SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.116 issue11-12Tree health in South Africa: Retrospect and prospectProgress in the management of Fusarium head blight of wheat: An overview author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

S. Afr. j. sci. vol.116 n.11-12 Pretoria Nov./Dec. 2020

http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/7688 

REVIEW ARTICLE

 

Accomplishments in wheat rust research in South Africa

 

 

Zacharias A. PretoriusI; Renée PrinsII, III; Elsabet WesselsII; Cornel M. BenderI; Botma VisserI; Willem H.P BoshoffI

IDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
IICenGen (Pty) Ltd., Worcester, South Africa
IIIDepartment of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Rust diseases, although seasonal, have been severe constraints in wheat production in South Africa for almost 300 years. Rust research gained momentum with the institution of annual surveys in the 1980s, followed by race identification, an understanding of rust epidemiology, and eventually a focused collaboration amongst pathologists, breeders and geneticists. Diversity in South African populations of Puccinia triticina, P. graminis f. sp. tritici and P. striiformis f. sp. tritici has been described and isolates are available to accurately phenotype wheat germplasm and study pathogen populations at national, regional and global levels. Sources of resistance have been, and still are, methodically analysed and molecular marker systems were developed to incorporate, stack and verify complex resistance gene combinations in breeding lines and cultivars. Vigilance, capacity, new technologies, collaboration and sustained funding are critical for maintaining and improving the current research impetus for future management of these important diseases.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Rust diseases threaten wheat crops worldwide, including in South Africa.
Management of rusts includes regular surveillance, pathogen diversity studies, rigorous screening of wheat germplasm, and efficient breeding and selection for resistance.
Collaboration among plant pathologists, geneticists and breeders has provided momentum in rust research and control in South Africa in recent years.

Keywords: Puccinia, resistance, rust, surveillance, wheat


 

 

Background

The sowing of small grain cereals in South Africa occurred within 2 months after the United (Dutch) East India Company set foot on land in present-day Cape Town in 1652.1,2 Crop failures, in particular due to damage caused by heavy rains, wind storms and unadapted cultivars, were common occurrences. Nonetheless, efforts to successfully grow wheat continued and systematically included new production areas, different sowing times, new cultivars - not only from Europe but also from India, and exports when grain supplies allowed. Varietal assessments during the early years provided evidence for the first selection of higher-yielding types in South Africa.2 The pioneering wheat cultivars are not well documented, but reference is made of 'white' wheat in 1659, 'Sarut' from India in 1673, 'Roode' and 'Grijse Winter' in 1677, until names based on phenotype (e.g. 'Bloukoring', 'Kleinkoring', 'Baardkoring', 'Zwartbaard', 'Vroeëbaard'), origin (e.g. 'Ciciliaans', 'Bengaalsch'), or growers (e.g. 'Du Toits', 'Niewoudts', 'Tautes') became customary.2

No mention is made of rust during the foundational years of cereal production in South Africa but, according to Theal3, a critical shortage of wheat in 1727 was ascribed in the previous year to rust - a disease known in South Africa only on rye at the time. The regular occurrence of rust led Neethling2 to conclude: 'There is no doubt that rust, owing to the severe damage caused, is the most important factor which caused the extinction and origin of varieties in South Africa'. Nhemachena and Kirsten4 gave a detailed account of wheat cultivar development in South Africa, Smit et al.5 summarised wheat research between 1983 and 2008, and overviews of wheat rust research in South Africa were provided by De Jager6, Lombard7 and Pretorius et al.8 Early milestones were interspecies crosses to transfer stem rust resistance genes to bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in 1912 followed by pathotyping isolates of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Erikss. & E. Henn. (Pgt) and P. triticina Erikss. (Pt) in the 1920s and 1930s.8The establishment of a centre for dedicated small grains research at Bethlehem in 1976, currently named Agricultural Research Council - Small Grain (ARC-SG), resulted in appropriate training in rust methodologies, surveillance, race analysis and germplasm evaluation. These initiatives were expanded with the formation of a rust laboratory at the University of the Free State in 1989.

In recent decades, notable events and initiatives in South African wheat rust research include annual surveys8, Sr24 virulence9, the appearance of stripe rust (caused by P. striiformis Westend. f. sp. tritici, Pst)10, Ug99 stem rust studies11-15, the mapping of quantitative resistance loci16,17, genetic characterisation of Puccinia isolates1820, comprehensive phenotyping of wheat germplasm, and establishment of a marker service laboratory with a particular focus on rust resistance genes (https://www.cengen.co.za).

The objective of this review is to provide a summary of recent accomplishments in wheat rust research in South Africa.

 

Rust surveillance and phenotypic analysis

Surveillance and race typing are routinely conducted by the ARC-SG to determine rust distribution, impact and pathogenicity in the major wheat-producing areas of South Africa. Recent reports of similarities in races between southern African countries have also emphasised the importance of regional sampling.21-23

Handling obligate rust fungi in controlled experiments such as race typing or host plant screening requires specific infrastructure. In addition to facilities for plant growth, inoculation and incubation, equipment for collection and application of small amounts of urediniospores is essential. Because these specialised items are not commercially available, Pretorius et al.24 developed an additive manufacturing process to assemble spore collectors and atomisers through 3D printing. Using these devices, traditional race analysis is done by infecting seedlings of a predetermined (differential) set of wheat host lines with a rust isolate. An appropriate experimental set-up and experience in achieving accurate seedling infection types are essential for reliable phenotyping. Examples of infection types are shown in Figure 1.

