REVIEW ARTICLE

 

Tree health in South Africa: Retrospect and prospect

 

 

Michael J. Wingfield^{I, II, III}; Brett Hurley^{I, III}; Brenda Wingfield^{I, III}; Bernard Slippers^{I, III}

^IDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
^IIDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
^IIIForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

South Africa is a country with very limited natural forest cover. Consequently, the timber and fibre needs of the country cannot be provided for from indigenous forest. It is largely for this reason that South Africa initially developed a highly productive plantation forest industry, which today makes a substantial contribution to the local economy. These plantations are based on non-native species of Eucalyptus, Pinus and Australian Acacia. In the early years of establishment, South African plantations were relatively free of pest and pathogen problems. But, over time, an increasing number of insects, fungi and bacteria have emerged as serious threats to the sustainability of the forestry industry. Numerous native pests and pathogens, especially insects, have adapted to these introduced tree species to cause damage or disease. The problem is compounded by the accidental introduction of non-native pests and pathogens, and this has been at a rapidly increasing rate over the past three decades. Some of these introduced pests and pathogens also threaten the fitness and even the survival of many indigenous South African tree species. Fortunately, South Africa has developed an impressive knowledge base and range of integrated management options to deal with these problems. This development was first driven by government programmes, and in more recent years by public-private partnerships between industry, universities and government. It is clear from the pattern of emergence of pests and pathogens in recent years that South Africa will deal with an increasing number of these problems and a continuously changing tree health environment. This requires robust investment in both quarantine and mitigation mechanisms to protect the country's biodiversity as well as to ensure the sustainability of its wood and fibre industries.
SIGNIFICANCE:
• This review about tree health in South Africa was in part inspired by the 2020 International Year of Plant Health. Plant health, and particularly tree health, is an important topic in regard to the sustainability of our forestry industry and conservation of our native forests. South Africa has been a leader in the field and this review highlights some of the achievements that researchers in the country, both past and present, have attained.

Keywords: forest pathology, forest entomology, tree diseases, forest pests

---

 

 

Introduction

South Africa is an arid country and consequently has very limited resources of natural forest in the western part of the country. This is the primary reason why South Africa was one of the first countries in the world to establish commercial plantation forestry based on non-native tree species. These plantations were able to accommodate local demand for wood products, especially for construction and fuelwood. In the process, this allowed small tracts of natural forest and woody ecosystems to be spared from destruction.¹

The first commercial plantations established in South Africa were those of Pinus pinaster (around 1825), soon overtaken by P. radiata and much later by P. patula. Likewise, Eucalyptus was an early addition to the exotic tree resource with the first planting of Eucalyptus globlus in 1887. Subsequently, commercial forestry has grown considerably in South Africa based mainly on Pinus and Eucalyptus, but also including Australian Acacia species, mainly Acacia mearnsii. According to Forestry South Africa, as of February 2020, the current landholding representing commercial plantation forestry in South Africa is approximately 1.2 million hectares.

Many factors affect the health of trees. These factors include damage by insect and nematode pests and pathogens such as bacteria, fungi and viruses. Climatic factors such as rainfall, temperature and wind, as well as edaphic factors including soil structure and quality, are all important contributors to the overall health and vigour of trees. For the purpose of this review, we deal exclusively with pests and pathogens - thus broadly the fields of forest entomology and forest pathology as they relate to the health of forest trees in South Africa.

When considering forest tree health in South Africa, it is important to clearly distinguish between trees in natural woody ecosystems and those that are planted commercially. These are very different situations, both in terms of the impact and the management of insect pests and pathogens. Plantations, especially in the southern hemisphere, typically comprise non-native tree species often planted in high-density monocultures that are intensively managed. The choice of species, provenance or genotype is carefully controlled, and typically tailored to particular regions and sites based on numerous biotic and abiotic conditions as well as risk factors. Natural forest and woody ecosystems in South Africa are biodiverse and composed of large numbers of native trees and other plants in a complex matrix, and are typically protected from logging. In contrast, plantations are managed mainly by commercial enterprises and are of high value. Among other factors, this dichotomy leads to different approaches to managing pests and pathogens, although significant tree health challenges exist in both commercial and noncommercial woody ecosystems.

In plantations, serious damage due to pests and pathogens is usually very obvious and is considered important and worthy of intervention. In contrast, disease and pest problems in natural forests have been afforded very little attention in South Africa in the past. The value of understanding and managing health risks in natural forests has changed in recent years, due in part to the recognition of bidirectional transfer of pests and pathogens between native and non-native plantation systems, and the resulting substantial impacts on trees grown as non-natives in plantations.^2,3 Thus, the establishment of the South African Department of Science and Innovation (DSI) and National Research Foundation (NRF) Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology (CTHB) in 2004, which includes the health of trees and shrubs in natural woody ecosystems as well as commercial plantations, is particularly important.⁴

It is not the intention of this review to provide a detailed history of forest protection in South Africa. There are various previous reviews dealing with the history of forest pathology and forest entomology in the country, which treat this topic relatively comprehensively.^5-9 It is also not an aim to consider the finer details of the likely future concerning forest tree health in this country. That topic has also been treated in some detail in various recent reviews, particularly those relating to plantation forestry.^10,11 In contrast, we attempt to briefly capture some of the key elements of the history of forest protection in South Africa. Furthermore, we broadly consider the current situation and the likely requirements for this field in the future. Rather than focus on the specifics of numerous insect pests and diseases, for which detailed information can be found in the most recent edition of the South African Forestry Handbook, broad concepts with selected examples are provided.¹²

 

Pest and pathogens of native woody plants

There are extensive records of fungi and insects for South Africa^13-15, which are mainly housed in the National Collections and, in the case of insects, also in various museums. Many among these fungi and insects colonise the living tissue of trees. Yet, very little is known about most of these collections beyond some basic taxonomy. Generally, there has been little support for studies of insects or pathogens occurring in natural ecosystems. This is largely due to the fact that they are not considered to be of economic importance.

