SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.116 issue7-8Forest restoration or propaganda?: The need for Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) scores to uphold research integrityA few hours in the Seychelles with Alex du Toit in 1938 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

S. Afr. j. sci. vol.116 n.7-8 Pretoria Jul./Aug. 2020

http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8112 

RESEARCH LETTERS

 

Aerobiology in South Africa: A new hope!

 

 

Linus AjikahI, II; Frank H. NeumannI; Dilys BermanIII, IV; Jonny PeterIII, IV

IEvolutionary Studies Institute and School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
IIDepartment of Plants and Ecological Studies, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
IIIAllergy and Immunology Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
IVDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Pollen and fungal spores (aerospora) are the major atmospheric bioaerosols. Aerospora occurrence and concentration vary by geographical region and blossoming period, and with meteorological factors. Allergic respiratory diseases affect about 20 million South Africans, with pollen and fungal allergens amongst the leading triggers. Asthma triggered by aerospora can be life threatening; allergic rhinitis causes considerable morbidity and carries financial implications for individuals and health systems. Thus, knowledge about geographical variation, seasonal timing and intensity, as well as annual aerospora fluctuations in South Africa, where climate and vegetation are exceptionally diverse, is essential for effective diagnosis and treatment of allergies. Unfortunately, there is a lack of continuous aeropalynological data from South Africa. The longest annual monitoring exists for Cape Town (~20 years), with almost no data out of the Cape since the 1990s, and many parts of South Africa have never been monitored. In this brief review, we highlight the cross-disciplinary need for strengthened and expanded continuous aeropalynological study in South Africa, the history of efforts to date, and the introduction of the interdisciplinary South African Pollen Network (SAPNET). SAPNET was launched in seven major cities in August 2019 in order to monitor weekly variations of aerospora, and provide online data for allergy sufferers and health-care providers (www.pollencount.co.za) with the aim to establish regional pollen calendars.
Significance:
The significance of aerobiology as the study of airborne organic particles which include pollen, spores of fungi and cryptogams, plant hair, insect remains etc. especially as agents of allergic rhinitis (commonly known as hay fever) is outlined. Cases of allergic rhinitis are globally increasing due to current climate change. Very limited pollen monitoring data are available for South Africa; such data are a prerequisite for establishing pollen calendars to help medical practitioners and allergy sufferers. SAPNET (South African Pollen Network) addresses this lack of data. Since August 2019, seven 7-day volumetric spore traps have been operating in South Africa in major cities, and are continuously gathering data about the pollen and spore contents in a country which is highly affected by allergic rhinitis

Keywords: aerospora, pollen monitoring network, pollen allergy, public health


 

 

The problem

Allergic rhinitis affects 20-30% of South Africans, with co-morbid asthma in 20% of cases. Pollen and house dust mite allergens are the commonest triggers of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Most of the common global aeroallergens are found in South Africa, due to a variety of climates and biomes.1 Non-native trees have been planted in South Africa to produce timber, for example eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) and pine (Pinus spp.) trees, or because of their ornamental value, for example London plane tree (Platanus acerifolia). Many non-native trees have undesired effects, such as fire proneness or pollen allergenicity.2 Global warming is responsible for alarming changes, including increased total pollen amount, earlier shifts of pollen seasons with levels expected to be four times higher by 2050, invasion of allergenic plants with resultant increases in allergic sensitisation, and increased amounts of allergenic protein in pollen.3 The changing environment, the major health ramifications and the biodiversity of South Africa underline a need for widespread pollen monitoring. In this paper, we follow Galán et al.4 in regard to aerobiological terminology.

There are more than 879 active pollen monitoring stations globally.5 Pollen monitoring coverage is biased towards the northern hemisphere; Europe has more than 500 spore traps. Pollen monitoring in Africa was, until August 2019, restricted to four spore traps in northern Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia), four spore traps in western Africa (Nigeria, Benin) and one spore trap in southern Africa (Cape Town, South Africa) (Figure 15) - the only location of continuous monitoring in South Africa.6 Monitoring in the Cape has shown large seasonal variability and increasing pollen productivity; changes in other parts of the country were until recently unknown.6

 

 

Aerospora are globally increasingly inducing allergic respiratory disorders such as asthma, rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis and atopic dermatitis, especially in arid to semi-arid regions in the world.7 Atopic individuals have a genetic predisposition to produce IgE antibodies against usually harmless environmental proteins (allergens). Several factors influence the development of new allergic sensitisations, including: (1) allergen exposure (large geographical pattern in aeroallergen profiles); (2) nature of the allergenic proteins, e.g. certain aeroallergens are considerably more allergenic; and, increasingly, (3) the co-factor of air populates such as particulate matters NO2, ozone, CO and SO2.8

