBI. High recovery success across disturbance treatments and incubation periods suggest that the TBI can be applied successfully to spatial and temporal decomposition studies.

Keywords: carbon cycling, herbivory, herbivore loss, nutrient-rich, semi-arid


 

 

Introduction

Research on linkages between decomposition and carbon flux is covered extensively for temperate1,2 and boreal3,4 ecosystems, whilst studies in tropical and subtropical ecosystems, especially in Africa, remain limited5,6. The paucity of information available on these mechanistic relationships in African savannas may be ascribed to complex interactions between top-down (e.g. climate variability, fire, large mammalian herbivores) and bottom-up controls (e.g. soil physical-chemical properties, soil-based microbes and detritivores) that collectively regulate savanna structure and function.6,7 While governed by various environmental factors, decomposition is primarily regulated by the chemical composition of site-specific leaf litter. Cross-site comparison of natural litter decomposition and intrinsic drivers thereof is subsequently compromised by variability in detrital chemistry.1,3,4,6,8-10

Attempts to standardise approaches to examine the role of environmental drivers on decomposition have evolved from the use of cotton strips or natural leaf litter mixtures1,6,9 to the most recent Tea Bag Index (TBI) approach introduced by Keuskamp et al.8 This approach is an internationally standardised, user-friendly method to collect comparable, globally distributed decomposition data. The TBI consists of two parameters describing decomposition rate (k) and stabilisation factor (S).5,8 Standardised test kits include commercially available Lipton® tea bags (i.e. rooibos and green tea).8 Tea bags were selected based upon differences in chemical composition, with green tea representing high-quality organic matter with low C:N ratios, and rooibos tea a low-quality organic matter with high C:N ratios.3,8,9 Tea bags therefore act as proxies for labile and recalcitrant compounds in naturally occurring organic matter.1,8,9

Assessments of ecosystem functioning, such as the TBI, are becoming increasingly valuable, especially for application in monitoring programmes in areas exposed to increasing intensities of land-use and/or climate change. However, the physical and biological template upon which African systems function varies from most ecosystems in which the TBI has been applied 1-4 Here, we reflect on applying the TBI in an African context to facilitate decomposition monitoring. Details on (1) an experimental design aimed at elucidating temporal dynamics, (2) tea bag losses due to large mammalian herbivores, fungal infestation and termites, (3) recommended equipment to enhance effective sampling and (4) the potential value in African systems are provided.

 

Study area

The study was conducted in a semi-arid subtropical savanna at the Nkuhlu exclosures long-term monitoring site (24°58'S, 31°46'E) located in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. This area is characterised by a hot growing season with sporadic precipitation from October to April and a mild to warm, dry non-growing season.11 Average annual rainfall is 561 mm, with temperatures varying from an average minimum of 5.6 °C in winter to an average maximum of 32.6 °C in summer.11 Situated on the foot slopes of undulating granitic landscapes, the study site is characterised by sodium-rich, deep duplex soil, referred to as the sodic zone. The plant community of the sodic zone is described as a Sporobolus nitens-Euclea divinorum Dry Sodic Savanna and is associated with nutrient-rich vegetation.11 Sodic patches therefore produce palatable, high-quality forage capable of supporting large herbivores, including grazers and mixed-feeders.11

 

Materials and methods

Experimental design

The Nkuhlu exclosures form part of a large-scale, long-term exclusion experiment of ecosystem drivers (i.e. herbivory and fire) to determine their effect on spatial and temporal heterogeneity patterns of vegetation in a semi-arid African savanna.11 These exclosures consist of three herbivore treatments including (1) a partially fenced area (elephant exclosure), (2) an unfenced area (control) and (3) a fully fenced area (large mammalian herbivore exclosure).11 As the TBI was developed and applied in systems in which decomposition is dominated by microbial agents6,12, it does not account for the presence and possible damage caused by savanna-based disturbance agents, such as large mammalian herbivores and termites6,10,12. We applied a paired tea bag design which entailed the burial of 20 green and 20 rooibos tea bags in each of the 25 fixed plots across three herbivore treatments (Figure 1) which added up to 1000 experimental tea bags in total.