Where native trees or shrubs have exhibited signs of serious decline or damage, the causal agents are typically known or thought to be non-native. Perhaps the best example of a non-native organism with severe negative impacts on native plants is the root-feeding fungus-like heterokont, Phytophthora cinnamomi, which is particularly important on species of the Proteaceae in natural areas within the Cape fynbos.^16-18 Among the most susceptible native species is Leucadendron argenteum (the Cape silver tree), which has died in large numbers on the Cape Penisula.¹⁹ Research on P. cinnamomi has shown that the pathogen was most likely introduced into South Africa.²⁰ The unusually large numbers of plants that have been killed, together with the rapid onset of this disease, support this view. Another contemporary and well-publicised example of an introduced pathogen that has the potential to damage native woody plants in South Africa is the root-feeding fungus, Armillaria mellea. This fungus was accidentally introduced into the country, most likely from Europe by early European settlers²¹, and has gradually become established in the natural environment of the Cape Penisula^22,23, with devastating effects on Protea and Leucodendron.

In many cases in which trees or woody plants are diseased in natural ecosystems, the origin (i.e. native versus introduced) of associated pests or pathogens is difficult to determine.^2,24 Organisms that are new to science (commonly the case) are often erroneously designated as native owing to the lack of knowledge of their true worldwide distribution. This is important because geographic origin aids in predicting the spread and severity of a novel pest or pathogen problem and informs the search for potential biological control agents. The rapidly growing availability of population-based molecular genetic tools has, however, changed this situation. A growing number of studies show that pathogens found associated with tree diseases in natural ecosystems are in many cases likely to be of exotic origin.^20,24-27

The importance of tree health in natural forests has recently been highlighted by the accidental introduction of the polyphagous shot hole borer, Euwallacea fornicatus, and its fungal symbiont Fusarium euwallaceae.²⁸The beetle is native to Asia and was first detected in South Africa in 2016, as part of a programme to survey botanical gardens for new and emerging pest risks. Originally isolated from the non-native London plane tree (Platanus x acerifolia), it has subsequently been recorded on a large number of tree species in South Africa, including native forest species. The impact of this invasive beetle and pathogen on South Africa's natural forest is currently being investigated (De Beer ZW 2020, personal communication). Its introduction strongly emphasises the importance of surveillance programmes, such as those in botanical gardens and arboreta, amenity tree plantings as well as in natural and plantation forests, and ports of entry.

 

Pests and pathogens of plantation trees

Native insects and fungi

Not surprisingly, the history of recording and studying pests and pathogens of plantation-grown trees dates back to the beginning of the forestry industry in South Africa.^2,29 Some of the first records of pests and pathogens in plantations were those caused by native organisms that were able to feed on the non-native trees. Noticeable examples were of the pine emperor moth (Nudaurelia cytherea) recorded damaging Pinus radiata in 1885 and Armillaria root rot³⁰ (now known to be caused by the native Armillaria fuscipes)³¹recorded on Pinus species in various provinces of South Africa³².

Many other native insect pests and pathogens are now known to cause serious damage to commercially propagated species of Pinus, Eucalyptus and Acacia in South Africa.³ The analysis by Crous and co-authors³ showed that native insect pests more commonly shift to and cause damage to these non-native plantation trees than do native pathogens. Examples include the wattle bagworm, Kotochalia junodi, that has been severely damaging to Acacia mearnsii virtually since the tree was first planted in this country.^6,9 Numerous other native insects, including defoliating and wood-boring Lepidoptera and Coleoptera, white grubs and sap-sucking insects are pests of Eucalyptus, Pinus spp. and A. mearnsii.^12,33Recent outbreaks of the wattle semi-looper, Achaea lineardi, the pine brown tail moth, Euproctis terminalis, and N. cytherea (authors' personal observation) indicate the importance of these native insect pests and the need for research to acquire knowledge on their biology, population dynamics, diversity and other aspects that will inform management actions.

The relatively large number of native insects that have been able to feed on non-native plantation trees, at least in comparison to examples of pathogens, might relate to the fact that a subset of insects are highly polyphagus. They consequently have wide host ranges and thus easily adapt to feed on non-native trees.³ There are nevertheless a number of examples of damaging native pathogens that have adapted to damage non-native plantations. This number is also increasing because a number of contemporary studies using DNA-based techniques have shown that fungal pathogens, which might originally have been thought of as introduced into South Africa, are actually native.

A recent and fascinating example of a native pathogen originally believed to be introduced into South Africa is found in the case of the eucalyptus canker pathogen Chrysoporthe austroafricana. When first discovered in South Africa, this fungus was thought to be the notorious Cryphonectria cubensis (Figure 1). But it was later shown to be a native fungus occurring naturally on South African Myrtaceae which had undergone a host range shift to infect introduced Eucalyptus spp.^34-36 Likewise, the canker stain and wilt pathogen of A. mearnsii, Ceratocystis albifundus, was originally thought to be the pathogen C. fimbriata and was later shown to be a common natural inhabitant on the wounds of many native South African woody plants.³⁷ Likewise, a relatively large number of Botryosphaeriaceae canker and dieback pathogens that occur in non-native plantations are likely native to the region.³⁸ The origin of many pathogens remains unclear and it is expected that further sampling and growth in the number of molecular population genetic and phylogeographic studies will reveal that other pathogens on non-native plants are native.