 

 

Based on the pathogenicity of an isolate on entries in the differential set, a race (pathotype) name is allocated. Apart from an alpha-numerical code to name leaf and stem rust races in South Africa8, the North American system of nomenclature25,26 is used to place races in an international context. The standard South African differential set for determining seedling infection types to Pt isolates contains 20 entries.27 Except for Thew (Lr20) and Agent (Lr24), all Lr genes occur in a Thatcher wheat background. New races are further characterised on an additional set containing 23 Lr genes.27 Infection types on the lines RL6011 (Lr72), CT263 (Lrí3), RL6044 (Lr22a), RL6058 (Lr34), RL6082 (Lr35) and Thatcher control (Lr22b) are determined on flag leaves of adult plants.

No new Pt races were detected between 1988 and 2008 in South Africa.8,28 This situation changed with the report of race 3SA145 (CCPS North American race code) in 2009, followed by races 3SA146 (MCDS, 2010), 3SA147 (FBPT, 2010), 3SA115 (CBPS, 2012), 3SA10 (CFPS, 2016), 3SA38 (CDPS, 2016) and 3SA248 (CFPS, 2016).27-30 The frequency of Pt races with virulence to Lr3, Lr12, Lr13, Lr15, Lr26 and Lr37 is high and varied between 79% and 98% during recent surveys.27 The Pt population was dominated for many years by race 3SA133 (PDRS) which initially was common on winter wheat in the Free State. This changed significantly with the appearance of races 3SA145, 3SA146 and 3SA115 which accounted for >80% of isolates typed during the 2012-2016 surveys.27 The more recently described races 3SA38 and 3SA10 are increasing in prevalence and comprised more than 50% of the isolates typed from the 2018 growing season.31Pt race MCDS was common in Zimbabwe and Zambia with FBPT and SCDS detected in Zimbabwe and Malawi.23

Twenty differential wheat lines are used for stem rust pathotyping. Although the resistance genes are similar to the proposal of Jin et al.26, Acme (Sr9g), Renown (Sr17) and Trident (Sr38) have replaced CnSr9g, Combination VII and VPM1, respectively. Additional differentials include Barleta Benvenuto (SrSb), the triticales Coorong (Sr27), Kiewiet (SrKw) and Satu (SrSatu), and either LcSrWst-2Wst (Sr9h) or Matlabas (Sr9h).32 New races are further characterised on an extended set of tester lines.33 Although differential lines grown in the field can provide an indication of prevailing Pgt races, Boshoff et al.34 showed that certain resistance genes are not well expressed in adult plants whereas other lines contain resistance in addition to that observed in seedling assays.

The most significant change in the Pgt population since 2005 was the regular appearance of new races in the Ug99 lineage. African race Ug99, named after the country of first detection (Uganda) and year of description (1999)11, was the first race with virulence for the widely used Sr31 resistance gene. Its broad virulence and subsequent specialisation in 13 pathotypes have raised serious concerns about sustained wheat production in many regions of the world.15 Stem rust race 2SA106 (TTKSP North American race code) detected in 2007, 2SA107 (PTKST, 2009), 2SA88+ (TTKSF+, 2010) and 2SA42 (PTKSK, 2017) all show phenotypic similarities to race 2SA88 (TTKSF, 2000), which was the first stem rust race in the Ug99 lineage detected in South Africa.12,13,18,21,32,35 These races are phenotypically characterised by differences in virulence for Sr9h, Sr21, Sr24 and Sr37.13,32Sr24 and Sr31 have been reported to occur in South African wheat germplasm36 and virulence was not unexpected. Likewise, the virulence adaptation of TTKSF+ was recently confirmed by the endorsement of Sr9h in the wheat cultivar Matlabas.37 Despite being less virulent compared to the more recently detected Ug99 races, TTKSF remains the dominant variant.8,31,32,38 Stem rust races TTKSF (2009), TTKSF+ (2010) and PTKST (2010) were also identified in samples collected in Zimbabwe and PTKST was confirmed in Mozambique.15,21

Seedling infection types produced on the World and European differential sets39,40, followed by an A+ or A- suffix to describe virulence or avirulence for the YrA gene in Avocet R41, are used for Pst race designations in South Africa. Near-isogenic lines with Avocet S as the recurrent parent are used as additional tester lines for race characterisation and in field plots.42 Following the detection of Pst race 6E16A- in 199610, proposed to be a foreign introduction from Central or Western Asia either by wind or human intervention43,44, there is strong evidence that adaptation to the host genes Yr25 (race 6E22A-, cultivar Hugenoot, 1998) and YrA (6E22A+, PAN 3195, 2005) resulted from selection pressure10,19. The Pst population has remained relatively stable since the detection of race 6E22A+ on winter wheat in the eastern Free State in 200519 with 6E22A+ persisting as the most dominant race, comprising 58% of isolates in 201831.

The outbreak of stripe rust on irrigated spring wheat in 2018 represented the first report of the disease in Zimbabwe.45 Showing virulence to Yr3a, Yr4a, Yr9 and Yr27, race 30E142A+ was distinctly more virulent on South African wheat cultivars than 6E22A+ and poses a potential threat to the local industry. However, it is not yet known if Pst will successfully establish in Zimbabwe and, as anticipated, migrate to South Africa.

It has been suggested that wheat cultivated at a higher elevation in Lesotho during summer serves as a source of Pst inoculum for winter-grown crops in South Africa.8 Although not customary, some hectares may also be sown to wheat in the Free State during summer. The impact of these formal off-season productions on the epidemiology of the rusts has, however, not been studied in detail. Volunteer wheat has generally been assumed to provide a green bridge for the survival of these biotrophic pathogens between seasons.