Decomposition is a time-bound process consisting of different phases3,9, primarily regulated by the chemical composition of detrital substrate with respect to labile and recalcitrant ratios5,8. Due to the dynamic nature of savannas, regulating factors change over time, influencing the rate and extent of decomposition. Temporal comparisons are therefore essential to observe not only progression in decomposition phases, but the influence of site-specific factors thereon.6,7,9,12,13 Our suggested extended application includes replicates which represent different incubation periods (i.e. 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-months) to capture dynamics in k and S but also to determine the resilience of the TBI in an unexplored system over the course of a year (Figure 1). All tea bags were buried in January 2019 (summer) and retrieved in intervals of three months, each representing a different season (i.e. April 2019, July 2019, October 2019 and January 2020).

Statistical analyses

Differences in recovery success of green and rooibos tea bags within each incubation period were tested for significance using independent Student's t tests in Microsoft Excel (2013). To test for significant variation in the number of tea bags infested by fungi and damaged by termites across treatments and over the different incubation periods, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied in Paleontological Statistics Software (PAST) and Microsoft Excel (2013).

 

Results and discussion

The overall recovery success, irrespective of herbivore treatment and incubation, was 78.5%. Results did not reveal significant differences in recovery between green and rooibos tea among most treatments (Figure 2), although significantly fewer rooibos tea bags could be retrieved after the 6-month incubation period (Figure 2).

A finely grained black fungus was present on 42% of recovered green tea bags, while no rooibos tea bags were infested. Fungal infestation showed no significant difference between incubation periods (p=0.897). Fungal infestation and damage by termites were significantly lower in the control site (p<0.001, Figure 3a and p=0.003, Figure 3b). Rooibos tea bags were significantly more damaged by termites than were green tea bags (p=0.033).

From our results, it is evident that the presence of large mammalian herbivores complicates the retrieval of tea bags. This could be ascribed to difficulty in finding markers, because the use of above-ground markers is not recommended in areas with high mammal activity. Moreover, detritivore activity in the form of termites has a significant impact on the longevity of tea bags. To account for termite-based damage, Teo et al.6 suggested the use of physical and/or chemical barriers (e.g. metal mesh and termiticide), although such applications may impede the practicality and standardisation of the TBI and furthermore reduce its effectiveness in measuring decomposition by altering regulatory constituents12. The seemingly high number of replicates used in our small-scale investigation successfully buffered the tea bag losses ascribed to animal, insect and fungal activity. Sufficient recovery (78%) with little differences between green and rooibos tea bags will lead to confident conclusions made from estimates of the TBI.

 

Value of the TBI in an African context

Decomposition is central to the effective functioning of terrestrial ecosystems as it forms the link between above- and belowground nutrient cycling.3,4,6,9,14,15 Yet, little is known about site-specific disturbance effects (i.e. herbivory and fire) on decomposition and carbon flux. TBI-based decomposition studies can provide valuable information on the extent of these disturbances and their potential effect on essential ecosystem processes.1,5,9,14,15 The TBI approach has been developed to remove the subjectivity involved in using site- and species-specific litter, only providing information pertaining to the potential decomposition capacity (i.e. deduced from standardised litter) of a specific site or system based on process-driven soil functions.1,8,9 However, despite the major differences in chemical composition of standardised (e.g. tea) and local litter, both respond in similar ways to environmental drivers.1,9 The TBI is therefore able to identify and examine environmental drivers of decomposition without ambiguous effects of site-specific litter, serving as a reference which facilitates data comparison across spatial scales.1,3,5,8,9

Despite growing concerns about climate change and increased atmospheric CO2 levels, research on decomposition and soil carbon flux remains limited for Africa.5,10 Necessary resources required for such studies are often unavailable in many African countries. However, citizen science projects, such as the TBI, have become a useful tool to facilitate ecological research due to relatively easy application and public engagement (e.g. Teatime 4 Science, http://www.teatime4science.org/).1,5,8,9

With the aim to promote efficient decomposition studies, we therefore suggest the application of this extended TBI approach for at least a 9-month duration together with application-based amendments as set out in Table 1. The TBI remains a relatively easy and cost-effective approach which greatly reduces the amount of data to be collected in normal litterbag decomposition studies. As such, this method is more conducive to both the available resources and prevailing environmental conditions in Africa.

 

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge and thank South African National Parks (SANParks) for general logistic support. We express our gratitude towards various people who contributed to this project through assisting in the burial and retrieval of the tea bags: Jaco Koch, Clarissa Minnaar, Marlize Muller, Judith Botha and Franco de Kock; as well as Thomas Rikombe for protection during field work.

 

Competing interests

We declare that there are no competing interests.