Non-native insects and fungi

While native pests and pathogens can clearly cause very serious damage to non-native trees in plantations, it is generally recognised that the outstanding growth of these trees is largely due to the fact they have been separated from their natural enemies. In this respect, they behave much like weeds with their superior performance being attributed to 'enemy release'.³⁹ It is for this reason that the accumulation of insects and pathogens and the accelerating rate of introduction into the non-native plantation resource of South Africa represent a serious threat to the local industry.^8,9,11,29,40

Host-specific insect pests and pathogens of species of Pinus, Eucalyptus and Acacia known to occur in the areas of origin of these trees have appeared in South African plantations with increasing frequency. When cumulative data for insects and pathogens of any of these trees are examined, there is a clear trend of an accelerating problem and it is one that is likely to continue in the foreseeable future.^9,29,40 Risk abatement and management strategies must clearly take this growing threat into serious consideration.

The eucalyptus snout beetle, Gonipterus sp. n. 2 (originally recorded as G. scutellatus)⁴¹, recorded in South Africa in 1916 (Figure 1), was the first serious non-native pest to affect non-native plantations in the country^42,43. Numerous other non-native insect pests, especially those on Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus spp., have subsequently entered the country, with varying impact. These include various guilds of insects, including sap-suckers, gall formers, bark and wood borers, and defoliators.^12,33 The more recent arrivals are the bronze bug (Thaumastocoris peregrinus), bluegum chalcid (Leptocybe invasa), red gum lerp psyllid (Glycaspis brimblecombei), shell lerp psyllid (Spondyliaspis c.f. plicatuloides; Figure 1), and the eucalypt gall wasp (Ophelimus maskelli) - all pests of Eucalyptus and recorded in 2003, 2007, 2012, 2014 and 2014, respectively.^44-46

Non-native pathogens have had a very substantial impact on plantation forestry in South Africa. It can be reasonably argued that they have substantially influenced the choice and distribution of species planted. The pine shoot and dieback pathogen Diplodia sapinea was the first non-native pathogen recorded in South African plantations^47,48 and was rapidly recognised as leading to the death of large numbers of trees after hail damage^49,50. Thus, susceptible species, such as P. radiata and P. patula, were specifically not planted on sites prone to hail storms. Likewise, leaf blotch caused by Teratosphaeria nubilosa (originally recorded as Mycosphaerella molleriana) is thought to have contributed to the failure of E. globulus as a plantation species in South Africa.⁵¹ From the insect side, the eucalyptus snout beetle is at least in part responsible for the discontinued planting of Eucalyptus viminalis and E. globulus in the country.^40,42,43 And the recent introduction of the gall wasp L. invasa has already substantially influenced the Eucalyptus genotypes that can be planted in affected areas due to considerable differences in host resistance.^45,52

Much as in the case of introduced insect pests, a large number of host-specific pathogens of Pinus, Eucalyptus and Acacia species have been recorded in South Africa.^2,3,12 Many of these are relatively weak pathogens that have not caused serious damage, while others are much more important. Certainly, the most important pathogen affecting commercial forestry in recent years has been the pine pitch canker pathogen, Fusarium circinatum (Figure 1). This pathogen was first found in a single nursery in 1991 and it has subsequently spread to all pine production nurseries in the country.^53,54 For many years, it was known only as a nursery problem, but in 2005 it was first recorded on mature P. radiata trees on the Cape Peninsula.⁵⁵ While the canker disease on established trees is of concern, particularly in coastal plantations, the most important impact of F. circinatum has been that it has rendered P. patula virtually impossible to establish cost effectively.⁵⁶ Essentially, the most important Pinus species planted in South Africa will most likely need to be replaced due to this pathogen.

Non-native pests and pathogens entering South Africa may arrive from the native range of plantation trees. As these agents of disease are increasingly being moved around the world, the probability of establishment increases non-linearly.^2,9,11,40,57 Available evidence suggests that once a pest or pathogen has become established in a new environment, it is more likely to move again - a trend referred to by Lombaert and co-authors⁵⁸ as 'a bridgehead effect'. The worldwide movement of the Sirex woodwasp Sirexnoctilio, one of South Africa's most serious pine pests, is one of many insects and pathogens that illustrates this effect.^29,59-62 Trees in urban environments often serve as a convenient bridgehead between regions, before pests and pathogens spread into natural or plantation forests.⁶³ For this reason, urban environments, and botanical gardens in particular, offer important opportunities to study and monitor invasive or potentially invasive pathogens.^63-65

 

Management of pests and pathogens

Efforts to reduce the impact of insect pests and pathogens in South African plantations date back to the time of the first records of these problems.^5,6 Broadly, the available options include chemical control, biological control (mainly for insects), avoidance through planting non-susceptible species and efforts to reduce the populations/inoculum loads of the pests/pathogens. While chemical control was quite widely used in the early period of South African forestry (see for example Tooke⁶⁶), the negative environmental and health effects, and consequently rules set by, for example, the Forestry Stewardship Council, have rendered this approach increasingly difficult.