 

Genetic analysis of Puccinia isolates

Analysis of Pt, Pgt and Pst with microsatellite markers has contributed to explaining genetic diversity within the three populations. In the absence of functional alternate hosts for wheat rust pathogens in South Africa, wind dispersal, human activities, mutation and possibly somatic recombination are considered as drivers of variation. The South African Pgt population consists of two highly diverse genetic lineages.18 In the absence of viable historical samples in South Africa, the close genetic similarity of members of the non-Ug99 genetic lineage with Australian standard races 21-0 collected in 1954, and 326 and 194 collected in 1969, respectively, suggested that this lineage represents the original South African population.46 Included in this lineage are races that are specific for both wheat and triticale. The acquisition of virulence within this group appears to be the result of step-wise mutations.32,33 On a global scale, this lineage grouped closest with Pgt samples from Pakistan, Czech Republic47,48 and Australia due to the proposed movement of urediniospores on high-altitude westerly winds46.

The Ug99 lineage on the other hand, first detected in South Africa in 2000 with the description of TTKSF12, has expanded into five variants13,14,21,35. In contrast to the non-Ug99 lineage, all five South African variants and the original TTKSK11 shared more than 85% genetic similarity and fall within the bigger Ug99 race group from east Africa15. In a recent study, Li et al.48 provided genomic evidence of somatic hybridisation in Pgt, shedding light on the origin of Ug99 through the exchange of nuclei between standard race 21 and an unknown race. This is an important discovery to understand the formation of new diversity in the absence of sexual recombination.

The current South African Pt population consists of two primary genetic lineages20, but at least five were evident according to Pt isolates collected during the previous century49. Three of these appear to be extinct while only one lineage is expanding.27,28,30 Similar to Pgt, these new races probably represent exotic introductions as races with similar phenotypes and genotypes were found in countries to the north of South Africa.23 Globally, the South African Pt races grouped significantly with isolates from the Middle East, Pakistan and New Zealand.50

Based on microsatellite analysis, the four Pst races described in South Africa represent a single, clonal lineage.19 As opposed to these races, the recently identified Pst race in Zimbabwe was genetically very similar to two Kenyan isolates45, indicating a southerly expansion of stripe rust diversity in Africa.

Due to the unique ability of markers to distinguish genotypes independently of their associated phenotypes, genetic screening of field isolates can detect variants before a new phenotype becomes evident. While Pt races 3SA38, 3SA10 and 3SA248 were first detected as phenotypic variants in 201627, their unique genotypes were already abundant in field isolates collected in 201549. These markers also indicated that within each phenotype, significant genetic variation was present, making genetic markers an effective supplementary tool to race phenotyping.

 

Host resistance

Resistance phenotypes in wheat are typically growth stage mediated. All-stage resistance (ASR), conferred by major genes, is clearly expressed throughout the lifespan of the plant whereas adult plant resistance (APR), often polygenic and partial in manifestation, becomes effective at more mature growth stages.51 Phenotypes commonly encountered on adult plants are shown in Figure 1. As some APR genes are considered durable, this resistance type is frequently preferred in breeding and selection. Wheat cultivars carrying the pleiotropic race non-specific APR genes Sr2/Yr30, Lr34/Yr18/Sr57, Lr46/Yr29/Sr58 and Lr67/Yr46/Sr55 have maintained moderate levels of rust resistance under epidemic field trial conditions in South Africa and might not provide adequate protection when deployed singly under high disease pressure. Soko et al.52 recorded grain yield losses due to stem rust of between 10.1% and 19.5% for APR cultivars as opposed to a 6.4% loss in an ASR line. Previously, Pretorius et al.8 mentioned losses as high as 65% for susceptible wheat cultivars infected with stripe rust and a 56% yield gain was obtained when leaf rust was controlled by fungicide application on a susceptible cultivar. Breeders are therefore encouraged to either combine APR sources or stack them with ASR genes, the latter especially in areas prone to early-season infection.

The damage potential of wheat rusts is a reality, and it remains important to verify the resistance status of local germplasm and embark on appropriate breeding and selection programmes. As part of risk assessment and compilation of production guidelines, all commercially recommended wheat cultivars in South Africa, as well as leading breeding lines, are tested annually against a panel of rust races. These tests comprise seedling assays for ASR and field tests under high inoculum pressure in carefully managed rust nurseries. The University of the Free State has implemented rust nurseries with great success at the research facilities of Corteva Agriscience at Greytown in KwaZulu-Natal since the early 1990s. The Greytown environment is highly conducive to the vigorous development of both spring and winter wheat types as well as rust development. In a typical year, stripe rust would be first to establish during the cooler months of August and September, followed by leaf rust in October and finally stem rust, which peaks at the end of the season.

Stem rust assessments for local germplasm are summarised in Figure 2. Only cultivars with seedling infection types <2 (0 to 4 scale)53, and a coefficient of infection54 <20, were considered to carry true aSr. Some cultivars regarded as resistant as seedlings showed an intermediate stem rust reaction in the field and were thus not classified as displaying true ASR. Inoculum loads in the Greytown field nursery are extremely high and not all ASR genes provide complete rust protection under such conditions. In most cases it is assumed that these cultivars will be acceptable in commercial fields where inoculum pressure is lower. The opposite was also observed where some cultivars were classified as intermediate in the seedling stage but stem rust resistant in the field. The effect of using race PTKST in the field from 2011 onwards is clear from the initial decrease in resistance before a gradual improvement in resistant entries as breeders adapted their selection and breeding strategies. Collectively such information, also for leaf and stripe rust, adds to an understanding of disease risk and management at production level. To support field data, protocols for accelerated and reliable greenhouse assays have been developed for stripe rust16,55,56, leaf rust57 and stem rust58.