A major challenge for aerobiologists in South Africa is the diverse vegetation and climate across its nine biomes (Figure 2) - ranging from the arid Karoo to the humid coast of KwaZulu-Natal in the East and from the cool Drakensberg grasslands to the wet, windy Cape.9,10 The Cape Floristic Region, which consists of the Fynbos and Succulent Karoo Biomes, illustrates this diversity, with its approximately 9000 flowering plants11 (Figure 2) compared to Europe which harbours about 10 600 flowering plants12. Other South African biomes are the tropical Indian Ocean Coastal Belt, the temperate Grassland, and the hot Savanna Biome which represents the southern extension of the largest biome of Africa (Figure 2).10 These different environments have distinct flora and include, next to indigenous vegetation, alien plants from Europe, North and South America and Australasia (548 taxa).13 Aerospora diversity is associated with distinct allergy patterns, and it is inaccurate to apply aerospora data from one biome to another; multiple monitoring stations are the only option for understanding regional aerospora diversity.

 

 

What we do know? History of aerobiology in South Africa

Aerobiological studies in South Africa began with Davidson's studies in 1941 on grasses in Johannesburg. Aerobiological studies in South Africa are summarised in Table 1. Ordman and Etter14,15 contributed to the understanding of pollinosis in South Africa. Hawke and Meadows16 studied seasonal allergens and their morphology by observing, measuring and documenting aeroallergens in 1945-1970 in some areas of South Africa, and unravelling some of the unknown elements of the environmental allergens that trigger allergies. Potato dextrose agar settle plates and Durham (gravity) spore traps were used to collect pollen and to culture fungi by exposing a sticky slide at the top of a three-storey building in Johannesburg. Grasses were identified as the most important pollen allergens in South Africa.17 The late winter peak pollination period for Cupressaceae (cypress) pollen in Cape Town and Johannesburg was first documented by Ordman14. He identified Prosopis (mesquite) as an important allergenic pollen in South West Africa (Namibia). Ordman18 hypothesised a link between climate and respiratory allergy, observing that humidity in coastal areas is a key factor in perennial respiratory allergy. This discovery was remarkable considering that house dust mites had yet to be identified.

Early pioneering contributions were followed by a second wave of allergists and aerobiologists. In 1981, Weinberg et al.19 successively upgraded and operated a 7-day volumetric spore trap in the Cape. By 1985, the Air Pollution Department in Cape Town added pollen sampling to their Air Quality Monitoring Programme, developing a partnership with the Red Cross Allergy Department. This allowed for pollen monitoring in different suburbs of Cape Town and provision of data to the Allergy Clinic, which treated patients from many areas of the Cape Town metropole.6 Cadman and Dames20 added insights and observations on pollen seasonality and profiles of Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal through pollen monitoring from 1987 to 1991. Potter and colleagues21 and Dames and Cadman22 concluded that Alternaria was amongst the most prominent fungal spore perennially, both in Cape Town and Durban. In 2008, Berman6 set up a 3-year aerobiological survey for an Environmental Impact Assessment commission in Mpumalanga. Here, differences in seasonality of aerospora in the Lowveld were tracked, and differed from those in the Cape. Grass pollen peaked in January, and tree pollen was low and dominated by non-native trees (Platanus spp.), oak (Quercus spp.) and eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.). High levels of fungal spores were observed, probably due to increased humidity. Berman23 provided a profile for all aerospora for respiratory diseases at sites close to a residential area. Berman24 continued to conduct research in different parts of South Africa to monitor aerospora for clinical studies.

Aerobiological studies outlined above have provided important insights into the most allergenic aerospora in South Africa. Some of these insights are given below.

At the Cape, the grass pollen season is September-March, with peaks in October. On the Highveld, the grass pollen season is longer (September-May); grass is regarded as a 'perennial' allergen.1 In Gauteng, a noticeable variation was reported between the models for both grass pollen and spores for Johannesburg and Pretoria due to meteorological factors.25 Allergenic grass pollens in South Africa are Eragrostis curvula, kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) and buffalo grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum).1,23Zea mays is problematic in the Free State Province.

Unlike in Europe, tree pollen is a relatively uncommon cause of seasonal allergy in South Africa, although further studies are needed as allergenic pollen of non-native trees such as oak (Quercus spp.), Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens), plane trees (Platanus spp.), and mulberry (Morus spp.) are a 'growing problem', especially in the cities where they are planted as ornamentals or fruit trees1,23 (own unpublished data).