South Africa has a long and well-established history of using biological control to reduce the impact of forest pests (Figure 2). This use dates back to the introduction of the parasitoid wasp Anaphes nitens for the biological control of Gonipterus sp. 2 (then known as G. scutellatus)^42,43, which remains one of the classic examples of successful biological control. Other examples of classical biological control for non-native insect pests include Pauesia sp. for the control of Cinara cronartii, various biological control agents for the control of Phoracantha species, Deladenus siricidicola and Ibalia leucospoides for the control of S. noctilio (Figure 2), Selitrichodes neserifor the control of L. invasa, and Cleruchoides noackae for the control of T. peregrinus.^6,67-70Biological control remains the most effective option currently available to manage the impact of damaging introduced forest insects.^40,71

Various strategies have been used to reduce the impact of diseases in South African plantations.¹⁰ Silvicultural methods such as thinning to reduce stress and the removal of dead and dying plant material from plantations are commonly applied for both insect and pathogen management. But the most commonly used approach is planting resistant species or clones in areas prone to infection by fungal pathogens. The most notable and long-standing example is found in the case of the shoot and dieback pathogen Diplodia sapinea. This fungus is opportunistic and infections typically occur on stressed trees, as mentioned above. The most commonly encountered of these stresses is that associated with hail damage.^49,50 Thus, highly susceptible species such as P. radiata and P. patula have been confined to areas where the risk of hail is minimal. Likewise, damage due to pruning produces wounds for infection and, at least for some time, stress on the trees, which often results in infection. Thus, recommendations for pruning at times of the year when D. sapinea is unlikely to infect⁵⁰ have been implemented.

By far the most commonly used and effective means to deal with disease in plantations is to establish trees that are highly tolerant or even resistant to infection.^10,72 As mentioned previously, this approach has been very effective in reducing the damage caused by various pathogens. Particularly for Eucalyptus, the emergence of vegetative propagation and, thus, clonal forestry has had a remarkable impact on the ability to manage disease problems. Here, the selection of clones of single species, and increasingly hybrids, has allowed forestry companies to avoid disease problems (Figure 2).

Opportunities to avoid disease problems by deploying Eucalyptus clones with low levels of susceptibility first emerged at the onset of the serious canker diseases caused by Chrysoporthe austroafricana and Teratosphaeria zuluense (=Coniothyrium zuluense). Over a 20-year period, the diseases caused by these serious pathogens have been reduced to a tolerable level.^10,34 This has necessitated extensive screening trials.^73-75 Planting resistant genotypes is also important for the control of insect pests, where host resistance coupled with biological control is likely to be the main strategy for the management of pests such as L. invasa⁴⁵and G. brimblecombei⁴⁵.

In the longer term, understanding the biology and global movement of insect pests and pathogens affecting plantation trees, including those in South Africa, will be facilitated by molecular genetic tools that are rapidly emerging for this purpose.^72,76 Sequencing of the genomes of trees such as Eucalyptus⁷⁷as well as those of important Eucalyptus and Pinus pathogens⁷⁸⁸¹, pests^61,82 and their biological control agents⁸³, is already providing important insights. Ultimately, DNA-based genetic markers will also be produced to detect traits such as susceptibility to a particular disease based on small tissue samples.⁷²

 

Looking ahead

South Africa has had a long history of dealing with insect pests and diseases affecting plantation-grown trees. Initially, most work in this field was done by small groups of scientists working in research institutes (government and private) or at universities. Up until the early 1970s, the larger proportion of the forest plantation patrimony was in government hands and support for forest pathology and entomology came primarily from government. Later, as the private forestry industry began to grow, and together with growing numbers of emerging insect pest and disease problems, the need for a more unified forest protection resource has also grown. This need has been filled largely by the Tree Protection Co-operative Programme established in 1990 and representing a collaborative venture between university and private forest owners, together with financial support by various government funding agencies. In more recent years, private companies have also begun to support some field-level research and development 'in house' in order to increase their capacity to deal with the increasing threats due to pests and diseases. The Eucalyptus and Pine Pathogen Interactions Programme, together with the Forest Molecular Genetics Programme, is also increasingly supporting gene and genome based approaches to pest and pathogen management.

In the early 1960s, at a time when plantation forestry based on non-native species, particularly in the tropics and southern hemisphere, was growing rapidly, the pioneer South African forest researcher Dr J.A. Lückhoff made the point that South African forestry had been particularly fortunate in not having been severely affected by tree pests and pathogens.⁸⁴ Given the fact that there had been a number of serious disease and pest problems even at that time, Lückhoff's statement might better be interpreted as a recognition that the forest resource could easily have been much more seriously affected. The pool of potentially damaging species is vast, and only a fraction of possible invaders have established to date. If one considers the situation today with the growing numbers of new pests and pathogens that continue to appear, there is little doubt that these factors will challenge plantation forestry greatly in the future.

One of the reasons that plantation forestry has not been devastated by insects and diseases must be attributed to the fact that a wide variety of trees has been grown in South Africa over time, changing species and clones as disease and pest problems have arisen. This has provided a buffering effect and the absence of an undue reliance on any particular species over space and time. The available variability of planting stock to deal with changing pest and disease problems has come about, not so much as a result of careful planning to minimise risk, but rather due to the fortuitous fact that South Africa is a large country with hugely variable climatic and edaphic zones that are not suitable to any single species of Pinus, Eucalyptus or Acacia. Yet, in terms of risk, continuous attention must be paid to ensure the maintenance of a genetically variable, yet manageable planting stock. The heavy reliance on P. patula and the potential loss of this species due to the pitch canker pathogen provides a strong warning signal in this regard.

Intensive commercial forestry practices such as those employed in South Africa can, of themselves, elevate the threat of damage due to insect pests and pathogens. Large-scale planting of single species, and especially blocks of identical clones of trees, can allow populations of insects and pathogens to build up rapidly. Planting disease- or insect-tolerant clones can also produce genetic adaptation, resulting in new and potentially more damaging pest or pathogen strains in the environment. Likewise, short rotations of trees planted on the same sites can result in the build-up of populations of soil-borne insects and microbial pathogens.