 

 

Genetic studies of host resistance provide information on the monogenic or polygenic nature of genes involved, their identity and chromosome location, association with known genes or quantitative trait loci (QTL), and molecular markers for tracking the resistance. Together this knowledge contributes to assumptions of durability and targeted attempts to achieve long-lasting resistance. Ramburan et al.16 were the first to map rust resistance in a South African wheat cultivar. They identified three major stripe rust resistance loci in the spring wheat cultivar Kariega and paved the way for fine mapping and marker development for QYr.sgi-2B.1 and QYr.sgi-4A.1, and confirmation of the pleiotropic resistance gene Lr34/ Yr18/Sr57.57,59In a similar approach, the durable stripe rust resistance of the European wheat cultivar Cappelle Desprez was mapped17 with subsequent identification of the major effect QTL QYr.ufs-2A along with three QTL of smaller effect, QYr.ufs-2D, QYr.ufs-5B and QYr.ufs-6D. Using histological techniques, Maree et al.60,61 investigated fungal behaviour in lines containing different combinations of the stripe rust resistance QTL characterised in Kariega and Cappelle Desprez, respectively. These studies confirmed the value of gene stacking and careful selection of lines with the best ability to mitigate fungal invasion.

Prins et al.62 assessed stem rust response in an African wheat collection and identified several marker-trait associations in a genome-wide study. Two lines with exceptional APR were identified and biparental mapping populations developed. Marker-trait associations on chromosomes OAS and 3BS and the Lr34/Yr18/Sr57 resistance locus were confirmed, along with stem rust resistance QTL not detected in the association study, one of which was the significant QTL QSr.ufs-4D. This emphasises the value of applying multiple approaches to unravel host resistance, particularly in cases where marker coverage in certain chromosomal areas is too low to detect QTL.

The availability of Pgt races with virulence attributes appropriate for targeting certain sources of resistance has contributed to several studies. These projects addressed phenotyping and genetics of resistance to Ug99 races6366, resistance characterisation of triticale67 and lines with genes transferred from Aegilops sharonensis68and Thinopyrum ponticum69,70. Furthermore, Pretorius et al.71 demonstrated the application of remote sensing and the normalised difference vegetation index in reliably phenotyping wheat stripe rust response in the field.

 

Breeding and selection

Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is widely accepted as a key strategy to pyramid resistance genes into wheat genotypes, in particular, genes that do not exhibit easily distinguishable phenotypes.72 In South Africa, large-scale MAS was not implemented by breeding companies in the early 2000s8, although it was routinely used to select for several traits in countries such as Australia, Mexico, USA, the UK and India72. In 2011, a proposal by CenGen (Pty) Ltd. titled 'Establishment of a molecular marker service laboratory for routine application of marker-assisted selection in South African wheat breeding programs' (WCT/W/2009/02), was approved for funding by the Winter Cereal Trust. The capital expense of establishing a MAS laboratory and routine maintenance justified a central facility at CenGen for all wheat breeding programmes. The project is based on (1) purity testing of donor lines and confirmation of the target trait, (2) planning of breeding schemes and crosses to transfer the new trait, and (3) tracking the trait in subsequent filial generations.

South African seed companies use different strategies to breed for rust resistance, dependent on their approach, resources and location. Yet there is a collective focus on pyramiding rust resistance genes, in particular those that confer durable APR, to uphold the international drive of gene stewardship. Sensako (Pty) Ltd., a private breeding company with headquarters in Bethlehem (Free State, South Africa), follows a strategy in which they combine target genes/QTL in doubled haploid donor lines. This is followed by a top cross with their elite lines or commercial cultivars and from the F1-generation doubled haploid lines are developed to integrate the genes/QTL into better adapted backgrounds. This approach has proven to be successful in pyramiding rust resistance genes/QTL (Figure 3). They have managed to develop a line containing multiple genes for resistance to all three rust pathogens, which is now used as a key donor line to incorporate complex resistance into existing cultivars.

 

 

The South African wheat breeding programme of Corteva AgriscienceTM follows a more traditional approach of gradually incorporating multiple genes/QTL into their breeding lines. Gene enrichment is done at the F2-generation, and the presence of the target genes is confirmed in the F5-generation after three cycles of selection for agronomic traits. Pure lines containing the target genes are then either used to generate new resistance gene combinations or, if within the tolerance levels set for the different milling and baking quality criteria, are considered for commercial release. This programme has been successful in combining APR genes for stem, stripe and leaf rust resistance into elite breeding material that performs similarly to current commercial cultivars in yield trials (Table 1).

 

 

The MAS programme commenced in 2011 with the capacity to screen for 19 genes/QTL, of which 13 were related to rust resistance. These targets included the popular APR genes Lr34/Yr18/Sr57/Pm38 (Pm is the notation for powdery mildew resistance genes) and Sr2/Yr30, the leaf rust resistance gene Lr1973 as well as QTL previously identified for stripe rust resistance in the cultivars Kariega16 and Cappelle-Desprez17. Since its inception, the programme has grown to include 63 genes/ QTL of which 29 are associated with rust resistance (Figure 4). These are obtained by breeders through international collaboration with organisations such as CIMMYT, or are newly identified sources from ongoing local research projects.62

 

 

Molecular markers for target genes/QTL are obtained from the public domain and research articles, or from in-house mapping projects by CenGen and collaborators. These include simple sequence repeat (SSR), sequence-tagged site (STS), cleaved amplified polymorphic site (CAPS) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Since 2013, the implementation and upgrade of KASP SNPLline instruments (LGC, UK) at CenGen greatly enhanced high-throughput capacity. The number of data points (calculated as the number of samples x number of markers tested per sample) that are generated annually continues to increase (Figure 5) despite a decrease in industry funding.