Weeds are arguably a minor problem, although the invader plantain Plantago spp. as well as several, mostly indigenous, members of the daisy family are known to cause allergies. 1,23

Fungal spores are globally the most abundant aerospora. In South Africa, Cladosporium, Alternaria, Aspergillus and Epicoccum are the most important.1,23

These insights provided a basic understanding; however, many of these studies were conducted decades ago and environments might have changed. Furthermore, Table 1 and Figure 2 show that aerospora concentrations in many South African provinces and cities have never been monitored (Northern Cape, North West and Limpopo Provinces), and even for well-monitored areas, uninterrupted data are limited. There is an urgent need for up-to-date monitoring data to address knowledge gaps including: (1) the main allergenic aerospora in many areas/regions/biomes; as well as the (2) flowering times and (3) peak concentrations of important allergens.

 

The way forward: South African Pollen Network and Monitoring Programme (SAPNET)

The need for a pollen monitoring network in South Africa has been outlined above. Already in 2007, the necessity of a national network of spore traps in South Africa as 'a collaborative exercise between allergists and the botany or palynology departments of the local universities' was underlined.23 A network of this scale requires substantial funding; a strong, dedicated team of collaborators; and widespread public and institutional support. SAPNET was launched in August 2019 at the University of Cape Town Lung Institute and 7-day volumetric Burkard spore traps were placed in seven major South African cities (Bloemfontein, Cape Town, Durban, Johannesburg, Kimberley, Port Elizabeth, Pretoria; Figure 2). This new cycle of monitoring, which covers several biomes and includes major population centres, is a necessity for South Africa, considering the growing and mobile population, climate and environmental changes and the expansion and likely worsening of aeroallergen-triggered allergic diseases. This will provide insight into the high-low risk periods for sensitised individuals through weekly online updates (http://www.pollencount.co.za/), as well as the development of updated pollen calendars for major cities and provinces spanning different biomes. Information about allergenic aerospora will assist health-care providers, including general practitioners, in making clinical diagnoses and decisions. It will help pollen allergy sufferers to identify plants which have the tendency to produce allergenic pollen in their environment and adopt prophylactic measures as advised on the website.

 

Future goals

1.Expansion of SAPNET into northern provinces (Mpumalanga, Limpopo, North West) and neighbouring countries.

2.Coverage of rural areas in South Africa, including townships in the mining belt of Mpumalanga and other, highly industrialised areas or along major transport routes where - due to high air pollution - the risk of asthma, often triggered by pollen allergy24-26, is high.

3.Collaboration with above-mentioned northern and western African nations (see Figure 1), as well as southern hemisphere pollen monitoring networks.

4.Training of aerobiologists and knowledge exchange with other countries, where pollen monitoring is established, with the aim to improve aerobiological methods in South Africa.

 

Acknowledgements

SAPNET acknowledges all investigators (in alphabetical order): Marion Bamford, Prosper Bande, Angela Effiom, Kevwe Eweto, Moteng Moseri and Nikiwe Ndlovu (Johannesburg); Rebecca Garland, Robin Green, Juanette John and Seneca Naidoo (Pretoria); Lize Joubert, Mawethu Ndiki, Louis Scott, Riaz Seedat and Andri van Aardt (Bloemfontein); Jemma Finch, Trevor Hill and Ahmed Ismail Manjra (Durban/Pietermaritzburg); Erin Hilmer and Lynne Quick (Port Elizabeth); Joseph Chikumbirike, Werner Hoek and Tendai Musvuugwa (Kimberley). SAPNET also acknowledges financial support from (in alphabetical order): A. Vogel Echinoforce, Clicks, Durand Foundation, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Twinsaver and Zeiss. We thank the Wits School of Governance for sponsoring the Life in the City project and providing funds for the postdoctoral research of L.A. at the University of the Witwatersrand. We also thank Karen Adamson of Chocolate Cow Design for designing Figure 2 and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

 

Authors' contributions

L.A.: Conceptualisation, formulation of the overarching research aims, preparation and creation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft. F.H.N.: Critical review, commentary, extension and revision of text, tables, figures, corresponding author. D.B.: Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of the review and other research outputs, contributions to text. J.P.: Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication, management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, contributions to text.