While plantation forestry based on non-native species might be considered a relatively high-risk enterprise, there are also many options to combat pest and pathogen problems. New technologies continue to emerge that promise to improve our ability to deal with these problems.⁷² The introduction of vegetative propagation and the ability to hybridise between species has thus provided many examples of solutions to pest and pathogen problems.¹⁰ Molecular genetic techniques which have made it possible to 'fingerprint' clones and thus to select and more carefully deploy planting stock, have already had a significant positive effect on dealing with diseases and insect problems.^10,72 In the longer term, there seems little doubt that genetic modification will become an important tool for this purpose. In effect, the intensive propagation of fast-growing trees represents a conflict between pests, pathogens and the successful production of timber and timber products. Recognising the challenge is perhaps the most important part of overcoming the enemy and ensuring forest plantation sustainability.

Native forests and woody ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to invasive alien pests and pathogens. Once a serious invasive alien organism becomes established in these heterogeneous and sensitive environments, there is little chance of recovery. There are many examples, particularly in the boreal region, that illustrate this fact.^85,86 Although there are some very worrying examples, South Africa has been relatively fortunate in not having been severely affected by disease problems in natural woody ecosystems. Unfortunately, this situation is also likely to change, well illustrated by the recent report of the polyphagous shot hole borer Euwallacea fornicatus²⁸, a stem canker disease of Rapanea melanophloeos⁸⁷and the recent arrival of the myrtle rust pathogen Austropuccinia psidii⁸⁸. Austropuccinia psidii is likely to cause serious issues for Eucalyptus forestry in South Africa, but these problems can be resolved through breeding and selection. It will most likely also severely impact some native Myrtaceae to varying degrees, and may even drive highly susceptible species such as Heteropyxis natalensis to extinction. Euwallacea fornicatus might have even more serious consequences, and might also threaten certain species with extinction should a biological control management option not be found.

Every effort must be made to strengthen quarantine measures and to ensure that new and damaging insect pests and pathogens of trees are not accidentally introduced into South Africa. At the same time, the capacity to deal with pests and pathogens after their introduction should be strengthened. Yet, as history has shown, even the best quarantine does not provide complete protection. Given that the current quarantine systems are far from effective, South African forestry is likely to have to deal with many more serious pests and pathogens affecting forests and forestry in the future.

 

Acknowlegements

We are grateful to the members of the Tree Protection Co-operative Programme, the DSI/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology, the Department of Environmental Affairs, Rural Development, Forestry and Fisheries (previously Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries), and the University of Pretoria for sustaining one of the world's strongest programmes focused on the health of forest trees. This support provides some confidence in ensuring the long-term sustainability of forests and forestry in South Africa.

 

Competing interests

We declare that there are no competing interests.

 

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualisation and writing of the article; M.J.W. produced the initial draft.

 

References

1. Owen DL, Van der Zel DA. Trees, forests and plantations in southern Africa. In: South African forestry handbook. Pretoria: Southern African Institute of Forestry; 2000. p. 3-8.         [ Links ]

2. Burgess TI, Wingfield MJ. Pathogens on the move: A 100-year global experiment with planted eucalypts. BioScience. 2017;67:14-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw146        [ Links ]

3. Crous CJ, Burgess TI, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ. Ecological disequilibrium drives insect pest and pathogen accumulation in non-native trees. AoB PLANTS. 2017;9, plw081. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw081        [ Links ]

4. Steenkamp ET, Wingfield MJ. Global forest research, science education and community service positively impacted by a unique Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology. South Forests. 2013;75:71-80. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2013.800757        [ Links ]

5. Geertsema H. A historical review of forest entomology in South Africa. In: Jordaan JV, editor. Saasveld 50: A miscellany of articles and photographs published in 1982 to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the College for Foresters, Saasveld. Pretoria: Department of Environment Affairs; 1982. p. 199-206.         [ Links ]

6. Webb D van V. Forest and timber entomology in the Republic of South Africa. Entomology Memoir No. 34. Pretoria: Department of Agricultural Technical Services; 1974.         [ Links ]

7. Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Roux J, Wingfield BD. Worldwide movement of forest fungi, especially in the tropics and southern hemisphere. BioScience. 2001;51:134-140. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0134:WMOEFF]2.0.CO;2        [ Links ]

8. Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Hurley BP Coutinho TA, Wingfield BD, Roux J. Eucalypt pests and diseases: Growing threats to plantation productivity. South Forests. 2008;70:139-144. https://doi.org/10.2989/SOUTH.FOR.2008.70.2.9.537        [ Links ]

9. Wingfield MJ, Roux J, Wingfield BD. Insect pests and pathogens of Australian acacias grown as non-natives - an experiment in biogeography with far-reaching consequences. Divers Distrib. 2011;17:968-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00786.x        [ Links ]

10. Wingfield MJ, Roux J, Slippers B, Hurley BP Garnas J, Myburg AA, et al. Established and new technologies reduce increasing pest and pathogen threats to eucalypt plantations. For Ecol Manag. 2013;301:35-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.002        [ Links ]

11. Wingfield MJ, Brockerhoff EG, Wingfield BD, Slippers B. Planted forest health: The need for a global strategy. Science. 2015;349:832-836. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6674        [ Links ]

12. Roux J, Hurley BP Wingfield MJ. Diseases and pests of eucalypts, pines and wattle. In: Forestry handbook. 5th ed. Pretoria: Southern African Institute of Forestry; 2012. p. 303-336.         [ Links ]

13. Doidge EM. The South African fungi and lichens to the end of 1945. Bothalia. 1950;5:1-1094.         [ Links ]

14. Doidge EM, Bottomley AM, Van der Plank JE, Pauer GD. A revised list of plant diseases in South Africa. Department of Agriculture Science Bulletin. 1953;346:1-122.         [ Links ]

15. Crous PW, Phillips AJL, Baxter AP. Phytopathogenic fungi from South Africa. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University Department of Plant Pathology Press; 2000.         [ Links ]