 

 

Notwithstanding the success of the implementation and application of the MAS programme for single locus traits such as rust resistance, the status of MAS in South Africa trails behind that of international programmes, which are exploring an integrated genomics-assisted breeding approach.74 In 2010, crop geneticists started to investigate genomic selection in wheat to select for complex, multi-locus traits.75 By 2012, reports of the value of genomic selection using genotyping-by-sequencing in wheat were published, creating yet another avenue for genomics-assisted breeding (Figure 6).76 The challenge remains for South African breeders and geneticists to follow international trends in genomics-assisted breeding and sensibly implement selection strategies for multi-locus traits.

 

 

Conclusions

The relatively frequent introduction of new rust races into South Africa strongly suggests the possibility of further incursions. Stem rust and stripe rust, in particular, are extremely damaging diseases and the description of highly virulent and aggressive Pst and Pgt races in other wheat regions77,78 emphasises continued vigilance. The introduction of such races could impact severely on cultivar response with a consequent increase in production risk and cost. The survival of rust on off-season wheat crops and ancillary hosts such as wild rye (Secale strictum subsp. africanum) in the Roggeveld Mountains of the southwestern Karoo79, requires further attention. Although samples collected from wild rye revealed Pst, the stem and leaf rust forms were those of cultivated rye and not bread wheat.79 Wild rye is, however, moderately susceptible to Pgt and could serve as an inoculum source. The occurrence of both Pt and Pgt on a summer wheat crop in the eastern Free State in January 2020 (WHP Boshoff, unpublished) is of concern and supports the expansion of surveys to this period. Scientists should thus continue with surveillance, studies of pathogen variability, characterisation of cultivars, genetic analyses, resistance discovery, focused breeding and selection, and communication of research outcomes to producers. Overarching activities include international, regional and national collaboration; capacity building and training; embracing of new technologies; resistance gene stewardship; and sourcing sustained funding.

 

Acknowledgements

Substantial funding by BBSRC-DfID for the project 'Assessment of genetic biodiversity of durable disease resistance in African wheat genotypes, leading to the development of novel marker systems for wheat breeding' (BB/F004125/1) and by BBSRC-SCPRID for 'Implementing effective marker technologies into disease resistance wheat breeding programmes within Africa' (BB/J011525/1) is gratefully acknowledged. Additional support by the Winter Cereal Trust, University of the Free State, National Research Foundation, Cornell University (DRRW project) and many local and international colleagues is also acknowledged.

 

Competing interests

We declare that there are no competing interests.

 

Authors' contributions

Z.A.P developed the outline, wrote the Abstract, Background, 'Host resistance' section and Conclusions; R.P. and E.W. wrote the 'Breeding and selection' section including table and figures; C.M.B. provided longterm cultivar data; B.V. wrote 'Genetic analysis of Puccinia isolates'; W.H.P.B. wrote 'Rust surveillance and phenotypic analysis'. All authors contributed to editing of the final manuscript. Z.A.P and W.H.PB. provided photographs of rust phenotypes.

 

References

1. Bosman DJ, Thom HB. Daghregister gehouden by den oppercoopman Jan Anthonisz van Riebeeck Deel 1 1651-1655 [Day register held by commander Jan Anthonisz van Riebeeck Part 1 1651-1655]. Cape Town: AA Balkema; 1952. Dutch.         [ Links ]

2. Neethling JH. Wheat varieties in South Africa: Their history and development until 1912. Sci Bull. 1932;108:41.         [ Links ]

3. Theal GM. History and ethnography of Africa south of the Zambesi, 15051795, Vol. 3: The Cape Colony to 1795, the Koranas, Bantu, and Portuguese in South Africa to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1910 (reproduced in 2010).         [ Links ]

4. Nhemachena CR, Kirsten JA. Historical assessment of sources and uses of wheat varietal innovations in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2017;113(3/4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160008        [ Links ]

5. Smit HA, Tolmay VL, Barnard A, Jordaan JP Koekemoer FP Otto WM, et al. An overview of the context and scope of wheat (Triticum aestivum) research in South Africa from 1983 to 2008. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2010;27(1):81-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2010.10639973        [ Links ]

6. De Jager JNW. 'n Oorsig oor die koringsiektesituasie in Suid-Afrika, met spesiale verwysing na stamroes, en oorwegings vir 'n nasionale koringsiekteprogram [An overview of the wheat disease situation in South Africa, with special reference to stem rust and considerations for a national wheat disease programme] [PhD thesis]. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 1980. Afrikaans.         [ Links ]

7. Lombard B. Host-pathogen interactions involving wheat and Puccinia graminis tritici in South Africa [PhD thesis]. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 1986.         [ Links ]

8. Pretorius ZA, Pakendorf KW, Marais GF, Prins R, Komen JS. Challenges for sustainable cereal rust control in South Africa. Aust J Agric Res. 2007;58(6):593-601. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06144        [ Links ]

9. Le Roux J, Rijkenberg FHJ. Pathotypes of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici with increased virulence for Sr24. Plant Dis. 1987;71:115-119.         [ Links ]

10. Pretorius ZA, Boshoff WHP Kema GHJ. First report of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici on wheat in South Africa. Plant Dis. 1997;81(4):424. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.4.424D        [ Links ]

11. Pretorius ZA, Singh RP Wagoire WW, Payne TS. Detection of virulence to wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr31 in Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Plant Dis. 2000;84(2):203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.2.203B        [ Links ]