 

References

1.Potter PC. Common indoor and outdoor aeroallergens in South Africa. CME. 2010;28(9):426-432.         [ Links ]

2.CastroDíez P, Vaz AS, Silva JS, Vanloo M, Alonso Á, Aponte C, et al. Global effects of non-native tree species on multiple ecosystem services. Biol Rev. 2019;94:1477-1501.         [ Links ]

3.Damialis A, Häring F, Gökkaya M, Rauer D, Reiger M, Bezold S, et al. Human exposure to airborne pollen and relationships with symptoms and immune responses: Indoors versus outdoors, circadian patterns and meteorological effects in Alpine and urban environments. Sci Total Environ. 2019;653:190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.366        [ Links ]

4.Galán C, Ariatti A, Bonini M, Clot B, Crouzy B, Dahl A, et al. Recommended terminology for aerobiological studies. Aerobiologia. 2017;33:293-295.         [ Links ]

5.Buters JTM, Antunes C, Galveias A, Bergmann KC, Thibaudon M, Galán C, et al. Pollen and spore monitoring in the world. Clin Transl Allergy. 2018;8:9-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0197-8        [ Links ]

6.Berman D. Aerobiology studies in South Africa. Curr Allergy Clin Im. 2014;27(4):255-258.         [ Links ]

7.International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). ISAAC Steering Committee. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998;28(suppl.5):52-66; discussion 90-1. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.028s5052.x        [ Links ]

8.Berman D. Variations in pollen and fungal air spora: An analysis of 30 years of monitoring for the clinical assessment of patients in the Western Cape [PhD thesis]. Cape Town: University of Cape Town; 2018.         [ Links ]

9.Rutherford MC, Westfall RH. Biomes of southern Africa - an objective categorization. 2nd ed. Mem Bot Surv S Afr. 1994;63:1-94.         [ Links ]

10.Mucina L, Rutherford MC, editors. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute; 2006. p.748-789.         [ Links ]

11.Goldblatt P, Manning JC. Plant diversity of the Cape region of southern Africa. Ann Missouri Bot. 2002;89(2):281-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/3298566        [ Links ]

12.Mutke S, Sánchez JG, Chambel MR, Prada MA, Álvarez D, Iglesias S, et al. Phenotypic plasticity is stronger than adaptative differentiation among Mediterranean stone pine provenances. Forest Syst. 2010;19(3):354-366. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2010193-9097        [ Links ]

13.Henderson L. Invasive, naturalized and casual alien plants in southern Africa: A summary based on the Southern African Plant Invaders Atlas (SAPIA). Bothalia. 2007;37:215-248. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v37i2.322        [ Links ]

14.Ordman D. Pollinosis in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 1947;21:38-48.         [ Links ]

15.Ordman D, Etter KG. The air-borne fungi in Johannesburg: A five-year survey as a basis for the study of fungus allergy in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 1956;30(11):1054-1058.         [ Links ]

16.Hawke, P, Meadows M. Winter airspora spectra and meteorological conditions in Cape Town, South Africa. Grana. 1989;28(3):187-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173138909427430        [ Links ]

17.Ordman D. The evolution and present status of the concepts and practice of allergy in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 1963;36:419-424.         [ Links ]

18.Ordman D. Respiratory allergy in the coastal areas of South Africa. S Afr Med J. 1955;19(8):173-179.         [ Links ]

19.Weinberg EG, Potter PC, Motala C. The Allergy Clinic: 50 years. S Afr Med J. 2006;96:9.         [ Links ]

20.Cadman A, Dames JF. Airspora of Durban: A coastal South African city. I: Pollen component. Grana. 1994;32:346-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139409429023        [ Links ]

21.Potter PC, Berman D, Toerien A, Malherbe D, Weinberg EG. Clinical significance of aero-allergen identification in the western Cape. S Afr Med J. 1991;79(2):80-84.         [ Links ]

22.Dames JF, Cadman A. Airspora of Durban: A subtropical, coastal South African city. II: Fungal spore component. Grana. 1994;33(6):346-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139409429023        [ Links ]

23.Berman D. Pollen monitoring in South Africa. Curr Allergy Clin Im. 2007;20:184-187.         [ Links ]

24.Berman D. Regional-specific pollen and fungal spore allergens in South Africa. Curr Allergy Clin Im. 2013;26(4):196.         [ Links ]

25.Cadman A. Airspora of Johannesburg and Pretoria, South Africa, 1987/88. I: Pollen calendars. Grana. 1991;29(4):311-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139009428942        [ Links ]

26.Motta AC, Marliere M, Peltre G, Sterenberg PA, Lacroix G. Traffic-related air pollutants induce the release of allergen-containing cytoplasmic granules from grass pollen. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2006;139(4):294-298. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091600        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Frank Neumann
Email: frank.neumann@wits.ac.za

Received: 31 Mar. 2020
Revised: 18 May 2020
Accepted: 24 May 2020
Published: 27 July 2020

 

 

Editor: Pascal Bessong
Funding: Wits School of Governance/University of the Witwatersrand, A. Vogel Echinoforce, Clicks, Durand Foundation, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Twinsaver, Zeiss

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License