16. Von Broembsen SL. Distribution of Phytophthora cinnamomi in rivers of the South-Western Cape Province. Phytophylactica. 1984;16:227-229. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA03701263_874        [ Links ]

17. Von Broembsen SL, Kruger FJ. Phytophthora cinnamomi associated with mortality of native vegetation in South Africa. Plant Dis. 1985;69:715-717. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-69-715        [ Links ]

18. Nagel JH, Gryzenhout M, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ. The occurrence and impact of Phytophthora on the African continent. In: Lamour K, editor. Phytophthora: A global perspective. Wallingford: CAB International; 2013. p. 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640938.0204        [ Links ]

19. Knox-Davies PS, Van Wyk PS, Marasas WFO. Diseases of Proteas and their control in the South-Western Cape. Acta Hortic. 1986;185:189-200. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1986.185.20        [ Links ]

20. Linde C, Drenth A, Wingfield MJ. Gene and genotypic diversity of Phytophthora cinnamomi in South Africa and Australia revealed by DNA polymorphisms. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1999;105:667-680. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008755532135        [ Links ]

21. Coetzee MPA, Wingfield BD, Harrington TC, Steimel J, Coutinho TA, Wingfield MJ. The root rot fungus Armillaria mellea introduced into South Africa by early Dutch settlers. Mol Ecol. 2001;10:387-396. https://doi.org/10.1046Zj.1365-294x.2001.01187.x        [ Links ]

22. Coetzee MPA, Wingfield BD, Roux J, Crous PW, Denman S, Wingfield MJ. Discovery of two northern hemisphere Armillaria species on Proteaceae in South Africa. Plant Pathol. 2003;52:604-612. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00879.x        [ Links ]

23. Coetzee MPA, Musasira NY Roux J, Roets F, Van der Merwe NA, Wingfield MJ. Armillaria root rot spreading into a natural woody ecosystem in South Africa. Plant Pathol. 2018;67:883-891. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12804        [ Links ]

24. Sakalidis M, Slippers B, Wingfield BD, Hardy GE St. J, Burgess TI. The challenge of understanding the origin, pathways and extent of fungal invasions: Global populations of the Neofusicoccum parvum-N. ribis species complex. Divers Distrib. 2013;19:873-883. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12030        [ Links ]

25. Pérez G, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD, Carnegie AJ, Burgess TI. Cryptic species, native populations and biological invasions by a eucalypt forest pathogen. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:4452-4471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05714.x        [ Links ]

26. Mehl J, Wingfield MJ, Roux J, Slippers B. Invasive everywhere? Phylogeographic analysis of the globally distributed tree pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Forests. 2017;8:145. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8050145        [ Links ]

27. Jami F, Marincowitz S, Slippers B, Crous PW, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, et al. Botryosphaeriaceae associated with Acacia heterophylla (La Reunion) and Acacia koa (Hawaii). Fungal Biol. 2019;12:783-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2019.07.001        [ Links ]

28. Paap T, De Beer ZW, Migliorini D, Nel WJ, Wingfield MJ. The polyphagous shot hole borer (PSHB) and its fungal symbiont Fusarium euwallaceae: A new invasion in South Africa. Australas Plant Pathol. 2018;47:231-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-018-0545-0        [ Links ]

29. Hurley BP, Garnas J, Wingfield MJ, Branco M, Richardson DM, Slippers B. Increasing numbers and intercontinental spread of invasive insects on eucalypts. Biol Invasions. 2016;18:921-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1081-x        [ Links ]

30. Peringuey L. Insects injurious to forest trees in South Africa. Trans S Afr Phil Soc. 1887;4:15-25.         [ Links ]

31. Coetzee MPA, Wingfield BD, Coutinho TA, Wingfield MJ. Identification of the causal agent of Armillaria root rot of Pinus species in South Africa. Mycologia. 2000;92:777-785. https://doi-org.uplib.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00275514.2000.12061218        [ Links ]

32. Bottomley AM. Some of the more important diseases affecting timber plantations in the Transvaal. S Afr J Sci. 1937;33:373-376.         [ Links ]

33. Hurley BP, Slippers B, Sathyapala S, Wingfield MJ. Challenges to planted forest health in developing economies. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:3273-3285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1488-z        [ Links ]

34. Wingfield MJ. Increasing threat of diseases to exotic plantation forests in the southern hemisphere: Lessons from Cryphonectria canker. Australas Plant Pathol. 2003;32:133-139. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP03024        [ Links ]

35. Gryzenhout M, Myburg H, Van der Merwe NA, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. Chrysoporthe, a new genus to accommodate Cryphonectria cubensis. Stud Mycol. 2004;50:119-142.         [ Links ]

36. Heath RN, Gryzenhout M, Roux J, Wingfield MJ. Discovery of Chrysoporthe cubensis on native Syzygium species in South Africa. Plant Dis. 2006;90:433-438. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-0433        [ Links ]

37. Roux J, Heath RN, Labuschagne L, Nkuekam GK, Wingfield MJ. Occurrence of the wattle wilt pathogen, Ceratocystis albifundus on native South African trees. For Pathol. 2007;3:292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2007.00507.x        [ Links ]

38. Jami F, Wingfield MJ, Gryzenhout M, Slippers B. Diversity of tree-infecting Botryosphaeriales on native and non-native trees in South Africa and Namibia. Australas Plant Pathol. 2017;46:529-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-017-0516-x        [ Links ]

39. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0        [ Links ]

40. Garnas JR, Hurley BP, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ. Biological control of forest plantation pests in an interconnected world requires greater international focus. Int J Pest Manage. 2012;58:211-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2012.698764        [ Links ]