12. Boshoff WHP, Pretorius ZA, Van Niekerk BD, Komen JS. First report of virulence in Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici to wheat stem rust resistance genes Sr8b and Sr38 in South Africa. Plant Dis. 2002;86(8):922. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.8.922B        [ Links ]

13. Terefe TG, Pretorius ZA, Visser B, Boshoff WHP. First report of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici race PTKSK, a variant of wheat stem rust race Ug99 in South Africa. Plant Dis. 2019;103(6):1421. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-18-1911-PDN        [ Links ]

14. Visser B, Herselman L, Park RF, Karaoglu H, Bender CM, Pretorius ZA. Characterization of two new Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici races within the Ug99 lineage in South Africa. Euphytica. 2011;1790):119-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0269-x        [ Links ]

15. Singh RP Hodson DP Jin Y Lagudah ES, Ayliffe MA, Bhavani S, et al. Emergence and spread of new races of wheat stem rust fungus: Continued threat to food security and prospects of genetic control. Phytopathology. 2015;105(7):872-874. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-15-0030-FI.         [ Links ]

16. Ramburan VP, Pretorius ZA, Louw JH, Boyd LA, Smith PH, Boshoff WHP, et al. A genetic analysis of adult plant resistance to stripe rust in the wheat cultivar Kariega. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108(7):1426-1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1567-7        [ Links ]

17. Agenbag GM, Pretorius ZA, Boyd LA, Bender CM, Prins R. Identification of adult plant resistance to stripe rust in the wheat cultivar Cappelle-Desprez. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125(1):109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1819-5        [ Links ]

18. Visser B, Herselman L, Pretorius ZA. Genetic comparison of Ug99 with selected South African races of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10(2):213-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00525.x        [ Links ]

19. Visser B, Herselman L, Pretorius ZA. Microsatellite characterization of South African Puccinia striiformis races. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2016;33(3):161-166. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02571862.2015.1125957        [ Links ]

20. Visser B, Herselman L, Bender CM, Pretorius ZA. Microsatellite analysis of selected Puccinia triticina races in South Africa. Austr Plant Pathol. 2012;41(2):165-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-011-0104-4        [ Links ]

21. Pretorius ZA, Szabo LJ, Boshoff WHP Herselman L, Visser B. First report of a new TTKSF race of wheat stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Plant Dis. 2012;96(4):590. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1027-PDN        [ Links ]

22. Mukoyi F, Soko T, Mulima E, Mutari B, Hodson D, Herselman L, et al. Detection of variants of wheat stem rust race Ug99 (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) in Zimbabwe and Mozambique. Plant Dis. 2011;95(9):1188. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0300        [ Links ]

23. Pretorius ZA, Visser B, Terefe T, Herselman L, Prins R, Soko T, et al. Races of Puccinia triticina detected on wheat in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi and regional germplasm responses. Austr Plant Pathol. 2015;44(2):217-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-014-0339-y        [ Links ]

24. Pretorius ZA, Booysen GJ, Boshoff WHP Joubert J, Maree GJ, Els J. Additive manufacturing of devices used for collection and application of cereal rust urediniospores. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10, Art. #639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00639        [ Links ]

25. Long DL, Kolmer JA. A North American system of nomenclature for Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology. 1989;79:525-529. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-79-525        [ Links ]

26. Jin Y, Szabo L, Pretorius ZA, Singh RP, Fetch T, Jr. Detection of virulence to Sr24 within race TTKS of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Plant Dis. 2008;92(6):923-926. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-6-0923        [ Links ]

27. Boshoff WHP Labuschagne R, Terefe T, Pretorius ZA, Visser B. New Puccinia triticina races on wheat in South Africa. Austr Plant Pathol. 2018;47(3):325-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-018-0560-1        [ Links ]

28. Terefe TG, Visser B, Herselman L, Prins R, Negussie T, Kolmer JA, et al. Diversity in Puccinia triticina detected on wheat from 2008 to 2010 and the impact of new races on South African wheat germplasm. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014;139(1):95-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-013-0368-3        [ Links ]

29. Terefe TG, Pretorius ZA, Bender CM, Visser B, Herselman L, Negussie TG. First report of a new wheat leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) race with virulence for Lr12, 13, and 37 in South Africa. Plant Dis. 2011;95(5):611. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-10-0545        [ Links ]

30. Terefe TG, Visser B, Herselman L, Selinga T, Pretorius ZA. First report of Puccinia triticina (leaf rust) race FBPT on wheat in South Africa. Plant Dis. 2014;98(7):1001. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-13-1195-PDN        [ Links ]

31. Terefe TG. Update on wheat rusts in South Africa. SA Grain Magazine. 2019 September;31-33. Available from: https://sagrainmag.co.za/2019/08/30/update-on-wheat-rusts-in-south-africa/        [ Links ]

32. Terefe TG, Visser B, Pretorius ZA. Variation in Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici detected on wheat and triticale in South Africa from 2009 to 2013. Crop Prot. 2016;86(8):9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.04.006        [ Links ]

33. Boshoff WHP Pretorius ZA, Terefe T, Bender CM, Herselman L, Maree GJ, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic description of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici race 2SA55 in South Africa. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2018;152(3):783-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1527-3        [ Links ]

34. Boshoff WHP Bender CM, Pretorius ZA. The value of field ratings of differential lines for pathotyping Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2019;155(1):349-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01754-7        [ Links ]

35. Pretorius ZA, Bender CM, Visser B, Terefe T. First report of a Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici race virulent to the Sr24 and Sr31 wheat stem rust resistance genes in South Africa. Plant Dis. 2010;94(6):784. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-6-0784C        [ Links ]