 

Authors' contributions

L.L.E.: Methodology, data collection, sample analysis, data analysis, validation, data curation, writing - the initial draft, writing - revisions, project leadership. H.v.C.: Methodology, data collection, sample analysis, data analysis, validation, data curation, writing - the initial draft, writing - revisions, project leadership, student supervision, project management. F.S.: Conceptualisation, writing - the initial draft, writing -revisions, project leadership.

 

References

1. MacDonald E, Brummell ME, Bieniada A, Elliott J, Engering A, Gauthier TL, et al. Using the Tea Bag Index to characterize decomposition rates in restored peatlands. Boreal Environ Res. 2018;23:221-235.         [ Links ]

2. Tremblay JA, Boulanger Y Cyr D, Taylor AR, Price DT, St-Laurent MH. Harvesting interacts with climate change to affect future habitat quality of a focal species in eastern Canada's boreal forest. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):1-26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191645        [ Links ]

3. Elumeeva TG, Onipchenko VG, Akhmetzhanova AA, Makarov MI, Keuskamp JA. Stabilization versus decomposition in alpine ecosystems of the Northwestern Caucasus: The results of a tea bag burial experiment. J Mt Sci. 2018;15(8):1633-1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4960-z        [ Links ]

4. Petraglia A, Cacciatori C, Chelli S, Fenu G, Calderisi G, Gargano D, et al. Litter decomposition: Effects of temperature driven by soil moisture and vegetation type. Plant Soil. 2019;435(1-2):187-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3889-x        [ Links ]

5. Becker J, Kuzyakov Y Seasonal variation in standardized litter decomposition and effects of elevation and land use at Mount Kilimanjaro. Paper presented at: 19th EGU General Assembly; 2017 April 23-28; Vienna, Austria. p.14877.         [ Links ]

6. Teo A, Kristensen NP Keuskamp JA, Evans TA, Foo M, Chisholm RA. Validation and extension of the Tea Bag Index to collect decomposition data from termite-rich ecosystems. Pedobiologia. 2020;80, Art. #150639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2020.150639        [ Links ]

7. Ratnam J, Sheth C, Sankaran M. African and Asian savannas: Comparisons of vegetation composition and drivers of vegetation structure and function. In: Scogings PF, Sankaran M. Savanna woody plants and large herbivores. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2019. p. 25-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119081111.ch2        [ Links ]

8. Keuskamp JA, Dingemans BJ, Lehtinen T, Sarneel JM, Hefting MM. Tea Bag Index: A novel approach to collect uniform decomposition data across ecosystems. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4(11):1070-1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12097        [ Links ]

9. Didion M, Repo A, Liski J, Forsius M, Bierbaumer M, Djukic I. Towards harmonizing leaf litter decomposition studies using standard tea bags - a field study and model application. J For. 2016;7(8):167. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7080167        [ Links ]

10. Leitner M, Davies AB, Parr CL, Eggleton P Robertson MP Woody encroachment slows decomposition and termite activity in an African savanna. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24(6):2597-2606. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14118        [ Links ]

11. Van Coller H, Siebert F Siebert SJ. Herbaceous species diversity patterns across various treatments of herbivory and fire along the sodic zone of the Nkuhlu exclosures, Kruger National Park. Koedoe. 2013;55(1), Art. #a1112. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.1112        [ Links ]

12. Sundsdal A. Teatime for termites: Understanding the impact of human land-use and climate on termite and microbial litter decomposition [master's thesis]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2019.         [ Links ]

13. Berg B, Kj0naas OJ, Johansson MB, Erhagen B, Äkerblom S. Late stage pine litter decomposition: Relationship to litter N, Mn, and acid unhydrolyzable residue (AUR) concentrations and climatic factors. Forest Ecol Manag. 2015;358:41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.032        [ Links ]

14. Eldridge DJ, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Travers SK, Val J, Oliver I, Hamonts K, et al. Competition drives the response of soil microbial diversity to increased grazing by vertebrate herbivores. Ecology. 2017;98(7):1922-1931. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1879        [ Links ]

15. Paudel E, Dossa GG, de Blécourt M, Beckschäfer P Xu J, Harrison RD. Quantifying the factors affecting leaf litter decomposition across a tropical forest disturbance gradient. Ecosphere. 2015;6(12):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00112.1        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Loewan Erasmus
Email: loewan_erasmus@outlook.com

Received: 23 Aug. 2019
Revised: 28 Sep. 2020
Accepted: 28 Sep. 2020
Published: 29 Jan. 2021

 

 

Editors: Teresa Coutinho, Salmina Mokgehle
Funding: None

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License