41. Mapondera TS, Burgess T, Matsuki M, Oberprieler RG. Identification and molecular phylogenetics of the cryptic species of the Gonipterus scutellatus complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Gonipterini). Aust J Entomol. 2012;51:175-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2011.00853.x        [ Links ]

42. Tooke FGC. The eucalyptus snout beetle, Gonipterus scutellatus Gyll.: A study of its ecology and control by biological means. Entomology Memoirs Union of South Africa Department of Agriculture vol 3. Pretoria : Division of Entomology; 1953.         [ Links ]

43. Schroder ML, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Hurley BP. Invasion history and management of eucalyptus snout beetles in the Gonipterus scutellatus species complex. J Pest Sci. 2020;93:11-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-019-01156-y        [ Links ]

44. Jacobs DH, Neser S. Thaumastocoris australicus Kirkaldy (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae): A new insect arrival in South Africa, damaging to eucalyptus trees. S Afr J Sci. 2005;101:233-236.         [ Links ]

45. Dittrich-Schröder G, Wingfield MJ, Hurley BP Slippers B. Diversity in Eucalyptus susceptibility to the gall-forming wasp Leptocybe invasa. Agr Forest Entomol. 2012;14:419-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2012.00583.x        [ Links ]

46. Bush SJ, Slippers B, Neser S, Harney M, Dittrich-Schröder G, Hurley BP. Six recently recorded Australian insects associated with Eucalyptus in South Africa. Afr Entomol. 2016;24:539-544. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.024.0539        [ Links ]

47. Fisher J. Two fungus diseases of coniferous trees. Agr J Union S Africa. 1912;3:389-391.         [ Links ]

48. Laughton EM. The incidence of fungal diseases on timber trees in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 1937;33:377-382.         [ Links ]

49. Zwolinski JB, Swart WJ, Wingfield MJ. Economic impact of a post-hail outbreak of dieback induced by Sphaeropsis sapinea. Eur J For Pathol. 1990;20:405-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1990.tb01155.x        [ Links ]

50. Swart WJ, Wingfield MJ. Biology and control of Sphaeropsis sapinea on Pinus species in South Africa. Plant Dis. 1991;75:761-766. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-75-0761        [ Links ]

51. Hunter G, Roux J, Wingfield BD, Crous PW, Wingfield MJ. Mycosphaerella species causing leaf diseases in South African Eucalyptus plantations. Mycol Res. 2004;108:672-681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204009864        [ Links ]

52. Oates CN, Külheim C, Myburg AA, Slippers B, Naidoo S. The transcriptome and terpene profile of Eucalyptus grandis reveals mechanisms of defence against the insect pest, Leptocybe invasa. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:1418-1428. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv064        [ Links ]

53. Viljoen A, Wingfield MJ, Marasas WFO. First report of Fusarium subglutinans f.sp. pini on pine seedlings in South Africa. Plant Dis. 1994;78:309-312. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0309        [ Links ]

54. Wingfield MJ, Hammerbacher A, Ganley RJ, Steenkamp ET, Gordon TR, Wingfield BD, et al. Pitch canker caused by Fusarium circinatum - a growing threat to pine plantations and forests worldwide. Australas Plant Pathol. 2008;37:319-334. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP08036        [ Links ]

55. Coutinho TA, Steenkamp ET, Mongwaketsi K, Wilmot M, Wingfield MJ. First outbreak of pitch canker in a South African pine plantation. Australas Plant Pathol. 2007;36:256-261. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP07017        [ Links ]

56. Mitchel RG, Steenkamp ET, Coutinho TA, Wingfield MJ. The pitch canker fungus, Fusarium circinatum: Implications for South African forestry. South Forests. 2011;73:1-13. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2011.574828        [ Links ]

57. Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Wingfield BD, Barnes I. The unified framework for biological invasions: A forest fungal pathogen perspective. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:3201-3214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1450-0        [ Links ]

58. Lombaert E, Guillemaud T, Cornuet J-M, Malausa T, Facon B, Estoup A. Bridgehead effect in the worldwide invasion of the biocontrol Harlequin ladybird. PLoS ONE. 2010;5, e9743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009743        [ Links ]

59. Hurley BP Slippers B, Wingfield MJ. A critical review of control of the alien invasive woodwasp, Sirexnoctilio, in the southern hemisphere, with a special emphasis on biological control. Agric For Entomol. 2007;9:159-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007.00340.x        [ Links ]

60. Garnas J, Auger-Rozenberg MA, Roques A, Bertelsmeier AC, Wingfield MJ, Saccaggi DL, et al. Complex patterns of global spread in invasive insects: Eco-evolutionary and management consequences. Biol Invasions. 2016;18:935-952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1082-9        [ Links ]

61. Boissin E, Hurley B, Wingfield MJ, Vasaitis R, Stenlid J, Davis C, et al. Retracing the routes of introduction of invasive species: The case of the Sirex noctilio woodwasp. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:5728-5744. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12065        [ Links ]

62. Slippers B, Hurley BP Wingfield MJ. Sirex woodwasp: A model for evolving management paradigms of invasive forest pests. Annu Rev Entomol. 2015;60:601-619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021118        [ Links ]

63. Paap T, Burgess TI, Wingfield MJ. Urban trees: Bridge-heads for forest pest invasions and sentinels for early detection. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:3515-3526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1595-x        [ Links ]

64. Hulbert JM, Agne MC, Burgess TI, Roets F, Wingfield MJ. Urban environments provide opportunities for early detections of Phytophthora invasions. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:3629-3644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1585-z        [ Links ]

65. Hulbert JM, Paap T, Burgess TI, Roets F, Wingfield MJ. Botanical gardens provide valuable baseline Phytophthora diversity data. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;46:126461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126461        [ Links ]