36. Pretorius ZA, Jin Y Bender CM, Herselman L, Prins R. Seedling resistance to stem rust race Ug99 and marker analysis for Sr2, Sr24 and Sr31 in South African wheat cultivars and lines. Euphytica. 2012;186(1):15-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0476-0        [ Links ]

37. Wessels E, Prins R, Boshoff WHP Zurn JD, Acevedo M, Pretorius ZA. Mapping a resistance gene to Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in the bread wheat cultivar Matlabas. Plant Dis. 2019;103(9):2337-2344. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-18-1731-RE        [ Links ]

38. Terefe TG, Pretorius ZA, Paul I, Mebalo J, Meyer L, Naicker K. Occurrence and pathogenicity of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici on wheat in South Africa during 2007 and 2008. S Afr J Plant Soil. 2010;27(2):163-167.         [ Links ]

39. Johnson R, Stubbs RW, Fuchs E. Nomenclature for physiological races of Puccinia striiformis infecting wheat. Trans Brit Mycol Soc. 1972;58:475-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(72)80096-2        [ Links ]

40. Johnson R, Taylor AJ. Yellow rust of wheat. In: Annual report 1976. Cambridge: Plant Breeding Institute;1976. p 106-109.         [ Links ]

41. Wellings CR, Mcintosh RA. Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in Australasia: Pathogenic changes during the first 10 years. Plant Pathol. 1990;39(2):316-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1990.tb02509.x        [ Links ]

42. Wellings CR, Singh RP, McIntosh RA, Pretorius ZA. The development and application of near isogenic lines for stripe (yellow) rust pathosystem. Paper presented at: 11th Cereal Rusts and Powdery Mildews Conference; 2004 August 23-26; Norwich, UK. p. A1.39.         [ Links ]

43. Hovm0ller MS, Yahyaoui AH, Milus EA, Justesen AF. Rapid global spread of two aggressive strains of a wheat rust fungus. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(17):3818-3826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03886.x        [ Links ]

44. Ali S, Gladieux P, Leconte M, Gautier A, Justesen AF, Hovmoller MS, et al. Origin, migration routes and worldwide population genetic structure of the wheat yellow rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici. PLoS Pathol. 2014;10(1), e1003903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003903        [ Links ]

45. Boshoff WHP, Visser B, Lewis CM, Adams TM, Saunders DGO, Terefe T, et al. First report of Puccinia striiformis on wheat in Zimbabwe. Plant Dis. 2020;104(1):290. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-19-1395-PDN        [ Links ]

46. Visser B, Meyer M, Park R, Gilligan C, Burgin LE, Hort MC, et al. Microsatellite analysis and urediniospore dispersal simulations support the movement of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici from southern Africa to Australia. Phytopathology. 2019;109(1):133-144 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-18-0110-R        [ Links ]

47. Lewis CM, Persoons A, Bebber DP, Kigathi RN, Maintz J, Findlay K, et al. Potential for re-emergence of wheat stem rust in the UK. Comm Biol. 2018;1:13 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0013-y        [ Links ]

48. Li F, Upadhyaya NM, Sperschneider J, Matny O, Nguyen-Phuc H, Mago R, et al. Emergence of the Ug99 lineage of the wheat stem rust pathogen through somatic hybridisation. Nat Comm. 2019;10:5068. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12927-7        [ Links ]

49. Labuschagne R. Microsatellite analysis of the Puccinia triticina population in South Africa [MSc dissertation]. Bloemfontein: University of the Free State; 2019.         [ Links ]

50. Kolmer JA, Ordonez ME, German S, Morgounov A, Pretorius Z, Visser B, et al. Multilocus genotypes of the wheat leaf rust fungus Puccinia triticina in worldwide regions indicate past and current long distance migration. Phytopathology. 2019;109(8):1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-18-0411-R        [ Links ]

51. Pretorius ZA, Ayliffe M, Bowden RL, Boyd LA, DePauw RM, Jin Y, et al. Advances in control of wheat rusts. In: Langridge P editor. Achieving sustainable cultivation of wheat. Volume 1: Breeding, quality traits, pests and diseases. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing; 2017. p. 295-343.         [ Links ]

52. Soko T, Bender CM, Prins R, Pretorius ZA. Yield loss associated with different levels of stem rust resistance in bread wheat. Plant Dis. 2018;102(12):2531-2538. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0307-RE        [ Links ]

53. McIntosh RA, Wellings CR, Park RF. Wheat rusts: An atlas of resistance genes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995.         [ Links ]

54. Roelfs AP Singh RP Saari EE. Rust diseases of wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexico DF: CIMMYT; 1992.         [ Links ]

55. Pretorius ZA, Pienaar L, Prins R. Greenhouse and field assessment of adult plant resistance to stripe rust of wheat. Austr Plant Pathol. 2007;36(6):552-559. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP07058        [ Links ]

56. Boshoff WHP, Prins R, De Klerk C, Krattinger SG, Bender CM, Maree GJ, et al. Point inoculation method for measuring adult plant response of wheat to stripe rust infection. Plant Dis. 2019;103(6):1228-1233. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-18-1312-RE        [ Links ]

57. Prins R, Pretorius ZA, Bender CM, Lehmensiek A. QTL mapping of stripe, leaf and stem rust resistance genes in a Kariega x Avocet S doubled haploid wheat population. Mol Breed. 2011;27(2):259-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9428-y        [ Links ]

58. Bender CM, Prins R, Pretorius ZA. Development of a greenhouse screening method for adult plant resistance in wheat to stem rust. Plant Dis. 2016;100(8):1627-1633. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-16-0163-RE        [ Links ]