66. Tooke FGC. Investigations on the biology of Euproctis terminais Walk., the pine brown tail moth and its control by aeroplane and ground dusting. Union of South Africa, Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Science Bulletin no. 179; 1938.         [ Links ]

67. Kfir R, Kirsten F, Van Rensburg NJ. Pauesia sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae): A parasite introduced into South Africa for biological control of the black pine aphid, Cinara cronartii (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol. 1985;14:597-601. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/14.5.597        [ Links ]

68. Tribe GD, Cilliè JJ. The spread of Sirex noctilio Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in South African pine plantations and the introduction and establishment of its biological control agents. Afr Entomol. 2004;12:9-17.         [ Links ]

69. Kelly J, La Salle J, Harney M, Dittrich-Schröder G, Hurley BP. Selitrichodes neseri n. sp., a new parasitoid of the eucalyptus gall wasp Leptocybe invasa Fisher & La Salle (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae: Tetrastichinae). Zootaxa. 2012;3333:50-57.         [ Links ]

70. Mutitu EK, Garnas J, Hurley BP, Wingfied MJ, Harney M, Bush SJ, et al. Biology and rearing of Cleruchoides noackae (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid for the biological control of Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae). J Econ Entomol. 2013;106:1979-1985. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC13135        [ Links ]

71. Kenis M, Hurley BP, Hajek AE, Cock MJW. Classical biological control of insect pests of trees: Facts and figures. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:3401-3417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1414-4        [ Links ]

72. Naidoo S, Slippers B, Plett JM, Coles D, Oates CN. The road to resistance in forest trees. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00273        [ Links ]

73. Van Heerden SW, Wingfield MJ. Effect of environment on the response of Eucalyptus clones to inoculation with Cryphonectria cubensis. For Pathol. 2002;32:395-402. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0329.2002.00300.x        [ Links ]

74. Roux J, Eisenberg B, Kanzler A, Nel A, Coetzee V, Kietzka E, et al. Testing of selected South African Pinus hybrids and families for tolerance to the pitch canker pathogen, Fusarium circinatum. New For. 2007;33:109-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9017-4        [ Links ]

75. Mitchel RG, Wingfield MJ, Hodge GR, Steenkamp RT, Coutinho TA. Selection of Pinus spp. in South Africa for tolerance to infection by the pitch canker fungus. New For. 2012;43:473-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-011-9293-5        [ Links ]

76. Aylward J, Steenkamp ET, Dreyer LL, Roets F, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. A plant pathology perspective of fungal genome sequencing. IMA Fungus. 2017;8:1-15. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.01        [ Links ]

77. Myburg AA, Grattapaglia D, Tuskan GA, Hellsten U, Hayes RD, Grimwood J, et al. The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. Nature. 2014;510:356-362. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13308.pdf        [ Links ]

78. Wingfield BD, Steenkamp ET, Santana QC, Coetzee MPA, Bam S, Barnes I, et al. First fungal genome sequence from Africa: A preliminary analysis. S Afr J Sci. 2012;108:1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v108i1/2.537        [ Links ]

79. Bihon W, Wingfield M,J Slippers B, Duong TA, Wingfield BD. MAT gene idiomorphs suggest a heterothallic sexual cycle in a predominantly asexual and important pine pathogen. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;62:55-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2013.10.013        [ Links ]

80. Nagel JH, Wingfield MJ, Slippers B. Evolution of the mating types and mating strategies in prominent genera in the Botryospheriaceae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2018;114:24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2018.03.003        [ Links ]

81. Aylward J, Havenga M, Dreyer LL, Roets F, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. Genomic characterization of mating type loci and mating type distribution in two apparently asexual plantation tree pathogens. Plant Pathol. 2020;69(1):28-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13094        [ Links ]

82. Dittrich-Schröder G, Hoareau TB, Hurley BP Wingfield MJ, Lawson S, Nahrung H, et al. Population genetic analyses of complex global insect invasions in managed landscapes: A Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera) case study. Biol Invasions. 2018;20:2395-2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1709-0        [ Links ]

83. Fitza KNE, Garnas JR, Lombardero MJ, Ayres MP Krivak-Tetly FE, Ahumada R, et al. The global diversity of Deladenus siricidicola in native and non-native populations. Biol Control. 2019;132:57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.01.014        [ Links ]

84. Lückhoff HA. The natural distribution, growth and botanical variation of Pinus caribaea Mor. and its cultivation in South Africa. Ann Univ Stellenbosch. 1964; 39:1-160.         [ Links ]

85. Wingfield MJ, Coetzee MPA, Crous PW, Six D, Wingfield BD. Fungal phoenix rising from the ashes? IMA Fungus. 2010;1:149-153. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2010.01.02.06        [ Links ]

86. Wingfield MJ, Slippers B, Roux J, Wingfield BD. Fifty years of tree pest and pathogen invasions, increasingly threatening world forests. In: Richardson DM, editor. Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444329988.ch8        [ Links ]

87. Chen SF, Wingfield MJ, Roets F, Roux J. A serious canker disease caused by Immersiporthe knoxdavesiana gen. et sp. nov. (Cryphonectriaceae) on native Rapanea melanophloes in South Africa. Plant Pathol. 2012;62:667-678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02671.x        [ Links ]

88. Roux J, Greyling I, Coutinho TA, Verleur M, Wingfield MJ. The myrtle rust pathogen, Puccinia psidii, discovered in Africa. IMA Fungus. 2013;4:155-159. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.01.14        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Brenda Wingfield
Email: Brenda.Wingfield@fabi.up.ac.za

Received: 07 Mar. 2020
Revised: 25 June 2020
Accepted: 29 June 2020
Published: 26 Nov. 2020

 

 

Editors: Teresa Coutinho, Salmina Mokgehle
Funding: None