59. Agenbag GM, Pretorius ZA, Boyd LA, Bender CM, MacCormack R, Prins R. High-resolution mapping and new marker development for adult plant stripe rust resistance QTL in the wheat cultivar Kariega. Mol Breed. 2014;34(4):2005-2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0158-4        [ Links ]

60. Maree GJ, Prins R, Bender CM, Boshoff WHP Negussie TG, Pretorius ZA. Phenotyping Kariega x Avocet S doubled haploid lines containing individual and combined adult plant stripe rust resistance loci. Plant Pathol. 2019;68(4):659-668. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12985        [ Links ]

61. Maree GJ, Prins R, Boyd L, Castelyn HD, Bender CM, Boshoff WHP et al. Assessing the individual and combined effects of QTL for adult plant stripe rust resistance derived from Cappelle Desprez. Agron. 2019;9(3):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9030154        [ Links ]

62. Prins R, Dreisigacker S, Pretorius Z, Van Schalkwyk H, Wessels E, Smit C, et al. Stem rust resistance in a geographically diverse collection of spring wheat lines collected from across Africa. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:973. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00973        [ Links ]

63. Rouse M, Nirmala J, Jin Y Anderson JA, Chao S, Fetch TG, et al. Characterization of Sr9h, a wheat stem rust resistance allele effective to Ug99. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(8):1681-1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2330-y        [ Links ]

64. Pretorius ZA, Prins R, Malaker PK, Barma MCD, Hakim MA, Thapa D, et al. Assessing the vulnerability of wheat germplasm from Bangladesh and Nepal to African stem rust. Phytoparasitica. 2015;43(5):637-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-015-0487-9        [ Links ]

65. Babiker EM, Gordon TC, Chao S, Rouse MN, Wanyera R, Newcomb, M, et al. Genetic mapping of resistance to the Ug99 race group of Puccinia graminis f. sp tritici in a spring wheat landrace CItr 4311. Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129(11):2161-2170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2764-5        [ Links ]

66. Zurn J, Rouse M, Chao S, Aoun M, Macharia G, Hiebert C, et al. Dissection of the multigenic wheat stem rust resistance present in the Montenegrin spring wheat accession PI 362698. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4438-y        [ Links ]

67. Olivera PD, Pretorius ZA, Badebo A, Jin Y. Identification of resistance to races of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici with broad virulence in triticale (X Triticosecale). Plant Dis. 2013;97(4):479-l84. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-12-0459-RE        [ Links ]

68. Millet E, Steffenson B, Sela H, Allen A, Pretorius ZA. Genome targeted introgression of resistance to African stem rust from Aegilops sharonensis into bread wheat. The Plant Genome. 2017;10(3):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2017.07.0061        [ Links ]

69. Li H, Zheng Q, Pretorius ZA, Li B, Tang D, Li Z. Establishment and characterization of new wheat - Thinopyrum ponticum addition and translocation lines with resistance to Ug99 races. J Gen Genomics. 2016;43(9):573-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.07.004        [ Links ]

70. Li H, Boshoff WHP Pretorius ZA, Zheng Q, Li B, Li Z. Establishment of wheat -Thinopyrumponticum translocation lines with resistance to Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici race Ug99. J Gen Genomics. 2019;46(8):405-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2019.07.005        [ Links ]

71. Pretorius ZA, Lan CX, Prins R, Knight V, McLaren NW, Singh RP, et al. Application of remote sensing to identify adult plant resistance loci to stripe rust in two bread wheat mapping populations. Prec Agric. 2017;18(4):411-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9461-x        [ Links ]

72. Gupta P, Langridge P, Mir R. Marker-assisted wheat breeding: Present status and future possibilities. Mol Breed. 2010;26(2):145-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-009-9359-7        [ Links ]

73. Prins R, Groenewald JZ, Marais GF, Snape JW, Koebner RMD. AFLP and STS tagging of Lr19, a gene conferring resistance to leaf rust in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;103(4):618-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00002918        [ Links ]

74. Leng P Lübberstedt T, Xu M. Genomics-assisted breeding - A revolutionary strategy for crop improvement. J Integr Agric. 2017;16:2674-2685. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61813-6        [ Links ]

75. Crossa J, De Los Campos G, Pérez P Gianola D, Burgueno J, Araus JL, et al. Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics. 2010;186(2):713-724. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.118521        [ Links ]

76. Poland J, Endelman J, Dawson J, Rutkoski J, Wu S, Manes Y et al. Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. The Plant Genome. 2012;5(3):103-113. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2012.06.0006        [ Links ]

77. Ali S, Rodriguez-Algaba J, Thach T, S0rensen CK, Hansen JG, Lassen P et al. Yellow rust epidemics worldwide were caused by pathogen races from divergent genetic lineages. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01057        [ Links ]

78. Olivera PD, Sikharulidze Z, Dumbadze R, Szabo LJ, Newcomb M, Natsarishvili K, et al. Presence of a sexual population of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in Georgia provides a hotspot for genotypic and phenotypic diversity. Phytopathology. 2019;109(12):2152-2160. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-19-0186-R        [ Links ]

79. Pretorius ZA, Bender CM, Visser B. The rusts of wild rye in South Africa. S Afr J Bot. 2015;96(1):94-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2014.10.005        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Zacharias Pretorius
Email: pretorza@ufs.ac.za

Received: 29 Nov. 2019
Revised: 16 Mar. 2020
Accepted: 18 Mar. 2020
Published: 26 Nov. 2020

 

 

Editors: Teresa Coutinho, Salmina Mokgehle
Funding: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council / Department for International Development (BBSRC-DfID; BB/ F004125/1); Sustainable Crop Production Research for International Development, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC-SCPRID; BB/J011525/1)

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License